Click the case name for better results:

Lucky Technology Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Application for Disclosure): FTTTx 23 Feb 2021

Application for disclosure – Disclosure sought ‘potentially relevant’ to issue(s) in the case – Whether disclosure precluded by s 18 Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 and GDPR – No – Application allowed – Directions made for progression of appeal Citations: [2021] UKFTT 55 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Customs and Excise … Continue reading Lucky Technology Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Application for Disclosure): FTTTx 23 Feb 2021

JJ Manangement Llp and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 25 Jul 2019

Challenge to the lawfulness of an investigation by HMRC of tax affairs relating to the claimant’s businesses in Europe. HMRC had been claiming a right to conduct an informal investigation using the 2005 Act. The taxpayer sought judicial review of their actions. Held: The request for review was refused. The statute gave to the revenue … Continue reading JJ Manangement Llp and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 25 Jul 2019

Oxfordshire County Council v Oxford City Council and others: HL 24 May 2006

Application had been made to register as a town or village green an area of land which was largely a boggy marsh. The local authority resisted the application wanting to use the land instead for housing. It then rejected advice it received from a non-statutory enquiry, and sought a declaration from the court as to … Continue reading Oxfordshire County Council v Oxford City Council and others: HL 24 May 2006

HM Revenue and Customs v Begum and Others: ChD 15 Jul 2010

The Commissioners claim was founded in an alleged conspiracy from a ‘missing trader intra-community fraud’ amounting to andpound;96 million. Held: Section 423 had extra territorial effect. Judges: David Richards J Citations: [2010] EWHC 1799 (Ch), [2011] BPIR 59 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 423 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Regalway Care Ltd … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Begum and Others: ChD 15 Jul 2010

Revenue and Customs v Pendragon Plc and Others: SC 10 Jun 2015

This appeal is about an elaborate scheme designed and marketed by KPMG relating to demonstrator cars used by retail distributors for test drives and other internal purposes. In the ordinary course, a car distributor will buy new cars for use as demonstrators, paying VAT on the full amount of the sale price. This will in … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Pendragon Plc and Others: SC 10 Jun 2015

Revenue and Customs, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Coroner for The City of Liverpool: Admn 21 May 2014

The Coroner, conducting an investigation into a person’s death, issued notices under para 1(2) of Schedule 5 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, requiring the Revenue and Customs Commissioners to provide occupational information concerning the deceased for the purpose of investigating whether he had died as a result of an industrial disease. The Commissioner … Continue reading Revenue and Customs, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Coroner for The City of Liverpool: Admn 21 May 2014

Neil Martin Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners: 28 Sep 2006

The claimant sought damages from the revenue for their failure properly to process his claim for a sub-contractor’s certificate which had led to losses. Held: The revenue owed no common law duty of care to the claimant and nor were damages claimable under the section, and the claim failed. The Act imposed no statutory time … Continue reading Neil Martin Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners: 28 Sep 2006

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: CA 4 Apr 2003

The taxpayer appealed a decision that a conversion of a non-residential part of a building used for business and residential purposes was not exempt from VAT. Held: The building was not within the definition of a self contained residential building. If separate parts could be buildings, no part would satisfy the definition of a building … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: CA 4 Apr 2003

Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra v Revenue and Customs: CA 9 Oct 2006

The Orchestra apealed a finding that it was not entitled to exemption from VAT as a supply by an eligible body of a cultural performance. The taxpayer’s board was voluntary, but the management was employed. Held: The appeal failed. In order to decide whether the condition allowing exemption was satisfied, the court had to identify … Continue reading Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra v Revenue and Customs: CA 9 Oct 2006

Generale Bank Nederland Nv (Formerly Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland Nv) v Export Credit Guarantee Department: CA 23 Jul 1997

The bank claimed that it had been defrauded, and that since an employee of the defendant had taken part in the fraud the defendant was had vicarious liability for his participation even though they knew nothing of it. Held: Where A becomes liable to B as a joint tortfeasor with C in the tort of … Continue reading Generale Bank Nederland Nv (Formerly Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland Nv) v Export Credit Guarantee Department: CA 23 Jul 1997

British Steel Plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Customs and Excise: CA 20 Dec 1996

The claimant company paid excise duty on hydrocarbon oil used in its blast furnaces, whilst consistently contending that it was entitled to relief under section 9(1) of that Act on the ground that the oil was not used as fuel. The Commissioners rejected that contention. The claimant brought an action against the Commissioners claiming restitution … Continue reading British Steel Plc v Her Majesty’s Commissioners for Customs and Excise: CA 20 Dec 1996

Nokia Corporation v Revenue and Customs: ChD 27 Jul 2009

Nokia sought judicial review of a decision of the Commissioners to release a consignment of goods which it said were infringing counterfeits of its own models. The Commissioners said that in the absence of evidence that they were intended for distribution within the EU, it had no power to detain them. The goods were agreed … Continue reading Nokia Corporation v Revenue and Customs: ChD 27 Jul 2009

Customs and Excise v Smith: ChD 9 Nov 2005

Lewison J cited the case of Gascoyne saying that it was clear that ‘in the run-of-the-mill case where there has been a failure to give a paragraph 3 notice invoking the condemnation proceedings, the deeming provision will indeed operate against the applicant in any subsequent appeal to a tribunal.’ He likened the tribunal’s function to … Continue reading Customs and Excise v Smith: ChD 9 Nov 2005

HM Revenue and Customs v Cotter: CA 8 Feb 2012

Mr Cotter’s accountants had submitted a second tax return adding claims to loss relief in the following year. The claims were contentious, but he invited a review by the Revenue asserting that the losses wiped out any liability to tax. The Revenue said they would investigate but pursued the tax it said was due in … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Cotter: CA 8 Feb 2012

Marks and Spencer plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 11 Jul 2002

The claimant challenged the reduction of the limitation period from six years to three for the reclaiming of overpaid VAT with immediate effect, depriving it of the opportunity to recover sums paid in excess. The company sold vouchers. It paid VAT as directed by the Commissioners after challenge, but would have sought to reclaim sums … Continue reading Marks and Spencer plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 11 Jul 2002

M H Marshall v Southampton And South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching): ECJ 26 Feb 1986

ECJ The court considered the measure of compensation in a successful claim for sex discrimination arising from the health authority’s provision of an earlier compulsory retirement age for women compared with that for men in the same employment. The health authority paid her the maximum sum of pounds 6,250 which was then permitted as compensation … Continue reading M H Marshall v Southampton And South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching): ECJ 26 Feb 1986

Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd v Customs and Excise: ChD 27 Jul 2005

The appellants had imported Playstation computer games. They appealed refusal of a rebate of 50 million euros paid in VAT before a reclassification of the equipment so as to make it exempt from VAT. Held: ‘The effect of the annulment of a Community act under Articles 230 and 231 EC Treaty is to render that … Continue reading Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd v Customs and Excise: ChD 27 Jul 2005

Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Rank Group plc C-260/10: ECJ 10 Nov 2011

ECJ Taxation – Sixth VAT Directive – Exemptions – Article 13B(f) – Betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Mechanised cash bingo – Slot machines – Administrative practice departing from the legislative provisions – ‘Due diligence’ defence Citations: C-260/10, [2011] EUECJ C-260/10 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: European Citing: At VDT … Continue reading Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Rank Group plc C-260/10: ECJ 10 Nov 2011

Totel Distribution Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 31 Mar 2011

VAT – MTIC – contra-trading – clean chain broker – knew or should have known? – yes – appeal dismissed. Citations: [2011] UKFTT 217 (TC) Links: Bailii Citing: See Also – Totel Distribution Ltd v Customs and Excise VDT 24-Feb-2005 VDT VAT – input tax – alleged carousel fraud – Commissioners unable to establish circulation … Continue reading Totel Distribution Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 31 Mar 2011

Revenue and Customs v Cotter: ChD 14 Apr 2011

The taxpayer’s accountants had submitted a tax return amending the taxpayer’s own return adding claims for losses. The accountant acknowledged the contentious nature of the claim and invited a review. The Revenue sought now to recover the tax due under the initial return. Held: The County Court had jurisdiction to determine in collection proceedings whether … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Cotter: ChD 14 Apr 2011

Totel Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and Others: Admn 24 Mar 2011

The claimant sought to appeal against refusal of relief from payment of sums assessed by way of penalty, on the basis of hardship. HMRC argued that the right of appeal underthe 2007 Act had been taken away by the 1994 Act. Judges: Simon J Citations: [2012] QB 358, [2011] BVC 211, [2012] 2 WLR 435, … Continue reading Totel Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) and Others: Admn 24 Mar 2011

Lunn and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Revenue and Customs: Admn 16 Feb 2011

The claimants challenged a decision by HMCR to deal only with their client taxpayers direct and not with them as their agents, saying that they had failed to provide an opportunity for representations to be made and to give adequate reasons for the decision. Judges: Kenneth Parker J Citations: [2011] EWHC 240 (Admin) Links: Bailii … Continue reading Lunn and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Revenue and Customs: Admn 16 Feb 2011

Glaxo Group Ltd and Others v Inland Revenue Commissioners: ChD 21 Nov 1995

A tax adjustment can be made by the Inland Revenue on an open assessment following transfer pricing enquiry and direction, even after many years. The court considered that the jurisdiction of the special and the general commissioners to determine such issues was exclusive: ‘It is not easy to discern any clear dividing-line between High Court … Continue reading Glaxo Group Ltd and Others v Inland Revenue Commissioners: ChD 21 Nov 1995

RFC 2012 Plc (Formerly The Rangers Football Club Plc) v Advocate General for Scotland: SC 5 Jul 2017

The Court was asked whether an employee’s remuneration is taxable as his or her emoluments or earnings when it is paid to a third party in circumstances in which the employee had no prior entitlement to receive it himself or herself. Held: The company’s appeal failed. The purposive approach to the interpretation of the general … Continue reading RFC 2012 Plc (Formerly The Rangers Football Club Plc) v Advocate General for Scotland: SC 5 Jul 2017

The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 Dec 2009

FTTTx Community Law – Fiscal neutrality – Exemption – Exclusion of provision of ‘gaming machines’ from exemption – Whether taxed machines similar to exempt machines – Relevance of regulatory regime – TNT [2009] STC 1438 considered – Whether FOBTs exempt comparators – Whether on facts due diligence defence established to breach of fiscal neutrality Exemption- … Continue reading The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 Dec 2009

Inland Revenue Commissioners v Scottish Provident Institution: HL 25 Nov 2004

The parties anticipated a change in the system for taxing gains on options to buy or sell bonds and government securities. An option would be purchased before the change and exercised after the change to create losses which could be set off against other taxable gains. The risk to the market maker (Citibank) was set … Continue reading Inland Revenue Commissioners v Scottish Provident Institution: HL 25 Nov 2004

Barrett v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs: LT 24 Nov 2005

INHERITANCE TAX – house – comparables – allowance for lack of modern bathroom and kitchen, driveway and dispute with neighbour – market value of half-share in freehold interest determined at pounds 133,875 – Inheritance Tax Act 1984, s160 Citations: [2005] EWLands DET – 42 – 2005 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Inheritance Tax Updated: … Continue reading Barrett v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs: LT 24 Nov 2005

Yorkshire Co-operatives Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 16 Jan 2003

The retailer accepted coupons issued through newspapers against part of the purchase price of goods. The discount was recovered from the manufacturers on surrender of the coupons. They paid VAT on the discounted value, relying upon Gibbs. The commissioners sought VAT on the amount before the discount. Held: The claimant had misinterpreted the Gibbs case. … Continue reading Yorkshire Co-operatives Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 16 Jan 2003

Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v RBS Deutschland Holdings: ECJ 30 Sep 2010

ECJ Opinion – Interpretation of Article 17(3)(a) of the Sixth VAT Directive – Transactions carried out with the sole aim of obtaining a tax advantage – Provision of vehicle leasing services in the United Kingdom by the German subsidiary of a bank established in the United Kingdom. Judges: Mazak AG Citations: C-277/09, [2010] EUECJ C-277/09 … Continue reading Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v RBS Deutschland Holdings: ECJ 30 Sep 2010

In re Nortel Companies and Others: SC 24 Jul 2013

The court was asked as to the interrelationship of the statutory schemes relating to the protection of employees’ pensions and to corporate insolvency. Held: Liabilities which arose from financial support directions or contribution notices issued by the Pensions Regulator under the 2004 Act after the company had gone into administration, which required the company to … Continue reading In re Nortel Companies and Others: SC 24 Jul 2013

Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group: ChD 8 Jun 2009

The court was asked whether the VAT treatment of mechanised cash bingo breaches the principle of fiscal neutrality: and the core issue on the appeal is whether the burden lay on Rank to adduce evidence to prove not only that there was a difference in VAT treatment between similar (and apparently competing) products but also … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group: ChD 8 Jun 2009

NEC Semi-Conductors Limited and Other Test Claimants v The Commissioners of Inland Revenue: ChD 24 Nov 2003

UK companies were subsidiaries of companies resident abroad, and complained that they were unable to make group income elections. Held: The prohibition infringed non-discrimination provisions of double taxation agreements – non-discrimination provisions had not been given effect in domestic law in respect of advance corporation tax. It did not greatly matter whether the High Court … Continue reading NEC Semi-Conductors Limited and Other Test Claimants v The Commissioners of Inland Revenue: ChD 24 Nov 2003

Ingenious Media Holdings Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs: CA 4 Mar 2015

The claimant sought judicial review of the disclosure, off the record by an officer of the defendant to a journalist, of confidential materials as to their investigation of his involvement in a film investment scheme. The claim had been rejected by the Administrative Court. Held: The appeal failed. Sir Robin rejected the claimants’ arguments that … Continue reading Ingenious Media Holdings Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs: CA 4 Mar 2015

Ingenious Media Holdings Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Revenue and Customs: Admn 25 Oct 2013

Application for judicial review of a decision of the Defendants acting by one of their most senior officials to disclose information relating to the claimants in an ‘off the record’ briefing with two journalists. Held: The request for judicial review was refused. There was a proper connection between the function of the commissioners to collect … Continue reading Ingenious Media Holdings Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Revenue and Customs: Admn 25 Oct 2013

Rank Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 19 Aug 2008

VDT COMMUNITY LAW – Fiscal neutrality – Exemption – Gaming – Provision of gaming machines excluded from exemption – Similar supplies under Part III of Gaming Act 1968 exempt – Whether principle of fiscal neutrality infringed in law or in practice – Whether defence of due diligence by UK possible – Linneweber [2008] STC 1069 … Continue reading Rank Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 19 Aug 2008

The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: VDT 27 May 2008

VDT EXEMPT SUPPLIES – Gaming – Mechanised cash bingo under Gaming Act 1968 s.14 excluded from exemption – Similar supplies under s.21 exempt – Whether principle of fiscal neutrality infringed – Same company making supplies to same players under both section 14 and 21 – Whether infringement of fiscal neutrality requires competition between supplies as … Continue reading The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: VDT 27 May 2008

Neil Martin International Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 10 Oct 2005

reasonable excuse appeal Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19288 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Neil Martin Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners 28-Sep-2006 The claimant sought damages from the revenue for their failure properly to process his claim for a sub-contractor’s certificate which had led to losses. Held: The revenue owed … Continue reading Neil Martin International Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 10 Oct 2005

Lifestyles Healthcare (Europe) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Oct 2005

VALUE ADDED TAX – Exemption for health and welfare supplies – Group 7, item 1(a) and Note (2), Schedule 9, VATA – Appellant arranges for a diagnostic test to be carried out by a laboratory for the patient who is the Appellant’s customer – the diagnostic test supplied by the laboratory to the Appellant as … Continue reading Lifestyles Healthcare (Europe) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Oct 2005

Church of England Children’s Society v Revenue and Customs: ChD 29 Jul 2005

The Society sent out free newsletters to its unpaid fund-raisers and supporters. They sought to deduct input tax charged to them from the supplies associated with the costs. Held: The Society might be able to deduct such tax as residual input tax. The charity did carry on a business and made taxable supplies. The matter … Continue reading Church of England Children’s Society v Revenue and Customs: ChD 29 Jul 2005

Eli Lilly and Company and Another v 8PM Chemist Ltd: CA 5 Feb 2008

The defendant appealed against an order refusing summary relied against a claim for trade mark infringement. The claimant’s drugs were sold internationally, but outside the EU, being sourced in Turkey, and distributed eventually through the defendant’s premises in Slough. The claimant said that there was a pretence that the goods were sourced in the UK. … Continue reading Eli Lilly and Company and Another v 8PM Chemist Ltd: CA 5 Feb 2008

HM Revenue and Customs v Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd: ChD 21 Jan 2008

The court was asked whether the weight-watchers program which included attendance at a course and a supply of supporting materials was one single standard-rated supply or separate supplies of zero-rated printed materials and standard-rated support services. Held: The court asked whether if the tribunal was mistaken as to the law the court should overrule the … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd: ChD 21 Jan 2008

Able (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 22 Nov 2007

The taxpayer company had received compensation for having been excluded from its business premises for a period until a compulsory purchase process failed. It treated the receipt as capital. The revenue said it was income. Held: The court considered how to treat mistakes of law by lower courts.Buxton LJ said: ‘We were assured on all … Continue reading Able (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 22 Nov 2007

Loyalty Management UK Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 5 Oct 2007

The company (LMUK) managed a loyalty scheme for retailers. Their customers were awarded point sunder the schem on purchasing items, and then redeeemed those points against other purchases. LMUK sought to recover input tax on the invoices it paid to the companies accepting the loyalty cards against its sales. LMUK now appealed against refusal of … Continue reading Loyalty Management UK Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 5 Oct 2007

RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh v Revenue and Customs: VDT 24 Jul 2007

VDT VAT – deduction of input tax – leasing of cars within UK by German subsidiary company – cars purchased within UK, remaining there and subject to VAT in UK – leasing deemed to be supply of services in Germany for UK tax purposes – no VAT exigible in Germany on these payments – whether … Continue reading RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh v Revenue and Customs: VDT 24 Jul 2007

HM Revenue and Customs v Vodafone 2: CA 28 Jul 2006

The inspector had sought additional information from the company with respect to its tax returns, believing that the company had not provided sufficient information about the earnings of foreign controlled companies. They now challenged the ability of the commissioners, upheld at first instance to rule on a question of law. Held: Schedule 33 contained no … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Vodafone 2: CA 28 Jul 2006

Revenue and Customs v Maco Door and Window Hardware (Uk) Ltd: ChD 19 Jul 2006

The Revenue sought to disallow for industrial buildings allowance sums expended on warehouse premises which were to be used to store window products imported for use in other manufacturing processes. Held: The Revenue’s appeal succeeded. ‘The question under s.18(1) is whether the warehouse is in use for the purposes of a trade which consists in … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Maco Door and Window Hardware (Uk) Ltd: ChD 19 Jul 2006

Revenue and Customs v Loyalty Management UK Ltd: ChD 22 Jun 2006

The taxpayer operated a substantial loyalty reward scheme (Nectar) for assorted companies. The Revenue appealed against an order allowing the company to reclaim input VAT. The court was asked now: ‘what is the proper characteristic, for VAT purposes, of the payment made by LMUK to those other suppliers; is it a payment for a redemption … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Loyalty Management UK Ltd: ChD 22 Jun 2006

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Elm Milk Ltd: CA 3 Mar 2006

The taxpayer was sole director of a company. The company provided him with a car, and sought to recover the input VAT. The revenue disallowed the claim saying that it could not be shown to have been used exclusively for company business and not for private use. Held: The taxpayer had a contract with the … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Elm Milk Ltd: CA 3 Mar 2006

Revenue and Customs v RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh: SCS 13 Jan 2006

SCS The taxpayer, a German subsidiary of a UK bank, carried on a banking and leasing business in Germany. It did not have a place of establishment in the UK. It was registered in the UK for VAT as a non-established taxable person. It bought cars in the UK from an unconnected seller, and leased … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh: SCS 13 Jan 2006

Atlantic Electronics v HM Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Sep 2005

VALUE ADDED TAX – ZERO-RATING -supplies of mobile phones to a person in another Member State- International Consignment Notes (CMRs) contained false particulars – unreliable evidence demonstrating actual removal – no other evidence to substantiate removal – Commissioners entitled to conclude that the mobile phones had not been removed -whether domestic legislation compatible with Article … Continue reading Atlantic Electronics v HM Revenue and Customs: VDT 20 Sep 2005

College of Estate Management v Customs and Excise: HL 20 Oct 2005

The college supplied educational services by distance learning. The commissioner sought to argue that printe daterials supplied with the course were ancillary and did not have the same exemption form VAT. Held: The supplies did benefit from the exemption. The attempt to separate out the supply of prnted course materials was articifial and inconvincing. The … Continue reading College of Estate Management v Customs and Excise: HL 20 Oct 2005

Capewell v Customs and Excise and Another (No 2): CA 29 Jul 2005

The Commissioners had been appointed as receiver of the claimant’s assets. The receivership was later discharged, but should have been discharged earlier, the court had the power not only to calculate the level of remuneration but also who should be responsible for making payment. In this case the commissioner should bear some of the cost. … Continue reading Capewell v Customs and Excise and Another (No 2): CA 29 Jul 2005

Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra v Customs and Excise: ChD 21 Jul 2005

The Orchestra claimed exemption from VAT as a voluntary body supplying cultural services. The respondent argued that since the administrator was paid, the body was not voluntary. Held: The board operated as would a commercial company. All members were voluntary save the managing director who was paid. Where the remuneration of a board member was … Continue reading Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra v Customs and Excise: ChD 21 Jul 2005

Revenue and Customs v Jacobs: CA 22 Jul 2005

The taxpayer had converted a former residentional boarding school into a substantial private residence. He had sought to claim over andpound;300,000 VAT inputs. The Commissioners appealed the finding that he was so entitled. Held: ‘works constitute a residential conversion to the. extent only that they consist in the conversion of a non-residential (part of a) … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Jacobs: CA 22 Jul 2005

Brenner v Revenue and Customs; In re Modern Jet Support Centre Ltd: ChD 21 Jul 2005

The court was asked whether the process of distraint against goods for unpaid tax under section 61 of the 1970 Act is an ‘execution’ within section 183 of the 1986 Act which applies where a creditor has issued, but not completed, execution against the goods or land of a company which is subsequently wound up. … Continue reading Brenner v Revenue and Customs; In re Modern Jet Support Centre Ltd: ChD 21 Jul 2005

Revenue and Customs v Debenhams Retail Plc: CA 18 Jul 2005

The store introduced a system whereby when a customer paid by credit card, the charges made to them for card handling were expressed as a separate amount on the receipt. The store then said that VAT was payable only on the net amount allocated to the goods purchased. Held: The till slip was insufficent to … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Debenhams Retail Plc: CA 18 Jul 2005

Garde v Customs and Excise: VDT 25 Apr 2005

VDT DEFAULT SURCHARGE – Reasonable excuse – Pressure on taxpayer – Alleged blackmail of taxpayer by Inland Revenue – Alleged misfeasance by Court Service – Taxpayer’s time taken in resisting alleged wrongs – Whether reasonable excuse – No – Taxpayer’s wife acting as book-keeper – Taxpayer’s wife’s illness – Whether reasonable excuse – Not after … Continue reading Garde v Customs and Excise: VDT 25 Apr 2005

J v Crown Prosecution Service: CA 24 Jun 2005

The defendant had been made subject to a criminal restraint order so as to preserve his assets pending the outcome of criminal proceedings. He complained that the order affected property which was not his. Held: Such an order could cover property which he had obtained for the benefit of somebody else. What was required was … Continue reading J v Crown Prosecution Service: CA 24 Jun 2005

Messenger Leisure Developments Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 26 May 2005

The taxpayer supplied sports goods to members of a proprietary golf club. Held: The company was not acting to supply sports facilities. The commercial purpose of the trade undermined the company’s claim to exemption. Citations: [2005] EWCA Civ 648, Times 14-Jun-2005 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Kennemer Golf and Country Club … Continue reading Messenger Leisure Developments Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 26 May 2005

RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh v Revenue and Customs: VDT 3 May 2005

VDT Applications – opposed motion to sist part of the proceedings in the appeal pending an ECJ Decision: Application for an order for disclosure of documents – necessity of documents, relevance to issue reasonableness of request. Applications refused. Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19055 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: At VDT (1) – RBS Deutschland … Continue reading RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh v Revenue and Customs: VDT 3 May 2005

Totel Distribution Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 24 Feb 2005

VDT VAT – input tax – alleged carousel fraud – Commissioners unable to establish circulation of payment without tribunal inferring that certain payments had been made to particular party in chain of transactions – tribunal unwilling to make necessary inferences – appeal allowed without tribunal hearing any evidence. Citations: [2005] UKVAT V18956 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Totel Distribution Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 24 Feb 2005

Loyalty Management UK Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 6 Apr 2005

VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – the Appellant operates the Nectar programme under which customers who purchase goods (called primary goods) from certain retailers receive points which they may use to acquire goods (called secondary goods) from other suppliers – the Appellant pays the supplier for the secondary goods – whether, when a … Continue reading Loyalty Management UK Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 6 Apr 2005

Telewest Communications Plc Telewest (Publications) Limited v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 10 Feb 2005

The taxpayers sold cable services which were liable to VAT through 28 subsidiaries, and supplied by a third party as part of the same service a listings magazine. They sought exemption from VAT for that part of the consideration related to the magazine. Held: There had in effect to be a novation to convert the … Continue reading Telewest Communications Plc Telewest (Publications) Limited v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 10 Feb 2005

Inland Revenue and Another v Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc: CA 4 Feb 2005

The company sought repayment of excess advance corporation tax payments made under a mistake of law. The question was the extent of the effect of the ruling in Klienwort Benson, in particular whether it covered sums paid as taxation, and how the law of limitation was to be allowed for. Held: Money paid under a … Continue reading Inland Revenue and Another v Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc: CA 4 Feb 2005

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Thompson: ChD 28 Nov 2005

The claimant had been late in making class 2 national Insurance contributions over many years. The revenue appealed an order that it should have allowed the late paid contributions to count toward his pension entitlements. Held: The late payments may have been because of ignorance or lack of care or diligence, but that was not … Continue reading Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Thompson: ChD 28 Nov 2005

RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh v Customs and Excise: VDT 16 Nov 2004

VDT Application: Interlocutory Hearing – Jurisdiction – whether appeal raised in Edinburgh should be transmitted to London in respect that there was another connected appeal there – whether Appellants with potentially conflicting interests could or should be joined together at the instance of the Respondents – practical difficulties – whether appeal should be transferred so … Continue reading RBS Deutschland Holdings Gmbh v Customs and Excise: VDT 16 Nov 2004

Capewell v Commissioners for HM Customs and Excise and Sinclair: CA 2 Dec 2004

The court approved guidelines for the appointment and remuneration of a receiver appointed under the 1988 Act. Judges: Lord Justice Laws Lord Justice Longmore Lord Justice Carnwath Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 1628, [2005] 1 All ER 900, [2004] All ER (D) 29 Links: Bailii Statutes: Criminal Justice Act 1988 77(8) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: … Continue reading Capewell v Commissioners for HM Customs and Excise and Sinclair: CA 2 Dec 2004

Herbert Berry Associates Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners; re Herbert BerrySP, Regina (on The Application of) v The Lord Chancellor: HL 1977

The principle to the effect that the court should exercise its discretion to restrain a distress levied by a landlord before the commencement of a winding-up only where there were special circumstances rendering it inequitable that he should be permitted to do so, applies also to a distress levied by the Crown under a statutory … Continue reading Herbert Berry Associates Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners; re Herbert BerrySP, Regina (on The Application of) v The Lord Chancellor: HL 1977

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: ChD 12 Jul 2002

The tax payer had converted a building which had had both residential and business uses into residential use, and sought to reclaim the input tax on that part of the expenditure attributable to the residential part. The Commissioners appealed. Held: The tribunal was correct. There was no need to restrict the availability to wholly residential … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: ChD 12 Jul 2002

Gascoyne v Customs and Excise and Another: CA 28 Jul 2004

The Commissioners had found what they considered to be an excess of dutiable goods brought into the country by the tax payer, and had forfeited the car. The court considered the effect of the Gora case. Held: The difficult statements in Gora were obiter. In a case where the deeming provisions under paragraph 5 are … Continue reading Gascoyne v Customs and Excise and Another: CA 28 Jul 2004

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Frid: HL 13 May 2004

The company went into insolvent liquidation. The secretary of state was to make payments to employees and there were other state preferential creditors. At the same time a refund of VAT was due from the Commissioners of customs and Excise. Held: The sums paid out and preferential debts could be set off against the VAT … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Frid: HL 13 May 2004

Tesco Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 14 Oct 2003

The taxpayer had a loyalty scheme under which they issued vouchers to shoppers who had purchased goods to a certain value. They sought to deduct the sums when accounting for VAT. Held: Upon earning 150 loyalty points in a quarter, vouchers were given to customers, and there were other schemes. The entire cycle of transactions … Continue reading Tesco Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 14 Oct 2003

Regina on the Application of Wilkinson v The Commissioners of Inland Revenue: CA 18 Jun 2003

The claimant had not received the same tax allowance following his wife’s death as would have been received by a woman surviving her husband. That law had been declared incompatible with Human Rtights law as discriminatory, but the respondent refused to make good any claim which had not been originally pursued to the European Court, … Continue reading Regina on the Application of Wilkinson v The Commissioners of Inland Revenue: CA 18 Jun 2003

Mirror Group plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, Cantor Fitzgerald International v Same: ECJ 9 Oct 2001

A potential lessee who did not have an interest in immovable property agreed to take a lease in return for money paid by the landlord. The transaction was not exempt from value-added tax under article 13(B)(b) as ‘the leasing or letting of immovable property.’ Nor did a person taking an assignment of a lease of … Continue reading Mirror Group plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, Cantor Fitzgerald International v Same: ECJ 9 Oct 2001

Primback Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 15 May 2001

A company made arrangements for finance for its customers to purchase products at an apparent zero rate of interest. In fact the finance company deducted an undisclosed commission before forwarding payment to the shop. The shop wanted to pay VAT only on the amount it received. It was held to be liable on the amount … Continue reading Primback Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 15 May 2001

Kuwait Petroleum (GB) Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 27 Apr 1999

‘Items’ described as gifts’ which Kuwait Petroleum exchanged under a petrol promotion scheme for vouchers received by customers purchasing petrol were issued ‘free of charge’. The purchase of petrol and the exchange of vouchers for gifts were separate transactions, and the petrol was sold and invoiced for the price paid, there being nothing to suggest … Continue reading Kuwait Petroleum (GB) Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 27 Apr 1999

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Madgett and Baldwin (trading as Howden Court Hotel): ECJ 22 Oct 1998

The court considered the criteria for determining whether the provision to guests by a hotelier of travel services (and in particular transport to and from the hotel and excursions) constituted supply which was ancillary to the supply of accommodation. Held: The provision applied not just to travel agents, but to all ‘traders who habitually arrange … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Madgett and Baldwin (trading as Howden Court Hotel): ECJ 22 Oct 1998

Ames v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs: UTTC 25 Jun 2018

CAPITAL GAINS TAX – Enterprise Investment Scheme – meaning of ‘attributable’ in section 150A(2) Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 – whether CGT exemption only available if EIS income tax relief claimed – JUDICIAL REVIEW – whether HMRC adopted flawed methodology in appraising taxpayer’s late claim for relief and exercising powers under section 5(1) Commissioners … Continue reading Ames v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs: UTTC 25 Jun 2018

Gibbs and others v Rea: PC 29 Jan 1998

(Cayman Islands) The respondent worked for a bank. He disclosed a business interest, but that interest grew in importance to the point where he resigned in circumstances amounting to constructive dismissal. His home and business officers were raided and searched by the police. Nothing incriminating was found. He claimed damages saying the search warrrant had … Continue reading Gibbs and others v Rea: PC 29 Jan 1998

Clements v Revenue and Customs: VDT 18 Aug 2005

VALUE ADDED TAX – whether the Appellant properly registered for VAT purposes – paragraph 1(1)(a), Schedule 1, VATA – whether the exception from registration under paragraph 1(3), Schedule I, VATA applied – Customs refusing to take into account uncorroborated representations by the Appellant – Tribunal accepting the Appellant’s representations as to his expectations of the … Continue reading Clements v Revenue and Customs: VDT 18 Aug 2005

Fleming (T/A Bodycraft) v Revenue and Customs: HL 23 Jan 2008

The transitional rules introducing time limits for failing to deduct VAT inputs made insufficient allowance for the decisions in Marks and Spencer and Grundig. Held: Lord Hope said: ‘To be compatible with EU law, taxpayers were entitled to be told in advance of any transitional arrangements that would enable them to submit late accrued claims … Continue reading Fleming (T/A Bodycraft) v Revenue and Customs: HL 23 Jan 2008

Commissioners of Inland Revenue v McGuckian: HL 21 May 1997

Steps which had been inserted into a commercial transaction, but which had no purpose other than the saving of tax are to be disregarded when assessing the tax effect of the scheme. The modern approach to statutory construction is to have regard to the purpose of a particular provision and interpret its language, so far … Continue reading Commissioners of Inland Revenue v McGuckian: HL 21 May 1997

Apple and Pear Development Council v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 8 Mar 1988

Consideration means ‘everything received in return for the supply of services or the provision of services’. Judges: Advocate General Slynn Citations: C-102/86, R-102/86, [1988] EUECJ R-102/86, [1988] STC 221 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: European Cited by: Cited – Nell Gwynn House Maintenance Fund v Commissioners of Customs and Excise HL 15-Dec-1998 Trustees who managed a group … Continue reading Apple and Pear Development Council v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 8 Mar 1988

Ingenious Media Holdings Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs: SC 19 Oct 2016

The tax payer complained that the Permanent Secretary for Tax had, in an off the record briefing disclosed tax details regarding a film investment scheme. Despite the off the record basis, details were published in a newspaper. His claims had been rejected at first instance and at the court of appeal. Held: The taxpayer’s appeal … Continue reading Ingenious Media Holdings Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs: SC 19 Oct 2016

Energy Financing Team Ltd and others v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office, Bow Street Magistrates Court: Admn 22 Jul 2005

The claimants sought to set aside warrants and executions under them to provide assistance to a foreign court investigating alleged unlawful assistance to companies in Bosnia Herzegovina. Held: The issue of such a warrant was a serious step. The court gave guidance on the practice to be followed, but it was not correct for the … Continue reading Energy Financing Team Ltd and others v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office, Bow Street Magistrates Court: Admn 22 Jul 2005

Trafalgar Tours Ltd v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 1990

United Kingdom legislation is to be construed so far as possible so as to give effect to the purpose(s) of the European directives. As to the meaining of ‘consideration’ under the Sixth Directive: ‘Having regard to art 11A(1)(a) of the Sixth Directive, we are, therefore, subject to one important qualification prepared to accept that the … Continue reading Trafalgar Tours Ltd v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 1990

Customs and Excise Commissioners v Diner’s Club Ltd: CA 1989

Where a payment is made by credit card, some form of underlying contractual scheme will pre-date any individual contract of sale. This may include not merely the contract between the card-holder and card-issuer, but also an arrangement between the card-issuer or acquirer and the store. In over-the-counter sales, the retailer commonly has no record of … Continue reading Customs and Excise Commissioners v Diner’s Club Ltd: CA 1989

Customs and Excise Commissioners v Reed Personal Services Ltd: 1995

The court consideerd the basic nature of Value Added Tax (VAT): ‘First, . . .. the concept of supply for the purposes of VAT is not identical with that of contractual obligation. Secondly, in consequence, it is perfectly possible that although the parties in any given situation may conclude their contractual arrangements in writing so … Continue reading Customs and Excise Commissioners v Reed Personal Services Ltd: 1995

Herbert Berry Associates Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners: ChD 1976

The collector of taxes distrained on the goods of the company under section 61 TMA 1970 for unpaid taxes and the company entered into a walking possession agreement. Before the collector had sold the goods, and completed the distress, the company entered into voluntary winding-up and a liquidator was appointed. There was a deficiency of … Continue reading Herbert Berry Associates Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners: ChD 1976

Her Majestys Revenue and Customs: ICO 27 Apr 2011

The complainant made a request to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for information relating to the issue of fraudulently or dishonestly acquiring vehicles VAT-free through the disability scheme. HMRC provided some of the requested information but refused to provide all of the requested information. It explained that some of the information requested was exempt from … Continue reading Her Majestys Revenue and Customs: ICO 27 Apr 2011

Customs and Excise Commissioners v West Herts College: ChD 2001

West Herts College produced, printed and distributed prospectuses detailing its courses and facilities. The prospectuses were issued free to students and others. The expenditure producing the prospectuses had been treated by the Commissioners as expenditure in making both taxable and exempt supplies on the basis that a proportion of input tax on the goods and … Continue reading Customs and Excise Commissioners v West Herts College: ChD 2001

Routier and Another v Revenue and Customs: SC 16 Oct 2019

A Jersey Charity created under a will of a Jersey resident was transfer to the UK, and reregistered with the UK Charity Commission. The Revenue sought to apply Inheritance Tax. Held: Jersey was to be considered a third country for the purpose of a transfer of capital from the United Kingdom. The restriction of relief … Continue reading Routier and Another v Revenue and Customs: SC 16 Oct 2019

Routier and Another v Revenue and Customs: CA 16 Sep 2016

Executors appealed against a decision that a residual gift in a will was not charitable and that it was therefore subject to Inheritance Tax arguing that the section if construed in this way was an unlawful restriction on the free movement of capital. The revenue contended that the gift by a Jersey resident was to … Continue reading Routier and Another v Revenue and Customs: CA 16 Sep 2016

Routier and Another v Revenue and Customs: ChD 18 Sep 2014

Executors appealed against rejection of their claim that a gift in the will qualified for relief against Inheritance Tax as being a charitable gift. The Trusts concerned assets in Jersey. Held: The appeal failed: ‘The expression ‘held on trust for charitable purposes’ in section 23(6) requires not only that the charitable purposes be UK law … Continue reading Routier and Another v Revenue and Customs: ChD 18 Sep 2014

Revenue and Customs v Frank A Smart and Son Ltd: SC 29 Jul 2019

The question was whether a taxpayer can deduct as input tax the VAT which it has incurred in purchasing entitlements to an EU farm subsidy, the Single Farm Payment. The taxpayer had used those entitlements to annual subsidies over several years and intended to use money resulting from the receipt of those subsidies to fund … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Frank A Smart and Son Ltd: SC 29 Jul 2019

BLP Group v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 6 Apr 1995

The use of taxable goods for an exempt transaction disallowed a claim against VAT input tax. The use in that provision of the words ‘for transactions’ shows that to give the right to deduct under paragraph 2, the goods or services in question must have a direct and immediate link with the taxable transactions, and … Continue reading BLP Group v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 6 Apr 1995

Patel and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 5 Apr 2018

Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Assessment/Self-Assessment – INCOME TAX- preliminary issue – ‘voluntary returns’ – no notice given by HMRC under s.8(1) Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA) requiring a taxpayer to file a return – HMRC treating returns as made under s 8 TMA – enquiry commenced under s. 9A TMA – closure notice issued under … Continue reading Patel and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 5 Apr 2018