Derby v Weldon (No. 3): ChD 7 Nov 1988
The plaintiff alleged conspiracy to defraud in a sum in excess of andpound;25m. During the application for a freezing order the stance of the defendant had been one of ‘taciturnity’ and non-disclosure. But on the last day of the hearing it was said that the defendant held certain assets. Another defendant, to whom over andpound;50m … Continue reading Derby v Weldon (No. 3): ChD 7 Nov 1988