VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosure PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Disposal of appeal including remission The Court of Appeal had remitted back to the Tribunal the issue of a Chagger claim for damages for stigma loss, following the termination of the Appellant’s contract as a worker after raising asbestos issues which had constituted a detriment under … Continue reading Small v The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust (Victimisation Discrimination – Protected Disclosure – Practice and Procedure): EAT 19 Aug 2019

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosureWhether Claimant may rely on post-termination protected disclosure in ‘whistleblowing’ claim under s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996. He can. Appeal allowed against Employment Tribunal Judgment to the contrary. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2013] UKEAT 0407 – 12 – 2501 Links: Bailii Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 47B Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Onyango v Berkeley (T/A Berkeley Solicitors): EAT 25 Jan 2013

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSALAn act is on the ground that an employer has made a protected disclosure within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 47B if it is done by reason of such a disclosure or because the act was inherently for such a reason. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan … Continue reading Vivian v Bournemouth Borough Council: EAT 6 May 2011

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION: Protected disclosure The central question in this appeal was whether an employee/worker who complained of suffering a detriment from his current employer on the ground that he had made a protected disclosure could claim where that disclosure had been made not whilst employed by his current employer but whilst employed … Continue reading BP Plc v Elstone and Another: EAT 31 Mar 2010

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosureDismissal for making a protected disclosure Employment Tribunal decision upheld. Suffering a detriment for the same reason. Employment Tribunal decision inadequate and committed to a different decision for determination. Judges: Wilkie J Citations: [2008] UKEAT 0094 – 08 – 1605 Links: Bailii Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 47B 103(A) Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Glencross: EAT 16 May 2008

Renewed application for permission to appeal. Judges: Buxton LJ, Maurice Kay LJ Citations: [2006] EWCA Civ 1154 Links: Bailii Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 47B Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Kraus v Penna Plc and Another EAT 20-Nov-2003 The claimant said that his dismissal was automatically unfair on the basis that he had … Continue reading Babula v Waltham Forest College: CA 21 Jul 2006

Judges: Gross, Lewison , Singh LJJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 803, [2019] WLR(D) 269 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Employment Rights Act 1996 47B(1A) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Employment Updated: 03 July 2022; Ref: scu.637320

The claimant said that his dismissal was automatically unfair on the basis that he had made a qualifying disclosure. Held: ‘the worker’s reasonable belief in s.43B(1) relates to the information which he is disclosing and not to the existence of a legal obligation which does not actually exist. In other words if the employers are … Continue reading Kraus v Penna Plc and Another: EAT 20 Nov 2003

The employee claimed that he had been unlawfully dismissed, and that his dismissal broke the protection given to whistleblowers under the Act. The employer appealed. Held: In such claims it was necessary first for the tribunal to establish whether it had jurisdiction, by testing whether a protected disclosure had taken place, and whether that had … Continue reading ALM Medical Services Limited v Bryan Bladon: CA 26 Jul 2002

This appeal concerns the proper construction of section 43K (whistleblowers) and the application of that section to a certain category of doctors operating in the health service. Held: The appeal succeeded. Judges: Gloster VP CA, Elias LJJ, Moylan J Citations: [2017] EWCA Civ 329, [2017] WLR(D) 307, [2017] ICR 917, [2017] IRLR 623 Links: Bailii, … Continue reading Day v Health Education England and Others: CA 5 May 2017

EAT Victimisation Discrimination : Protected Disclosure – Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in striking out part of the Claimant’s claim of detriment on the ground of having made a protected disclosure. Specifically as to whether the Tribunal approached its task correctly in concluding that part of the Claimant’s claim should be struck out … Continue reading Greenly v Future Network Solutions Ltd: EAT 19 Dec 2013

EAT Victimisation Discrimination : Whistleblowing – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke – Employment Tribunal failed to explain sufficiently their reasoning on the causation issue in s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996 ‘whistle-blowing’ complaint. Case remitted to same ET for reconsideration. Peter Clark J [2013] UKEAT 0279 – 13 – 1102 Bailii Employment Rights Act 1996 … Continue reading Barclays Bank Plc v Mitchell: EAT 11 Feb 2014

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Worker, employee or neither The Employment Judge was entitled on the facts that she found to conclude that the Claimant was in business on his own account rather than an ’employee’ or ‘worker’ within the meaning of sections 47B, 230(1) and 230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996. Serota QC [2012] UKEAT 0416 … Continue reading Suhail v Herts Urgent Care: EAT 14 Nov 2012

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION
Whistleblowing
Detriment
Whether or not a decision by the Chief Adjudicator of the Traffic Parking Tribunal not to allocate cases to a fee paid Parking Adjudicator . .

Appeal against refusal by the Employment Judge to strike out Dr Armes’ claims under sections 47B, 103A and 100(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996. The application to strike out was made on the basis that Dr Armes had no reasonable prospect of establishing that his pleaded disclosures were ‘qualifying disclosures’ within the meaning of section 43B(1), … Continue reading Twist DX Ltd and Others v Armes and Others (Whisleblowing, Protected Disclosures): EAT 23 Oct 2020

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissalVICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosureThe ET erred in holding that the Appellant lecturer was fairly dismissed for misconduct in refusing to undertake duties which the Respondent required her to undertake. The ET failed to consider whether the employer had conducted a proper investigation into the agreement reached as to … Continue reading Smith v London Metropolitan University: EAT 21 Jul 2011

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSALAn act is on the ground that an employer has made a protected disclosure within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 47B if it is done by reason of such a disclosure or because the act was inherently for such a reason. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan … Continue reading Vivian v Bournemouth Borough Council: EAT 4 Feb 2011

The claimant had argued that she had been unfairly dismissed since her dismissal was founded in her making a protected disclosure. The ET had not accepted either her explanation or that of the employer. Held: The employee’s appeal failed, and the employer’s succeeded. It was wrong to draw parallels with prohibited grounds reasons and unfair … Continue reading Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd: CA 17 Apr 2008

The claimant appealed refusal to award damages after an alleged failure to give a proper reference, saying that the decision in Fadipe could not stand with the later decision in Rhys-Harper. She said that she had suffered victimisation after making a protected disclosure, but after having left the company. The company said that the Act … Continue reading Woodward v Abbey National Plc: CA 22 Jun 2006

The Respondent, a provider of hospitals with specialist treatment programmes for patients detained under the Mental Health Act, appealed against the Decision of the ET which upheld the Claimant employee’s claim of public interest disclosure detriment pursuant to section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996. The appeal was on the grounds that the ET had: (1) … Continue reading Elysium Healthcare No2 Ltd v Ogunlami: EAT 12 Feb 2019

EAT A employed R as a support worker. R made a number of protected disclosures relating to a fellow worker’s conduct towards a client. The ET held various detriments were suffered by R on the ground of the disclosures. On appeal A asserted (1) the ET did not give adequate reasons, (2) the findings were … Continue reading Cumbria County Council v Carlisle-Morgan: EAT 29 Jan 2007

To be protected, a disclosure had to be causative in the sense of being the real reason or core reason, the motive for the treatment complained of. Judges: His Hon Judge J R Reid QC Citations: EAT/891/01, [2002] UKEAT 891 – 01 – 2507 Links: Bailii, EAT Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – … Continue reading Aspinall v MI Mech Forge Ltd: EAT 5 Jul 2002

EAT Unfair Dismissal – Reason for dismissal including substantial other reason Judges: His Hon Judge Ansell Citations: UKEAT/644/03, [2004] UKEAT 0644 – 03 – 2301 Links: Bailii, EAT Cited by: Cited – Fecitt and Others v NHS Manchester EAT 23-Nov-2010 EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosureS.47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that ‘A … Continue reading Virgo Fidelis Senior School v Kevin Boyle: EAT 11 Dec 2003

The appellant challenged reversal by the EAT of a finding that it had not unlawfully victimised the respondents for the making of a protected disclosure. The claimant had reported a co-worker exaggerating his qualifications. After repeated investigations, the employer decided that the apology from the employee was enough. When the claimant persisted the employee who … Continue reading NHS Manchester v Fecitt and Others: CA 25 Oct 2011

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosureS.47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that ‘A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure.’In cases where a Claimant has … Continue reading Fecitt and Others v NHS Manchester: EAT 23 Nov 2010