Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Glencross: EAT 16 May 2008

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosure
Dismissal for making a protected disclosure Employment Tribunal decision upheld.
Suffering a detriment for the same reason. Employment Tribunal decision inadequate and committed to a different decision for determination.

Judges:

Wilkie J

Citations:

[2008] UKEAT 0094 – 08 – 1605

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Employment Rights Act 1996 47B 103(A)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedBarke v Seetec Business Technology Centre Ltd CA 16-May-2005
Challenge to the lawfulness of the practice of the EAT in referring back to the IT deficient reasons with an invitation to expand upon them.
Held: The words ‘disposing of’ in the section meant ‘dealing with conclusively’ rather than . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271320