EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Interim relief
Explanation of meaning of ‘likely’ given in Taplin v C Shippam Ltd [1978] IRLR 450 held not to have been invalidated by SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle [2009] IRLR 746 and to represent the correct approach in applications under section 128 of Employment Rights Act 1996
Observations on nature of evidence required in interim relief applications
OTE: This decision, having been made at a preliminary hearing, was not at first put on the Tribunal’s website – But it has been thought right to do so now, since the Appellant has been refused permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal (in fact, refused twice because of an unusual procedural history), but the decisions in question are not on BAILII ([2010] EWCA Civ 305 and 785) and may be overlooked.
Citations:
[2009] UKEAT 0408 – 09 – 1011
Links:
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 21 August 2022; Ref: scu.421018
