Citations: [2002] EWHC 2688 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.178892

Guidance given on what evidence should be admitted to affect the length of disqualification and conditions of Director’s disqualification.A director’s duty to exercise his powers in the best interests of the company and to recognise the separate legal character of the company are essential attributes of fitness to be concerned in the management of a … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Griffiths; Conway and Wassell; In Re Westmid Packing Services Ltd: CA 16 Dec 1997

Judges: Lightman J Citations: [2006] EWHC 299 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Regina v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, Ex Parte Eastaway HL 8-Nov-2000 Where the Court of Appeal had refused permission to apply for judicial review after a similar refusal … Continue reading Eastaway v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and similar: ChD 2 Mar 2006

Judges: Rix LJ Citations: [2005] EWCA Civ 1098 Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 28 June 2022; Ref: scu.229858

Application by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry for an order under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Citations: [1999] EWHC 838 (Ch), [1999] 2 BCLC 704 Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 6 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.341196

Mr Bairstow had been found guilty of grave misconduct and neglect of his duties in wrongful dismissal proceedings which he brought against a company of which he had been the managing director. The Secretary of State now sought an order against him under section 8 of the 1986 Act. Judges: The Honourable Sir Donald Ratee … Continue reading In re Queens Moat Houses Plc; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow, Hersey, Marcus, Porter: ChD 19 Jul 2004

‘It is well established on the authorities that causing a company to trade, first, while it is insolvent and, secondly, without a reasonable prospect of meeting creditors’ claims is likely to constitute incompetence of sufficient seriousness to ground a disqualification order. But it is important to emphasise that it will usually be necessary for both … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Creegan and others: CA 27 Nov 2001

A director was prosecuted for the criminal offence of fraudulent trading, and in light of that the Disqualification Unit at the Insolvency Service decided not to pursue its own disqualification application under s6 but to ask the prosecution to seek an order under s2 if a conviction was obtained. That request was made to the … Continue reading Re Denis Hilton Ltd: ChD 2002

Appeal from Company Director Disqualification Citations: [2001] EWCA Civ 1237 Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 31 May 2022; Ref: scu.147644

Morritt LJ, giving the judgment of the court, distinguished between the conduct of two directors, disqualifying one for twelve years and the other for eight. He said: ‘The period for disqualification is a matter for the discretion of the judge hearing the application to be exercised in accordance with the relevant principles. One such principle … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v McTighe: CA 1997

Judges: Mullen ICC J Citations: [2019] EWHC 459 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 6 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 30 May 2022; Ref: scu.634409

Appeal against banning order. Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 286 Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 29 May 2022; Ref: scu.216730

A director’s disqualification order was sought. The order was sought on the basis of allegations of conduct as liquidator of several companies. Judges: Newey J Citations: [2012] EWHC 1899 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Deloitte and Touche Ag v Johnson and Another PC 10-Jun-1999 … Continue reading Wood and Another v Mistry: ChD 10 Jul 2012

A finding of breach of duty is neither necessary nor of itself sufficient for a finding of unfitness. As the judge (at first instance) observed a person may be unfit even though no breach of duty is proved against him or may remain fit notwithstanding the proof of various breaches of duty. The appeal was … Continue reading In re Barings plc (No 5): CA 2000

A disqualified director applied for consent to act in the management of a company before his disqualification had expired. He succeeded, and the judge made no award for costs. On appeal by the Secretary of State it was held that the lifting of the disqualification was a matter purely for the discretion of the judge. … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Collins and others: CA 13 Jan 2000

When considering what constituted a shadow director, courts should be reluctant to move away from the words of the Act. The words should be construed carefully because the term was used in several pieces of legislation, including those with penal provisions. A shadow director is one who has real influence on a company. He does … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Deverill and another: CA 20 Jan 2000

The disqualified director sought leave under section 17 to act as a director in circumstances which did not involve him assuming any executive responsibilities, other than of a trivial nature, and left him free to contract as a consultant. Held: Where a disqualification order has been made following dishonesty, that is likely to be a … Continue reading Re Barings and Others (No 3): ChD 1999

Sir Richard Scott V-C considered the effect of the relative strength of the case as to need on the degree of risk to the public that might be acceptable on any resumption of company director responsibilities, and concluded that in a strong case of need some slight risk might be acceptable: ‘In a case where … Continue reading Re Dawes and Henderson Agencies Ltd: ChD 1999

Company directors had had civil proceedings for disqualification suspended pending the outcome of criminal proceedings arising from the circumstances of the failure of their companies. They had variously suffered penalties including criminal disqualifications in those criminal proceedings, under section 2. They sought to argue that the continuation of the civil proceedings under section 6 would … Continue reading In Re Cedarwood Productions Ltd; In Re Inter City Print and Finishing Ltd; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Rayna and Another: CA 26 Jun 2001

The purpose of the jurisdiction created under the Act is to promote better management standards in companies. Citations: [1993] BCLC 796 Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Michael Hamilton Amiss, Jonathan Andrew Chapman, Roger Rex Ingles ChD 20-Mar-2003 … Continue reading re Swift 736 Limited: 1993

The Secretary of State, when presenting an application for the disqualification of a company director is obliged to present a balanced picture. ‘It is accepted that these are not ordinary adversarial proceedings but have an element of public interest and may entail penal consequences. It follows that there is a duty on the applicant to … Continue reading Re Moonlight Foods Ltd , Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Hickling: 1996

Referring to the procedure in disqualification proceedings of serving an affidavit, the court held: ‘That procedure, and, in particular, the mandatory requirement in r 6, emphasises the importance to the respondent of being able to ascertain with clarity from the evidence filed on behalf of the applicant what are the criticisms laid against him, and … Continue reading Re Sutton Glassworks Ltd: ChD 1996

Chadwick J said: ‘It would be preferable, for the future, if those preparing and swearing affidavits in support of applications under this Act were careful to distinguish between facts which they are able to establish by direct evidence, the inferences which they invite the court to draw from those facts, and the matters which are … Continue reading Re Pinemoor Ltd: ChD 1997

The affidavit filed in proceedings under the Act take a role similar to that of the pleadings in other cases. Judges: HH Judge Micklem Citations: [1994] BCC 226 Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Swan and Othes ChD … Continue reading Re Circle Holidays International plc: ChD 1994

A failure to file his company’s accounts is a serious default, and is sufficient to warrant the disqualification of a company secretary from acting as a company director. The filing of accounts is a substantial protection for those trading with limited companies. Citations: Times 05-Jan-1993 Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, Companies Act 1985 Jurisdiction: … Continue reading In Re Pamstock Ltd: ChD 5 Jan 1993

Judges: Miles J Citations: [2020] EWHC 2778 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 17(3) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.655198

Judges: Mr Eason Rajah QC (Sitting as a Judge of the High Court) Citations: [2021] EWHC 2463 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 17 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.671318

The director appealed against a 12 year disqualification. The basis of the disqualification was unlawful trading to the detriment of creditors, and taking excess drawings. The Vice-Chancellor, Lord Justice Buxton, And, Lady Justice Arden [2004] BCC 581, [2002] 1 BCLC 119, [2000] 1 WLR 2230, [2001] EWCA Civ 1787 Bailii Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 … Continue reading Official Receiver v Stern and Another: CA 20 Nov 2001

The Secretary of State sought company director disqualification orders against the defendants saying they had been convicted of making false instruments. The Insolvency service had decided against such proceedings, and the Crown Court judge, when sentencing them had considered and rejected orders. The defendants now argued that the instant proceedings were an abuse of process. … Continue reading The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Weston and Another: ChD 5 Sep 2014

The claimant sought a disqualification after the defendants had been directors of a company mis-selling Structured Capital at Risk products. The FSA had reported that they had been negligent. Held: ‘I do not have to decide whether or not the defendants were negligent. The question is whether their risk ratings were so flawed that they … Continue reading Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills v Aaron and Others: ChD 10 Dec 2009

Robert Walker LJ said that the expression ‘de facto director’ had been in use for a long time, and commented on the failure to distinguish in pleadings between pleas that someone was a shadow or a de facto director. The two different labels were not necessarily mutually exclusive. He said: ‘However the two concepts do … Continue reading Re Kaytech International plc; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Kaczer and others: CA 1999

The directors appealed against disqualification orders made against them under the 1986 Act. Their company had become insolvent, owing substantial arrears of PAYE and NI contributions. The revenue had said that they had paid other creditors first. Held: When considering appeals to avoid disqualification, a court would be better guided by the use of the … Continue reading Cathie and Another v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills: CA 1 Jun 2012

The claimant had offered an undertaking not to act as a company director for a period of time, to avoid applications for his disqualification. He now sought leave to act. Held: The applicant had: ‘put forward ample evidence to justify a finding that he is skilled and experienced at marketing and sales and would be … Continue reading Harris v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills: ChD 9 Aug 2013

renewed application for permission to appeal . .

. .

The lower court had dismissed a petition for a director disqualification because of the failure to comply with the ten day requirement in section 16.
Held: (Majority) The provisions of section 16 were directory only and not mandatory. . .

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .