Citations:
[2010] EWHC 2858 (Ch)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Financial Services
Updated: 04 November 2022; Ref: scu.426058
[2010] EWHC 2858 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 04 November 2022; Ref: scu.426058
Interest swaps mis-selling claim
HH Judge Kramer sitting as a judge of the High Court
[2019] EWHC 3744 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.649078
Public policy rendered an assignment of a remedy void, where the assignment was an attempt to split it from another remedy. For the purpose of construing a contract the law excludes from the admissible factual background the previous negotiations of the parties. This is due to ‘reasons of practical policy’. What is said in the course of negotiations provides too uncertain a guide as to what is the position between contracting parties when later they commit themselves finally by their contract.
Leggatt LJ, Swinton Thomas LJ, Mummery LJ
Times 08-Nov-1996, [1996] EWCA Civ 862
England and Wales
Appeal from – Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society; Etc ChD 10-Oct-1996
Part of a chose in action is not capable of being validly separately assigned in order to stop a court action. . .
Cited – P and S Platt Ltd v Crouch and Another CA 25-Jul-2003
The claimant sought a declaration that certain easements had been included by implication in a conveyance of part of land to him.
Held: Since the easements were capable of subsisting at law, and existed as quasi-easements at the time, and did . .
Appeal from – Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society HL 19-Jun-1997
Account taken of circumstances wihout ambiguity
The respondent gave advice on home income plans. The individual claimants had assigned their initial claims to the scheme, but later sought also to have their mortgages in favour of the respondent set aside.
Held: Investors having once . .
Cited – Kay, Gorman, etc v London Borough of Lambeth, London and Quadrant Housing Trust CA 20-Jul-2004
The defendant local authority had licenced houses to a housing trust, which in turn granted sub-licences to the claimants who were applicants for housing under homelessness provisions, and who now asserted that they became secure tenants of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.82414
Each party sought summary judgment.
Held: Popplewell J granted Tael’s application and dismissed Morgan Stanley’s. The payment premium was similar to interest and performed an analogous function. The cost of the borrowing was more than the interest of 11.25% per annum, but only that amount required to be paid out of cash flow three monthly in arrears. The remainder of the cost of borrowing was deferred and became payable, in the form of the payment premium, whenever the loan was repaid to a particular lender or all the lenders. The payment premium was therefore part of the consideration for the loan, and was calculated by reference to the period for which the borrower had the use of the money in just the same way as was the entitlement to ‘interest’ described as such.
Popplewell J
[2012] EWHC 1858 (Comm)
England and Wales
At first instance – Tael One Partners Ltd v Morgan Stanley and Co International Plc SC 11-Mar-2015
This appeal raises a question of contractual interpretation. Its significance lies in the fact that the contractual condition in question forms part of the Loan Market Association standard terms and conditions for par trade transactions which are a . .
At First Instance – Tael One Partners Ltd v Morgan Stanley and Co International Plc CA 1-May-2013
Morgan Stanley appealed against summary judgment given against it in respect of the application of the terms of a standard form assignment of a Loan agreement.
Held: The words ‘which are expressed to accrue by reference to the lapse of time’, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.462428
Alleged mis-selling of PPI.
[2012] EW Misc 11 (CC)
England and Wales
Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.461764
[2006] EWCA Civ 1716
England and Wales
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.246992
Mr Justice Zacaroli
[2020] EWHC 610 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.649097
[2019] UKFTT CMS-2019-0001 (GR
England and Wales
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.648213
Mr Justice Andrew Baker
[2019] EWHC 2414 (Comm)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.642106
Defined benefits part of pension scheme
Warren J
[2012] EWHC 1495 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.459893
The claimants had been advised to invest in a scheme promoted by the defendants with the assistance of their solicitors. On the failure of the scheme they now sought relief alleging inter alia, breach of trust.
Held: The claims failed. In connection with the negative day-to-day control test under section 235(2), it was necessary to look beyond the scheme documentation to the facts relating to ‘how the scheme was designed to and did operate in practice’.
Hamblen J
[2012] EWHC 1321 (Comm)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 235
England and Wales
See Also – Brown and Others v InnovatorOne Plc and Others ComC 19-Jun-2009
The claimants served proceedings by fax. The defendants denied that it was effective saying that they had not confirmed that they were instructed to accept service or that as required by the rules they had confirmed that they would accept service by . .
See Also – Brown and Others v InnovatorOne Plc and Others ComC 28-Jul-2010
The claimants alleged breach of trust by the defendants in their promotion of an investment scheme which went on to fail. One defendant, a Swiss bank now sought a declaration that the court had no jurisdiction over it.
Held: The defendant’s . .
Appeal from – Brown and Others v Innovatorone Plc and Others CA 4-Dec-2012
The claimants appealed against rejection of their claims of breach of trust against the respndents and their solicitors in the promotion of investment semes which went on to fail. . .
Cited – Asset Land Investment Plc and Another v The Financial Conduct Authority SC 20-Apr-2016
Proceedings were brought against the appellant’s associated parties, alleging that they had carred on regulated activities without authorisation, contrary to section 19 of the2000 Act. They had offered various plots of land for sale, suggesting they . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.459810
The claimant challenged by judicial review, disciplinary decisions made against him, saying tat insufficient reasons had been given. The Authority replied that judicial review was inappropriate since the claimant had open to him a reference to the Upper Tribunal.
Silber J
[2012] EWHC 1417 (Admin)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 67
England and Wales
Appeal from – Willford, Regina (on The Application of) v Financial Services Authority (FSA) CA 13-Jun-2013
Where a separate specialist statutory regime has been established by Parliament, there would need to be powerful reasons or exceptional circumstances to bypass that regime and permit an application for judicial review.
The Court considered and . .
At Admn – Willford, Regina (on The Application of) v Financial Services Authority (FSA) (No 2) CA 13-Jun-2013
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.459706
Appeal against a determination of the Pensions Ombudsman.
Warren J
[2012] EWHC 1369 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.459623
[1996] EWCA Civ 557, [1996] 2 All ER 449
England and Wales
Cited – Hillsdown Holdings plc v Pensions Ombudsman 1997
The court had to answer the question of whether the Pensions Ombudsman could make orders which the court could not.
Held: It could not, Knox J said: ‘there is a real distinction between ordering compensation for inconvenience and distress . .
Cited – Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd v CCA Stationery Ltd ChD 12-Dec-2003
The claimant had managed a pension scheme for the respondent company. It now challenged a finding of maladministration of the scheme, with respect to the methods of calculation of discounts applicable to those leaving the scheme.
Held: Since . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.140424
The claimant sought judicial review of decisions of the Financial Services Ombudsman on the complaint against him by the interested parties.
Collins J
[2012] EWHC 1253 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 28 October 2022; Ref: scu.459559
The Board was liable to pay compensation claims from equitable assignees of depositors with a failed bank. They were not to be excluded from making claims.
Gazette 16-Jun-1993, Independent 18-May-1993, Times 11-May-1993
England and Wales
Appeal from – Depositors Protection Board v Dalia and Another ChD 18-Nov-1992
Equitable assignees of deposits in a bank where those deposits were protected under the scheme, were entitled to the compensation which would have been paid to the beneficial owners. . .
Appeal from – Depositors’ Protection Board v Dalia HL 20-May-1994
The House was asked as to the meaning of the word ‘depositor’. Regulations were prayed in aid which were made four years after the date of the enactment.
Held: The protection given by the Depositor Protection Scheme does not extend to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 26 October 2022; Ref: scu.79921
Judge Jonathan Richards
[2021] EWHC 648 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 380 382
England and Wales
Updated: 26 October 2022; Ref: scu.660068
Application for various orders for payment and compensation against certain of the Respondents
Mr Justice Meade
[2021] EWHC 763 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.660787
Trial of a petition presented by the Financial Services Authority (‘FSA’) pursuant to s.367 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
[2007] EWHC 539 (Ch), [2007] Bus LR 879
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 367
England and Wales
Updated: 24 October 2022; Ref: scu.526405
The respondent had the benefit of a single member company pension scheme. He sold the company, but the purchasers, now assignees of the pension, and appellants alleged breach of warranty in the company sale, and sought to prevent further payments under the pension scheme.
Held: A consent order to restrict payment of sums falling due in the future would be valid, and nothing in the Act prevented such an order, but so far as the order affected accrued rights, it was invalid under the Act. Since the order made no distinction it was entirely unenforceable.
Lord Justice Aldous Lord Justice Mance Lord Justice Latham
[2003] EWCA Civ 1047, Times 18-Sep-2003
England and Wales
Cited – In re Scientific Instrument Pension Plan Trusts ChD 1999
The court accepted the application to pension trust deeds of the principle, whereby a forfeiture provision in a will or other trust instrument, purporting to forfeit an absolute or life interest in the event of voluntary or involuntary alienation, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 23 October 2022; Ref: scu.184854
‘The issue in this case turns on the effect of Rules, which are effectively in identical terms, of the Massey-Ferguson Works Pension Scheme (‘the Works Scheme’) and of the Massey-Ferguson Staff Pension Scheme (‘the Staff Scheme’). In a nutshell, the issue is whether employees over 50 years of age, a) who were made involuntarily redundant, and b) who were invited to volunteer to be made redundant, are entitled to receive an immediate and undiscounted pension.’
Neuberger J
[2002] EWHC 2878 (Ch), [2003] OPLR 119, [2003] Pens LR 47
England and Wales
Updated: 21 October 2022; Ref: scu.346770
Appeal against finding of maladministration of NHS pension scheme.
Briggs J
[2008] EWHC 909 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 21 October 2022; Ref: scu.267370
The Security and Investment Board’s requirement for IFA’s to self assess their own breaches of their professional rules was lawful and proper.
Times 18-May-1995
England and Wales
Updated: 21 October 2022; Ref: scu.87993
Calls from SIB for contributions to compensation fund for default were proper. The section was intended to ensure sufficiency of compensation, not to limit the liability of practitioners.
Times 09-Oct-1995, Independent 05-Oct-1995
Financial Services Act 1986 54(3)
England and Wales
Updated: 21 October 2022; Ref: scu.87995
[2005] EWHC 1153 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 20 October 2022; Ref: scu.227053
MONEY LAUNDERING REGULATIONS – appellant registered as tax adviser -appellant failing to pay annual fees in protest against HMRC requirements for enhanced due diligence – registration cancelled – penalty imposed for carrying on business while unregistered – whether appellant’s conduct penalisable – held no, as regulation 33 Money Laundering Regulations 2007 does not apply to tax advisers after 2009 – penalty cancelled
[2019] UKFTT 185 (TC)
England and Wales
Updated: 17 October 2022; Ref: scu.635747
The defendant’s pension scheme had been set up by deed in 1949. The trustees argued that the firm had an obligation to make substantial additional contributions to ensure it was not underfunded. The defendants argued that it was a money purchase scheme.
Held: Contributions were to be made by the employer and by its employees in proportion to earnings. It was therefore an Earnings Related scheme within the section, and if there was a substantial deficit, the employer could be called upon to make good the deficit.
Sir Andrew Morritt, Vice Chancellor
[2004] EWHC 1844 (Ch), Times 26-Aug-2004, [2005] 1 WLR 995
England and Wales
Appeal from – Aon Trust Corporation Ltd v KPMG (A Firm) and others CA 28-Jul-2005
The claimants were trustees of the defendant’s pension scheme. They sought additional payments to make up a shortfall in funds, on the basis that the fund was an earnings related pension scheme, and that the company therefore had obligations to make . .
Cited – Houldsworth and Another v Bridge Trustees Ltd and Another SC 27-Jul-2011
The court was asked as to the dividing line, for regulatory purposes, between defined benefit (normally earnings-related) schemes and defined contribution (or money purchase) schemes. The Secretary of State asserted that some methods used to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 15 October 2022; Ref: scu.199646
[2017] EWHC 1191 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 15 October 2022; Ref: scu.588007
(Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Markets in financial instruments – Directive 2004/39 / EC – Concepts of ‘retail client’ and ‘consumer’ – Conditions for invoking the status of consumer – Determination of the competence to know the demand
C-500/18, [2020] EUECJ C-500/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:264
European
Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.660149
Appeal by British Telecommunications plc (‘BT’) from an order of Hamblen LJ (as he then was) and Whipple J, sitting as a Divisional Court of the Queen’s Bench Division dismissing BT’s claim for judicial review of the decision of Her Majesty’s Treasury to implement full indexation of the guaranteed minimum pension payable to members of public service pension schemes.
Sir Terence Etherton MR, Lord Justice Henderson and Lady Justice Nicola Davies DBE
[2020] EWCA Civ 1
England and Wales
Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.646340
Appeal from Pensions Ombudsman decision
[2017] EWHC 501 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.581325
[2010] EWHC 3044 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 13 October 2022; Ref: scu.426471
Arnold J
[2010] EWHC 321 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 13 October 2022; Ref: scu.401869
Sir Andrew Morritt C, Moses, Patten LJJ
[2011] EWCA Civ 1578, [2012] BTC 12, [2012] STC 544, [2012] STI 36
England and Wales
Updated: 12 October 2022; Ref: scu.450114
[2019] EWHC 3108 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 12 October 2022; Ref: scu.646153
Short question as to the proper construction of the terms of a Personal Retirement Policy issued by the Applicant (then Royal Life Insurance Limited
[2000] EWHC Admin 379
England and Wales
Updated: 11 October 2022; Ref: scu.140194
Master Kaye
[2019] EWHC 2260 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 07 October 2022; Ref: scu.646138
Zacaroli J
[2019] EWHC 3032 (Ch)
England and Wales
See Also – Airways Pension Scheme Trustee Ltd v Fielder and Another ChD 15-Jan-2019
. .
Cited – In Re Beddoe, Downes v Cottam CA 1893
A trustee had unsuccessfully defended an action against the trust in detinue for the return of deeds. He now sought protection against a costs order. Costs having been awarded against a trustee in proceeding A, the trustee sought to be indemnified . .
Cited – Public Trustee v Cooper 2001
The court looked at the circumstances required when a court was asked to approve a proposed exercise by trustees of a discretion vested in them. The second category of circumstances was (quoting Robert Walker J): ‘Where the issue was whether the . .
Cited – MF Global UK Ltd, Re Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011 ChD 4-Jul-2014
Application to enable a settlement agreement to be made which would compromise and release all tracing and other claims between MF Global UK Limited (MFGUK) as trustee of the trust of client money and the general estate of MFGUK acting by its joint . .
See Also – Spencer and Others v Fielder ChD 15-Jul-2014
Beddoe proceedings by the present trustees of the Airways Pension Scheme for directions of the court in relation to their conduct of proceedings brought against them by British Airways plc.
Held: The Chancellor authorised the Trustee to defend . .
See Also – Airways Pension Scheme Trustee Ltd v Fielder and Another (3027) ChD 11-Nov-2019
Application by the corporate trustee (the ‘Trustee’) of the Airways Pension Scheme (the ‘Scheme’) for approval of its decision to enter into a settlement agreement with the second defendant . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 07 October 2022; Ref: scu.643897
Application to enable a settlement agreement to be made which would compromise and release all tracing and other claims between MF Global UK Limited (MFGUK) as trustee of the trust of client money and the general estate of MFGUK acting by its joint administrators.
Held: There was nothing to exclude the statutory power of compromise.
David Richards J
[2014] EWHC 2222 (Ch), [2014] WLR(D) 294, [2014] Bus LR 1156
Trustee Act 1925 15, Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011
England and Wales
Cited – Airways Pension Scheme Trustee Ltd v Fielder and Another (3032) ChD 11-Nov-2019
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 07 October 2022; Ref: scu.533807
Burnett J
[2012] EWHC 997 (Admin)
See Also – Ford, Regina (on The Application of) v The Financial Services Authority Admn 11-Oct-2011
The claimant sought, through judicial review, control over 8 emails sent by them to their lawyers. They claimed legal advice privilege, but the emails contained advice sent by their chartered accountants. The defendant had sought to use them in the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 07 October 2022; Ref: scu.452825
Application for directions as to distribution of funds realised on intervention in two unregulated investment schemes.
Mellor J
[2021] EWHC 372 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 382(3)
England and Wales
Updated: 06 October 2022; Ref: scu.659548
[2019] EWHC 3315 (Ch)
England and Wales
See Also – SL Claimants v Tesco Plc (3312) ChD 3-Dec-2019
Application for permission by defendant to withdraw admission. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 06 October 2022; Ref: scu.646214
Floyd J
[2012] EWHC 745 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 06 October 2022; Ref: scu.452446
[2011] EWHC 1463 (Ch), [2011] STC 1830, [2011] Pens LR 351, [2011] STI 2644
England and Wales
Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.441407
The court was asked to interpret the provisions as to ‘client money rules’ and ‘client money distribution rules’ in the FSA handbook, and to consider the consequences as to the applicable trusts. Substantial sums paid by clients to the bank before its insolvency were now unavailable.
Held: The appeal failed. The statutory trust under the scheme arose on receipt of client money, and not on its later segregation; the primary pooling arrangements applied to client money in house accounts; and, participation in the CMP was not dependant on the segregation of client money.
Lord Hope, Deputy President, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson, Lord Collins
[2012] UKSC 6, UKSC 2010/0194, [2012] 3 All ER 1, [2012] 1 BCLC 487, [2012] WLR(D) 53, [2012] Bus LR 667
Bailii, Bailii Summary, SC C Summ, SC
Insolvency Act 1986, Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2004/39/EC
England and Wales
At first instance – Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v CRC Credit Fund Ltd and Others ChD 15-Dec-2009
. .
See Also – Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v CRC Credit Fund Ltd and Others ChD 20-Jan-2010
. .
Appeal From – CRC Credit Fund Ltd and Others v GLG Investments Plc (Sub-Fund: European Equity Fund) and Others CA 2-Aug-2010
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.451702
[2012] EWCA Civ 178
England and Wales
Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.451679
Lloyd, Patten, Tomplinson LJJ
[2011] EWCA Civ 1544
England and Wales
Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.451349
Parties sought approval of the proposed scheme for the transfer of its insurance business engagements under the 2000 Act.
Morgan J
[2012] EWHC 632 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.452158
The court had made an order transferring the insurance business of the company. The question arose as to whether it also had the right to transfer the benefit of contracts of re-insurance, which could at common law, only be transferred by consent of the insurer.
Held: The Act contained the power in section 112 to make such orders even where the insured could not itself assign the contract.
Park J
Times 31-Dec-2002, [2002] EWHC 2784 (Ch)
Financial Markets and Services Act 2000 111 112(2)(a)
England and Wales
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.178707
[2010] EWHC 2582 (Ch), [2010] STC 2575, [2011] STC 372, [2010] STI 2797
England and Wales
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.425357
The court was asked to make a declaration which turned on the interpretation of the ‘anti-deprivation’ rule and its application to a settlement agreement: ‘Milbank is insolvent and has had an administration order made against it. Chaucer seeks an order of the court that certain provisions of the Settlement Agreement be struck down under the Principle so that amounts due to Milbank from Towergate under that agreement, and which have been assigned to Chaucer, are recoverable by Chaucer which otherwise they would not have been.’
Sir Edward Evans-Lombe
[2010] EWHC 1121 (Ch), [2010] 2 BCLC 440, [2010] BPIR 1155
England and Wales
Cited – Belmont Park Investments Pty Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Another SC 27-Jul-2011
Complex financial instruments insured the indebtedness of Lehman Brothers. On that company’s insolvency a claim was made. It was said that provisions in the documents offended the rule against the anti-deprivation rule. The courts below had upheld . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.415979
Peter Smith J
[2009] EWHC 3258 (Ch), [2010] PLR 1, [2010] ICR 732, [2010] Pens LR 1
England and Wales
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.383823
A bond contained an arbitration clause subject to a further clause giving the claimant an ‘exclusive right at its option to apply to the courts of England to settle any disputes which may arise out of or in connection with these presents’. The defendants started an arbitration challenging the claimant’s assertion that events of default had occurred; the claimant then started proceedings to recover the full amount due under the bond to which it added a section 72 claim asking for an injunction to restrain the arbitration. The defendants retaliated with an application for a stay under section 9, CPR 62.8(3) and section 49(3) Supreme Court Act 1981.
Held: The court rejected the general submission that the 1996 Act required the court to allow the arbitrators to decide whether they had jurisdiction. The claimant could therefore invoke section 72 (if it applied) to ask the court to decide the jurisdiction issue. The court rejected the defendants’ arguments that the claimant could not bring itself within section 72 because once the claimant opted for litigation, there was no longer an arbitration agreement. The decision depended on the deed: if, as he found, the claimant was entitled to litigate then obviously he would not grant a stay and vice versa. Thus the section 9 point did ‘not really arise as a contentious point’. The judge had no need to consider the separability of the arbitration clause but only had to decide if the litigation option had been rightly exercised by the party seeking to litigate. He decided that it had been and that accordingly the section 72 application for a declaration and an injunction should be granted and the stay application should be dismissed.
Mann J
[2005] EWHC 1412 (Ch), [2005] 2 Lloyds Rep 755
Arbitration act 1996 72, Supreme Court Act 1981 49(3)
England and Wales
Cited – Fiona Trust and Holding Corporation and others v Privalov and others CA 24-Jan-2007
The court was asked whether when contracts have been induced by bribery and have been rescinded on discovery of the bribery, that constitutes a dispute which can be determined by arbitration in the context of a common form of arbitration clause.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.228237
Lightman J
[2006] EWHC 999 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.241549
[2009] EWHC 2486 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 01 October 2022; Ref: scu.376151
The Authority sought a finding that the respondents had infringed their duties in providing financial advice with respect to the moving of personal pensions and had failed to comply with an order an order for compensation. The defendants asserted that the award made was incorrect and infringed their human rights.
Held: The parties had been notified of the time limits for appealing the original findings, and had not appealed. There had been no procedural unfairness. The order stood. As to the amount payable, in view of the defendants’ limited means, an order foir a top-up rather than a re-instatement would be substituted for the original.
Smith The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Smith
[2004] EWHC 2966 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 382
England and Wales
Cited – Wilson v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry; Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) HL 10-Jul-2003
The respondent appealed against a finding that the provision which made a loan agreement completely invalid for lack of compliance with the 1974 Act was itself invalid under the Human Rights Act since it deprived the respondent lender of its . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 01 October 2022; Ref: scu.220950
Imposition of fines
The Hon Mr Justice Evans-Lombe
[2005] EWHC 28 (Ch)
Financial Servoces And Markets Act 2000 Part VII
England and Wales
Updated: 01 October 2022; Ref: scu.221723
[2021] EWHC 396 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 01 October 2022; Ref: scu.658891
Peter Smith J
[2010] EWHC 1653 (Ch)
England and Wales
Cited – Zambia, Attorney General of Zambia for and on Behalf of v Meer Care and Desai (A Firm) and others ChD 7-Oct-2005
Reasons for dismissal of stay for certain defendants. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 29 September 2022; Ref: scu.420222
Norris J
[2009] EWHC 2521 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
England and Wales
Updated: 29 September 2022; Ref: scu.376148
FINANCIAL SERVICES – withdrawal of approval and cancellation of permission -prohibition of approved person for making and assisting in making of fraudulent mortgage applications – whether Authority’s case established – yes – reference dismissed
[2012] UKUT B17 (TCC)
England and Wales
Updated: 28 September 2022; Ref: scu.466685
Parties appealed against on order for the winding up of the company. The Authority (FSA) had said that the company which supplied warranties to owners of digital receiver boxes were providing regulated insurance services, but that the companies were not registered. The warranties were for the repair and supply of parts only, and the company denied that the activity should be regulated.
Held: The company’s appeal failed.
Patten LJ, Maurice Kay VP LJ, Aikens LJ
[2012] 1 CLC 39, [2011] EWCA Civ 1413, [2012] 2 All ER (Comm) 38, [2012] Bus LR 990, [2012] Lloyd’s Rep IR 112
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, First Council Directive 73/239/EEC, Council Directive 84/641/EEC
England and Wales
Appeal from – Re Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Ltd and Others ChD 31-Jan-2011
The Financial Services Authority sought public interest orders for the winding up of three companies selling, it said, extended warranty cover plans without authorisation. The companies said that authorisation was not required, since only services . .
Cited – Prudential Insurance Co v Inland Revenue Commissioners 1904
Contract for payment of sum on event
The Insurance company provided endowment insurance polices. They disagreed with the Commissioners as to whether these were policies of insurance and thus as to how they fell to be stamped. Life insurance was defined in the 1891 Act as ‘insurance . .
Cited – Card Protection Plan Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ECJ 25-Feb-1999
A company procuring insurance purchases for credit card protection was as exempt from VAT as was the insurer. A provision which restricted the ability to claim such exemption to those registered as insurers under national was invalid under European . .
Appeal from – Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Ltd and Another v Financial Services Authority SC 13-Feb-2013
The appellants challenged an order for the dissolution of their company under the 2000 Acts. They had provided warranties for assorted consumer electrical goods which amounted to insurance, but said that they were not required to be registered under . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 28 September 2022; Ref: scu.449032
Ward, Longmore, Sullivan LJJ
[2011] EWCA Civ 1341
Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000
England and Wales
Updated: 28 September 2022; Ref: scu.449008
[2010] EWHC 3365 (Ch), [2011] 1 WLR 1274, [2011] Pens LR 99
England and Wales
Updated: 27 September 2022; Ref: scu.427401
The court was asked to determine several questions revolving around the extent of a statutory ‘guarantee’ given by the Secretary of State in 1984 for the liabilities of the then newly formed and about to be floated British Telecommunications plc, so far as it extended to the liabilities of BT under its pension scheme.
Mann J
[2010] EWHC 2642 (Ch), [2010] Pens LR 487
England and Wales
Updated: 27 September 2022; Ref: scu.425381
[2005] EWHC 2993 (Ch)
England and Wales
Cited – Trustee Solutions Ltd and others v Dubery and Another ChD 21-Jun-2006
The rules of a pensions scheme were altered. It was required that any such alteration be in writing, but the trustees had not signed the document creating the amendment.
Held: The words ‘writing under hand’ clearly required a signature, and . .
Appeal From – Steria Ltd and others v Hutchison and others CA 24-Nov-2006
Neuberger LJ observed that estoppels are relied on because of difficulties in establishing a contract; and, since unconscionability is the single factor that must be established for an estoppel and views on unconscionability may vary, it is . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 27 September 2022; Ref: scu.236617
PROCEDURE – Appeals – Witness Summons – Whether proper to issue Witness Summons – Tribunal Procedure (UT) Rules, Rules 16
[2011] UKUT B22 (TCC)
England and Wales
Updated: 26 September 2022; Ref: scu.448059
Arnold J
[2009] EWHC 2785 (Ch), [2010] Pens LR 23
England and Wales
Updated: 25 September 2022; Ref: scu.377849
Hart J
[2005] EWHC 1999 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 25 September 2022; Ref: scu.230118
[2004] EWHC 1336 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 25 September 2022; Ref: scu.225997
Whether claim can be amended by High Court for claim which could only succeed if law changed at Court of Appeal
[2005] EWHC 311 (Ch)
England and Wales
Appeal from – Mandrake Holdings Ltd and Another v Countrywide Assured Group Ltd CA 12-May-2005
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 25 September 2022; Ref: scu.223694
(Antigua and Barbuda)
Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs, Lady Arden, Sir Andrew Longmore
[2019] UKPC 45
England and Wales
Updated: 22 September 2022; Ref: scu.645941
Mummery, Patten LJJ, Hedley J
[2011] EWCA Civ 1158
England and Wales
Appeal from – The Financial Services Authority v Sinaloa Gold Plc and Others SC 27-Feb-2013
The FSA sought injunctions to restrain the activities of the first defendants, including asset freezing orders under section 380 of the 2000 Act. The defendant’s bankers objected that they would be prejudiced by the restrictions without the FSA . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 September 2022; Ref: scu.445634
The applicants appealed against refusal of judicial review of a decision of the respondent to reject their complaint. They said that they had been sold an unsuitable endowment policy.
Rix LJ
[2004] EWCA Civ 1011
England and Wales
Updated: 20 September 2022; Ref: scu.445406
Auld LJ
[2005] EWCA Civ 269
England and Wales
Updated: 20 September 2022; Ref: scu.445285
The court was asked as to the construction of Conditions in a securitisation Trust Deed.
Briggs J
[2011] EWHC 2111 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 17 September 2022; Ref: scu.442576
The claimant sought damages alleging that the defendant had failed in its statutory duties under the 2000 Act when advising on pension reviews.
Pelling QC J
[2010] EWHC 2875 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 150
England and Wales
Updated: 17 September 2022; Ref: scu.442584
[2011] EWHC 2071 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 17 September 2022; Ref: scu.442265
Gambling transactions in foreign funds are not within the prohibition of the Stockjobbing Act
[1836] EngR 648, (1836) 2 Bing NC 722, (1836) 132 ER 278
England and Wales
Updated: 17 September 2022; Ref: scu.314980
The claimant had managed a pension scheme for the respondent company. It now challenged a finding of maladministration of the scheme, with respect to the methods of calculation of discounts applicable to those leaving the scheme.
Held: Since the calculations employed would have been carried out for others whether or not the instant pension scheme had existed, those methods were not part of the administration of the scheme, and the ombudsman had no jurisdiction to order their disclosure.
Mr Justice Laddie
[2003] EWHC 2989 (Ch)
England and Wales
Cited – Regina v Local Commissioner for Administration for the North and East Area of England ex parte Bradford Metropolitan City Council CA 1979
The court considered the meaning of ‘maladministration’ in the section.
Held: Lord Denning MR said: ‘It will cover ‘bias, neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, ineptitude, perversity, turpitude, arbitrariness and so on.’ It ‘would be a . .
Cited – Edge and others v Pensions Ombudsman and Another CA 29-Jul-1999
The Pensions Ombudsman was wrong to set aside the decision of pensions trustees where that decision was properly made within the scope of a discretion given to the Trustees. He should not carry out an investigation where no particular benefit could . .
Cited – Regina v Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte Eastleigh Borough Council CA 1988
Maladministration includes bias, neglect, inattention, delay, incompetence, inaptitude, perversity, turpitude and arbitrariness in reaching a decision or exercising a discretion, but that it has nothing to do with the intrinsic merits of the . .
Cited – Regina v Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration ex parte Dyer QBD 19-Oct-1993
Parliamentary Commissioners decisions are reviewable, but range of the discretion given to him by the Act is very wide, and his decisions will only rarely be susceptible to review. He is answerable to Parliament. . .
Cited – Hillsdown Holdings plc v Pensions Ombudsman 1997
The court had to answer the question of whether the Pensions Ombudsman could make orders which the court could not.
Held: It could not, Knox J said: ‘there is a real distinction between ordering compensation for inconvenience and distress . .
Cited – Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers HL 26-Jul-1977
The claimant sought an injunction to prevent the respondent Trades Union calling on its members to boycott mail to South Africa. The respondents challenged the ability of the court to make such an order.
Held: The wide wording of the statute . .
Cited – Miller; KC Independent Trustees Limited v Stapleton and Pensions Ombudsman CA 30-Jul-1996
. .
Cited – Westminster City Council v Haywood, Pensions Ombudsman CA 28-Jan-1997
The Pension’s Ombudsman has no jurisdiction on severance for a non-pensionable employee. . .
Cited – Edge v Pensions Ombudsman 12-Dec-1997
The Vice Chancellor discussed whether the pensions ombudsman had powers wider than those of the court. Referring to Hillsdown, he said: ‘I respectfully agree with this approach. In a case in which the maladministration complained of consists of an . .
Cited – Wakelin and others v Read and another CA 10-Apr-2000
The Pensions Ombudsman did not have the right to exercise his discretion to provide a different answer to the one which would be given by a court. This followed from the right given to parties to appeal against his decisions to the High Court on a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 16 September 2022; Ref: scu.188709
(New Zealand) A scheme was created for the construction of a major residential complex. The disappointed investors now claimed damages from the professional supervising ‘statutory’ trustees, after their money was lost. The minimum subscriptions had not been received, but the transaction proceeded.
Held: Despite the failings, the claimants had failed to show that the damages actually suffered flowed directly from the defendants’ failings. They might well have suffered the same loss without the errors.
Lord Slynn of Hadley Lord Mustill Lord Scott of Foscote Sir Christopher Staughton Sir John Roch
[2002] UKPC 4
PC, PC, Christchurch Pavilion ‘ target=’_n’>PC, Bailii, PC
Securities Act 1978 (New Zealand)
England and Wales
Updated: 16 September 2022; Ref: scu.167602
The Society sought approval of a scheme of arrangement. The Society had made promises of high returns to some policyholders, which it could not maintain after a decline in interest rates and the stock market. It sought a compromise arrangement. The arrangement had been voted on and accepted by members.
Held: The power given by the section to over-ride dissentients must be used with great care. There was not sufficient distinction in interests, to have required more than three classes of voters. The scheme proposal had been properly administered. It was proper, had been accepted by the members, and was approved.
The Honourable Mr Justice Lloyd
[2002] EWHC 140 (Ch), [2002] BCC 319, [2002] 2 BCLC 510
England and Wales
Updated: 16 September 2022; Ref: scu.167594
Sir Raymond Jack
[2011] EWHC 2009 (QB)
England and Wales
Updated: 16 September 2022; Ref: scu.442242
Mrs Justice Thirlwall
[2014] EWHC 3972 (Admin)
England and Wales
Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.539443
David Richards J
[2008] EWHC 1897 (Ch), [2009] Bus LR 465
England and Wales
Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.271300
MMI were members of the London Stock Exchange, and accordingly held one share in that non-profit making institution. The share was valueless. Anticipating losing their membership and so the share, and also the demutualisation, the share was to be transferred to a third party. At that point it would become worth andpound;3 million. Because the ownership of the share was merely an incident of membership, there was no conflict between the rules which deprived it both of membership and the share, and the rules which invalidated the transfer of assets of an insolvent person. Until the de-mutualisation, the share remained worthless, and the insolvency rules did not bite.
Neuberger J
[2002] 1 WLR 1150, [2001] EWHC 1052 (Ch)
England and Wales
Cited – Bombay Official Assignee v Shroff PC 1932
The bankrupt had been a member of the Bombay stock exchange. His share had been forfeit. The trustee claimed the share. The official assignee contended that his members card or the value thereof vested in him as the assignee in the insolvency, . .
Cited – Belmont Park Investments Pty Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Another SC 27-Jul-2011
Complex financial instruments insured the indebtedness of Lehman Brothers. On that company’s insolvency a claim was made. It was said that provisions in the documents offended the rule against the anti-deprivation rule. The courts below had upheld . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 14 September 2022; Ref: scu.166178
Hidyard J
[2013] EWHC 347 (Ch)
England and Wales
See Also – Challinor and Others v Juliet Bellis and Co (A Firm) ChD 9-Dec-2011
Appeal against order granting summary judgement. . .
See Also – Challinor and 20 Others v Juliet Bellis and Co and Egan ChD 19-Mar-2013
The court considered the correct approach to the award of statutory interest.
Held: Hildyard J said: ‘As to (1), it seems to me that the Court’s overall approach in the authorities cited to me is to distinguish between (a) cases relating to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.471577
Prohibition order – financial penalty on Mr Betton in relation to share ramping scheme.
[2011] UKUT B9 (TCC)
England and Wales
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440808
FINANCIAL SERVICES – withdrawal of company’s approval and cancellation of permission – prohibition of approved person for making or assisting in making of fraudulent mortgage applications – whether Authority’s case established – yes – penalty imposed – scale of appropriate penalty – whether sufficient account taken of person’s means – yes – reference dismissed
[2011] UKUT B19 (TCC) (TCC)
England and Wales
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440807
Peter Smith J
[2009] EWHC 1955 (Ch), [2009] Pens LR 307
England and Wales
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.368648
Application to strike out as doomed to fail, the claimant’s claim to a right to give directions to the trustees of a note issue.
Mann J
[2010] EWHC 3062 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.426522
[1856] EngR 163, (1856) 5 El and Bl 999, (1856) 119 ER 752
England and Wales
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.290918
Application for the sanction of the court to an insurance business transfer scheme for the transfer of policies of general (primarily motor) insurance.
[2006] EWHC 694 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 112
England and Wales
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.253485
[1998] EWHC Admin 166
England and Wales
Updated: 12 September 2022; Ref: scu.138287
a land-banking arrangement was held to amount to a collective investment scheme within section 235. The company purported to change its practices following intervention by the FCA. The changes were held by the judge insufficient to take it outside section 235. On two sites, the Crewe land and the Winterton land, involving sales respectively of some 56 and 98 individual plots. The company’s option agreements for each site stipulated the terms of any future transfers of individual plots, including a restrictive covenant precluding residential development without the consent of Sky Land. In the first period investors were given the clear understanding that the company would seek to obtain planning permission for each site as a whole, and would bear the full cost of doing so. Its website identified by name its planning consultants and planning solicitors. The judge noted the common expectation (though not formally agreed) that in the meantime the land would remain ‘in the occupation of the original owner and would continue to be farmed’. The FCA intervened and the company agreed to write to investors indicating that the restrictions would be removed, that Sky Land ‘cannot and will not’ play any further role in the development of the site, and that the individual owners would need to make their own arrangements to realise the value of the site as a whole.
Held: The statements had not been fulfilled. The company had continued as before, representing to investors that it would deal with planning and sale, and undertaking activities for that purpose
Richards J said that they fell within section 235: ‘A scheme whereby investors purchase individual plots within a site on the shared understanding that the company will seek planning permission and market the site including the plots are clearly capable of being ‘arrangements’ . . Each of these requirements [of section 235(1)] appears to be satisfied: (i) the arrangements concern land sold off in small plots to investors, (ii) the investors become owners of the individual plots and (iii) the purpose of the arrangements is to receive profits arising from the sale of the individual plots as parts of the larger site.’
and ‘I consider ‘the property’ to be the land comprising the individual plots sold to investors. It is that land, very probably as part of a larger site which includes areas retained by the original owner and areas acquired by the company, for which planning permission and a buyer would be sought by the company. The investors participate by each becoming an owner of part of the property. While it is legally possible for an investor to sell his plot on its own, that is not what is intended or likely to happen. The purpose is to obtain planning permission, for, and to sell, the property as a whole.’
Richards J
[2010] EWHC 399 (Ch)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 235
England and Wales
Cited – Asset Land Investment Plc and Another v The Financial Conduct Authority SC 20-Apr-2016
Proceedings were brought against the appellant’s associated parties, alleging that they had carred on regulated activities without authorisation, contrary to section 19 of the2000 Act. They had offered various plots of land for sale, suggesting they . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 September 2022; Ref: scu.439794
The court heard a proposed arrangement for the remedying of a deficit in the pension scheme.
Arden, Toulson, Rimer LJJ
[2011] EWCA Civ 543, [2011] Pens LR 223
England and Wales
At ChD (Approved) – Stena Line Ltd v Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Ltd and Another ChD 27-Jul-2010
. .
Cited – Gladman Commercial Properties v Fisher Hargreaves Proctor and Others CA 14-Nov-2013
The claimant appealed against the striking out of his claims for fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation as to the suitability for deveopment of two former fire service properties. The court had said that a settlement with co-tortfeasors operated . .
Cited – Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd and Another SC 2-Dec-2015
The Court considered whether, on exercising a break clause in a lease, the tenant was entitled to recover rent paid in advance.
Held: The appeal failed. The Court of Appeal had imposed what was established law. The test for whether a clause . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 September 2022; Ref: scu.439737
The defendant appealed against an order finding valid a charge in favour of the claimant despite non-compliance with the 2000 Act.
Lord Neuberger MR said as to the 1989 Act: Section 2 is concerned with contracts for the creation or sale of legal estates or interests in land, not with documents that actually create or transfer such estates or interests. So a contract to transfer a freehold or a lease in the future, a contract to grant a lease in the future or a contract for a mortgage in the future are all within the reach of the section, provided of course that the ultimate subject matter is land. However, an actual transfer, conveyance or assignment, an actual lease, or an actual mortgage are not within the scope of section 2 at all.
[Section 2] was directed to tightening up the formalities required for contracts for the creation or transfer of interests or estates in land and it was not concerned with documents that actually create or transfer legal estates or interests in land . .’
Lord Neuberger MR, Smith, Elias LJJ
[2011] EWCA Civ 542
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 2
England and Wales
Cited – Keay and Another v Morris Homes (West Midlands) Ltd CA 11-Jul-2012
The claimants sought damages alleging breach of contract. The defendants argued that the contract related to land, and since it was an oral agreement it was unenforceable under the 1989 Act.
Held: It was not possible that a contract which was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 September 2022; Ref: scu.439649
Action on an instrument of guarantee.
Held: judgment for the Claimant in respect of the principal sum of US$2m. and such interest payments as were due.
Teare J
[2011] EWHC 256 (Comm), [2011] 2 All ER (Comm) 385, [2011] BPIR 644, [2011] 2 BCLC 275, [2011] Bus LR 970, [2011] 1 WLR 2038
England and Wales
Cited – Antony Gibbs and Sons v La Societe Industrielle et Commerciale des Metaux CA 1-Jul-1890
The defendant had agreed to buy copper to be delivered in England by the plaintiff. The defendant refused to accept the copper and so was liable in damages to the plaintiff. The defendant, a French company, was placed in judicial liquidation in . .
Cited – New Zealand Loan and Mercantile Agency Company Limited v Christina Morrison PC 15-Dec-1897
(Victoria) . .
Cited – Moody and Another v Condor Insurance Ltd and Another ChD 3-Feb-2006
The claimants sought to enforce a deed of guarantee. The defendants argued that the claimant had no entitlement to enforce the deed, not being parties to it, and that they would be able to set aside the deed as against the company whose debts they . .
Cited – National Bank of Greece and Athens v Metliss HL 1957
The National Bank of Greece had been created under the law of Greece. By a Greek decree, the bank was dissolved and, by the same decree, amalgamated with another bank into a new banking corporation under the name of ‘National Bank of Greece and . .
Cited – In re United Railways of Havana and Regla Warehouses Ltd; Tomkinson v First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Co HL 1960
A sum was held to be due from that company in US dollars under a lease and another agreement which were both governed by the law of Pennsylvania.
Held: The sum provable in the liquidation of the company was to be converted at the rates of . .
Cited – In re United Railways of the Havana v Regla Warehouses Ltd CA 1960
There had been a financing transaction by way of a lease by a Pennsylvania corporation, as trustee for foreign bondholders, to an English company carrying on business in Cuba, of assets in Cuba. By a Cuban decree the assets were transferred to the . .
Cited – Adams v National Bank of Greece HL 1961
Questions of interpretation and enforcement of contracts are resolved by reference to the proper law. Although debt under a contract whose proper law is the law of another jurisdiction may, for the purposes of Scots law, be discharged by insolvency . .
Cited – Wight, Pilling, Mackey v Eckhardt Marine GmbH PC 14-May-2003
(Cayman Islands) An international bank went into liquidation in the Cayman Islands, with liabilities in Bangladesh. A new bank was created in Bangladesh, and the applicants sought to make the new bank liable, and through them the liquidators.
Cited – Cambridge Gas Transport Corp v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (of Navigator Holdings Plc and Others) PC 16-May-2006
(Isle of Man) A scheme of arrangement was proposed for a company with involvement in several jurisdictions. An order in New York sought assistance in the vesting of shares and assets in the Isle of Man in the creditors committee. Cambridge was a . .
Cited – Rubin and Another v Eurofinance Sa and Others CA 20-Jul-2010
The Court considered whether the principle of universality in insolvency proceedings enabled the court to enforce a judgment in personam which had been given in New York against the defendants in and for the purposes of bankruptcy proceedings in New . .
Cited – McGrath and others v Riddell and others HL 9-Apr-2008
(Orse In Re HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd)
HIH, an Australian Insurance company, became insolvent. An order was sought for the collection and remission of it assets in England under a letter of request from the Australia Court.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 September 2022; Ref: scu.429634
Blackburne J
[2009] EWHC 1915 (Ch)
England and Wales
Updated: 11 September 2022; Ref: scu.368641