Click the case name for better results:

Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions; Attorney General’s Reference No 4 of 2002: HL 14 Oct 2004

Appeals were brought complaining as to the apparent reversal of the burden of proof in road traffic cases and in cases under the Terrorism Acts. Was a legal or an evidential burden placed on a defendant? Held: Lord Bingham of Cornhill said: ‘The overriding concern is that a trial should be fair, and the presumption … Continue reading Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions; Attorney General’s Reference No 4 of 2002: HL 14 Oct 2004

Regina v Coutts: HL 19 Jul 2006

The defendant was convicted of murder. Evidence during the trial suggested a possibility of manslaughter, but neither the defence nor prosecution proposed the alternate verdict. The defendant now appealed saying that the judge had an independent duty to leave that option to the jury. Held: The appeal succeeded. The judge should have left a manslaughter … Continue reading Regina v Coutts: HL 19 Jul 2006

Bowman, Regina v: CACD 21 Dec 2005

Against sentence of 6 months after failure to notify a change of address as required by the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Held: Two months’ imprisonment should be substituted Citations: [2005] EWCA Crim 3612 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 24 November 2022; Ref: scu.239062

NE, Regina (on The Application of) v Birmingham Magistrates Court and Another: Admn 20 Mar 2015

Judges: Sir Brian Leveson P QBD, Walker J Citations: [2015] EWHC 688 (Admin), [2015] 2 Cr App R (S) 25, (2015) 179 JP 187, [2015] WLR(D) 135 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 20 November 2022; Ref: scu.544835

Privett, Regina v: CACD 29 Apr 2020

Sentencing practice for offences under section 14 Sexual Offences Act 2003 (arranging or facilitating the commission of a child sex offence) (a ‘section 14 offence’), and in particular the correct approach to assessing harm. There is tension within the relevant jurisprudence on this issue which requires consideration. The common feature between these cases is that … Continue reading Privett, Regina v: CACD 29 Apr 2020

Reed and Another v Regina: CACD 21 Apr 2021

The Court considered a particular aspect of the correct approach to be taken when sentencing certain offences against children under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (‘SOA’), namely when no sexual activity takes place, for instance, because i) the child is a fiction, ii) the defendant failed to persuade the child to engage in sexual activity … Continue reading Reed and Another v Regina: CACD 21 Apr 2021

Regina v Arundel Justices, Ex parte Westminster Press Ltd: 1985

The basic rule is that anything said in open court may be reported. Withholding the name from the public during the proceedings will provide the basis for the making of an order under section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. Citations: [1985] 1 WLR 708 Statutes: Contempt of Court Act 1981 11 Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Regina v Arundel Justices, Ex parte Westminster Press Ltd: 1985

DA v Strathclyde Joint Police Board: SCS 27 Jun 2012

The tribunal’s decision that the appellant had been unfairly dismissed by the respondent had been reversed at the EAT. The respondent had been allowed to withdraw a concession, and the appellant now sought to pursue a different argument. The appellant, a former police officer and latterly a training officer had a brother convicted of serious … Continue reading DA v Strathclyde Joint Police Board: SCS 27 Jun 2012

Thompson v Commissioner of Police of Metropolis; Hsu v Same: CA 20 Feb 1997

CS Damages of 200,000 pounds by way of exemplary damages had been awarded against the police for unlawful arrest and assault. Held: The court gave a guideline maximum pounds 50,000 award against police for wrongful arrest and wrongful imprisonment. Comparisons were proper with personal injury cases. It is important to identify and quantify the various … Continue reading Thompson v Commissioner of Police of Metropolis; Hsu v Same: CA 20 Feb 1997

Regina v Turner (Terence): CACD 1974

The defendant appealed against his conviction for murder. He admitted that he had killed his girlfriend with a hammer, but sought to bring psychiatric evidence that he was susceptible to provocation. Held: The law jealously guards the role of the jury, or the court where it is the trier of the facts, as the judge … Continue reading Regina v Turner (Terence): CACD 1974

Regina v Lichniak: HL 25 Nov 2002

The appellants challenged the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment imposed on them on their convictions for murder. They said it was an infringement of their Human Rights, being arbitrary and disproportionate. Held: The case followed on where the Anderson case left off. In these cases the judge had noted that he did not think the … Continue reading Regina v Lichniak: HL 25 Nov 2002

SR, Regina v: CACD 10 Dec 2019

Appeal by leave of the single judge against conviction of an offence of assault by penetration, contrary to section 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The grounds of appeal contend that the appellant did not have a fair trial, and his conviction is unsafe, because the judge unfairly interrupted defence counsel’s closing speech and … Continue reading SR, Regina v: CACD 10 Dec 2019

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX: SC 1 Apr 2020

A negligent delay in the diagnosis of her cancer left the clamant dependent on paid for surrogacy arrangements. Three issues were raised; could damages to fund surrogacy arrangements using the claimant’s own eggs be recovered? Second, if so, could damages to fund arrangements using donor eggs be recovered? Third, in either event, could damages to … Continue reading Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX: SC 1 Apr 2020

Hutchings, Regina v: CACD 22 Feb 2019

Issue concerning the written directions of the trial judge as to the law on consent and in particular the scope and effect of section 75(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This is a provision which it is argued before us is problematic in numerous respects. The case raises various points about the structure of … Continue reading Hutchings, Regina v: CACD 22 Feb 2019

Stannard and C and Others, Regina v; Attorney-General’s Reference (No 55 of 2008): CACD 26 Nov 2008

The court considered appeals all relating to the application of legislation regarding the imposition of sentences for public protection. Held: Before imposing such a sentence, the court should consider all the alternative ways of providing protection for the public against the risks posed by the particular defendant, including combining such sentences with other provision. Alternatives … Continue reading Stannard and C and Others, Regina v; Attorney-General’s Reference (No 55 of 2008): CACD 26 Nov 2008

Court, Regina v: CACD 9 Feb 2012

The defendants appealed against their convictions under common law for keeping a disorderly house. They were landlords using an agreement requiring the tenant not to be used for immoral purposes. There was evidence of limited sexual activity. Only one girl had been seen and therefore the charge under the 1956 Act was withdrawn. Held: the … Continue reading Court, Regina v: CACD 9 Feb 2012

TB, Regina (on the Application of) v The Combined Court at Stafford: Admn 4 Jul 2006

The claimant was the child complainant in an allegation of sexual assault. The defendant requested her medical records, and she now complained that she had been unfairly pressured into releasing them. Held: The confidentiality of a patient’s medical records belongs to the patient, and the duty of confidence owed by a medical professional to a … Continue reading TB, Regina (on the Application of) v The Combined Court at Stafford: Admn 4 Jul 2006

Regina v A (Prosecutor’s Appeal): CACD 15 Dec 2005

A had been charged with various indecent assaults on children. It had been intended that transitional regulations would govern thechange to the regime under the 2003 Act, but no regulations had been published. Held: It was not for the courts to fill the lacuna left by the Secretary of State. The 2003 Act recognised the … Continue reading Regina v A (Prosecutor’s Appeal): CACD 15 Dec 2005

Attorney General’s Reference No 7 of 2011: CACD 7 Mar 2011

The court was asked how the judge should approach offences committed under the Sexual Offences Act 1956 in the context of the Definitive Guidelines under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. It raises the important point as to how the judge should approach the totality where there has, over a considerable period, been a variety of … Continue reading Attorney General’s Reference No 7 of 2011: CACD 7 Mar 2011

Ayeva, Regina v: CACD 19 Nov 2009

The defendant appealed against his sentence of three and a half years imprisonment after conviction for causing another to engage in sexual activity without consent. Though otherwise of previous good characetr he had a caution for a similar assault. The judge had adopted a sentencing range more serious than that suggested by both defence and … Continue reading Ayeva, Regina v: CACD 19 Nov 2009

Rakib, Regina v: CACD 1 Apr 2011

Appeal from conviction, sentence (three year supervision requirement and a programme requirement to attend sex offending assessment, psychological testing and treatment, with the appropriate notification requirements) and costs of exposing his genitals intending that someone would see them and be caused alarm or distress. Citations: [2011] EWCA Crim 870, [2012] 1 Cr App R (S) … Continue reading Rakib, Regina v: CACD 1 Apr 2011

Regina v Grout: CACD 1 Mar 2011

The defendant appealed against conviction of intentionally causing a child under the age of 13 to engage in sexual activity. Held: The conviction was quashed. The evidence did not establish one of the essential elements for a conviction. Citations: [2011] EWCA Crim 299 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: … Continue reading Regina v Grout: CACD 1 Mar 2011

CICA v F-TT and RC (CIC); RN v F-TT and CICA (CIC): UTAA 7 Apr 2022

Crime of violence; application of Annex B; place of Sexual Offences Act 2003; Can on line `grooming’ be a crime of violence under the 2012 Scheme? Citations: [2022] UKUT 103 (AAC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Personal Injury Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.680339

Regina v Blythe: CACD 4 Apr 2008

The defendant had been convicted of sex related offences involving committing sex acts in the presence of a child, and while they were watching. He was himself under eighteen. He appealed the part of the order declaring him a dangerous sex offender. Held: Such offences when committed by a youth were not serious specified sexual … Continue reading Regina v Blythe: CACD 4 Apr 2008

Regina v Massey: CACD 19 Oct 2007

The defendant appealed his conviction for the offence of controlling a prostitute for gain. Held: The appeal failed. ‘Control’ in this context did not require the defendant to be shown to have compelled or otherwise coerced the prostitution. ‘Control’ included but was not limited to compulsion, and could be exercised in many ways. The offence … Continue reading Regina v Massey: CACD 19 Oct 2007

Mortimer, Regina v: CACD 25 May 2010

Appeal against the orders made in a Sexual Offences Prevention Order. Judges: Aikens LJ, Royce J, Radford QC Citations: [2010] EWCA Crim 1303 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 104 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 19 August 2022; Ref: scu.418440

O’Brien, Harris, Moss, Llewellyn and others v Regina: CACD 14 Jul 2006

In each case the court was asked whether a sentence imposed under section 225(2) of the 2003 CJA for the protection of the public could be made to run consecutively to the principle sentence for the offence, and how did this link in with the courts powers under the section 116 PCCA 2003. Held: Some … Continue reading O’Brien, Harris, Moss, Llewellyn and others v Regina: CACD 14 Jul 2006

Evans, Regina v: CACD 16 Dec 2009

The appellant appealed against his conviction for serious sexual assaults on his young daughters. He said that he had been denied the opportunity to put to a complainant that she had made other unfounded allegations. Judges: Moore-Bick LJ, Griffith Williams J Citations: [2009] EWCA Crim 2668 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003, Youth Justice … Continue reading Evans, Regina v: CACD 16 Dec 2009

Bai, Regina v: CACD 24 May 2022

rape of a child under 13 Judges: Lord Justice Coulson Mrs Justice Mcgowan Mr Justice Bourne Citations: [2022] EWCA Crim 805 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 20035(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 01 August 2022; Ref: scu.679786

Cartwright, Regina v: CACD 7 Nov 2007

The defendant was accused of a rape before 2000. No complaint was made until after 2004. The defendant wished to ask the complainant about her sexual history. It was argued that the former provision had been repealed, and tat the new provisons were not back dated, and that therefore there was no restriction. Held: Though … Continue reading Cartwright, Regina v: CACD 7 Nov 2007

AB v Her Majesty’s Advocate: SC 5 Apr 2017

This appeal is concerned with a challenge to the legality of legislation of the Scottish Parliament which deprives a person, A, who is accused of sexual activity with an under-aged person, B, of the defence that he or she reasonably believed that B was over the age of 16, if the police had previously charged … Continue reading AB v Her Majesty’s Advocate: SC 5 Apr 2017

Bouchacourt v France: ECHR 17 Dec 2009

The applicant had been sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment for rape and sexual assault on minors. His name had been placed automatically on a Register of Sexual and Violent Offenders, and had had to confirm his address every year and to give notice of any change of address. This could be done by registered letter … Continue reading Bouchacourt v France: ECHR 17 Dec 2009

Tolhurst v Director of Public Prosecutions: CACD 18 Nov 2008

Claim for judicial review of a decision of the Crown Prosecution Service to continue with a prosecution of the claimant for an offence under Section 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Judges: Latham LJ, Sullivan J Citations: [2008] EWHC 2976 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 5 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime … Continue reading Tolhurst v Director of Public Prosecutions: CACD 18 Nov 2008

Grosvenor, Regina v: CACD 9 Mar 2010

Failure to comply with the notification requirements of a Notification Order Citations: [2010] EWCA Crim 560, [2010] 2 Cr App Rep (S) 100 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 91(1)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.432753

Y v Slovenia: ECHR 28 May 2015

ECHR Article 8-1 Respect for private life Positive obligations Failure to protect complainant’s personal integrity in criminal proceedings concerning sexual abuse: violation Facts – In 2001, at the age of 14, the applicant was allegedly victim of repeated sexual assaults by a family friend, X. Following a criminal complaint by the applicant’s mother, investigations started … Continue reading Y v Slovenia: ECHR 28 May 2015

Crees, Regina v: CACD 24 Oct 2007

The defendant had been convicted of several offences involing serious assaults. He now appealed against a sentence to imprisonment for public protection. Judges: Latham L, Burton, Teare JJ Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 2650, [2007] All ER (D) 376 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 225 Citing: Cited – O’Brien, Harris, Moss, Llewellyn and others … Continue reading Crees, Regina v: CACD 24 Oct 2007

L, Regina (on the Application of) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Another: CA 1 Mar 2007

The court considered the proper content of an enhanced criminal record certificate. The claimant said that it should contain only matter relating to actual or potential criminal activity. Held: As to the meaning of section 115: ‘if Parliament had intended to limit relevant information to information of criminal or potentially criminal activity, it would be … Continue reading L, Regina (on the Application of) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Another: CA 1 Mar 2007

Bassett, Regina v: CACD 14 May 2008

The defendant could not be convicted of voyeurism under the 2003 Act for having watched a male’s breasts in a situation where that person might have expected privacy. Judges: Lord Justice Hughes, Mr Justice Treacy and Sir Peter Cresswell Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 1174, Times 18-Jun-2005 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 68(1)(a) Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Bassett, Regina v: CACD 14 May 2008

Terrell, Regina v: CACD 21 Dec 2007

The defendant appealed his sentence for making indecent images of children. Additional sentences had been imposed for public protection. He had a previous conviction for a similar offence. Held: The additional sentence should not have been imposed. He had not gone beyond the downloading of images. ‘The link between the offending act of downloading these … Continue reading Terrell, Regina v: CACD 21 Dec 2007

Mckenzie v Regina: CACD 11 Apr 2008

Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 758 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – O’Dowd v Regina CACD 12-May-2009 The defendant appealed against his conviction for serious sexual offences. The trial was very lengthy after the prosecution introduced bad character evidence from other allegations from some 17 years or … Continue reading Mckenzie v Regina: CACD 11 Apr 2008

In re S (a Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication): HL 28 Oct 2004

Inherent High Court power may restrain Publicity The claimant child’s mother was to be tried for the murder of his brother by poisoning with salt. It was feared that the publicity which would normally attend a trial, would be damaging to S, and an application was made for reporting restrictions to be applied to avoid … Continue reading In re S (a Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication): HL 28 Oct 2004

Attorney-General v Leveller Magazine Ltd: HL 1 Feb 1979

The appellants were magazines and journalists who published, after committal proceedings, the name of a witness, a member of the security services, who had been referred to as Colonel B during the hearing. An order had been made for his name not to be disclosed during the hearing, but the court had had no power … Continue reading Attorney-General v Leveller Magazine Ltd: HL 1 Feb 1979

Devon and Cornwall Constabulary (Decision Notice): ICO 20 Dec 2010

The complainant asked for a breakdown of the number of local teaching staff who had been investigated in connection with offences under section 16 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and for details of the outcome of these investigations. Devon and Cornwall Constabulary confirmed that it held such information but claimed it was exempt from … Continue reading Devon and Cornwall Constabulary (Decision Notice): ICO 20 Dec 2010

SK, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 25 Jan 2008

The claimant was a Zimbabwean National who was to be removed from the country. He was unlawfully held in detention pending removal. He sought damages for false imprisonment. He had been held over a long period pending decisions in the courts on the legality of returning failed asylum applicants to Zimbabwe. Held: Despite allegations of … Continue reading SK, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 25 Jan 2008

Hulme v Director Of Public Prosecutions: Admn 19 May 2006

Appeal by way of case stated from a decision of the Justices convicting the applicant of an offence of sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice, contrary to section 30 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Citations: [2006] EWHC 1347 (Admin) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 12 July … Continue reading Hulme v Director Of Public Prosecutions: Admn 19 May 2006

Xhelollari, Regina v: CACD 12 Jul 2007

Standing alone, a refusal by a convicted first-time sex offender to admit his guilt could warrant a finding of dangerousness. Judges: Hooper LJ, McCombe, Openshaw JJ Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 2052 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Citing: Cited – Lang and Others, Regina v CACD 3-Nov-2005 In each case the defendant had commited … Continue reading Xhelollari, Regina v: CACD 12 Jul 2007

Wallace v Regina: CACD 16 Jul 2007

Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 1760, [2007] 2 Crim App R 30 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 2003 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – O’Dowd v Regina CACD 12-May-2009 The defendant appealed against his conviction for serious sexual offences. The trial was very lengthy after the prosecution introduced bad character evidence from other … Continue reading Wallace v Regina: CACD 16 Jul 2007

DS v Her Majesty’s Advocate: PC 22 May 2007

An amendment to the 1995 Act placed restrictions on the questioning of the complainer in trials of persons charged with sexual offences. The defendant appealed, saying that the restrictions were incompatible with the right to a fair trial under article 6 of the Convention. Held: The challenge failed. Where a defendant in a rape trial … Continue reading DS v Her Majesty’s Advocate: PC 22 May 2007

Tirnaveanu, Regina v: CACD 24 May 2007

The defendant had been convicted of posing as a solicitor in order to commit frauds. He appealed, saying that the court had wrongly admitted evidence of his dealings with illegal immigrants. Held: The evidence admitted was highly relevant as evidence of bad character. The section has to be applied after a fact-specific exercise. The court … Continue reading Tirnaveanu, Regina v: CACD 24 May 2007

Regina v Jones: CACD 15 May 2007

The defendant appealed against his conviction for causing or inciting a child under the age of 13 to engage in sexual activity following a guilty plea after a direction that it was not necessary for the prosecution to identify any particular child as having been so affected. He had written graffiti in train stations seeking … Continue reading Regina v Jones: CACD 15 May 2007

Bree, Regina v: CACD 26 Mar 2007

The defendant appealed his conviction for rape. He said the girl had consented, despite having drunk substantial quantities of alcohol. Held: The voluntary consumption of much alcohol did not remove the possibility that the girl had consented to sex. Capacity to consent might evaporate well before she became unconscious, but it was a question of … Continue reading Bree, Regina v: CACD 26 Mar 2007

Reynolds and Others, Regina v: CACD 8 Mar 2007

The court considered how it could marry the law against the increase of penaties on appeal with the possible need to correct a judge’s error in sentencing. It summarised the provisions for sentencing for specified offences: ‘[The] regime requires the court to carry out a careful step by step evaluation of the sentencing consequences of … Continue reading Reynolds and Others, Regina v: CACD 8 Mar 2007

Regina v Kordansinski: CACD 7 Nov 2006

The defendant objected to the admission against him of documents of his convictions for similar sexual offences in Poland. Held: So far as the rule in Hollington v Hewthorn ever applied in criminal cases, it was not disapplied by section 99 of the 2003 Act. Judges: Lord Justice May, Mr Justice David Clarke and Mr … Continue reading Regina v Kordansinski: CACD 7 Nov 2006

Richards, Regina v: CACD 27 Oct 2006

The defendant appealed the imposition of a sexual offences prevention order under section 66, saying that it did not comply with sections 224 to 227 of the CJA 2003. If the judge had thought there was a serious risk of harm and extended sentence would have been imposd. Held: Sexual prevention orders were not subject … Continue reading Richards, Regina v: CACD 27 Oct 2006

Johnson, Regina v; Regina vHamilton; Attorney General’s Reference (No 64 of 2006): CACD 20 Oct 2006

The court provided explanation of the nature of sentences passed for public protection under the 2003 Act, and in particular whether it was correct to base the assessment on previous convictions. Held: ‘dangerousness’ is intended to represent a convenient shorthand for those cases where ‘The court is of the opinion that there is a significant … Continue reading Johnson, Regina v; Regina vHamilton; Attorney General’s Reference (No 64 of 2006): CACD 20 Oct 2006

O v Crown Court at Harrow: HL 26 Jul 2006

The claimant said that his continued detention after the custody time limits had expired was an infringement of his human rights. He faced continued detention having been refused bail because of his arrest on a grave charge, having a previous conviction for another grave offence. Held: The appeal was dismissed. Insofar as the the word … Continue reading O v Crown Court at Harrow: HL 26 Jul 2006

Norman and Others, Regina v: CACD 20 Jul 2006

The defendant said that the judge in setting his sentence had failed correctly to identify the time he had spent in custody awaiting trial, and which would act as time served. Held: The defendants were entitled to a direction. If the time for varying the order under s155 of the 2000 Act had passed, an … Continue reading Norman and Others, Regina v: CACD 20 Jul 2006

Dr D, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Health: CA 19 Jul 2006

The doctor complained of the use of Alert letters where he was suspected of sexual abuse of patients, but the allegations were unsubstantiated. He complained particularly that he had been acquitted in a criminal court and then also by the professional conduct committee of the GMC. Held: There had been very poor administration of the … Continue reading Dr D, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Health: CA 19 Jul 2006

Regina v G: CACD 12 Apr 2006

The defendant pleaded guilty to the rape of a twelve year old girl on the agreed basis that he had believed her to be 15, but had been advised that given her age, his belief was immaterial. He now appealed saying that the presumption infringed his human rights. Held: The question was whether the section … Continue reading Regina v G: CACD 12 Apr 2006

French and Webster, Regina v (Attorney General’s Reference No 14 and No 15 of 2006): CACD 8 Jun 2006

The defendant had been convicted of repeatedly raping a 12 week old girl, and other sexual offences against young girls. After pleading guilty, the judge had passed a life sentence setting the minimum term at six years which was lower because of the guilty plea. His partner had been convicted as an accomplice but took … Continue reading French and Webster, Regina v (Attorney General’s Reference No 14 and No 15 of 2006): CACD 8 Jun 2006

H, Regina v: CACD 25 Apr 2006

The defendant youth appealed his conviction and sentence for rape by oral penetration of a six or seven year old boy. He complained that the evidence contained such inconsistences that the case should not have proceeded. Complaint was also made that the court setting had been inappropriate for a thirteen year old witness. Held: The … Continue reading H, Regina v: CACD 25 Apr 2006

G and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CACD 12 Apr 2006

The defendants appealed their convictions for rape of a girl under 13. Held: The appeals were dismissed, but the sentences were reduced to conditional discharges. Judges: Lord Phillips CJ Citations: [2006] EWCA Crim 821, [2006] 1 WLR 2052 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 5 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Regina … Continue reading G and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CACD 12 Apr 2006

Timmins, Regina v: CACD 15 Nov 2005

The defendant appealed conviction for indecent assault. The charge alleged assault by intercourse per vaginam with a 13 year old girl. He had been 14 years old at the time. The verdict indicated consent by the complainant. Held: The appeal failed. The 2003 Act was not retrospective. However: ‘to hold that the express intention of … Continue reading Timmins, Regina v: CACD 15 Nov 2005

Forbes v Secretary of State for the Home Department: QBD 26 Jul 2005

The defendant argued that the 2003 Act was in breach of his article 8 rights. He had been registered as a sex offender, but the offence for which he had been convicted involved no proof of intention. Held: The claimant having brought the proceedings, his name was not to be withheld. The substantial point was … Continue reading Forbes v Secretary of State for the Home Department: QBD 26 Jul 2005

IP, Regina v: CACD 5 Oct 2004

Judges: Rose VP CACD LJ, Richards, Bean JJ Citations: [2004] EWCA Crim 2646, [2005] 1 Cr App R (S) 102 Links: Bailii Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 67(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.226797

Williams v The Secretary of State for the Home Office: CA 17 Apr 2002

The applicant was a post-tariff discretionary life prisoner, applying for a change in his security classification. He sought disclosure of his security report which was denied by the respondent. He alleged a breach of his human rights. Held: The punitive part of the sentence was complete. The earlier panel had advised his reclassification from security … Continue reading Williams v The Secretary of State for the Home Office: CA 17 Apr 2002

Seal v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: HL 4 Jul 2007

The claimant had sought to bring proceedings against the respondent, but as a mental patient subject to the 1983 Act, had been obliged by the section first to obtain consent. The parties disputed whether the failure was a procedural or substantial failing and whether it made the proceedings a nullity. Held: The claimant’s appeal failed. … Continue reading Seal v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: HL 4 Jul 2007

Regina v Soneji and Bullen: HL 21 Jul 2005

The defendants had had confiscation orders made against them. They had appealed on the basis that the orders were made more than six months after sentence. The prosecutor now appealed saying that the fact that the order were not timely did not invalidate them. Held: The appeal was allowed. The confiscation orders made by the … Continue reading Regina v Soneji and Bullen: HL 21 Jul 2005

Regina (DJ) v Mental Health Review Tribunal; Regina (AN) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region): Admn 11 Apr 2005

Each applicant sought judicial review of the refusal of the tribunal to authorise their release from detention under the 1983 Act, saying that the Tribunal had accepted evidence to a lower standard of proof. Held: Neither the criminal standard of proof nor the level of proof set down in Addington applied. To raise the standard … Continue reading Regina (DJ) v Mental Health Review Tribunal; Regina (AN) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region): Admn 11 Apr 2005

Regina v Corran, Regina v Cutler, Regina v Heard, Regina v Willams: CACD 2 Feb 2005

Various sentences were appealed in respect of defendants convicted of sexual offences under the 2003 Act. Held: The Act contained new extended ranges of sexual offences, and these required resvised sentencing guidelines. The starting point for non-penile penetration will be generally lower. No safe guideline could be given for a rape of a child under … Continue reading Regina v Corran, Regina v Cutler, Regina v Heard, Regina v Willams: CACD 2 Feb 2005

Monument v Regina: CACD 21 Jan 2005

The defendant appealed his sentence after conviction for making indeent photographs and pseudo-photographs, saying tha imposition of a restraining order in addition to other sentences was incorrect. Held: The 2003 Act had brought in an extended definition of ‘serious sexual harm’. However at the time when the order wa smposed, the power to make it … Continue reading Monument v Regina: CACD 21 Jan 2005

Regina (Kent Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v Serious Fraud Office: CA 11 Nov 2004

In 2002 the SFO was investigating allegations that drug companies were selling generic drugs, including penicillin-based antibiotics and warfarin, to the National Health Service at artificially sustained prices. To further the investigation the SFO obtained search warrants and executed them. The company challenged the release of the documents recovered to other government departments. They had … Continue reading Regina (Kent Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v Serious Fraud Office: CA 11 Nov 2004

Regina v J: HL 14 Oct 2004

The defendant was to have been accused of having unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16. Proceedings could not be brought, because the allegation was more than a year old, and he was instead accused of indecent assault, but on the same facts. He appealed against his conviction, saying this was an abuse of … Continue reading Regina v J: HL 14 Oct 2004

PNM v Times Newspapers Ltd and Others: SC 19 Jul 2017

No anonymity for investigation suspect The claimant had been investigated on an allegation of historic sexual abuse. He had never been charged, but the investigation had continued with others being convicted in a high profile case. He appealed from refusal of orders restricting publication of his name and involvement in the inquiry. Held: (Kerr and … Continue reading PNM v Times Newspapers Ltd and Others: SC 19 Jul 2017

O’Dowd v Regina: CACD 12 May 2009

The defendant appealed against his conviction for serious sexual offences. The trial was very lengthy after the prosecution introduced bad character evidence from other allegations from some 17 years or more before. Judges: Scott Baker LJ, Rafferty DBE J, Beatson J Citations: [2009] EWCA Crim 905, [2009] 2 Cr App R 16, [2009] Crim LR … Continue reading O’Dowd v Regina: CACD 12 May 2009

Regina v Z (Prior acquittal): HL 22 Jun 2000

The defendant on a charge of rape had been tried and acquitted of the rape of different women on three previous occasions in three separate trials. The prosecution wished to call those three complainants to give similar fact evidence in support of the new charge. Held: Similar fact evidence was not inadmissible only because it … Continue reading Regina v Z (Prior acquittal): HL 22 Jun 2000

F, Regina v: CACD 27 Jan 2009

The appellant had been convicted and sentenced at the age of 13 for serious sexual offences committed at the age of 11. It was said that the judge had not considered the effect if being required to comply with notification requirements under the 2003 Act, which, it was said had been found in contravention of … Continue reading F, Regina v: CACD 27 Jan 2009

Regina v Boardman: HL 1974

The defendant appealed the admission of similar fact evidence against him. Acts of buggery were alleged by a schoolmaster with boys in which the accused was the passive partner. Held: In order to be admissible similar facts must bear a striking similarity to the facts of the case currently before the court.Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest … Continue reading Regina v Boardman: HL 1974

Pinheiro, Regina (on The Application of) v North Tyneside Magistrates Court and Another: Admn 17 May 2022

Challenge to a series of interim sexual risk orders (‘ISROs’) made pursuant to section 122E of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Judges: Mr Justice Fordham Citations: [2022] EWHC 1176 (Admin) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.677846

Regina v Jones: CACD 20 Dec 2002

The defendant might have been chaged with an offence under section 6 of the Act, of unlawful intercourse with a girl under 16, but the prosecution would have been outside the time limit of twelve months. Instead he was prosecuted for an offence under section 14 of indecent assault, but based upon the same facts. … Continue reading Regina v Jones: CACD 20 Dec 2002

Millberry, Morganian, Lackenby v Regina: CACD 9 Dec 2002

The Court gave detailed guidelines on sentencing for offences of rape, following a report from the sentencing advisory panel. Held: The court outlined the base sentences for single and multiple offences of rape, listing aggravating and mitigating factors, and dealing specifically with date rape, acquaintance rape, male rape, and anal rape. The base sentence should … Continue reading Millberry, Morganian, Lackenby v Regina: CACD 9 Dec 2002

Regina v Oliver etc: CACD 21 Nov 2002

The defendants appealed their sentences for possession and distribution of indecent images of children. The court gave detailed sentencing guidelines for the offences. Distinctions were made for the gradations of pornography, from erotic posing only, to depictions of sexual activity between children, to non-penetrative sexual activity between adults and children, to penetrative activity, and lastly … Continue reading Regina v Oliver etc: CACD 21 Nov 2002

Regina v Cairns; Regina v Zaldi, Regina v Chaudary: CACD 22 Nov 2002

The defendants applied for the defence statements of co-defendants to be disclosed. A co-defendant was to give evidence for the Crown, and they sought to have it excluded as unreliable. Held: The 1996 Act created a duty of secondary disclosure, where a defence statement might be of assistance to the co-defendants. Actual disclosure remained for … Continue reading Regina v Cairns; Regina v Zaldi, Regina v Chaudary: CACD 22 Nov 2002

Sargent, Regina v: CACD 21 Aug 2018

Application, brought by the Solicitor General, under section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, for leave to refer a sentence which he considers to be unduly lenient. The sentence was passed on the offender after the offender had pleaded guilty to five offences, counts 2, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of sexual activity with … Continue reading Sargent, Regina v: CACD 21 Aug 2018

Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust and Another: CA 16 Nov 2001

The claimant had sued her former employer for post-traumatic stress resulting from alleged harassment at her place of work. The claimant appealed against an order refusing damages. The court had held that outside the 1997 Act which was not in force at the time, there was no tort of harassment. The question was the extent … Continue reading Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust and Another: CA 16 Nov 2001

Stubbings and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 22 Oct 1996

There was no human rights breach where the victims of sex abuse had been refused a right to sue for damages out of time. The question is whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment in law: ‘Limitation periods in personal injury cases are a common feature of the … Continue reading Stubbings and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 22 Oct 1996

Van Droogenbroeck v Belgium: ECHR 24 Jun 1982

The applicant was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for theft. He had a previous convictions and was thought to have a persistent tendency to crime, and was placed at the government’s disposal for 10 years on that ground. This was subject to appeal, and was classified not as a security measure but as a penalty … Continue reading Van Droogenbroeck v Belgium: ECHR 24 Jun 1982

Regina – v- Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel, ex parte August; Similar: CA 18 Dec 2000

For the purposes of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme, a juvenile but willing participant in an act of buggery, is not deemed to be a victim of a crime of violence. The purpose of the section is to disapprove of such activity in general, and therefore neither participants is to be seen as a victim. … Continue reading Regina – v- Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel, ex parte August; Similar: CA 18 Dec 2000

Regina v Home Secretary ex parte Gunn: CA 2000

A challenge under article 5 to decisions about a prisoner’s treatment were misconceived in the context of the Secretary of State’s refusal to transfer a prisoner to open conditions with a view to improving his prospects of release: ‘[Article 5(4)] is not to do with how persons are treated while they were detained or where … Continue reading Regina v Home Secretary ex parte Gunn: CA 2000

Hutchison Reid v Secretary Of State For Scotland and Another: HL 5 Feb 1998

(Scotland) A detention in hospital which was capable of preventing the deterioration of a psychopathic disorder in a patient was sufficient to bring his detention within the requirement for treatment which might alleviate a condition, which phrase has a wide meaning. ‘Medical treatment’ could include treatment which alleviates or prevents a deterioration of the symptoms … Continue reading Hutchison Reid v Secretary Of State For Scotland and Another: HL 5 Feb 1998

Regina v Chauhan: CACD 1981

Evidence of a complainant’s distress is not admissible unless the complainant is unaware of being observed, and if the distress is exhibited at the time of, or shortly after, the offence itself, or in circumstances which appear to implicate the accused. ‘In normal cases, however, the weight to be given to distress varies infinitely, and … Continue reading Regina v Chauhan: CACD 1981

Ishaqzai, Regina v: CACD 17 Feb 2021

Appeal from conviction of an offence of sexual activity with a child, contrary to section 9 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Judges: Lord Justice Holroyde Mr Justice Lavender Mrs Justice Ellenbogen DBE Citations: [2021] EWCA Crim 222 Links: Bailii, Judiciary Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 23 May 2022; Ref: scu.674617

Regina v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd; Knuller etc v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1972

The defendants were charged after pasting up in telephone booths advertisements for homosexual services. They published a magazine with similar advertisements. The House was asked to confirm the existence of an offence of outraging public decency. Held: There now exists no power in the courts to create new criminal offences. A new criminal offence could … Continue reading Regina v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd; Knuller etc v Director of Public Prosecutions: HL 1972

Attorney General’s Reference (No 2 of 2001): CACD 12 Jul 2001

When assessing whether the defendant’s right to a trial within a reasonable time had been infringed, the court should look as from the date at which he was charged, or served with a summons, and not from the date of the first interview. Although a suspect could suffer material prejudice from the date of the … Continue reading Attorney General’s Reference (No 2 of 2001): CACD 12 Jul 2001

Energy Financing Team Ltd and others v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office, Bow Street Magistrates Court: Admn 22 Jul 2005

The claimants sought to set aside warrants and executions under them to provide assistance to a foreign court investigating alleged unlawful assistance to companies in Bosnia Herzegovina. Held: The issue of such a warrant was a serious step. The court gave guidance on the practice to be followed, but it was not correct for the … Continue reading Energy Financing Team Ltd and others v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office, Bow Street Magistrates Court: Admn 22 Jul 2005

Regina v Head: 2008

The causing or inciting required as part of an offence under section 8(1) must be intentional, ie. deliberate; recklessness or less will not do. Judges: Hughes LJ Citations: [2008] QB 43 Statutes: Sexual Offences Act 2003 8(1) Cited by: Cited – Regina v Grout CACD 1-Mar-2011 The defendant appealed against conviction of intentionally causing a … Continue reading Regina v Head: 2008

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation: CA 10 Nov 1947

Administrative Discretion to be Used Reasonably The applicant challenged the manner of decision making as to the conditions which had been attached to its licence to open the cinema on Sundays. It had not been allowed to admit children under 15 years of age. The statute provided no appeal procedure, and the applicant sought a … Continue reading Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation: CA 10 Nov 1947

Regina v Pepper, Regina v Barber, etc: CACD 28 Apr 2005

Each defendant appealed against the imposition of an extended sentence of imprisonment. Held: The The provisions were unduly complicated and about to change again. Courts would see their way clear by focussing on the offence for which the extended sentence was to be considered, and bearing in mind that the purpose of this particular form … Continue reading Regina v Pepper, Regina v Barber, etc: CACD 28 Apr 2005

Regina v Ismail: CACD 15 Feb 2005

The defendant appealed a sentence of six years detention in a young offender institution for oral rape. Held: The court should make no distinction in penalty between vaginal, anal or oral rape. The dangers might be different, but they remained real. Cases will vary in the offensiveness to the victim and courts should recognise the … Continue reading Regina v Ismail: CACD 15 Feb 2005

Regina v Smolenski: CACD 4 May 2004

The defendant complained that the long delay in his prosecution for alleged sexual assaults was an abuse. Held: Complaints about delays should normally be dealt with by the court of trial having heard the evidence. It was in the nature of allegations of sexual assault by children, that the courage to complain might only come … Continue reading Regina v Smolenski: CACD 4 May 2004