Click the case name for better results:

Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham and Others: EAT 1 Feb 2013

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Admissibility of Evidence In support of a discrimination claim the Claimant sought permission to adduce in evidence 39 hours’ worth of covert recordings which she had made of contacts between herself and her managers or colleagues. The Employment Judge refused the application. HELD, dismissing the appeal, that the Judge had … Continue reading Vaughan v London Borough of Lewisham and Others: EAT 1 Feb 2013

Rogers v The Deputy Commander and Another: EAT 1 Feb 2013

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Exclusions including worker/jurisdictionAn Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that section 94(1) did not apply to the wife of a serving soldier who was employed to manage a children’s play area in what was generally a NAAFI complex in Germany, where she was herself a German national, engaged to work wholly … Continue reading Rogers v The Deputy Commander and Another: EAT 1 Feb 2013

Citation Plc v Ellis Whittam Ltd: CA 8 Mar 2013

The parties competed in providing employment law services. The claimant complained of slanderous comments said to have been made by the defendant in discussions with a firm of solicitors seeking to select a firm. The claimant now appealed against the striking out of its action as ‘not worth the candle’. No damage was pleaded, and … Continue reading Citation Plc v Ellis Whittam Ltd: CA 8 Mar 2013

Rowstock Ltd v Jessemey: EAT 5 Mar 2013

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Polkey deduction AGE DISCRIMINATION – Dismissal VICTIMISATION – Post-employment FACTS The employee was dismissed on grounds of retirement, having reached an age over 65. A failure by the employer to follow statutory procedures in relation to age-related retirement led to findings by an Employment Tribunal of unfair dismissal and of unlawful … Continue reading Rowstock Ltd v Jessemey: EAT 5 Mar 2013

Buzolli v Food Partners Ltd: EAT 7 Feb 2013

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissalEmployment Tribunal entitled to conclude that notwithstanding procedural defects the employer’s decision to dismiss was reasonable in all the circumstances of the case. Appeal dismissed. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2013] UKEAT 0317 – 12 – 0702 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Employment Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: … Continue reading Buzolli v Food Partners Ltd: EAT 7 Feb 2013

Budge (Was Known As Baker) and Another v McGinley Support Services Ltd and Another: EAT 15 Nov 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL Constructive dismissal Polkey deduction Having concluded in its first Judgment that the Appellants had been unfairly dismissed, the Employment Tribunal erred in its law in failing to have regard to its reasons for reaching that conclusion when deciding, in its second Judgment, that the likelihood of the Appellants being made redundant if … Continue reading Budge (Was Known As Baker) and Another v McGinley Support Services Ltd and Another: EAT 15 Nov 2012

Onyango v Berkeley (T/A Berkeley Solicitors): EAT 25 Jan 2013

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosureWhether Claimant may rely on post-termination protected disclosure in ‘whistleblowing’ claim under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996. He can. Appeal allowed against Employment Tribunal Judgment to the contrary. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2013] UKEAT 0407 – 12 – 2501 Links: Bailii Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 47B Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Onyango v Berkeley (T/A Berkeley Solicitors): EAT 25 Jan 2013

Pybus v Geoquip Ltd: EAT 20 Nov 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – CompensationPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularityAppeal allowed on the ground that the Employment Tribunal did not consider a submission of constructive dismissal at a remedies hearing or its application to the facts of the case. Case remitted to same ET. Judges: Birtles J Citations: [2012] UKEAT 0134 – … Continue reading Pybus v Geoquip Ltd: EAT 20 Nov 2012

Five Elms Medical Practice v Hayes and Another: EAT 7 Dec 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissalEmployment Tribunal finding breach of implied term of mutual trust and confidence leading to constructive dismissal. No error of law shown. Appeal dismissed. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2012] UKEAT 0345 – 12 – 0712 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Employment Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.471290

Simmonds v Milford Club: EAT 6 Dec 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissal The Employment Tribunal regarded the fact that the Claimant had been given a final warning as determinative of the question whether his dismissal for subsequent conduct was fair. Without the previous warning the dismissal would have been held unfair. Held: if the Employment Tribunal has cause on the … Continue reading Simmonds v Milford Club: EAT 6 Dec 2012

Mohammed (T/A Mohammed and Co Solicitors) v Jackson: EAT 18 Dec 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularityThe Employment Tribunal failed to make the appropriate findings of fact and explain its reasoning as to why it found the Respondent had failed to process the medical assessment – delayed it – to enable her return to work: Meek v Birmingham City Council [1987] IRLR … Continue reading Mohammed (T/A Mohammed and Co Solicitors) v Jackson: EAT 18 Dec 2012

Contract Security Services v Adebayo: EAT 11 Dec 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Compensation Appeal against a finding of race discrimination by an employer on the grounds of prevention of cross-examination dismissed on the grounds that (a) there was only limited intervention by the Employment Tribunal and (b) such intervention was justified as the questioning … Continue reading Contract Security Services v Adebayo: EAT 11 Dec 2012

Mental Health Care (UK) Ltd v Biluan and Another: EAT 28 Feb 2013

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of DismissalThe Employment Tribunal held that dismissals following a redundancy selection exercise had been unfair principally because employees’ capabilities had been assessed entirely on the basis of a series of exercises designed for use in a recruitment context and had taken no account whatever of their past performance; the results … Continue reading Mental Health Care (UK) Ltd v Biluan and Another: EAT 28 Feb 2013

Bancroft v Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd: EAT 13 Dec 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissalThe Employment Tribunal erred in holding that the Respondent had taken all steps to seek to mitigate the injustice caused to the Claimant by his removal from the workplace at the behest of a third party without considering whether the Respondent had taken reasonable steps to inform themselves of … Continue reading Bancroft v Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd: EAT 13 Dec 2012

London Borough of Harrow v Cunningham: EAT 2 Nov 1995

The council appealed a finding that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed. He worked in the Cleansing Department, but took on additional private work in refuge disposal in breach of his contract. A co-worker who had done the same was not dismissed because of his exemplary record. Held: The appeal succeeded. The tribunal, when considering … Continue reading London Borough of Harrow v Cunningham: EAT 2 Nov 1995

Gdynia American Shipping Lines (London) Ltd v Chelminski: CA 8 Jul 2004

The employers had sought to appeal from a decision of the employment tribunal. The EAT had refused it as out of time. Held: The rules required the appellant to file within 42 days of receiving the decision, the notice of appeal together with a copy of the tribunal’s written reasons. ‘Sent’ meant the date on … Continue reading Gdynia American Shipping Lines (London) Ltd v Chelminski: CA 8 Jul 2004

Steer v Stormsure Ltd (Sex Discrimination, Human Rights): EAT 21 Dec 2020

The Appellant has presented a claim in the Employment Tribunal in which she alleges that she was dismissed by the Respondent and that the dismissal amounted to sex discrimination and/or victimisation on the ground that she had done a protected act, contrary to the Equality Act 2010. She appeals against the Employment Tribunal’s refusal to … Continue reading Steer v Stormsure Ltd (Sex Discrimination, Human Rights): EAT 21 Dec 2020

Jennings v Barts and The London NHS Trust: EAT 5 Feb 2013

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Disability related discrimination If a wrong label is attached to a mental impairment a later re-labelling of that condition is not diagnosing a mental impairment for the first time using the benefit of hindsight, it is giving the same mental impairment a different name and, given that whether or not an … Continue reading Jennings v Barts and The London NHS Trust: EAT 5 Feb 2013

Thomas Cook Airline Services Ltd v Wolstenholme: EAT 16 Jan 2013

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissalEmployment Tribunal proceedings withdrawn; High Court proceedings intimated. Application to dismiss under ET R25(4) rejected by Employment Judge. Respondent’s appeal dismissed. New proceedings did not amount to an abuse. Verdin considered. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2013] UKEAT 0353 – 12 – 1601 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: … Continue reading Thomas Cook Airline Services Ltd v Wolstenholme: EAT 16 Jan 2013

A v B: EAT 23 Jan 2013

EAT Disability Discrimination : Findings by the Employment Tribunal that the dismissal of the Claimant was neither unfair, wrongful nor discriminatory were upheld. There had been no failure on the part of the Respondent to make reasonable adjustments. The Claimant, who was disabled, had failed to show that for a reason connected with his disability … Continue reading A v B: EAT 23 Jan 2013

Barot v London Borough of Brent: EAT 17 Jan 2013

EAT REDUNDANCY PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity The Claimant worked as an Accountant in the Respondent’s Children and Families Directorate. The Employment Tribunal was correct to find that a redundancy situation was created when the Respondent reorganised the Directorate and introduced requirement for skills the Claimant was not considered to have. … Continue reading Barot v London Borough of Brent: EAT 17 Jan 2013

Jakpa v London Underground Ltd and Others: EAT 29 Jan 2013

EAT Practice and Procedure : Striking-Out or Dismissal – Exceptional case in which, after some 16 days of hearings, the Employment Tribunal was entitled to strike out claim by reason of the Claimant’s conduct of the proceedings rendering a fair trial impossible. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2013] UKEAT 0571 – 12 – 2901 Links: … Continue reading Jakpa v London Underground Ltd and Others: EAT 29 Jan 2013

Transport for London v O’Cathail: CA 29 Jan 2013

The court considered an appeal against a refusal of a late application for an adjournment by an employment tribunal. Held: The appeal was allowed. There had been no error of law in the decisions of the ET to refuse adjournments either in its approach in principle to the exercise of the ET’s discretion or in … Continue reading Transport for London v O’Cathail: CA 29 Jan 2013

Piper v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust: EAT 18 Dec 2012

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Dismissal or Ambiguous Resignation – Whether sanction short of dismissal on internal appeal expunged earlier dismissal. Employment Tribunal held: yes. On analysis, the contractual provision required the Claimant’s agreement to the lower sanction. Absent that agreement his dismissal stood – Roberts v West Coast Trains considered. Claimant’s appeal allowed. Judges: Peter … Continue reading Piper v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust: EAT 18 Dec 2012

De Souza v Manpower UK Ltd: EAT 12 Dec 2012

EAT Jurisdictional Points : Extension of Time: Just and Equitable – Race discrimination claim lodged one day out of time. Employment Tribunal decided not just and equitable to extend time. No error of law in ET approach. Cross-appeal moot. Both appeal and cross-appeal dismissed. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2012] UKEAT 0234 – 12 – … Continue reading De Souza v Manpower UK Ltd: EAT 12 Dec 2012

Espie v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services Ltd: EAT 30 Nov 2012

EAT Disability Discrimination : Direct Disability Discrimination – Where, in selecting for redundancy, the employer had regard to a period of absence during which there were two reasons for absence, one of which was by reason of a disability and one of which was for another medical reason, the Employment Tribunal did not err in … Continue reading Espie v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services Ltd: EAT 30 Nov 2012

Bijlani v Stewart QC and Others: EAT 20 Dec 2012

EAT Race Discrimination : Direct Detriment The Employment Tribunal did not err in holding that the actions complained of in the Complaints the subject of the appeal were not taken on grounds of race. They did not misdirect themselves in law on this issue and their judgment and reasons did not include expressly or by … Continue reading Bijlani v Stewart QC and Others: EAT 20 Dec 2012

Charles v Kuehne and Nagel Ltd: EAT 17 Oct 2012

EAT Practice and Procedure : AmendmentET1 alleged unfair dismissal (unfair selection for redundancy), and direct discrimination (because of disability) arising out of the employer including two periods of absence caused by the disability when scoring sickness absence in the selection process. The Claimant later applied to add claims of direct and indirect discrimination, discrimination arising … Continue reading Charles v Kuehne and Nagel Ltd: EAT 17 Oct 2012

Fish v Glen Golf Club: EAT 23 Oct 2012

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Reason for Dismissal Including Substantial Other – The Employment Tribunal was entitled to conclude that the reason it found for dismissal (redundancy) was the principal reason, even though some evidence pointed to other reasons (capability, conduct) and that the employer might have acted to disguise those reasons by alleging redundancy. Nor, … Continue reading Fish v Glen Golf Club: EAT 23 Oct 2012

Lindsay v London School of Economics and Political Science: EAT 9 Nov 2012

EAT Race Discrimination : Direct – HARASSMENT – Conduct – JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: just and equitableThe Claimant made 5 complaints of victimisation, harassment and/or direct discrimination on the grounds of race. The Employment Tribunal dismissed her 4 claims of direct discrimination and the EAT dismissed appeals against two of those, the other … Continue reading Lindsay v London School of Economics and Political Science: EAT 9 Nov 2012

McLauchlan v Chubb Electronic Security Systems Ltd: EAT 5 Dec 2012

EAT Disability Discrimination : Direct Disability DiscriminationVICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Other forms of victimisationThe Employment Tribunal was entitled to find the Claimant had a mental health impairment but it did not have such adverse effect on his day to day activities as to make him disabled at the time of the complaints, although he was later … Continue reading McLauchlan v Chubb Electronic Security Systems Ltd: EAT 5 Dec 2012

Arriva London Ltd v Eleftheriou: EAT 20 Nov 2012

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Polkey Deduction – Reinstatement/re-engagement – The Employment Tribunal found that an employee bus driver, dismissed procedurally unfairly for capability reasons (the effects of an accident), would have been 60% likely to have been fairly dismissed given time and proper procedures. The employee having fully recovered as at the date of hearing, … Continue reading Arriva London Ltd v Eleftheriou: EAT 20 Nov 2012

Lynch and Others v East Dunbartonshire Council: EAT 9 Mar 2010

EAT Lis Pendens. Equal pay claims. Claimants presented claims which were met with a response that included the contention that they had not complied with the statutory grievance procedures. While determination of that issue pending, claimants presented further claims (after having issued fresh grievance letters) in which, essentially, the same equal pay claims were made. … Continue reading Lynch and Others v East Dunbartonshire Council: EAT 9 Mar 2010

Mukoro Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (Practice and Procedure): EAT 24 Mar 2021

Practice and Procedure 1. The Claimant, who had been assisted by her daughter at earlier hearings, required emergency dental treatment on the day and at the time fixed for the hearing of the Respondents’ application for an order striking out her claims on the basis that a fair hearing was no longer possible. 2. The … Continue reading Mukoro Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (Practice and Procedure): EAT 24 Mar 2021

Ali v Office of The Immigration Services Commissioner (Race Discrimination): EAT 6 Nov 2020

It is unlawful for a person who is not a qualified person to provide immigration advice or services. One route to being a qualified person is to be registered by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (‘OISC’). The OISC also has powers to investigate and prosecute people suspected of providing such services unlawfully. Two … Continue reading Ali v Office of The Immigration Services Commissioner (Race Discrimination): EAT 6 Nov 2020

Big City Leisure Ltd v McCarthy: EAT 31 Oct 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – AmendmentThe Employment Tribunal held that the Appellant company, the transferee following a service provision change, needed permission to amend its ET3 in order to challenge whether Claimant was an employee (as opposed to being self-employed) prior to the transfer, and refused permission – Held that no such permission was required … Continue reading Big City Leisure Ltd v McCarthy: EAT 31 Oct 2012

Okoro and Another v Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd and Others: EAT 26 May 2011

EAT Jurisdictional Points : Claim In Time and Effective Date of TerminationContract workers banned – they claimed for discriminatory reasons – from working again for the principal. Claim brought some 6 months after this. Question was whether the ban was an act extending over a period, so as to confer jurisdiction, or whether Employment Tribunal … Continue reading Okoro and Another v Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd and Others: EAT 26 May 2011

Bryant v Saga Care Homes Ltd: EAT 11 Dec 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSALThe Claimant, a staff nurse of long experience, was dismissed by the Respondent after she had delegated the administration of a drug to a care assistant in the Respondent’s care home; the care assistant gave the drug to the wrong patient. In breach of the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s guidelines, the Claimant neither … Continue reading Bryant v Saga Care Homes Ltd: EAT 11 Dec 2012

Okoro and Another v Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd and Others: CA 4 Dec 2012

Appeals against orders whereby racial discrimination claims by the appellants were held to be out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. Judges: Pill, Hughes, Rimer LJJ Citations: [2012] WLR(D) 368, [2013] Eq LR 147, [2013] ICR 580, [2012] EWCA Civ 1590 Links: WLRD, Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Okoro and Another v Taylor Woodrow Construction Ltd and Others: CA 4 Dec 2012

Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v AB: EAT 27 Feb 2020

This was an appeal against the decision at a remedies hearing, following the conclusion that the employee had suffered discrimination on grounds of disability. The employee contended she had suffered a serious psychiatric injury as a result of the unlawful discrimination which prevented her from working for the foreseeable future and which required round the … Continue reading Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v AB: EAT 27 Feb 2020

Wollenberg v Global Gaming Ventures (Leeds) Ltd and Others (Practice and Procedure – Postponement or Stay): EAT 31 Jan 2019

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Postponement or stay In considering an application for a stay, the Employment Tribunal ought to have considered the particular difficulty faced by a Claimant who contended that documents disclosed in related criminal proceedings were relevant to his employment claim, but also was prevented from demonstrating their relevance by the undertaking which … Continue reading Wollenberg v Global Gaming Ventures (Leeds) Ltd and Others (Practice and Procedure – Postponement or Stay): EAT 31 Jan 2019

O’Hanlon v Post Office Ltd: EAT 15 Oct 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSALReason for dismissal including substantial other reasonReasonableness of dismissalThe Employment Tribunal erred in deciding that the unfair procedure did not matter because it related to matters, which the ET concluded, by a process of itself defining the reason for dismissal as opposed to considering the Respondent’s reason, were not a significant part of … Continue reading O’Hanlon v Post Office Ltd: EAT 15 Oct 2012

Beardshall v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council and Others: EAT 26 Oct 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Case management Postponement or stay The Employment Tribunal refused to postpone a multi-day hearing in circumstances where the Claimant’s medical evidence indicated that he was genuinely unwell and unfit to attend. There was a history of delay and previous adjournments. Cases relating to decisions on adjournment applications and to the need … Continue reading Beardshall v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council and Others: EAT 26 Oct 2012

Kabemba v ISS Eaton Ltd and Another: EAT 26 Oct 2012

EAT RACE DISCRIMINATION- Direct The Employment Tribunal failed to look at the factual findings overall in determining a complaint of direct race discrimination. Having done so, this Employment Appeal Tribunal was satisfied that the ET’s decision to dismiss that complaint was plainly and unarguably correct. Consequently the appeal was dismissed. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: … Continue reading Kabemba v ISS Eaton Ltd and Another: EAT 26 Oct 2012

Circle Anglia Ltd v Simons: EAT 16 Oct 2012

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of Dismissal – Contributory fault The majority of the Employment Tribunal, the Employment Judge dissenting, found the Respondent liable for the unfair dismissal for misconduct of the Claimant, but reduced his compensation by 55%. The EAT would not intervene once a correct self direction was given and the facts found, … Continue reading Circle Anglia Ltd v Simons: EAT 16 Oct 2012

British Telecommunications Plc v Adamson and Others: EAT 27 Sep 2012

EAT Transfer of Undertakings : Dismissal or Automatically Unfair Dismissal Pensions and other terms On a service provision change to which TUPE applied, the Employment Tribunal found, following a correct self direction on the law, the reason for the dismissal of the transferor’s staff was redundancy and the transferee was liable. This finding of fact … Continue reading British Telecommunications Plc v Adamson and Others: EAT 27 Sep 2012

Brunel University and Another v Webster and Vaseghi: CA 22 May 2007

The parties had been involved in long standing disputes about the procedures in the respondents complaints of race discrimination. The claims had been dismissed, but the Vice-Chancellor then wrote publicly of unfounded unwarranted and excessive claims of race discrimination. The claimants asserted that this amounted to victimisation for having pursued the claims, and they first … Continue reading Brunel University and Another v Webster and Vaseghi: CA 22 May 2007

Atabo v Kings College London and others Newman, Methven, Law: CA 19 Apr 2007

The claimant sought leave to appeal dismissal of her claim for discrimination, saying that the EAT had missapplied the test in Madarassy and associated cases on the burden of proof. Held: ‘the applicant did not make out a prima facie case of discrimination on the facts. It was therefore wholly unnecessary for the Tribunal artificially … Continue reading Atabo v Kings College London and others Newman, Methven, Law: CA 19 Apr 2007

Zhang v Heliocor Ltd and Another: EAT 16 Aug 2022

Practice and Procedure – The claimant in the employment tribunal presented a claim, acting in person, which included at least two distinct complaints of direct race discrimination, or harassment, on the part of a named individual, Mr Tripathi. Two companies in the same group were named in the claim form as respondents, the claimant having … Continue reading Zhang v Heliocor Ltd and Another: EAT 16 Aug 2022

Stubbs v Grafters Ltd: EAT 31 May 2022

Practice and Procedure The claim form which alleged unfair dismissal contained an indication of a claim of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA). The strike out was made on the basis that the Appellant had insufficient continuity of employment to pursue an unfair dismissal claim. This was correct in respect … Continue reading Stubbs v Grafters Ltd: EAT 31 May 2022

Turner v East Midlands Trains Ltd: CA 16 Nov 2012

The employee, a train ticket conductor, was accused without direct evidence of manipulating her machine to produce false tickets which she was then said to have sold. Held: Elias LJ said that the Tribunal: ‘has to ask whether the employer acted within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer. It is not … Continue reading Turner v East Midlands Trains Ltd: CA 16 Nov 2012

Guildprime Specialists Contractors Ltd v Knight: EAT 24 Sep 2012

EAT UNLAWFUL DEDUCTION FROM WAGES At the hearing of the Claimant’s claim of unauthorised deductions, taken from his payments when he was made redundant in order to repay his car loan, the Employment Tribunal raised with the employer’s counsel the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. It then ruled upon it without giving counsel … Continue reading Guildprime Specialists Contractors Ltd v Knight: EAT 24 Sep 2012

Hair Division Ltd v Macmillan: EAT 12 Oct 2012

EAT Sex Discrimination : Direct Inferring discrimination – Discrimination. Pregnancy. Statutory Maternity Leave/Pay. Tribunal erred in approaching employee’s allegation of discrimination on the basis that employer had wrongly denied that she was entitled to maternity leave/pay when (a) they had no jurisdiction to determine a dispute over such entitlement, and (b) even if they had, … Continue reading Hair Division Ltd v Macmillan: EAT 12 Oct 2012

Arnold Clark Automobiles Ltd v Middleton: EAT 22 May 2012

EAT Practice and procedure. Whether competent for Employment Tribunal to call its own witnesses despite opposition from both parties. Tribunal’s decision to do so set aside on appeal. Appeal against witness order upheld. Judges: Lady Smith Citations: [2012] UKEAT 0011 – 12 – 2205, [2012] ICR D36 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Employment Updated: … Continue reading Arnold Clark Automobiles Ltd v Middleton: EAT 22 May 2012

Kingston Upon Hull City Council v Schofield and Others: EAT 6 Nov 2012

EAT UNLAWFUL DEDUCTION FROM WAGESThe Claimants claimed that the Respondent had wrongly evaluated their jobs under the applicable job evaluation scheme. They contended that properly evaluated they would have been awarded higher scores entitling them to a higher Grade, (Grade 7 or 8). They brought claims for deduction from wages under the Employment Rights Act … Continue reading Kingston Upon Hull City Council v Schofield and Others: EAT 6 Nov 2012

Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Mockler: EAT 11 Jul 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissalThe Employment Tribunal did not err in finding the Respondent unfairly dismissed the Claimant for misconduct in failing to observe trackside safety rules. The EAT would not interfere with its findings: Fuller v London Borough of Brent [2011] IRLR 414, Bowater v Northwest London Hospitals NHS Trust [2001] IRLR … Continue reading Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Mockler: EAT 11 Jul 2012

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust v Norris: EAT 30 Oct 2012

EAT Disability Discrimination – Disability – The effect of an impairment may be direct or indirect. However, the majority of the Employment Tribunal erred in holding that the deduced effect of the Claimant’s impairment for the purpose of Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 Part 1 paragraph 5 was substantial and adverse to her ability to … Continue reading Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust v Norris: EAT 30 Oct 2012

Olatunji v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: EAT 10 Sep 2012

EAT Practice and Procedure : Costs – The Employment Tribunal struck out the Claimant’s case after she did not appear. It ordered her to show cause why she should not pay andpound;10,000 costs. She submitted details of her ability to pay. The Employment Judge held without reasons that she had failed to show cause. This … Continue reading Olatunji v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: EAT 10 Sep 2012

Mather v Devine and Others (Bramhall Park Medical Centre): EAT 23 Aug 2012

EAT SEX DISCRIMINATION – Pregnancy and discriminationHARASSMENT – ConductThe Employment Tribunal did not address all the Claimant’s claims for pregnancy and sex discrimination and these were remitted to a fresh Tribunal, in part because the Judgment was not unanimous. Other grounds of appeal were dismissed and the Judgment upheld. Judges: McMullen QC J Citations: [2012] … Continue reading Mather v Devine and Others (Bramhall Park Medical Centre): EAT 23 Aug 2012

Tamang and Another v Act Security Ltd and Another: EAT 31 Aug 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURECompromiseDisposal of appeal including remissionThe Claimants made a compromise agreement with Reliance, one of three Respondents in a TUPE claim. The claim was against the Respondents jointly and severally for breach of the consultation provisions and against the transferee for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. The Employment Tribunal wrongly construed the agreement … Continue reading Tamang and Another v Act Security Ltd and Another: EAT 31 Aug 2012

X County Council and Another v D and Another: EAT 23 Oct 2012

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of Dismissal – Unfair dismissal. Drama teachers dismissed in relation to permitting GCSE students to stage a performance depicting sexual abuse including rape, sexual intercourse, sexual assault, oral sex, masturbation, and group sex. Tribunal’s finding of unfair dismissal held to be perverse; the Tribunal had, in finding that employers should … Continue reading X County Council and Another v D and Another: EAT 23 Oct 2012

Whyte v The London Borough of Lewisham: EAT 22 Aug 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularityUNFAIR DISMISSAL – CompensationObservations on the withdrawal of allegations of judicial bias.One point on unfair dismissal compensation and arithmetic merits a full hearing. A pure construction point on the Redeployment Scheme and its relationship to sick pay was dismissed, although not dealt with by the Employment … Continue reading Whyte v The London Borough of Lewisham: EAT 22 Aug 2012

Donovan v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham: CA 26 Oct 2012

Renewed application for permission to appeal. The claimant had worked for the respondent with a role in its Housing Developments and Partnerships department, in which by 2006 she became a team leader. In 2009 she brought employment tribunal proceedings against it, complaining of sex and race discrimination, harassment and detriment on the grounds that she … Continue reading Donovan v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham: CA 26 Oct 2012

Camden Primary Care Trust v Atchoe: CA 9 May 2007

Appeal against dismissal of claim of unauthorised deduction from wages. Judges: Sir Igor Judge P, Moore-Bick LJ, Sir Peter Gibson Citations: [2007] EWCA Civ 714 Links: Bailii Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 13 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – Camden Primary Care Trust v Atchoe EAT 22-Aug-2006 EAT Unlawful Deduction from Wages – … Continue reading Camden Primary Care Trust v Atchoe: CA 9 May 2007

Dr Adoko v Law Society: CA 7 Mar 1997

The appellant had complained to the Employment Tribunal alleging race discrimination by the Respondent. That claim had failed, and several appeals had also failed. The claim alleged indirect discrimination, and the respondent admitted unwitting indirect discrimination, and accordingly no damages were payable. Because of his manner of conduct of the proceedings, including disclosure of matters … Continue reading Dr Adoko v Law Society: CA 7 Mar 1997

GMB Trade Union v Brown: EAT 16 Oct 2007

EAT Unfair Dismissal: Reason for dismissal including substantial other reason / Compensation The employee claimed constructive unfair dismissal because the employers refused to modify their grievance procedures to deal with her grievance. She alleged, and the Tribunal accepted, that it could damage her health if she had to pursue the grievance formally with her line … Continue reading GMB Trade Union v Brown: EAT 16 Oct 2007

Mahon and Another v Rahn and Others (1): CA 12 Jun 1997

Two company directors sued Swiss bankers who had responded to enquiries from the police in London. The charges which followed had been dismissed, and the directors sued in defamation, seeking to rely upon the materials sent to the police. Held: The appeal succeeded. There is no implied undertaking as to the use of disclosed documents … Continue reading Mahon and Another v Rahn and Others (1): CA 12 Jun 1997

Van Rensburg v The Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames and others: EAT 16 Oct 2007

EAT Practice and Procedure: Striking-out/dismissal – Imposition of Deposit The Employment Tribunal made a deposit order under rule 20 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure against the Appellant on the grounds that her claims had little prospect of success. She failed to pay the deposit by the date specified and her claims were struck out. … Continue reading Van Rensburg v The Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames and others: EAT 16 Oct 2007

Commission for Equality and Human Rights (Decision Notice): ICO 16 Oct 2007

ICO Central government – The complainant submitted a request for information about the ethnicity of claimants to the Employment Tribunal Service and the outcome of each claimant’s case. The public authority refused the request on the basis that it did not hold the requested information. The Commissioner has concluded that the public authority did hold … Continue reading Commission for Equality and Human Rights (Decision Notice): ICO 16 Oct 2007

The Home Secretary v Parr (Practice and Procedure): EAT 6 Mar 2020

The Employment Tribunal at the full hearing of claims for equal pay and sex and race discrimination was entitled to review and revoke an earlier case management order which had provided for part of the proceedings to be in private under rule 50 of the ET Rules. The earlier order was expressly subject to review … Continue reading The Home Secretary v Parr (Practice and Procedure): EAT 6 Mar 2020

United States of America v Nolan: ECJ 22 Mar 2012

ECJ (Opinion) Directive 98/59/EC – Admissibility – Protection of workers – Collective redundancies – Information and consultation of workers – Closure of a US military base – Scope – Time at which the obligation to consult arises Judges: Mengozzi AG Citations: C-583/10, [2012] EUECJ C-583/10 Links: Bailii Statutes: Directive 98/59/EC Jurisdiction: European Citing: At EAT … Continue reading United States of America v Nolan: ECJ 22 Mar 2012

Spring v First Capital East Ltd: EAT 20 Jul 2012

EAT Practice and Procedure : Imposition of Deposit – Employment Tribunal ordered that Claimant pay a deposit of andpound;250 as a condition of being permitted to continue to take part in proceedings relating to his claim that he was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against on grounds of age.Appeal dismissed.(1) Rule 18(2) of Schedule 1 to … Continue reading Spring v First Capital East Ltd: EAT 20 Jul 2012

Riverside Echg v Ubredi: EAT 18 Jul 2012

EW EAT Victimisation Discrimination : Protected Disclosure – Employment Tribunal, by a majority decision, found that the First Respondent had committed an act of racial victimisation against the Claimant and awarded the Claimant compensation including interest in the sum of andpound;4,021.67 for injury to feelings. Appeal allowed on basis findings of fact made by majority … Continue reading Riverside Echg v Ubredi: EAT 18 Jul 2012

SNR Denton U Llp v Kirwan and Others: EAT 10 Jul 2012

EAT TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS – Service provision change – The Claimant solicitor worked in-house for a facilities management company which ran into financial difficulties. In consequence she was engaged in disposing of service contracts to third parties. Administrators were appointed, who had previously engaged the Appellant as solicitors to act for them in the administration. … Continue reading SNR Denton U Llp v Kirwan and Others: EAT 10 Jul 2012

Rembiszewski v Atkins Ltd: EAT 10 Oct 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL Reinstatement/re-engagement Polkey deduction Where the parties are requested or permitted to make written submissions to the Employment Tribunal following a remedies hearing, the assessment of practicability of re-engagement is to be judged on the basis that an order would take effect after such submissions have been made. Accordingly, applying and adapting the … Continue reading Rembiszewski v Atkins Ltd: EAT 10 Oct 2012

Johnson v Ruck SSC Ltd: EAT 16 Aug 2012

EAT Practice and Procedure : Time for Appealing – The Claimant failed to include the Employment Tribunal judgment and reasons in his last minute Notice of Appeal and gave no explanation at a hearing for this failure. Discretionary extension was refused as this was not an exceptional case. Judges: McMulen QC Citations: [2012] UKEAT 1928 … Continue reading Johnson v Ruck SSC Ltd: EAT 16 Aug 2012

Nejjary v Aramark Ltd: EAT 31 May 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL Reasonableness of dismissal Contributory fault Hospitality manager summarily dismissed for gross misconduct. Single incident of failure to check a booking sheet leading to a complaint from a customer about service provided at the booked event. Both the dismissing manager and an appeals officer rely on that incident, and no other prior matter, … Continue reading Nejjary v Aramark Ltd: EAT 31 May 2012

North Bristol Nhs Trust v Harrold: EAT 19 Sep 2012

EAT Practice and Procedure : New evidence on appealReviewThe Respondent appealed against a decision refusing its application for adjournment in a case where Claimant had alleged victimisation. Respondent wished to call witnesses but the Employment Tribunal held that there was no proper explanation as to why the Respondent had not arranged to call them earlier. … Continue reading North Bristol Nhs Trust v Harrold: EAT 19 Sep 2012

Booley v British Army Mod: EAT 19 Jul 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Time for appealingJURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Excluded employmentsThe Claimant, a former soldier, resigned and claimed constructive unfair dismissal and breach of contract in the Employment Tribunal. It declined jurisdiction: Employment Rights Act 1996 ss191-2 disapply the Act to the armed forces. The Claimant received clear legal advice to that effect but … Continue reading Booley v British Army Mod: EAT 19 Jul 2012

Gallop v Newport City Council: EAT 19 Jul 2012

EAT Practice and Procedure : Admissibility of Evidence – CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT – Notice and pay in lieuDisability related discriminationDirect disability discriminationReasonable adjustmentsWithout prejudice negotiations, not leading to a compromise agreement, revealed in evidence through questioning by an Employment Tribunal lay member. Subsequently, unfair dismissal compensation reduced by 50 per cent for the chance that … Continue reading Gallop v Newport City Council: EAT 19 Jul 2012

Knight v Fairway and Kenwood Car Service: EAT 10 Jul 2012

EAT Jurisdictional Points : Worker, Employee or Neither – The Claimant was a taxi driver working with the Respondent company under written terms. The Employment Tribunal decided he was not an employee. The EAT upheld the decision because the written terms did not require any minimum or reasonable amount of work from him; he was … Continue reading Knight v Fairway and Kenwood Car Service: EAT 10 Jul 2012

The Manchester College v Hazel and Another: EAT 9 Jul 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSALAutomatically unfair reasonsReinstatement/re-engagementTRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS – Economic technical or organizational reasonSix months after a TUPE transfer the Respondent began a process of cost savings which included a request for voluntary redundancies and wage cuts. The Claimants were told during this that their jobs were safe. They would not sign new contracts with up … Continue reading The Manchester College v Hazel and Another: EAT 9 Jul 2012

Logan v Celyn House Ltd: EAT 19 Jul 2012

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Constructive Dismissal – The Claimant resigned in response to a grievance decision which she found unsatisfactory. The grievance had involved a number of matters, including alleged bullying (which the Employment Tribunal found was a figment of her imagination) and a failure to pay contractual sick pay (which the Employment Tribunal had … Continue reading Logan v Celyn House Ltd: EAT 19 Jul 2012

University of East Anglia v Amaikwu: EAT 25 Jul 2012

EAT Practice and Procedure : Postponement or Stay – The Employment Tribunal fixed a hearing for 23/4/12 to 1/5/12. On the eve of the hearing the parties were notified it was cancelled because no judge was available. On 1/5/12 the ET sent out new dates, 28/8/12 to 5/9/12; the parties had not been asked for … Continue reading University of East Anglia v Amaikwu: EAT 25 Jul 2012

East Dunbartonshire Council v Trade Union Backed Claimants and Another: EAT 24 Jun 2010

EAT EQUAL PAY ACT – Article 141/European lawPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – AmendmentEmployment Tribunal granted Claimants’ applications to amend their equal pay claims to add new comparators to their existing lists. Two of the Claimants having left the Respondent’s employment more than six months prior to their claims being amended, time bar would have prevented them … Continue reading East Dunbartonshire Council v Trade Union Backed Claimants and Another: EAT 24 Jun 2010

Hussey v Photogenic Ltd: EAT 24 Jun 2010

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissal Employment Tribunal entitled to conclude, on their findings of fact, that Claimant had resigned from the employment in circumstances which did not amount to constructive dismissal and had not been dismissed by his employer. Citations: [2010] UKEAT 0069 – 10 – 2406 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Employment … Continue reading Hussey v Photogenic Ltd: EAT 24 Jun 2010

Arrow Nominees Inc, Blackledge v Blackledge: ChD 2 Nov 1999

The applicants sought to strike out a claim under section 459. The two companies sold toiletries, the one as retail agent for the other. They disputed the relationship of the companies, and the use of a trading name. Documents were disclosed which appeared to be fabrications. Held: Where a party was in breach of court … Continue reading Arrow Nominees Inc, Blackledge v Blackledge: ChD 2 Nov 1999

Igbinake v Clarkson House Residential Care Home Ltd (T/A The Vicarage Residential Care Home): EAT 28 Jun 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-BarkeInadequate Employment Tribunal reasons. Burns-Barke order made. Appeal adjourned. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2012] UKEAT 0072 – 12 – 2806 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Employment Updated: 04 November 2022; Ref: scu.463763

Edwards v London Borough of Sutton: EAT 12 Jul 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – AmendmentAn application to amend was made which the Employment Tribunal Judge had refused purely on the basis that it involved new claims; that was clearly wrong. She should have followed the procedure in Selkent v More [1996] ICR 836 at 842, this being an application which involved an amendment which … Continue reading Edwards v London Borough of Sutton: EAT 12 Jul 2012

Birmingham City Council v Millwood: EAT 3 Jul 2012

EAT RACE DISCRIMINATION – Inferring discriminationAn employee who was black was treated disadvantageously when compared to an Asian employee found to be in the same material circumstances. Though the Employment Tribunal accepted this did not without more justify a shifting of the burden of proof, it held that there was more. However, it did not … Continue reading Birmingham City Council v Millwood: EAT 3 Jul 2012

Clark v H2O Water Services Ltd: EAT 20 Aug 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ReviewJURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: reasonably practicableThe Claimant’s solicitor faxed an ET1 claiming unfair dismissal to the Tribunal more than 3 months after the effective date of termination. He said that he had sent an ET1 by post earlier, but the Tribunal had not received it. He did not … Continue reading Clark v H2O Water Services Ltd: EAT 20 Aug 2012

F and G Cleaners v Saddington and Others: EAT 16 Aug 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Mitigation of lossThe Claimants worked for Respondent 1 who supplied window cleaning services under contract to a local authority. The contract was subject to a re-tendering process; Respondent 2 was successful and the contract passed to them. R2 refused to accept the Claimants as employees and, instead, made them offers of … Continue reading F and G Cleaners v Saddington and Others: EAT 16 Aug 2012

Kings Castle Church v Okukusie: EAT 13 Jun 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – CompensationThe Employment Tribunal erred in law in awarding compensation for loss of earnings for a period after the Claimant’s leave to remain in this country, extended under Immigration Act 1971 section 3C(2)(c), had expired. Although the ET noted that the Claimant had been informed that the UKBA had refused his application … Continue reading Kings Castle Church v Okukusie: EAT 13 Jun 2012

Roberts v Whitecross School: EAT 19 Jun 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissalA settled communicated intention to pay half rather than full pay was a fundamental breach of contract. The conclusion of the Employment Tribunal that the established breach was not fundamental because of an honest though mistaken view of the meaning of the relevant contractual term erroneously relied upon the judgment … Continue reading Roberts v Whitecross School: EAT 19 Jun 2012

Rodrigues v Co-operative Group Ltd: EAT 17 Jul 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissalJURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: just and equitableRace Discrimination. Time bar. Whether conduct extending over a period. Whether just and equitable to extend time limit. Strike out. Whether Employment Tribunal erred in striking out where, on evidence led at PHR, Employment Judge had ‘serious doubts’ about the reliability of … Continue reading Rodrigues v Co-operative Group Ltd: EAT 17 Jul 2012

Leonard v Scottish Prison Service: EAT 18 Jul 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissalDismissal of prison officer for gross misconduct, namely that he was ‘negligent in [his] duty in failing to take appropriate action when an incident occurred’, the ‘charge’ of which he was given notice being in the same terms and the incident being that another officer assaulted an inmate at … Continue reading Leonard v Scottish Prison Service: EAT 18 Jul 2012

Sud v London Borough of Ealing: EAT 29 May 2012

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Direct disability discriminationThe Employment Tribunal did not err in its conclusion that the Appellant’s claims for discrimination were unfounded, save to the limited extent to which they found it should succeed, nor did it err in law in exercising its discretion to make an award of costs to the extent of … Continue reading Sud v London Borough of Ealing: EAT 29 May 2012