Babula v Waltham Forest College: CA 21 Jul 2006

Renewed application for permission to appeal.

Judges:

Buxton LJ, Maurice Kay LJ

Citations:

[2006] EWCA Civ 1154

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Employment Rights Act 1996 47B

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedKraus v Penna Plc and Another EAT 20-Nov-2003
The claimant said that his dismissal was automatically unfair on the basis that he had made a qualifying disclosure.
Held: ‘the worker’s reasonable belief in s.43B(1) relates to the information which he is disclosing and not to the existence . .
CitedBabula v Waltham Forest College CA 7-Mar-2007
The claimant said his dismissal had been automatically unfair under section 106(a) which protected him as a whistleblower. The court was asked whether any disclosure had to relate to an actual criminal offence, or otherwise what would be sufficient. . .
Appeal fromBabula v Waltham Forest College EAT 31-Mar-2006
EAT Public Interest Disclosure . .

Cited by:

CitedBabula v Waltham Forest College CA 7-Mar-2007
The claimant said his dismissal had been automatically unfair under section 106(a) which protected him as a whistleblower. The court was asked whether any disclosure had to relate to an actual criminal offence, or otherwise what would be sufficient. . .
LeaveBabula v Waltham Forest College CA 7-Mar-2007
The claimant said his dismissal had been automatically unfair under section 106(a) which protected him as a whistleblower. The court was asked whether any disclosure had to relate to an actual criminal offence, or otherwise what would be sufficient. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 07 July 2022; Ref: scu.244461