The claimants were airline pilots employed by the respondent company with headquarters in Hong Kong. The court was asked whether an English Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear their complaints of unfair dismissal. Held: The pilots were employed in England so as to allow a claim for unfair dismissal here. Judges: Lord Phillips Of Worth Matravers, … Continue reading Crofts and others v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd and others: CA 19 May 2005

The Claimant had relied on a number of causes of action in his ET claim, including an allegation of an automatically unfair health and safety dismissal contrary to s.100(1)(b) ERA 1996 for his having sought to undertake a workplace inspection in his capacity as a Safety Representative under the Safety Representatives and Safety Committees Regulations … Continue reading Markham v Asda Stores Ltd (Health and Safety): EAT 15 Aug 2019

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissal CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT – Wrongful dismissalEmployment Tribunal found Claimant guilty of serious misconduct for which dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses; but that it did not amount to gross misconduct therefore the dismissal was unfair. Applying s98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996, finding of unfair dismissal was … Continue reading Weston Recovery Services v Fisher: EAT 7 Oct 2010

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION Whistleblowing Dismissal On an application for interim relief under sections 128-129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the Employment Judge erred in law in finding that such applications should be restricted to simple factual disputes. By doing so she added a requirement that had no statutory basis. Appeal allowed and remitted for … Continue reading Raja v The Secretary of State for Justice: EAT 15 Feb 2010

The claimant worked for the local authority under a series of contracts. The employer denied that she had been continuously employed and there was no ‘irreducible minimum mutual obligation necessary to create a contract of service’. There were times when she had no work. Held: Given the authorities there was ample reason to find a … Continue reading Cornwall County Council v Prater: CA 24 Feb 2006

Uber drivers are workers The claimant Uber drivers sought the status of workers, allowing them to claim the associated statutory employment benefits. The company now appealed from a finding that they were workers. Held: The appeal failed (Underhill LJ dissenting) The drivers accepted the control of tee Uber app: ‘Even if drivers are not obliged … Continue reading Uber Bv and Others v Aslam and Others: CA 19 Dec 2018

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Worker, employee or neitherFor 13 years the Claimant worked installing double glazing for the Respondent. In 2004 he signed a ‘contract supply agreement’ though matters continued as before. On the Respondent ceasing to use his services the Claimant claimed unfair dismissal. The Respondent asserted the Claimant was not an employee but a … Continue reading Launahurst Ltd v Larner: EAT 18 Aug 2009

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissalWhether fundamental breach of implied term of trust and confidence cured, so that the Claimant’s resignation did not amount to constructive dismissal.Whether the range of reasonable responses test has any place in the question as to whether an employee has been constructively dismissed. Fairbrother and Claridge considered and not followed.General observations … Continue reading Bournemouth University Higher Education Corp v Buckland: EAT 8 May 2009

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal The Employment Tribunal did not approach the question of constructive unfair dismissal in a last straw case by reference to the steps in Omilaju. To take an analytic approach and ask of each event whether the Claimant had proved a breach or fundamental breach of contract was an error. Appeal … Continue reading Muschett v Parkwood Healthcare: EAT 16 Mar 2009

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Compensation/Mitigation of loss The employee was unfairly constructively dismissed. She was entitled to a 6 month notice period that was not paid by the employees in that period, during some of which she received payments for temporary work from a different employer. The ET, applying Norton Tool and Burlo, did not give … Continue reading Stuart Peters Limited v Bell: EAT 22 Oct 2008

EAT CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENTJURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Worker, employee or neitherReference under s.11 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 regarding statement of commencement date of employment. Written contract issued in 2001 showing start date of 1 October 2001 but claimant having worked for the respondents since 1990. Employment Tribunal’s judgment that 1 October 2001 was an accurate … Continue reading Booth v The Scottish Daily Record and Another: EAT 19 Jun 2008

EAT Transfer of Undertakings – Where, in connection with a transfer, the transferee directs the transferor to dismiss an employee in the claim that she had previously taken the transferee to an Employment Tribunal, the employee has a claim under s104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 against the transferee. Citations: [2008] UKEAT 0616 – … Continue reading Perry’s Motor Sales Ltd and Another v Lindley: EAT 2 May 2008

An industrial tribunal hearing conducted behind the locked doors of the chairman’s office was not held in public, even if, in fact, no member of the public was prevented from attending. The obligation to sit in public was fundamental, and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to conduct itself in this way. The industrial tribunal system … Continue reading Storer v British Gas plc: CA 25 Feb 2000

EAT Contract of Employment – definition of employeeInsolvencyThe Appellants were a husband and wife who entered into contracts of employment with a company which they managed and which they between them owned 99.99% of the shares (the wife having just 51.99% and the husband 48%). When the company became insolvent they claimed against the Secretary … Continue reading Nesbitt v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry: EAT 10 Aug 2007

EAT A employed R as a support worker. R made a number of protected disclosures relating to a fellow worker’s conduct towards a client. The ET held various detriments were suffered by R on the ground of the disclosures. On appeal A asserted (1) the ET did not give adequate reasons, (2) the findings were … Continue reading Cumbria County Council v Carlisle-Morgan: EAT 29 Jan 2007

EAT The employee was the practice manager at a general medical practice. She was dismissed for dishonesty, taking unauthorised pay for overtime hours. She alleged that she had been told by the former practice manager that she should do so, but the Tribunal found that she did not raise this with any of the doctors.The … Continue reading Kelly-Madden v Manor Surgery: EAT 19 Oct 2006

The reason adduced by the union for the dismissal of the climant was found by the Tribunal on the facts not to be the true reason for dismissal, the true reason being the union executive committee’s political antipathy to Mr Brady. Held: It was highly arguable that a finding that disciplinary proceedings had been commenced … Continue reading Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen v Brady: EAT 31 Mar 2006

The claimant had been dismissed shortly after becoming unable to work. She sought payment of her normal salary during the period of notice saying this was established good practice. Held: ‘We are put in the invidious position of being bound by a Court of Appeal decision which seems to the majority to conflict with a … Continue reading Langley and Another v Burso: EAT 3 Mar 2006

EAT The claimant had worked as an adviser for the respondent identifying investment opportunities. He said he had been unfairly dismissed after disclosing that the company had overpaid for an investment. He now appealed against a finding that any disclosures were not made in good faith and were not qualifying disclosures. Though his dismissal had … Continue reading Bachnak v Emerging Markets Partnership (Europe) Ltd: EAT 27 Jan 2006

The worker was employed via an employment agency. The contract the company had was with the agency, and the agency had the contract with the worker. The worker claimed an implied contract of employment with the end-user. Held: The end-user company’s appeal failed. The ET was entitled to hold that Mr Muscat had been an … Continue reading Cable and Wireless Plc v Muscat: CA 9 Mar 2006

EAT Whether an Employment Tribunal took a permissible approach to determining that a dismissal was unfair, in circumstances in which it did not clearly set out the terms of section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Whether on the facts it substituted its own view of the occurrence and quality of misconduct for that … Continue reading Mars UK Ltd T/A Masterfoods v K Parker: EAT 24 Oct 2005

The applicant was employed as director-general, with his contract stating that his retirement age would be 70. Nobody else had a similar occupation within the organisation, and he said this therefore constituted his ‘normal age’ for retirement, entitling hiim to claim unfair dismissal. Held: The fact that only one employee was in the applicant’s class, … Continue reading Wall v The British Compressed Air Society: CA 10 Dec 2003

EAT Unfair Dismissal When an employee is dismissed and then reinstated on an internal appeal it is open to the parties to agree reinstatement as a matter of contract and such an arrangement albeit made after the gap in the continuity of employment, fills in the gap for the purposes of section 212 of the … Continue reading London Probation Board v Kirkpatrick: EAT 7 Jan 2005

Unlawful Deduction From Wages – The Claimant claimed sums that he said were due to him by way of unpaid bonus. His written contract of employment stated that any bonus was discretionary but there had been a further agreement regarding his bonus when he was promoted to General Manager in April 2015. The Respondent argued … Continue reading Bluestones Medical Recruitment Ltd v Swinnerton: EAT 18 Feb 2019

The claimant appealed against the dismissal of his unfair dismissal application. Not having two years continuous employment he had claimed the protection of section 100 as a whistleblower, but the Tribunal had found that there had been a Health and Safety Committee where he could have made known his concerns about the long hours being … Continue reading Jackson v ICS Group of Companies Ltd: EAT 22 Jan 1998

The claimant appealed against a decision that she had not been unfairly dismissed. She had been dismissed after complaints by a colleague, but had not been given the opportunity to examine him during the process. Held: An employer was not duty bound to allow an employee subject to a disciplinary hearing to cross examine those … Continue reading Santamera v Express Cargo Forwarding (T/A IEC Ltd): EAT 26 Nov 2002

The claimant alleged that she had been dismissed for making qualifying disclosures about her employers. The employer said that her actions had not been in good faith. The claimant answered that her motive was irrelevant. The claimant appealed dismissal of her claim. Held: The minimum requirement of the Act was that the disclosures were made … Continue reading Street v Derbyshire Unemployed Workers’ Centre: CA 21 Jul 2004

The claimant had been employed by the respondents, partners in a former firm of solicitors. On the retirement of one partner, the practice was continued by the sole remaining partner, who claimed that the dissolution broke the continuity of the employment so as to defeat her application for unfair dismissal. Held: The dissolution of the … Continue reading Bower v Stevens and Another: CA 6 Apr 2004

The applicant had been a head teacher. She claimed unfair dismissal. The respondents claimed that they were not her employers. The school was a community school. Held: The governors should have been the correct respondents. They held the powers consistent with the power to dismiss. A constructive dismissal claim should not be treated differently on … Continue reading Kent County Council v Green: CA 23 Jan 2004

PC (Bermuda) The courts should be reluctant to accept a fetter on the employer’s right to dismiss on notice where there is an express term in the contract empowering the employer to do so. Lord Millet considered the contention that the employer was duty bound to preserve the relationship of trust and confidence: ‘which ought … Continue reading Reda, Abdul-Jalil v Flag Limited: PC 11 Jul 2002

The complainant appealed a decision that she had not been constructively dismissed. She had been told off in public, causing her great distress. The tribunal had found the employer’s behaviour regrettable but not such as to break the duty of trust and confidence. It was argued that any breach of that duty must go to … Continue reading Morrow v Safeway Stores Plc: EAT 21 Sep 2000

ECJ Despite the limited character of the harmonization of rules in respect of collective redundancies which Directive 75/129 was intended to bring about, national rules which, by not providing for a system for the designation of workers’ representatives in an undertaking where an employer refuses to recognize such representatives, allow an employer to frustrate the … Continue reading Commission v United Kingdom (Judgment): ECJ 8 Jun 1994

The claimant doctor had been dismissed. He said it was unfairly, and the Trust replied that he had been made redundant ‘for some other reason’ since he had nt acceted new conditions of work. Held: The employee’s appeal failed. The EAT had re-iterated the conclusion that there had been no diminution of the need for … Continue reading Shawkat v Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust: CA 21 Jun 2001

The claimants worked for Rotaprint when it went into receivership in 1988, and then for the receiver before being transferred to Pan Graphics. Statutory redundany payments were made on the receivership of Rotaprint. The claimants sought further redundancy payment on the insolvency of Rotaprint. The Secretary now appealed the decision of the EAT that payments … Continue reading Lassman and Others v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry: CA 19 Apr 2000

An employee did not return to work after a presentation to him of a good service award, because he had drunk alcohol. A new policy required staff not to return to work after consuming alcohol, but had also said that alcohol would not be provided. Held: The tribunal had failed to look properly at how … Continue reading Haddon v Van Den Bergh Foods Ltd: EAT 10 Nov 1999