EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissal
Employment Tribunal proceedings withdrawn; High Court proceedings intimated. Application to dismiss under ET R25(4) rejected by Employment Judge. Respondent’s appeal dismissed. New proceedings did not amount to an abuse. Verdin considered.
Judges:
Peter Clark J
Citations:
[2013] UKEAT 0353 – 12 – 1601
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Verdin v Harrods Ltd EAT 21-Dec-2005
EAT Contract of Employment – Damages for breach of contract – The Tribunal Chairman erred in law in concluding that Mrs Verdin’s breach of contract claim should be dismissed.
Rule 25 of the Employment . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 13 November 2022; Ref: scu.470765
