Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Elm Milk Ltd: CA 3 Mar 2006

The taxpayer was sole director of a company. The company provided him with a car, and sought to recover the input VAT. The revenue disallowed the claim saying that it could not be shown to have been used exclusively for company business and not for private use.
Held: The taxpayer had a contract with the company which explicitly required it to be used only on company business and to be parked at the company. The keys were kept in the company office. Private use would be a breach of the director’s contract of employment. In these circumstances the company had done enough to show an intention that it be used exclusively on company business, and the company was able to reclaim the input tax.

Judges:

Lord Justice Ward Lady Justice Arden Lord Justice Moore-Bick

Citations:

Times 20-Mar-2006, [2006] EWCA Civ 164

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Value Added Tax (Input Tax) Order 1992 7

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

At VDTElm Milk Ltd v Customs and Excise VDT 16-Apr-2004
. .
Appeal fromCommissioners of Customs and Excise v Elm Milk Ltd ChD 3-Feb-2005
The taxpayer, was sole director of a company. The company provided him with a car, and sought to recover the input VAT. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.239838