Two appeals from exclusion orders Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 1822, [2003] ELR 104, [2003] LGR 371 Links: Bailii Statutes: School Standards and Framework Act 1998 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Education Updated: 06 December 2022; Ref: scu.346817
1. There was nothing in s 85A of the 2002 Act preventing the Secretary of State from adducing evidence. 2. The requirement to show that a loan was ‘part of an Academic or Educational Loan Scheme’ for the purposes of paragraph 1B(d)(7) of Appendix C is not met merely by showing that the loan was … Continue reading Rana (S 85A; Educational Loans Scheme) Bangladesh: UTIAC 15 Nov 2019
The appellant had been convicted of causing death by careless driving with excess alcohol. He said that he had taken alcohol after stopping driving but before being tested. He challenged the weight of the burden of proof ascribed by the statute. The judge had directed the jury that he faced a persuasive burden of establishing … Continue reading Drummond v Regina: CACD 7 Mar 2002
The appellant had undergone a male to female sex change, but was refused employment by the respondent before the Human Rights Act came into effect. Held: Although the Human Rights Act could not apply, the act was in breach of the Equal Treatment Directive and discrimination. The 1999 regulations were incompatible with the provisions of … Continue reading A v Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire Police and Another: CA 5 Nov 2002
Gilliatt Parents wanted their high end autistic child to be educated according to the Lovaas principle at home with a phased introduction into mainstream school. The local education authority proposed that the child should be educated at a specialist centre based in a school. The court held that under s 319 of the Education Act … Continue reading T v Special Educational Needs Tribunal and Another: Admn 18 Jul 2002
The applicants sought damages after they had had placed with them for adoption a child who proved to be destructively hyperactive. Held: The authority might be liable where they failed to disclose to adoptive parents known characteristics of a child. A person exercising a particular skill might owe a duty of care where its negligent … Continue reading A, B v Essex County Council: QBD 18 Dec 2002
The company appealed against a finding that they were in breach of their contract of employment in not including the claimant in those considered for an enhanced redundancy package. Held: The appeal failed. Tribunals should be cautious before appearing to extend the terms of the implied duty of trust and confidence between employer and employee.Pill … Continue reading Transco Plc v O’Brien: CA 7 Mar 2002
Practice and Procedure, Jurisdictional/Time Points The ET made no error of law when deciding on an application for reconsideration not to vary or revoke an earlier order striking out claims of unfair dismissal and age and disability discrimination on the grounds of non-compliance with existing orders and the claimant apparently not actively pursuing the claim. … Continue reading Phipps v Priory Education Services Ltd: EAT 6 Oct 2021
Care standards Citations: [2013] UKUT 510 (AAC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Education Act 2002 142 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Education Updated: 19 September 2022; Ref: scu.516818
The local authority changed its policy on admissions to secondary schools, so that children living nearer a school were given priority over children with siblings already at the school. The school admissions appeal panel overruled decisions made under the policy, and the authority appealed. Held: The policy was lawful under the Act. The panel’s power … Continue reading Hounslow London Borough Council v School Admission Appeals Panel for Hounslow London Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 2002
Three pupils appealed their exclusion from school for violent or threatening behaviour. Held: The statute imposed clear obligations on the appeal panel to act independently, and to consider both the individual circumstances of the child and the case, and to bear in mind the guidance issued by the Secretary of State. In addition the panel … Continue reading Regina (S) v Brent London Borough Council and Others Regina (T) v Brent and Others Regina (P) v Oxfordshire County Council’s Exclusion Appeals Panel and Another: CA 17 May 2002
A neighbour challenged the use of houses as temporary accommodation for homeless youths. The properties housed up to six youths, who, the council claimed lived together as a single unit, and therefore came within Class C3. Held: Nothing in the case law suggested that such a group must constitute a household before coming together within … Continue reading Regina (on the application of Hossack) v Kettering Borough Council and another: CA 25 Jun 2002
EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissalWhether fundamental breach of implied term of trust and confidence cured, so that the Claimant’s resignation did not amount to constructive dismissal.Whether the range of reasonable responses test has any place in the question as to whether an employee has been constructively dismissed. Fairbrother and Claridge considered and not followed.General observations … Continue reading Bournemouth University Higher Education Corp v Buckland: EAT 8 May 2009
The 1841 Act was intended to encourage land owners to make land available for educational purposes: ‘One can see that the provision with regard to reverter would have been and no doubt was considered by the Legislature to be a very useful encouragement to charitably minded persons, particularly if they were the owners of an … Continue reading In Re Cawston’s Conveyance and the School Sites Act 1841: CA 1940
The applicants were head teachers employed in junior schools. They alleged sex discrimination, and sought to use as comparators head teachers from different local authorities. The comparators had been put forward on the basis that the teacher in question was male and was being paid at a higher rate for work that was like work … Continue reading Morton v South Ayrshire Council: IHCS 14 Feb 2002
The local authority applied for an interim care order immediately the child, B, was born. A proposal was made for the mother and child to move from the maternity hospital to a residential placement a mother and baby home which provided help in improving parents’ child care skills. The local authority was not prepared to … Continue reading In re B (Interim care order: Directions): CA 14 Jan 2002
Judges: Scott Baker J Citations: [2002] EWHC 1382 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Oxford and Cambridge Act 1923 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Education, Employment Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.175119
Parents applied for secondary school places, indicating three single sex schools. This was from a clear religious conviction. The local authority allocated another place, without giving reasons, but did provide a pamphlet setting out its policy, which showed that one criterion was a preference for a single-sex school. Held: The need to respect religious views … Continue reading Regina (K) v Newham London Borough Council and Another: QBD 19 Feb 2002
The claimant had succeeded in her appeal against the cancellation of her registration as a child minder, and now sought damages for negligence in using unnecessarily the emergency procedure leading to damage to the claimant’s reputation and business. Judges: Peter Gibson LJ, May LJ Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 569 Links: Bailii Statutes: Children Act 1989 … Continue reading Bowden and Another v Lancashire County Council: CA 16 Apr 2002
EAT Mr Gilbert was paid for 44 weeks a year, of which 38 weeks were those in which he was required to work. The issue was whether, as the ET had held, ‘a week’s pay’ fell to be calculated by dividing the annual salary payable monthly to the employees by 52; or whether it fell … Continue reading Gilbert and others v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council: EAT 12 Apr 2002
The appellant was convicted of the crime of being a parent whose child had failed to attend school regularly. She challenged saying that the offence required no guilty act on her part, but was one of strict liability, and contrary to her human rights. Held: Although the offence is one of strict liability, there is … Continue reading Barnfather v London Borough of Islington Education Authority, Secretary of State for Education and Skills: QBD 7 Mar 2003
The claimant was injured, being hit in the face by a football in a school playground. It was before school started. There had been accidents, and there were rules which had not been enforced. The school appealed a finding of negligence. Held: ‘a school owes to all pupils who are lawfully on its premises the … Continue reading Kearn-Price v Kent County Council: CA 30 Oct 2002
The claimant sought an extension of the limitation period to allow him to pursue an action. He sought damages for negligence against his former school which had failed to diagnose and treat his dyslexia. Held: His appeal was denied. The claim was one for personal injury, but the question of whether to extend the time … Continue reading Robinson v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 25 Jul 2002
Judges: Lord Justice Chadwick, Pill LJ, Longmore LJ Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 641, [2002] 1 WLR 2322 Links: Bailii Statutes: Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 70(3), Social Security (Invalid Care Allowance) Regulations 1976 5 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Deane CA 23-Jun-2010 … Continue reading Tina Yasmin Flemming v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 10 May 2002
The Force appealed findings of sex discrimination against the respondent who had undergone gender reassignment. She required the fact of the procedure to be kept secret. The force refused her application for appointment since they said she would be unable to conduct searches, which were required in law to be by officers of the same … Continue reading The Chief Constable of the West Yorkshire Police v A, Secretary of State for Education: EAT 2 Oct 2001
The claimant sought damages from the respondents who had been responsible for his education, for having failed to diagnose his learning difficulties. The school had recognised that he was underachieving, but diagnosis as to the reason was not easy. Held: Though the school had acted properly, it had failed to call in specialist help and … Continue reading Liennard v Slough Borough Council: QBD 15 Mar 2002
Land having been conveyed under the Act, and it no longer being needed as a school, it had to be decided to whom the land reverted. Held: The tracing of beneficiaries had to be in the basis under section 2, that the land had never been so conveyed. It would so have passed not as … Continue reading Rector of Wrington and The Bath and Wells Diocesan Board of Finance v Jenkinson and Others: ChD 26 Feb 2002
The tenant took farm premises subject to a lease allowing its use for farming purposes only. It prevented its use as a market garden, which would have allowed compensation to be claimed on its termination. He had come to operate several activities from the farm. The landlords claimed that the new activities were in breach … Continue reading McGowan and Gibbons v Jewell: CA 28 Feb 2002
The Appellant had introduced a system of fining lorry drivers returning to the UK with illegal immigrants hiding away in their trucks. The rules had been found to be in breach of European law and an interference with their human rights. The penalties were substantial, though there existed a system of appeals. Held: The principle … Continue reading Secretary of State for the Home Department v International Transport Roth Gmbh and others: CA 22 Feb 2002
The request was for minutes of senior management meetings at the DfES relating to the setting of school budgets in England between June 2002 and June 2003. Although some information was provided the majority of the information requested was withheld under section 35(1)(a), on the basis that the information related to the formulation and development … Continue reading Department for Education and Skills (Decision Notice): ICO 4 Jan 2006
The teacher was ill and was not to return to work. She expressed her willingness to take early retirement, but then claimed her full entitlement to four months’ notice of her dismissal. Held: The expression of willingness was to be taken as her notice to leave the job if the condition was fulfilled. She had … Continue reading Healey v Bridgend County Borough Council: CA 14 Nov 2002
The court was asked as to the need to give reasons in making a decision on a direction in a case of special educational needs. Citations: [1995] ELR 58 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Hasan, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry CA 25-Nov-2008 The claimant … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for Education, ex parte G: 1995
Teachers otherwise falling within the description in Clause 6.1 of the Burgundy Book, but who have not been given the notice of termination there referred to have no contractual right to insist upon service of such a notice upon them. Citations: [2002] ELR 367 Cited by: Cited – Verner, Sheppard, Ridley v Derby City Council, … Continue reading Regina (on the application of Dorling) v Sheffield City Council and the Governing Body of Woodthorpe Primary School (1): 2002
The applicants appealed the refusal of judicial review of the refusals of their appeals against exclusion from school. Held: The Act provided a full appeal procedure from the initial decision of the school’s head teacher, first to the governors, and then to an independent appeal panel. They argued that Rowlands established that a right to … Continue reading Regina (DR) (AM) v St George’s Catholic School and Others, Regina (A) v Kingsmead School Governors and Another: CA 13 Dec 2002
A permanently excluded pupil sought judicial review of the decision to exclude him. The school resisted saying that since there remained an avenue of appeal, a judicial review was inappropriate. He could still ask for a review of the decision of the independent appeal panel. Held: Such a decision was of great importance to the … Continue reading Regina (A) v Kingsmead School Governors and Another: QBD 13 Mar 2002
The applicant had applied to the respondent for funding for new buildings. The application was approved, but the application was rejected when the respondent ran out of funds. The claimant said that a legitimate expectation had been created, and that it should be re-imbursed its expenses. Held: The application failed. The meat of the alleged … Continue reading Grimsby Institute of Further and Higher Education, Regina (on The Application of) v Learning and Skills Council: Admn 12 Aug 2010
The standard of reasonableness of an inquiry into an employee’s misconduct can depend upon the state of the case against him or her. Wood J said: ‘in one extreme there will be cases where the employee is virtually caught in the act and at the other there will be situations where the issue is one … Continue reading Inner London Education Authority v Gravit: EAT 1988
The defendant alleged that the offence of which had been convicted, under the 1994 Act, infringed his rights under article 6.2 in reversing the burden of proof. Held: The principle that the duty of proof lay on the prosecution was subject to statutory exceptions. To place a legal (persuasive) burden of proof on the defendant … Continue reading Regina v S (Trade Mark Defence) (Roger Sliney v London Borough of Havering): CACD 20 Nov 2002
Statutory appeal against the decision of the authorised decision-maker for the Secretary of State for Education to make an indefinite Prohibition Order (with a review period set for three years) prohibiting the appellant from teaching in any school. Andrews DBE J [2016] EWHC 1519 (Admin), [2016] WLR(D) 341 Bailii, WLRD
The respondent company had asserted that the local authority had made a determination of the issue of whether electricity could be generated on a waste treatment site without further planning permission. The council said that without a formal planning application, no determination had been made. Held: The procedure of making a determination had important consequences. … Continue reading Regina (Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd) v East Sussex County Council Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd v Same: HL 28 Feb 2002
IPSEA (a national charity active in supporting children with special educational needs) applied for judicial review in relation to the status of non-statutory guidance issued by the Secretary of State in a document called the ‘SEN Toolkit’. The court refused to grant a judicial review but gave useful guidance on how the guidance in the … Continue reading Ipsea Ltd, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Education and Schools: Admn 26 Mar 2002
A genuine religious belief which supported the use of corporal punishment in schools was not itself either a manifestation of religious belief which required protection under the convention, or a religious and philosophical conviction for the purposes of the right to education provisions of article 2. A religiously founded belief that corporal punishment should be … Continue reading Regina (Williamson and Others) v Secretary of State for Education and Employment: Admn 15 Nov 2001
The landowner sought to use houses as temporary accommodation for young people in need. The council asserted that this use of each of the properties was ‘use as a dwelling house by the residents living together as a single household’ under class C3. Held: The critical question was whether the individuals in the house had … Continue reading Hossack, Regina (on the Application of) v Kettering Borough Council and Another: Admn 25 Mar 2002
EAT Jurisdictional Points : Extension of Time: Reasonably Practicable – Extension of time: just and equitable – FIXED TERM REGULATIONS – Time limits. Employment Judge entitled to conclude that claims under Employment Rights Act 1996 made 5.5 years out of time should not proceed. Even if not reasonably practicable to present them within time, they … Continue reading Stephens v Kingston University Higher Education Corporation: EAT 10 Dec 2013
Failure to comply with timescales [2013] ScotIC 105 – 2013 Bailii Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 Scotland, Information Updated: 19 November 2021; Ref: scu.514872
The defendant appealed a conviction for hiding assets from her receiver following her bankruptcy. He said that recent case law suggested that the burden of establishing the defence under section 352 was evidential only. Held: The conviction predated the Human Rights Act, and was correct at the time. The Carass ruling applied also to the … Continue reading Regina v Daniel: CACD 22 Mar 2002
Having had various claims made in county courts rejected, the applicant was then refused leave to appeal. He sought judicial review of the refusal to give leave to appeal, and now appealed the refusal of leave to apply for a judicial review. Held: In the absence of some procedural irregularity or other exceptional circumstance, judicial … Continue reading Sivasubramaniam v Wandsworth County Court, Management of Guildford College of Further and Higher Education and Another: CA 28 Nov 2002
The claimants sought a declaration that the restriction on the infliction of corporal punishment in schools infringed their human right of freedom of religion. The schools concerned were Christian schools who believed that moderate corporal discipline was required in order to give expression to their religious beliefs. The respondent argued that the beliefs asserted, whilst … Continue reading Regina (Williamson and Others) v Secretary of State for Education and Employment: CA 12 Dec 2002
Right to Life Did Not include Right to Death The applicant was paralysed and suffered a degenerative condition. She wanted her husband to be allowed to assist her suicide by accompanying her to Switzerland. English law would not excuse such behaviour. She argued that the right to die is not the antithesis of the right … Continue reading Pretty v The United Kingdom: ECHR 29 Apr 2002
The applicants had been made subject of anti-social behaviour orders. They challenged the basis upon which the orders had been made. Held: The orders had no identifiable consequences which would make the process a criminal one. Civil standards of evidence therefore applied, and hearsay evidence was admissible. Nevertheless, the test as to whether it was … Continue reading Clingham (formerly C (a minor)) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea; Regina v Crown Court at Manchester Ex parte McCann and Others: HL 17 Oct 2002
The appellants were teachers in Christian schools who said that the blanket ban on corporal punishment interfered with their religious freedom. They saw moderate physical discipline as an essential part of educating children in a Christian manner. Held: The appeal was dismissed. For Article 9 to be engaged (aside from certain other threshold conditions) the … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for Education and Employment and others ex parte Williamson and others: HL 24 Feb 2005
Reasobaleness of Investigation Judged Objectively The employer appealed against a decision that it had unfairly dismissed the respondent. The majority of the Employment Tribunal had decided that the employers had not carried out a reasonable investigation into the employee’s alleged misconduct which consisted of stealing an article found in his locker at work, because other … Continue reading J Sainsbury Ltd v Hitt; Orse Sainsburys Supermarkets Limited v Hitt: CA 18 Oct 2002
The claimant worked as a residential social worker. Allegations were made against him of inappropriate behaviour with a child. The girl’s allegations varied. A criminal investigation took place but insufficient evidence was found. The investigation took over two years during which time the claimant was prevented from speaking to anybody at the home, and therefore … Continue reading A v B: EAT 14 Nov 2002
The claimant was a post operative male to female trans-sexual. She claimed that her human rights were infringed when she was still treated as a man for National Insurance contributions purposes, where she continued to make payments after the age at which a woman would have ceased payments thus causing harassment. A second claimant again … Continue reading Goodwin v The United Kingdom: ECHR 11 Jul 2002
In each case, the other parent appealed care orders where she had been found to have injured her children. In each case the sole evidence was the injury to the child’s health and expert medical evidence. The cases were referred following the Cannings case. Held: The appeals failed. It was wrong to diminish the difference … Continue reading In re LU (A Child); In re LB (A Child) (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof); re U (A Child) (Department for Education and Skills intervening): CA 14 May 2004
Duncombe_desEAT2008 EAT Jurisdictional Points – Working outside the jurisdictionFixed Term RegulationsExtra-territorial jurisdiction. Teachers working abroad. Breach of contract claim within ET jurisdiction. Whether Claimants can rely on provisions of FTER 2002, implementing F-T Working Directive (99/70/EC) in light of Elias P reasoning in Bleuse v MBT Transport (UKEAT/0339/07 21 December 2007). Consistency of EAT decisions. … Continue reading Duncombe and others v Department for Education and Skills: EAT 24 Apr 2008
(French Text) In 1962 France and Algeria had signed a statement of principle on cultural co-operation which provided inter alia for French children residing in Algeria, including those having dual French and Algerian nationality under French law, to . .
In each case, the applicant sought to argue that documents which had actually been received on a certain date should not be deemed to have been served on a different day because of the rule.
Held: The coming into force of the Human Rights Act . .
A party sought from the EAT a declaration as to incompatibility of the exemption of small firms from the provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act. The industrial tribunal had said it was not a court entitling it to consider such an . .
The claimant teacher challenged the decision of the respondent, taken under section 142 of the 2002 Act, to bar him from working with children. . .
Appeal from a direction by the Secretary of State under section 142 Education Act 2002 that his name be included on the list of people prohibited from working with children because of his unsuitability. . .
The various applicants sought judicial review of the operation of the Protection of Vulnerable Adults List insofar as they had been placed provisionally on the list, preventing them from finding work. One complaint was that the list had operated . .
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
Citations: [2019] WLR(D) 228, [2019] EWHC 943 (Admin) Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Education Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Education Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.636087
The court was asked whether a school was entitled to refuse to allow a Muslim girl to wear the niqab full face veil at school. The reasons were ‘first educational factors resulting from a teacher being unable to see the face of the girl with a niqab; second the importance of a uniform policy as … Continue reading X, Regina (on the Application of) v Y School: Admn 21 Feb 2007
The claimant had been employed as a teaching assistant. She came to work with the union, eventually being released from her work full time to undertake the role within the union. The defendant suspended the claimant from her role for alleged breaches of the Borough’s Code of Conduct and Social Media Policy. The actions did … Continue reading Davies v London Borough of Haringey: QBD 17 Oct 2014
Burchell case remains good law The appellant head teacher had been dismissed for failing to disclose the fact that her partner had been convicted of a sex offence. She now appealed from rejection of her claim for unfair dismissal. Held: The appeal was dismissed. The tribunal was entitled to conclude that it was a reasonable … Continue reading Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council: SC 14 Mar 2018
The claimant was employed as a teaching assistant. He was suspended after allegations of sexual misbehaviour with boy at the school. He refused to take part in the disciplinary proceedings until the police investigation was concluded. A decision was made that no prosecution would follow. The claimant’s solicitors asked to be allowed to represent him … Continue reading G, Regina (on The Application of) v X School: SC 29 Jun 2011
The claimant was a teaching assistant. A complaint had been made that he had kissed a boy having work experience at the school, but it had been decided that no criminal prosecution would follow. He sought judicial review of the school’s decision to take disciplinary proceedings without allowing him legal representation. The school now appealed … Continue reading G, Regina (on The Application of) v X School and Others: CA 20 Jan 2010
The University applied to have struck out the claim by the claimant for damages alleging negligence in its teaching leading to a lower class degree than he said he should have been awarded. Held: Strike out on the basis that the claim was bound to fail was refused. Nor was the claim bound to fail … Continue reading Siddiqui v University of Oxford: QBD 5 Dec 2016
The applicants sought asylum. Their child had a right of residence as a European citizen. Held: The applicants could not rely upon their child’s right of residence to establish one for themselves. Judges: Lord Justice Keene Lord Justice May Lord Justice Wall Citations: Times 07-Jun-2006, [2006] EWCA Civ 484 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 3 May 2006
The applicant, having moved here from Greece, applied for emergency housing. The Council received no reply to its requests for corroboration sent to Greece. Housing was refused, but the officer later suggested that the real reason was that the applicant had accommodation available in Greece. The court considered an affidavit on behalf of the decision-maker … Continue reading Regina v Westminster City Council Ex Parte Ermakov: CA 14 Nov 1995
Local authorities were presently bound to plan future housing developments in accordance with Regional Spatial Strategies which the new government intended to abolish. The respondent had previously been told by the court that primary legislation was required, and that therefore a direction to ignore the current criteria was unlawful. The claimant now said that a … Continue reading Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: Admn 16 Dec 2010
After parties were enabled to testify in most civil cases by the 1851, the court recognised that the failure of one of them to deny a fact which it is in his power to deny gives colour to the evidence against him. Judges: Alderson B Citations: (1855) 10 Exch 647 Statutes: Evidence Act 1851 Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Boyle v Wisman: 1855
1. British citizenship is a relevant factor when assessing the best interests of the child. 2. British citizenship includes the opportunities for children to live in the UK, receive free education, have full access to healthcare and welfare provision and participate in the life of their local community as they grow up. 3. There is … Continue reading SD (British Citizen Children – Entry Clearance) Sri Lanka: UTIAC 23 Jan 2020
Fair Coment on Political Activities The defendant newspaper had published articles wrongly accusing the claimant, the former Prime Minister of Ireland of duplicity. The paper now appealed, saying that it should have had available to it a defence of qualified privilege because of the claimant’s status as a politician. Held: The appeal failed (Lords Hope … Continue reading Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and others: HL 28 Oct 1999
The OFT had considered whether it was necessary to refer a merger between two companies to the Competition Commission, and decided against. The Competition Appeal Tribunal held that the proposed merger should have been referred. The OFT and parties appealed. Held: The Tribunal had misdirected itself as to one test. The statutory test required the … Continue reading Office of Fair Trading and others v IBA Health Limited: CA 19 Feb 2004
The mother of the child on behalf of whom the application was made, was to face trial for murder. The child was in care and an order was sought to restrain publiction of material which might reveal his identity, including matters arising during the trial. Held: (Hale LJ dissenting) The court in this case was … Continue reading Re S (A Child): CA 10 Jul 2003
In 2000, the defendant introduced a policy to make compensation payments for those British services personnel who had been imprisoned by the Japanese in the second world war. The appellant, a citizen of Pakistan had served in the Indian Army, was captured and became a prisoner of war of the Japanese. He accepted that he … Continue reading Mohammed, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Defence: CA 1 May 2007
UTIAC (1) The effect of section 85A(3)(a) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 is such that Exception 2 can apply where an appeal is brought against an immigration decision of a kind specified in section 82(2)(a) or (d), whether or not the appeal includes, or is treated by section 85(1) as including, an … Continue reading Mushtaq (S 85A, (A): Scope; Academic Progress) Pakistan: UTIAC 8 Feb 2013
The claimant sought damages. The respondent had acted as an adoption agency but had failed to disclose all relevant information about the child. Held: Any such duty extended only during the period where the child was with the prospective adopters pending their decision on adoption. Hale LJ: ‘Whenever the question of a common law duty … Continue reading A and Another v Essex County Council: CA 17 Dec 2003
The court was asked about the age at which entitlement to a pension began for someone of transgender. Held: The court was divided, and the issue was referred to the European Court of Justice. Judges: Lady Hale, Deputy President, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson, Lord Hodge Citations: [2016] UKSC 53, UKSC 2014/0220 Links: Bailii, … Continue reading MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 5 Jul 2016
A nine year old pupil was injured by a fellow pupil whirling an anorak around his head. The accident occurred when they were on their way from the school buildings to the school gates at the end of school day. There was no member of staff on duty to supervise the passage of pupils on … Continue reading Wilson v Governors of Sacred Heart Roman Catholic School: CA 5 Nov 1997
Four children complained that, for years before they were taken into care by the local authority, its social services department was well aware that they were living in filthy conditions and suffering ‘appalling’ neglect in the home of their parents. Suspicions of abuse had arisen in 1987, but they were given effective support only in … Continue reading Z And Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 10 May 2001
The copyright tribunal was given a wide discretion for the awarding of costs on applications made to it for licenses. The nature of the applications and the different basis makes it dangerous to import rules for awards from the general rules on costs. The Copyright Tribunal was wrong to award costs on an award to … Continue reading AEI Rediffusion Music Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd: CA 1 Feb 1999
The employee was a transsexual, awaiting completion of surgical transformation to a woman. The employer said she could not use the female toilet facilities, but was offered use of the unisex disabled facilities. Held: The 1975 Act provides for a category of persons who are not to be discriminated against. By virtue of the definition … Continue reading Croft v Royal Mail Group Plc (formerly Consignia Group plc): CA 18 Jul 2003
The applicants complained that as an unmarried couple they had been excluded from consideration as adopters. Held: Northern Ireland legislation had not moved in the same way as it had for other jurisdictions within the UK. The greater commitment to traditional family structures did not however justify the difference. The rules were unlawful discrimination.Lord Hoffmann … Continue reading In re P and Others, (Adoption: Unmarried couple) (Northern Ireland); In re G: HL 18 Jun 2008
The claimant appealed against a decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) dismissed his appeal against a decision of an Immigration Judge in turn dismissing his appeal under section 82 of the 2002 Act against the decision of the Home Secretary refusing to vary leave to remain in the United Kingdom pursuant to … Continue reading AQ (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: CA 20 Jul 2011
UTIAC LAW(A) There is nothing in MS (Palestinian Territories) [2010] UKSC 25 that overrules the judgments in MA (Ethiopia) [2009] EWCA Civ 289. Where a claim to recognition as a refugee depends on whether a person is being arbitrarily denied the right of return to a country as one of its nationals, that issue must … Continue reading ST (Ethnic Eritrean – Nationality – Return) Ethiopia CG: UTIAC 1 Jul 2011
The appellant had sought to challenge refusal of disability living allowance. Ultimately her request a judicial review of the Upper Tribunal’s decion was rejected on the basis that the UT, being a court of superior record, was not susceptible to judicial review save in very limited circumstancs. Held: The appeal failed, though the reasons varied. … Continue reading EBA v Advocate General for Scotland: SC 21 Jun 2011
The claimant complained of the reporting of a sexual encounter which he said was private. Held: The reporting of ‘tawdry allegations about an individual’s private life’ does not attract the robust protection under Article 10 afforded to more serious journalism. In such cases, ‘freedom of expression requires a more narrow interpretation’ and ‘The Court observes … Continue reading Mosley v The United Kingdom: ECHR 10 May 2011
The claimant alleged complicity by the defendant, (now former) Foreign Secretary, in his mistreatment by the US while held in Libya. He also alleged involvement in his unlawful abduction and removal to Libya, from which had had fled for political persecution. The defendants now appealed from rejection of the defendants’ claim to state immunity and … Continue reading Belhaj and Another v Straw and Others: SC 17 Jan 2017
G was a prisoner who was refused permission by the Home Secretary to consult a solicitor with a view to bringing libel proceedings against a prison officer. The court construed article 6 of ECHR, which provides that ‘in the determination of his civil rights . . everyone is entitled to a fair . . hearing’, … Continue reading Golder v The United Kingdom: ECHR 21 Feb 1975
Grand Chamber – The first applicant said he had been injured by a shot fired by a British soldier who had been carried for two miles into the Republic of Ireland, clinging to the applicant’s vehicle following an incident at a checkpoint. Held: Rules granting the State immunities, did not infringe the applicants’ right to … Continue reading McElhinney v Ireland; Al-Adsani v United Kingdom; Fogarty v United Kingdom: ECHR 21 Nov 2001
When offering courses to distance learning students, the College offered materials for the courses. As part of the course this supply would be exempt, as books, the supply would be zero-rated, but the taxpayer would be able to reclaim its VAT inputs. Held: ‘There clearly was a separate supply of goods, namely the printed material … Continue reading College of Estate Management v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 11 Aug 2004
The mother appealed against refusal of a specific issue order requested to allow her to remove the four children with her from Cleveland to Stronsay in the Orkneys. Both parents were GPs and accepted to be excellent parents. She and her new partner had accepted an offer to work as GPs on Stronsay. Held: The … Continue reading In re F (Children): CA 27 Oct 2010
The claimant had sought and been refused judicial review of a decision of the SIAC Upper Tribunal. The Upper Tribunals were designated as courts of superior record, and the court at first instance had said that SIACs specialist procedures and jurisdiction meant that it was amenable to judicial review, but only on grounds of excess … Continue reading Cart, Regina (on The Application of) v The Upper Tribunal and Others: CA 23 Jul 2010
The employer had altered existing employment contracts. The claimants having commenced discrimination claims then sought to add to the existing proceedings comparators from different job groups. The tribunal had been asked whether, given that this amounted to a new claim (applying Bainbridge), that new claim was out of time and if so whether its discretion … Continue reading North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust v Fox and Others: CA 30 Jun 2010
TIAC (i) In London Borough of Harrow v Ibrahim Case C-310/08 and Maria Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth Case C-480/08 the European Court of Justice ECJ confirmed the principle established in the Baumbast Case C-413/99 [2002] ECR I-7091, namely that in order to confer on a child a right of residence Article 12 of … Continue reading MDB and Others (Article 12, 1612/68) Italy: UTIAC 2 Jun 2010
Tribunal procedure and practice (including UT) – statements of reasons Citations: [2010] UKUT 10 (AAC) Links: Bailii Citing: Cited – Alloway, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Bromley Admn 17-Sep-2008 The claimant, a young autistic adult, sought judicial review of an assesment carried out for the respondent under the 2000 Act as … Continue reading DC v London Borough of Ealing: UTAA 11 Jan 2010
