Depositors’ Protection Board v Dalia and Another: CA 11 May 1993

The Board was liable to pay compensation claims from equitable assignees of depositors with a failed bank. They were not to be excluded from making claims.
Gazette 16-Jun-1993, Independent 18-May-1993, Times 11-May-1993
Banking Act 1987 58(1)
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal fromDepositors Protection Board v Dalia and Another ChD 18-Nov-1992
Equitable assignees of deposits in a bank where those deposits were protected under the scheme, were entitled to the compensation which would have been paid to the beneficial owners. . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromDepositors’ Protection Board v Dalia HL 20-May-1994
The House was asked as to the meaning of the word ‘depositor’. Regulations were prayed in aid which were made four years after the date of the enactment.
Held: The protection given by the Depositor Protection Scheme does not extend to . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 09 April 2021; Ref: scu.79921