Sud v London Borough of Ealing: EAT 29 May 2012

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Direct disability discrimination
The Employment Tribunal did not err in its conclusion that the Appellant’s claims for discrimination were unfounded, save to the limited extent to which they found it should succeed, nor did it err in law in exercising its discretion to make an award of costs to the extent of 50% of the Respondent’s reasonable costs.

Judges:

Wilkie J

Citations:

[2012] UKEAT 0482 – 11 – 2905

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment, Discrimination, Costs

Updated: 04 November 2022; Ref: scu.463515