Search Results for: Equality Act 2010 18

Click the case name for better results:

Hurley and Moore, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills: Admn 17 Feb 2012

The applicants, intending university students, challenged the decision to raise to andpound;9,000 per annum, the fees which might be charged by qualifying universities.Elias LJ said: ‘Contrary to a submission advanced by Ms Mountfield, I do not accept that this means that it is for the court to determine whether appropriate weight has been given to … Continue reading Hurley and Moore, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills: Admn 17 Feb 2012

C, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 1 Nov 2017

This case is about how the Department for Work and Pensions (the DWP), in administering our complex welfare benefits system, treats people with a reassigned gender, and specifically whether certain policies conflict (1) with the Gender Recognition Act 2004; (2) with the Human Rights Act 1998; or (3) with the Equality Act 2010. The claimant … Continue reading C, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 1 Nov 2017

P v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: SC 25 Oct 2017

This appeal concerns the directly effective right of police officers under EU law to have the principle of equal treatment applied to them. The question raised is whether the enforcement of that right by means of proceedings in the Employment Tribunal is barred by the principle of judicial immunity, where the allegedly discriminatory conduct is … Continue reading P v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis: SC 25 Oct 2017

Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 23 Jul 1999

The police had arrested three peaceful but vociferous preachers when some members of a crowd gathered round them threatened hostility. Held: Freedom of speech means nothing unless it includes the freedom to be irritating, contentious, eccentric, heretical, unwelcome and provocative provided it did not tend to provoke violence. There was no reasonable inference available in … Continue reading Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 23 Jul 1999

Cowie and Others v Scottish Fire and Rescue Service: EAT 13 Jun 2022

Disability discrimination – section 15 Equality Act 2010 – unfavourable treatment Disability discrimination – remedy – injury to feelings Sex discrimination – section 19 Equality Act 2010 – indirect discrimination – disadvantage During the coronavirus pandemic, as a response to the need for a number of its staff to remain at home either because they … Continue reading Cowie and Others v Scottish Fire and Rescue Service: EAT 13 Jun 2022

Belhaj and Another v Straw and Others: SC 17 Jan 2017

The claimant alleged complicity by the defendant, (now former) Foreign Secretary, in his mistreatment by the US while held in Libya. He also alleged involvement in his unlawful abduction and removal to Libya, from which had had fled for political persecution. The defendants now appealed from rejection of the defendants’ claim to state immunity and … Continue reading Belhaj and Another v Straw and Others: SC 17 Jan 2017

Alcom Ltd v Republic of Colombia: HL 1984

A bank account used to cover the day-to-day expenses of an Embassy, clearly served sovereign purposes and therefore was immune from enforcement measures. The Act of 1978 must be read against the background of customary international law current in 1978. It is highly unlikely that Parliament intended to require United Kingdom courts to act contrary … Continue reading Alcom Ltd v Republic of Colombia: HL 1984

Holland v Lampen-Wolfe: HL 20 Jul 2000

The US established a base at Menwith Hill in Yorkshire, and provided educational services through its staff to staff families. The claimant a teacher employed at the base alleged that a report on her was defamatory. The defendant relied on state immunity. Held: A claim in libel was defeated by a claim of sovereign immunity. … Continue reading Holland v Lampen-Wolfe: HL 20 Jul 2000

London Borough of Hounslow v Powell, Leeds City Council v Hall etc: SC 23 Feb 2011

In each case the tenant occupied the property as his home, but was not a secure tenant of the local authority. The Court was asked whether, in granting a possession order in such a case, the court was obliged to consider the proportionality of the order requested. Powell had been given emergency accomodation as a … Continue reading London Borough of Hounslow v Powell, Leeds City Council v Hall etc: SC 23 Feb 2011

Harrison v Aryman Ltd (Admissibility of Evidence): EAT 27 Aug 2019

Following her resignation, the Claimant presented a claim form. The Respondent had written her a letter in August 2016 proposing that her employment be terminated on the basis of a settlement agreement. Her case was that this was a reaction to the news that she was pregnant, that there had been a history of various … Continue reading Harrison v Aryman Ltd (Admissibility of Evidence): EAT 27 Aug 2019

Britliff v Birmingham City Council (Disability Discrimination): EAT 16 Aug 2019

The Claimant is pursuing claims of disability discrimination in the Employment Tribunal, which are defended. It is common ground between the parties that for the purposes of an Equality Act 2010 claim the 2006 United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has indirect effect. At a Preliminary Hearing the Employment Tribunal correctly … Continue reading Britliff v Birmingham City Council (Disability Discrimination): EAT 16 Aug 2019

Town and Country Glasgow Ltd v Munro (Maternity Rights and Parental Leave — Sex Discrimination): EAT 23 Jul 2019

Sex discrimination – pregnancy and discrimination; Contract Workers; Jurisdiction Contract of employment Maternity Rights and Parental leave – sex discrimination In this case the Employment Appeal Tribunal heard an appeal against the Employment Tribunal’s decision under s 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010. The EAT allowed the appeal and concluded on the facts found proved … Continue reading Town and Country Glasgow Ltd v Munro (Maternity Rights and Parental Leave — Sex Discrimination): EAT 23 Jul 2019

Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban, etc: SC 6 Oct 2011

(Scotland) The appellant had variously been convicted in reliance on evidence gathered at different stages before arrest, but in each case without being informed of any right to see a solicitor. The court was asked, as a devolution issue, at what point the duty to allow access to a solicitor arose, and what use might … Continue reading Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban, etc: SC 6 Oct 2011

Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 14 Dec 2009

The claimant, an EU national, came to the UK to join her son. He had worked but became dependent on benefits. She sought payment of the State Pension. Held: A refusal to pay the pension would dissuade workers from moving around within the EU, and was therefore contrary to EU law and the Citizens Directive. … Continue reading Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 14 Dec 2009

Essop and Others v Home Office (UK Border Agency): SC 5 Apr 2017

The appellants alleged indirect race and belief discrimination in the conditions of their employment by the respondent. Essop came as lead claimant challenging the tests used for promotion. Statistics showed lower pass rates for BME candidates, but with no explanation of the connection. Naaem was an imam. He began as a part time prison chaplain, … Continue reading Essop and Others v Home Office (UK Border Agency): SC 5 Apr 2017

Kennedy v The Charity Commission: SC 26 Mar 2014

The claimant journalist sought disclosure of papers acquired by the respondent in its conduct of enquiries into the charitable Mariam appeal. The Commission referred to an absolute exemption under section 32(2) of the 2000 Act, saying that the exemption continued until the papers were destroyed, or for 20 years under the 1958 Act. Held: The … Continue reading Kennedy v The Charity Commission: SC 26 Mar 2014

A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2): HL 8 Dec 2005

Evidence from 3rd Party Torture Inadmissible The applicants had been detained following the issue of certificates issued by the respondent that they posed a terrorist threat. They challenged the decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission saying that evidence underlying the decisions had probably been obtained by torture committed by foreign powers, and should not … Continue reading A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2): HL 8 Dec 2005

Amin, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 16 Oct 2003

Prisoner’s death – need for full public enquiry The deceased had been a young Asian prisoner. He was placed in a cell overnight with a prisoner known to be racist, extremely violent and mentally unstable. He was killed. The family sought an inquiry into the death. Held: There had been a police investigation and trial … Continue reading Amin, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 16 Oct 2003

Naeem v The Secretary of State for Justice: CA 9 Dec 2015

The claimant appealed against rejection of his claim for discrimination when under the 1952 Act, there was a requirement to appoint a member as pastor of the prison a Clergyman of the Church of England, and other chaplains, including himself, an imam, were paid less. Held: The claimant’s appeal failed. It was not enough to … Continue reading Naeem v The Secretary of State for Justice: CA 9 Dec 2015

A Ltd v Z: EAT 28 Mar 2019

Disability related discrimination – section 15(2) – knowledge; section 15(1)(b) – justification; loss and mitigation; compensation It was accepted that the Claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 – by reason of the fact she suffered from mental and psychiatric impairments, namely stress, depression, low mood and schizophrenia – … Continue reading A Ltd v Z: EAT 28 Mar 2019

Birtenshaw v Oldfield: EAT 11 Apr 2019

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Disability related discrimination The Claimant was employed by the Respondent, a provider of services for adults and children with special needs, as a care worker on a temporary basis. She applied for and was granted a permanent position, but subject to medical clearance. Following receipt of a medical report, the Respondent withdrew … Continue reading Birtenshaw v Oldfield: EAT 11 Apr 2019

The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) v Lloyd (Age Discrimination): EAT 15 Mar 2019

The Claimant was a member and branch secretary of the Respondent trade union. At the age of 62, he was nominated to stand for election to the Respondent’s National Executive Committee for the requisite three-year term. His nomination was rejected by the Respondent on the basis of a rule in its Rulebook which did not … Continue reading The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) v Lloyd (Age Discrimination): EAT 15 Mar 2019

Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust: CA 7 Mar 2007

The employer had applied to strike out their employee’s claim for unfair dismissal, and also sought a deposit from the claimant. The claim had been re-instated by the EAT. Held: A claim should not be struck out where, as here, there were facts in dispute between the parties which might affect the decision. It was … Continue reading Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust: CA 7 Mar 2007

Taylor v OCS Group Ltd: CA 31 May 2006

The employer appealed against findings of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The employee worked in IT. He was profoundly deaf, but could lip read and read sign language. He had been accused of obtaining improper access to a senior staff member’s emails. During the disciplinary hearing, he had been assisted by an interpreter for part … Continue reading Taylor v OCS Group Ltd: CA 31 May 2006

McLeary v One Housing Group Ltd: EAT 6 Feb 2019

JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Claim in time and effective date of termination DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION Following her resignation, the Appellant complained of various types of disability discrimination and of constructive unfair dismissal. At a Preliminary Hearing the Judge determined that all the complaints of discrimination during employment were out of time and that it was not just … Continue reading McLeary v One Housing Group Ltd: EAT 6 Feb 2019

Sinclair v Her Majesty’s Advocate: PC 11 May 2005

(Devolution) The defendant complained that the prosecutor had failed to disclose all the witness statements taken, which hid inconsistencies in their versions of events. Held: The appeal was allowed. It was fundamental to a fair trial that the parties have equality of arms, but in a criminal trial the rights were entirely in the defendant. … Continue reading Sinclair v Her Majesty’s Advocate: PC 11 May 2005

Prasad v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: EAT 23 Jan 2019

HARASSMENT – Conduct SEX DISCRIMINATION – Continuing act JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: just and equitable The Claimant’s complaints included one of harassment related to sex, by a colleague having sent an anonymous letter criticising her handling of a patient’s care, to five recipients. The Respondent’s case was that the sender acted solely from … Continue reading Prasad v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: EAT 23 Jan 2019

Iforce Ltd v Wood: EAT 3 Jan 2019

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Disability related discrimination The Claimant was employed by the Respondent to work in its warehouse. She was a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (‘EqA’) by reason of suffering osteoarthritis. It was her perception (supported by her GP) that her symptoms worsened in cold and damp weather. When … Continue reading Iforce Ltd v Wood: EAT 3 Jan 2019

Menson v United Kingdom: ECHR 6 May 2003

There had been a racist attack. The victim was set on fire and killed in the street by assailants. His relatives sought compensation. However the assailants were not agents of the state and they were duly prosecuted, convicted and sentenced. No blame attached to state authorities for the killing and no breach of the state’s … Continue reading Menson v United Kingdom: ECHR 6 May 2003

Jasper v The United Kingdom: ECHR 16 Feb 2000

Grand Chamber – The defendants had been convicted after the prosecution had withheld evidence from them and from the judge under public interest immunity certificates. They complained that they had not had fair trials. Held: The right was breached insofar as the prosecution had themselves sought to make that assessment without judicial involvement. Disclosure at … Continue reading Jasper v The United Kingdom: ECHR 16 Feb 2000

Loizidou v Turkey: ECHR 23 Mar 1995

(Preliminary objections) The ECHR considered the situation in northern Cyprus when it was asked as to Turkey’s preliminary objections to admissibility: ‘although Article 1 sets limits on the reach of the Convention, the concept of ‘jurisdiction’ under this provision is not restricted to the national territory of the High Contracting Parties. According to its established … Continue reading Loizidou v Turkey: ECHR 23 Mar 1995

Dombo Beheer BV v The Netherlands: ECHR 27 Oct 1993

‘under the principle of equality of arms, as one of the features of the wider concept of a fair trial, each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a disadvantage vis-a-vis his opponent ‘ and ‘the contracting states have greater latitude when dealing … Continue reading Dombo Beheer BV v The Netherlands: ECHR 27 Oct 1993

Core Issues Trust v Transport for London: Admn 22 Mar 2013

The claimant sought judicial review of the decision made by TfL not to allow an advertisement on behalf of the Trust to appear on the outside of its buses. It was to read: ‘NOT GAY! EX-GAY, POST-GAY AND PROUD. GET OVER IT!’. The decision was said to be based on the resondent’s policies. The respondent … Continue reading Core Issues Trust v Transport for London: Admn 22 Mar 2013

MA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 9 Nov 2016

The appellants claimed housing benefit. They appealed against rejection of their claims that the imposition of limits to the maximum sums payable, ‘the bedroom tax’, was unlawful on equality grounds. The claimants either had disabilities, or lived with dependent family with disabilities, or live in what are known as ‘sanctuary scheme’ homes (accommodation specially adapted … Continue reading MA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 9 Nov 2016

Jones v Ministry of Interior for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and others: HL 14 Jun 2006

The claimants said that they had been tortured by Saudi police when arrested on false charges. They sought damages, and appealed against an order denying jurisdiction over the defendants. They said that the allegation of torture allowed an exception to state immunity. Held: The Kingdom’s appeal succeeded. The protection of state immunity was essentially a … Continue reading Jones v Ministry of Interior for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and others: HL 14 Jun 2006

National Association of Health Stores and Another, Regina (on the Application of) v Department of Health: CA 22 Feb 2005

Applications were made to strike down regulations governing the use of the herbal product kava-kava. Held: The omission of any transtitional provisions had not affected anyone. Nor was the failure to consult as to the possibility of dealing with the issue by use of a warning label fatal to the regulations. The Minister’s own personal … Continue reading National Association of Health Stores and Another, Regina (on the Application of) v Department of Health: CA 22 Feb 2005

Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen (Sex Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Harassment): EAT 12 Feb 2019

SEX DISCRIMINATION – Direct SEX DISCRIMINATION – Indirect RELIGION OR BELIEF DISCRIMINATION HARASSMENT The Appeal Tribunal dismissed appeals against findings that the Respondent had been subjected to direct sex discrimination and harassment. The Tribunal’s findings of fact were a sufficient basis for its conclusions on each of these claims. The Appeal Tribunal allowed the Appellant’s … Continue reading Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen (Sex Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Harassment): EAT 12 Feb 2019

Hoareau and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs: Admn 8 Feb 2019

Challenge to resettlement arrangements for population removed from Chagos Islands. Judges: Singh LJ, Carr J Citations: [2019] EWHC 221 (Admin), [2019] WLR(D) 85 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Equality Act 2010 149 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Human Rights, Constitutional Updated: 27 April 2022; Ref: scu.633412

Hurst, Regina (on the Application of) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v London Northern District Coroner: HL 28 Mar 2007

The claimant’s son had been stabbed to death. She challenged the refusal of the coroner to continue with the inquest with a view to examining the responsibility of any of the police in having failed to protect him. Held: The question amounted to asking whether the coroner’s decision on the resumption should have been affected … Continue reading Hurst, Regina (on the Application of) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v London Northern District Coroner: HL 28 Mar 2007

Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and Department of Health and Social Security: HL 17 Oct 1985

Lawfulness of Contraceptive advice for Girls The claimant had young daughters. She challenged advice given to doctors by the second respondent allowing them to give contraceptive advice to girls under 16, and the right of the first defendant to act upon that advice. She objected that the advice infringed her rights as a parent, and … Continue reading Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and Department of Health and Social Security: HL 17 Oct 1985

Stec and Others v United Kingdom: ECHR 12 Apr 2006

(Grand Chamber) The claimants said that differences between the sexes in the payment of reduced earning allowances and retirement allowances were sex discrimination. Held: The differences were not infringing sex discrimination. The differences arose from the differences in pensionable ages for men and women introduced in 1940 in order to help remedy severe social inequalities … Continue reading Stec and Others v United Kingdom: ECHR 12 Apr 2006

Kumar v DHL Services Ltd: EAT 8 Sep 2017

EAT RACE DISCRIMINATION – Direct RACE DISCRIMINATION – Burden of proof Direct race discrimination – burden of proof – section 136 Equality Act 2010 – whether the Employment Tribunal had wrongly imported the first stage test into its scrutiny of the Respondent’s explanation at the second stage – whether it had, in any event, subjected … Continue reading Kumar v DHL Services Ltd: EAT 8 Sep 2017

Farmah v Birmingham City Council (1): EAT 20 Jun 2017

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissal Procedure – Rule 9 of the Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013 – Equal Pay Claims – Inclusion of Claims by Two or More Claimants On the Same Claim Form – Whether Irregular – Whether Discretion to Strike out – Whether Appropriate to Exercise Discretion to Strike Out Claims or Waive … Continue reading Farmah v Birmingham City Council (1): EAT 20 Jun 2017

A B Conteh v First Security (Guards) Ltd: EAT 11 Sep 2017

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Amendment Although the Claimant had apparently considered he might have been subjected to detriment and subsequently dismissed for making protected disclosures, when he lodged his ET claim he did not include such a claim but made complaints of unfair dismissal (under section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996) and unlawful race … Continue reading A B Conteh v First Security (Guards) Ltd: EAT 11 Sep 2017

Ward and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: CA 16 Apr 2019

Challenge to housing policy as discriminatory against Irish travellers or Kurdish refugees. Judges: Underhill VP, Lewison, King LJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 692, [2019] WLR(D) 244, [2019] PTSR 1738 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Housing Act 1996 166A, Children Act 2004 11(2), Equality Act 2010 19 29 149 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – … Continue reading Ward and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: CA 16 Apr 2019

The Guinness Partnership v Szymoniak (Disability Discrimination): EAT 10 Jul 2017

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Disability Disability discrimination – definition of disability – section 6 Equality Act 2010 (‘EqA’) The Claimant, who was pursuing a complaint of disability discrimination, claimed that he met the definition of a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 EqA by reason of what he contended were the long-term substantial … Continue reading The Guinness Partnership v Szymoniak (Disability Discrimination): EAT 10 Jul 2017

Birmingham City Council v Lawrence (Disability Discrimination): EAT 2 Jun 2017

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Section 15 DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Reasonable adjustments UNFAIR DISMISSAL -Reasonableness of dismissal Disability discrimination – discrimination by means of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability – section 15 Equality Act 2010 Disability discrimination – discrimination by means of a failure to comply with a duty to make … Continue reading Birmingham City Council v Lawrence (Disability Discrimination): EAT 2 Jun 2017

Interserve Fm Ltd v Tuleikyte: EAT 14 Mar 2017

EAT Sex Discrimination: Direct – Pregnancy and discrimination In respect of a single finding of unfavourable treatment because of absence on maternity leave under section 18(4) Equality Act 2010, the Employment Tribunal did not apply the correct legal test, wrongly treating the case as a ‘criterion’ type case rather than a ‘reasons why’ type case: … Continue reading Interserve Fm Ltd v Tuleikyte: EAT 14 Mar 2017

Hertfordshire Police v Van Colle; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police: HL 30 Jul 2008

Police Obligations to Witnesses is Limited A prosecution witness was murdered by the accused shortly before his trial. The parents of the deceased alleged that the failure of the police to protect their son was a breach of article 2. Held: The House was asked ‘If the police are alerted to a threat that D … Continue reading Hertfordshire Police v Van Colle; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police: HL 30 Jul 2008

DA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 15 May 2019

Several lone parents challenged the benefits cap, saying that it was discriminatory. Held: (Hale, Kerr LL dissenting) The parents’ appeals failed. The legislation had a clear impact on lone parents and their children. The intention was to encourage claimants back into work. It was said that thus contradicted the other policy of providing no free … Continue reading DA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 15 May 2019

Lubbe (Suing As Administrator Of The Estate Of Rachel Jacoba Lubbe) and 4 Others v Cape plc and Related Appeals: HL 22 Jun 2000

South African asbestosis victims suing in England submitted that to stay their proceedings in favour of the South African forum would violate their article 6 rights. A stay was refused on the non-Convention ground that, because of the lack of funding and legal representation in South Africa, they would be denied a fair trial on … Continue reading Lubbe (Suing As Administrator Of The Estate Of Rachel Jacoba Lubbe) and 4 Others v Cape plc and Related Appeals: HL 22 Jun 2000

Donald v AVC Media Enterprises Ltd: EAT 9 Nov 2016

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Mitigation of Loss – DISCRIMINATION: JURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Extension of time: just and equitable In a case where the claimant had succeeded in a claim of constructive unfair dismissal, the Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to mitigation of loss. The judgment contained no acknowledgment of where the onus of proof lay. … Continue reading Donald v AVC Media Enterprises Ltd: EAT 9 Nov 2016

City of York Council v Grosset: EAT 1 Nov 2016

EAT Disability Discrimination – Section 15 DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Justification UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissal Appeal Disability discrimination – unfavourable treatment because of something arising from the consequences of disability – justification – section 15 Equality Act 2010 (‘EqA’) The Claimant – Head of English at a secondary comprehensive school operated by the Respondent … Continue reading City of York Council v Grosset: EAT 1 Nov 2016

Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security: HL 2 Jan 1981

The court was asked whether nurses could properly involve themselves in a pregnancy termination procedure not known when the Act was passed, and in particular, whether a pregnancy was ‘terminated by a medical practitioner’, when it was carried out by nurses acting on the instructions of such a practitioner. Held: The phrase ‘treatment for the … Continue reading Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security: HL 2 Jan 1981

Tyrrell v HM Senior Coroner County Durham and Darlington and Another: Admn 26 Jul 2016

The court was aked what article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights requires of a coroner when a serving prisoner dies of natural causes. Held: The reuest for judicial review failed. Mr Tyrrell’s death was, from the outset, one which was clearly from natural causes. The cause of death was established and then … Continue reading Tyrrell v HM Senior Coroner County Durham and Darlington and Another: Admn 26 Jul 2016

Vodafone Ltd v Winfield (Jurisdictional Points: Extension of Time: Just and Equitable): EAT 25 Apr 2016

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: just and equitable UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissal The Employment Tribunal did not err in law in its application of section 123(1) of the Equality Act 2010. It did not err in law, nor was it perverse, in deciding that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed. David Richardson … Continue reading Vodafone Ltd v Winfield (Jurisdictional Points: Extension of Time: Just and Equitable): EAT 25 Apr 2016

Taiwo and Another v Olaigbe and Others: SC 22 Jun 2016

The claimants had been brought here illegally to act as servants for the defendants. They were taken advantage of and abused. They made several claims, but now appealed against rejection of their claims for discrimination. The court was asked whether discrimination because of, or on grounds of, immigration status amounts to discrimination because of, or … Continue reading Taiwo and Another v Olaigbe and Others: SC 22 Jun 2016

Kelly v Covance Laboratories Ltd (Race Discrimination: Direct): EAT 20 Oct 2015

EAT HARASSMENT – Conduct HARASSMENT – Purpose Equality Act 2010 sections 13(1), 23 and 26 In circumstances in which the Claimant had been instructed not to speak Russian in the workplace, had the Employment Tribunal erred in dismissing her claims of direct race (national origins) discrimination and/or harassment related to her race (national origins)? Held: … Continue reading Kelly v Covance Laboratories Ltd (Race Discrimination: Direct): EAT 20 Oct 2015

McCann and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 6 Oct 1995

Wrong assumptions made by police officers in the killing of terrorists amounted to a human rights breach, despite the existence of danger to the public of an imminent attack. Article 2(1) is ‘one of the most fundamental provisions in the Convention’. It would have been incumbent on the state to conduct a ‘thorough, impartial and … Continue reading McCann and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 6 Oct 1995

Middleton, Regina (on the Application of) v Coroner for the Western District of Somerset: HL 11 Mar 2004

The deceased had committed suicide in prison. His family felt that the risk should have been known to the prison authorities, and that they had failed to guard against that risk. The coroner had requested an explanatory note from the jury. Held: The jury should indeed have been given opportunity to explain their verdict: ‘By … Continue reading Middleton, Regina (on the Application of) v Coroner for the Western District of Somerset: HL 11 Mar 2004

Regina v Special Adjudicator ex parte Ullah; Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 17 Jun 2004

The applicants had had their requests for asylum refused. They complained that if they were removed from the UK, their article 3 rights would be infringed. If they were returned to Pakistan or Vietnam they would be persecuted for their religious faiths. Held: A distinction was to be made between domestic cases involving actions within … Continue reading Regina v Special Adjudicator ex parte Ullah; Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 17 Jun 2004

Johns and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Derby City Council and Another: Admn 28 Feb 2011

The claimants had acted as foster carers for several years, but challenged a potential decision to discontinue that when, as committed Christians, they refused to sign to agree to treat without differentiation any child brought to them who might be homosexual. A declaration was sought as to the legality of the proposed decision. Held: A … Continue reading Johns and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Derby City Council and Another: Admn 28 Feb 2011

The Basildon Academies Trust v Polius-Curran: EAT 23 Jun 2015

EAT Race Discrimination : Continuing Act – JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: just and equitable RACE DISCRIMINATION – Direct Limitation – whether a continuing act – whether just and equitable to extend time. Substantively, the Employment Tribunal failed to consider the Respondent’s explanation at Stage 2 of Igen v Wong. Employer’s appeal allowed. Case … Continue reading The Basildon Academies Trust v Polius-Curran: EAT 23 Jun 2015

Hunt v North Somerset Council: SC 22 Jul 2015

The appellant had sought judicial review of a decision of the respondent to approve a Revenue Budget for 2012/13 as to the provision of youth services. He applied for declarations that the respondent had failed to comply with section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 and section 507B of the Education Act 1996 and for … Continue reading Hunt v North Somerset Council: SC 22 Jul 2015

Suhail v Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals and Another: EAT 11 Jun 2015

EAT Jurisdictional Points: Worker, Employee or Neither – Whether a GP, whose services were provided to the Trust through a Cooperative, was a worker under section 230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996. The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that he was not. Whether the Claimant had abandoned an argument that he was a worker under … Continue reading Suhail v Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals and Another: EAT 11 Jun 2015

Kay and Another v London Borough of Lambeth and others; Leeds City Council v Price and others and others: HL 8 Mar 2006

In each case the local authority sought to recover possession of its own land. In the Lambeth case, they asserted this right as against an overstaying former tenant, and in the Leeds case as against gypsies. In each case the occupiers said that the recovery of possession interfered with their right respect for their family … Continue reading Kay and Another v London Borough of Lambeth and others; Leeds City Council v Price and others and others: HL 8 Mar 2006

Engel And Others v The Netherlands (1): ECHR 8 Jun 1976

The court was asked whether proceedings in a military court against soldiers for disciplinary offences involved criminal charges within the meaning of Article 6(1): ‘In this connection, it is first necessary to know whether the provision(s) defining the offence charged belong, according to the legal system of the respondent State, to criminal law, disciplinary law … Continue reading Engel And Others v The Netherlands (1): ECHR 8 Jun 1976

Swansea University Pension and Assurance Scheme (The Trustees of) and Another v Williams (Disability Discrimination: Justification): EAT 21 Jul 2015

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Justification; Disability Related Discrimination The Claimant accepted ill-health retirement at 38, because his disabilities were such that he could no longer continue in post. He was entitled to a pension calculated as if he had worked on until retirement age, which was to be paid immediately upon retirement and without actuarial … Continue reading Swansea University Pension and Assurance Scheme (The Trustees of) and Another v Williams (Disability Discrimination: Justification): EAT 21 Jul 2015

Williams v Swansea University Pension and Assurance Scheme Swansea University: CA 14 Jul 2017

The claimant argued that the pension scheme of his defendant former employers was discriminatory. As a final salary scheme he would receive a lower payment having had to take early ill health retirement. Helld: His appeal failed: ‘No authority was cited to us to support the view that a disabled person who is treated advantageously … Continue reading Williams v Swansea University Pension and Assurance Scheme Swansea University: CA 14 Jul 2017

London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm: HL 25 Jun 2008

Unrelated Detriment was no Discrimination The tenant had left his flat and sublet it so as to allow the landlord authority an apparently unanswerable claim for possession. The authority appealed a finding that they had to take into account the fact that the tenant was disabled and make reasonable adjustments. Held: The authority’s appeal succeeded. … Continue reading London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm: HL 25 Jun 2008

Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2): SC 19 Jun 2013

The bank challenged measures taken by HM Treasury to restrict access to the United Kingdom’s financial markets by a major Iranian commercial bank, Bank Mellat, on the account of its alleged connection with Iran’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programmes. The bank sought to have the direction given under section 7 of the 2008 Act. … Continue reading Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2): SC 19 Jun 2013

Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM: CA 20 Dec 2021

This second appeal arises from a claim for possession of rented residential premises and concerns the impact on such a claim of the public sector equality duty (‘the PSED’), set out in s. 149 of the Equality Act 2010. Lord Justice Green, Lord Justice Nugee, And, Lord Justice Snowden [2021] EWCA Civ 1890 Bailii, Judiciary … Continue reading Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM: CA 20 Dec 2021

Saad v University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust and Another: EAT 4 Dec 2014

EAT Disability Discrimination: Disability The Appellant was a Specialist Registrar in cardiothoracic surgery. He contended that he had a disability within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. He had an impairment in the form of a depressive and general anxiety disorder. He contended that the impairment had a substantial and long-term … Continue reading Saad v University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust and Another: EAT 4 Dec 2014

MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 31 Jul 2014

The appellant, a male to female transsexual, had remained married to her wife despite having the right to have the marriage annulled following the 2004 Act. She now appealed against rejection of her claim to a state pension on attaining the age of 60. She had not applied for a Gender Recognition Certificate because she … Continue reading MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 31 Jul 2014

Aster Communities Ltd v Akerman-Livingstone: CA 30 Jul 2014

The respondent tenant had resisted possession proceedings on the basis of his disability. Held: The court facing such a defence should treat it in the same way as it would an argument that the tenat’s article 8 Human rights were threatened. Arden, Black, Briggs LJJ [2014] EWCA Civ 1081, [2014] WLR(D) 350 Bailii, WLRD European … Continue reading Aster Communities Ltd v Akerman-Livingstone: CA 30 Jul 2014

Kanu v The London Borough of Southwark: CA 29 Jul 2014

Mr Kanu, aged 48, had physical problems, including back pain, hepatitis B, hypertension and haemorrhoids, as well as psychotic symptoms and suicidal ideation. His wife assisted him in taking the necessary drugs, but stress would raise his hypertension to ‘quite dangerous levels’, requiring an increase in the dose of the relevant drugs. An order for … Continue reading Kanu v The London Borough of Southwark: CA 29 Jul 2014

Williams v Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research: EAT 6 Feb 2014

EAT Disability Discrimination : Disability – Decision of the Employment Judge that the Claimant had failed to establish recurring or fluctuation effects of his impairment for the requisite period or extent upheld. There was no error of law or perversity in the decision that the Claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of … Continue reading Williams v Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research: EAT 6 Feb 2014

Lyons v DWP Jobcentre Plus: EAT 14 Jan 2014

EAT Sex Discrimination : Direct – Pregnancy and discrimination The Claimant appealed against the Employment Tribunal’s dismissal of her complaints of direct sex discrimination and/or pregnancy and maternity discrimination under ss. 13 and 18 of the Equality Act 2010. She was dismissed for periods of absence due to post-natal depression arising after her period of … Continue reading Lyons v DWP Jobcentre Plus: EAT 14 Jan 2014

Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence: EAT 16 Jul 2013

EAT Disability Discrimination : Reasonable Adjustments Langstaff J P [2013] UKEAT 0227 – 13 – 1607 Bailii Equality Act 2010 England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence CA 13-May-2014 The appellant was employed by the respondents working in Germany. Her daughter suffered chronic illness and she wished to care … Continue reading Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence: EAT 16 Jul 2013

Allan v Wandsworth Borough Council and Others: EAT 11 Jul 2013

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissal DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Discrimination by other bodies Local Authority member and chair of a committee, removal as chair – section 58(1) and (4) of the Equality Act 2010. Supperstone J [2013] UKEAT 0049 – 13 – 1107 Bailii Equality Act 2010 58(1) 58(4) England and Wales Employment Updated: 26 … Continue reading Allan v Wandsworth Borough Council and Others: EAT 11 Jul 2013

Halawi v WDFG UK Ltd (T/A World Duty Free) and Another: EAT 4 Oct 2013

EAT Contract of Employment : Whether Established – The Claimant worked in a World Duty Free outlet at an airport, selling Shiseido cosmetic products airside. Her security clearance to do so was withdrawn by R1, and she claimed that she had thereby been unfairly dismissed and discriminated against. To claim this she had to show … Continue reading Halawi v WDFG UK Ltd (T/A World Duty Free) and Another: EAT 4 Oct 2013

Hunt, Regina (on The Application of) v North Somerset Council: CA 6 Nov 2013

Appeal against an order dismissing the challenge by the appellant, to the lawfulness of the decision of the respondent, the Council to cut its Youth Services budget for the year 2012/2013. The claimant suffered ADHD and relied on services supported by the Council. Judicial review had been refused. Held: The court upheld the appellant’s argument … Continue reading Hunt, Regina (on The Application of) v North Somerset Council: CA 6 Nov 2013

Copeland v E Coomes (Holdings) Ltd (Age Discrimination): EAT 13 Jun 2013

EAT AGE DISCRIMINATION UNFAIR DISMISSAL Automatically unfair reasons Reason for dismissal including substantial other reason The reason for the Claimant’s dismissal was retirement. The Employment Tribunal erred in holding that the Claimant’s claim of age discrimination failed by application of Regulation 30 of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 when the 2006 regulations had been … Continue reading Copeland v E Coomes (Holdings) Ltd (Age Discrimination): EAT 13 Jun 2013

Ladele v London Borough of Islington: CA 15 Dec 2009

The appellant was employed as a registrar. She refused to preside at same sex partnership ceremonies, saying that they conflicted with her Christian beliefs. Held: The council’s decision had clearly disadvantaged the claimant, and the question was whether its policies were a proportionate way of achieving a legitimate aim. They were. The overarching policy was … Continue reading Ladele v London Borough of Islington: CA 15 Dec 2009

British Airways Plc v Mak and Others: CA 24 Feb 2011

The court was asked whether the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear claims of age discrimination brought by the appellant’s employees, based in Hong Kong, but working as crew on flights between there and London. Held: The appeal failed: ‘There was no error of law in the ET’s ruling that Ms Mak did ‘her work … Continue reading British Airways Plc v Mak and Others: CA 24 Feb 2011

National Secular Society and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Bideford Town Council: Admn 10 Feb 2012

The claimant challenged the placing of a prayer on the agenda of the respondent’s meetings. Held: The claim succeeded. The placing of such elements on the Agenda was outside the powers given to the Council, and the action was ultra vires: ‘S111 is the statutory expression of the powers implied by common law for corporations. … Continue reading National Secular Society and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Bideford Town Council: Admn 10 Feb 2012

Drozd and Janousek v France and Spain: ECHR 26 Jun 1992

The applicants complained of the unfairness of their trial in Andorra (which the Court held it had no jurisdiction to investigate) and of their detention in France, which was not found to violate article 5. Held: Member states are obliged to refuse their co-operation with another state if it emerges that a conviction ‘is the … Continue reading Drozd and Janousek v France and Spain: ECHR 26 Jun 1992

Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union: CA 14 May 2009

The parties disputed whether the inclusion of length of service within a selection matrix for redundancy purposes would amount to unlawful age discrimination. The court was asked whether it was correct to make a declaratory judgment when the case had otherwise been effectively settled. Held: With considerable misgivings, the court agreed to hear the appeal. … Continue reading Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union: CA 14 May 2009

Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: HL 21 Jun 2004

Same Sex Partner Entitled to tenancy Succession The protected tenant had died. His same-sex partner sought a statutory inheritance of the tenancy. Held: His appeal succeeded. The Fitzpatrick case referred to the position before the 1998 Act: ‘Discriminatory law undermines the rule of law because it is the antithesis of fairness. It brings the law … Continue reading Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: HL 21 Jun 2004

Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd and Another: CA 26 Feb 2014

The court was asked whether a claim as to acts of victimisation could be sustained in connection with actions alleged after termination of employment. Held: The appeal succeeded. The Act operated to proscribe such actions. However, this is one of those exceptional cases where the court could confidently say that the draftsman had erred and … Continue reading Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd and Another: CA 26 Feb 2014