Raza Narayana Gajapatiraju v Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatan (The Indian Case): PC 1939
Land was to be acquired for anti-malarial works relating to a harbour development. Lord Romer rejected the suggestion in a compulsory purchase valuation that it would be possible to ascertain the potential special value of land to a ‘special purchaser’ by imagining an auction, as being ‘an entire waste of the arbitrator’s imagination’. Potentiality should … Continue reading Raza Narayana Gajapatiraju v Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatan (The Indian Case): PC 1939