The claimant appealed against a decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) dismissed his appeal against a decision of an Immigration Judge in turn dismissing his appeal under section 82 of the 2002 Act against the decision of the Home Secretary refusing to vary leave to remain in the United Kingdom pursuant to Rule 245Z of the Immigration Rules (post-study work).
Held: The majority’s approach in AS did not require consideration of events subsequent to the Secretary of State’s decision.
Judges:
Pill, Toulson, Sullivan LJJ
Citations:
[2011] EWCA Civ 833, [2011] Imm AR 832, [2012] INLR 33
Links:
Statutes:
Nationality & Asylum Act 2002 82
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – AS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department CA 20-Oct-2009
An appeal to the FTT covers not only any ground before the Secretary of State when she made the decision under appeal but also any grounds raised in response to a one-stop notice issued under section 120 of the 2002 Act, even if they had not been . .
Cited by:
Cited – Patel and Others v Secretary of State for The Home Department SC 20-Nov-2013
The court was asked as to the respective duties of the Secretary of State and the First-tier Tribunal, on an appeal against refusal of an application to vary leave to enter or remain under the Immigration Act 1971, and more particularly as to the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration, Education
Updated: 16 September 2022; Ref: scu.441994
