The claimant had served an asset freezing order on the bank in respect of one of its customers. The bank paid out on a cheque inadvertently as to the order. The Commissioners claimed against the bank in negligence. The bank denied any duty of care. Held: The bank’s appeal succeeded. The bank owed a duty … Continue reading HM Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc: HL 21 Jun 2006
(1) In judicial review applications transferred by the Administrative Court to the Upper Tribunal, the applicable procedural regime is that contained in the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008. The Civil Procedure Rules have no effect thereafter; although the procedural history may be significant, particularly as regards time limits. (2) The prohibition in rule 29(3) … Continue reading Kimondo, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department (Relevant Rules; AOS Requirements) (IJR): UTIAC 14 Nov 2014
The court considered whether a judge sitting in the County court had power to sit alone and without assessors when determining an application to strike out a pleading. Held: He had that power. Judges: Sedley, Moses LJJ Citations: [2010] EWCA Civ 1279, [2011] CP Rep 12 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Civil Procedure Rules … Continue reading Deman v The Commission for Equality and Human Rights and Others: CA 16 Nov 2010
The Court considered the rights or otherwise of appealing to the Court of Appeal in Patents cases. Kitchin, Floyd LJJ [2016] EWCA Civ 1296 Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 52.3(6) England and Wales Litigation Practice, Intellectual Property Updated: 27 January 2022; Ref: scu.572422
The parties had agreed to work tgether in the development of new drugs, but came to dispute whether certain projects were subject to the agreement. The claimant sought details of the defendant’s internal documents justifying that conclusion. The defendant then refused access to certain documents asserting legal professional privlege. The claimants now sought an order … Continue reading Astex Therapeutics Ltd v Astrazeneca Ab: ChD 8 Nov 2016
Application by the Defendants for security for costs pursuant to CPR 25 Snowden J [2016] EWHC 2610 (Ch) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules England and Wales Costs Updated: 24 January 2022; Ref: scu.570478
Claimant may be ordered to disclose funder The claimant alleged the misselling of interest rate sawp agreements by the defendant to his companies, leading to losses of andpound;700 million. The defendant now applied for disclosure of the identity of any third party funding the claimant’s litigation, and if appropriate the associated costs order. Held: RBS … Continue reading Wall v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc: ComC 7 Oct 2016
The court was asked: ‘can the court proceed to validate a warrant of possession where a landlord who seeks to enforce his right to possession because of an alleged breach of the terms of a suspended possession order has not complied with CPR 83.2? ‘ Held: CPR r 83.2 were intended to provide real protection … Continue reading Cardiff County Council v Lee (Flowers): CA 19 Oct 2016
ECJ Articles 53(2) and 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Social policy – Principle of equal treatment – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Determination of length of service – Difference … Continue reading Vino C-161/11: ECJ 22 Jun 2011
The defendant appealed against an order that it provide security for the claimant’s costs which led to the stay of the defendant’s counterclaim. Morgan J [2013] EWHC 686 (Ch) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 25.12 20.3 England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 20 January 2022; Ref: scu.472044
appeal about security for costs. Held: Where a foreign company is reticent in revealing, or declines to reveal its financial position, it is ‘sound’ practice to grant security against it: ‘ If a company is given every opportunity to show that it can pay a defendant’s costs and deliberately refuses to do so there is, … Continue reading Sarpd Oil International Ltd v Addax Energy Sa and Another: CA 3 Mar 2016
ECJ (Order) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 – Scope – Recognition of a private divorce pronounced by a religious court in a third country – Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court C-281/15, … Continue reading Sahyouni v Mamisch: ECJ 12 May 2016
Reconsideration of a dismissal order dated 19 February 2016 dismissing an appellant’s notice for failure to comply with the Civil Procedure Rules Practice Direction 52C. Meacher M [2016] EWCA Civ 380 Bailii England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.563246
Appeal by a defendant, whose defence had been struck out for non-compliance with court orders, against the refusal of relief from that sanction pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 3.9. The principal issues in this appeal were: i) whether, in assessing the seriousness of non-compliance with an ‘unless’ order, the court should have regard to the … Continue reading Oak Cash and Carry Ltd v British Gas Trading Ltd: CA 15 Mar 2016
This appeal raises the question of how the court should approach the grant of relief from sanctions in a case where the defaulting party has delayed in applying for relief but is able to point to evidence that enables it to allege that the claim is a fraudulent one. Lewison, Beatson, Vos LJJ [2016] EWCA … Continue reading Gentry v Miller and Another: CA 9 Mar 2016
Application for pre-action disclosure made pursuant to section 33(2) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and part 31.16 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Richard Spearman QC HHJ [2016] EWHC 376 (Ch) Bailii England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.560320
The parties were competing companies. The claimant sought to usePre-action disclosure procedures after proceedings had already been issued. Held: ‘the Claimants have made out a clear and strong case for the exercise of the Court’s discretion to order pre-action disclosure in their favour, and I so order.’ Moloney QC HHJ [2016] EWHC 297 (QB) Bailii … Continue reading Anglia Research Services Ltd and Another v Finders Genealogists Ltd and Another: QBD 17 Feb 2016
The claimants sought a declaration as against the residuary beneficiaries (wife and daughter) under the will, saying that the claimants had a beneficial interest in company shares within the estate. The defendants fild acknowledgments of service but asserting expressly that they did not submit to the jurisdiction of the court. The claimants said that the … Continue reading Winkler and Another v Shamoon and Others: ChD 15 Feb 2016
The defendant sought to have struck out the claim on the basis that delay made a fair trial impossible. Warren J [2006[ EWHC 3697 (Ch) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 3.492) England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 09 January 2022; Ref: scu.263664
ECJ Order – Preliminary reference – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Absence of reasonable doubt – Jurisdiction in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 16, paragraph 1 a) – Determination of the date on which a court is seised – Application for stay of proceedings – … Continue reading P v M: ECJ 16 Jul 2015
Two Part 8 Claims brought by the parties seeking declarations in respect of the proper construction of income sharing arrangements under a waste management project agreement and associated relief. Mrs Justice O’Farrell [2021] EWHC 2867 (TCC) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 8 England and Wales Contract Updated: 02 January 2022; Ref: scu.670702
In each case the local authority sought to recover possession of its own land. In the Lambeth case, they asserted this right as against an overstaying former tenant, and in the Leeds case as against gypsies. In each case the occupiers said that the recovery of possession interfered with their right respect for their family … Continue reading Kay and Another v London Borough of Lambeth and others; Leeds City Council v Price and others and others: HL 8 Mar 2006
The union appellant challenged the validity of the imposition of fees on those seeking to lay complaints in the Employment Tribunal system. Held: The appeal succeeded. The fees were discriminatory and restricted access to justice. The consequence of the order had been very substantially to reduce the number of cases coming before the tribunal, and: … Continue reading Unison, Regina (on The Application of) v Lord Chancellor: SC 26 Jul 2017
Master Dagnall [2021] EWHC 1680 (Comm) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 71 England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.667391
ECHR Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Limitations on access to domestic courts to review recruitment procedure before European Patent Office when reasonable alternative procedure (arbitration) available: inadmissible Facts – The applicant, who is disabled, applied for a post as a patent examiner at the European Patent Office (EPO) in Munich. Although … Continue reading Klausecker v Germany (Dec): ECHR 6 Jan 2015
Where an innocent party had been joined in an action in order to ensure proper discovery, he should be excused from the action once he had complied with the discovery required. It would be wrong to continue his involvement against an unsupported expectation that further documents might be required. Mr John Jarvis, QC Times 14-Feb-2002, … Continue reading Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc and Others: ChD 6 Feb 2002
Appeal against judgment given under Part 24 of Civil Procedure Rules. Moore-Bick, McFarlane, Floyd LJJ [2014] EWCA Civ 994 Bailii England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 17 December 2021; Ref: scu.534409
Mr Justice Morison [2003] EWHC 1367 (Comm) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 31.16 England and Wales Civil Procedure Rules Updated: 16 December 2021; Ref: scu.183567
U appealed from conviction and sentence of six months for contempt of court. The court used its inherent jurisdictionVos LJ said: ‘The process of committal for contempt is a highly technical one as this case shows. But it is highly technical for a very good reason, namely the importance of protecting the rights of those … Continue reading In re L (A Child): CA 22 Mar 2016
Media application for release of report referred to in proceedings The Honourable Mr Justice Calver [2021] EWHC 1193 (Comm) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 5.4C(2) England and Wales Civil Procedure Rules, Media Updated: 15 December 2021; Ref: scu.663102
Mr Lawson was employed by Serco as a security supervisor at the British RAF base on Ascension Island, which is a dependency of the British Overseas Territory of St Helena. Mr Botham was employed as a youth worker at various Ministry of Defence establishments in Germany; under the NATO Status of Forces Agreement of 1951 … Continue reading Serco Ltd v Lawson; Botham v Ministry of Defence; Crofts and others v Veta Limited: HL 26 Jan 2006
One of the defendants had not been properly served by posting the proceedings to an address at which he stayed on his very occasional visits to London. The proceedings had not been issued for the purposes of service abroad, because at the time of deemed service under CPR 6 he was not physically within the … Continue reading Chellaram and Another v Chellaram and others (No 2): ChD 16 Apr 2002
In litigation where there are split issues (such as liability preceding quantum), where no offer to settle the litigation under CPR Part 36 has been made, and where one party makes a without prejudice save as to costs offer covering the entirety of the litigation (‘a Calderbank offer’) how might the discretion as to costs … Continue reading Mckeown v Langer: CA 26 Nov 2021
Defendants appealed against an order allowing the application of the first, second and fourth respondents for relief from sanction under CPR 3.9. The relief sought had previously been refused by Hildyard J, so this was the respondents’ second application for the same relief. The defendants had, before the second application complied with the unless order. … Continue reading Thevarajah v Riordan and Others: CA 16 Jan 2014
The claimants alleged misuse of their private information in collecting information about their internet useage when using Google products. Google now applied for an order setting aside consent for service out of the jurisdiction. Held: The judge dismissed the applications to set aside permission to serve the claim form out of the jurisdiction in respect … Continue reading Vidal-Hall and Others v Google Inc: QBD 16 Jan 2014
ECHR Article 46-2 Execution of judgment Measures of a general character Respondent State encouraged to take further measures to provide genuine effective relief for violations of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time Facts – In their applications to the European Court, the three applicants complained of the lack of an effective … Continue reading Vlad And Others v Romania (Legal Summary): ECHR 26 Nov 2013
The defendant company appealed against an order re-instating the claimants’ claims for damages for race discrimination and victimisation after they had been struck out for wilful disobedience of the tribunal’s orders. Held: When making a strike-out order, there were two cardinal conditions at least one of which must be met. Either the unreasonable conduct has … Continue reading Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James: CA 25 May 2006
ECHR Article 8Positive obligationsArticle 8-1Respect for family lifeRespect for private lifeRefusal to allow a change of patronymic: violationFacts – In March 2004 the applicant, a Ukrainian national, lodged a request for a change of her patronymic to one derived from her stepfather’s forename. The Registration Office refused on the grounds that the Rules on Civil … Continue reading Garnaga v Ukraine: ECHR 16 May 2013
Appeal from a decision relating to relief from sanction under CPR 3.9. The context is failure to serve witness statements within the time specified by a prior court order. Laws, Sullivan, Davis LJJ [2014] EWCA Civ 506, [2014] 3 Costs LR 588, [2014] CILL 3513 Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 3.9 England and Wales Costs Updated: … Continue reading Chartwell Estate Agents Ltd v Fergies Properties Sa and Another: CA 16 Apr 2014
The claimant said that the software supplied to it was not fit for purpose. The defendant said that the company had relied on its own inspections of what was a standard package, and had not made known its desire to use it in a specific context. The claimant had originally pleaded reliance on the defendant’s … Continue reading Kingsway Hall Hotel Ltd v Red Sky IT (Hounslow) Ltd: TCC 6 May 2010
An appeal against a damages award in a defamation case had been unsuccessful. The claimant now appealed for the award of indemnity costs. The claimant had made an offer of compromise, which had been ignored by the defendant. Held: If a party has made a real effort to find a reasonable solution for the circumstances, … Continue reading Kiam II v MGN Ltd (2): CA 6 Feb 2002
The claimant appealed against a decision allowing a defendant to withdraw an admission of liability. As a child she had got into difficulties during a class swimming lesson, and had ceased to breathe leaving her with catastrophic hypoxic brain injury. There had been confusion about the involvement of the Swimming Teachers’ Association. The claimant said … Continue reading Woodland v Stopford and Others: CA 16 Mar 2011
amwell_dogherty The claimant had secretly recorded the disciplinary hearings and also the deliberations of the disciplinary panel after their retirement. The tribunal had at a case management hearing admitted the recordings as evidence, and the defendant appealed, saying also that it had been disclosed too late. Held: The evidence contained in the recordings was relevant … Continue reading Amwell View School v Dogherty: EAT 15 Sep 2006
A claim was issued in London in December 2004, and then served in part in Switzerland in January 2005. One copy was removed from the bundle by a Swiss official, seeing that it had been marked ‘Nor for service out of the jurisdiction.’ That marking had been in error. After proceedings were then issued in … Continue reading Nussberger and Another v Phillips and Another (No 4): CA 19 May 2006
Immigration detention proper after prison release The Home Secretary appealed against a finding that he had unlawfully detained the applicant. The applicant had been detained on release from prison pending his return to Zimbabwe as recommended by the sentencing judge under section 6 of the 1971 Act. The court had found that the detention had … Continue reading SK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 6 Nov 2008
There are no degrees of nullity The plaintiffs had owned mining property in Egypt. Their interests were damaged and or sequestrated and they sought compensation from the Respondent Commission. The plaintiffs brought an action for the declaration rejecting their claims was a nullity. The Commission replied that the courts were precluded from considering the question … Continue reading Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission: HL 17 Dec 1968
The various claimants sought damages for established breaches of their human rights involving breaches of statutory duty by way of maladministration. Does the state have a duty to provide support so as to avoid a threat to the family life of the claimant? Held: A finding that a Convention right has been infringed, including a … Continue reading Anufrijeva and Another v London Borough of Southwark: CA 16 Oct 2003
Defamation/privacy claims against doctors failed The claimant, seeking damages for alleged defamation, now asked for the case to be anonymised. Held: The conditions for anonymisation were not met. The anonymity would be retained temporarily until any time for appeal had passed. As to the defamation allegation (contained in an email: ‘in order to satisfy the … Continue reading ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust: QBD 26 Jul 2019
Rule Against Appeal was Ultra Vires W had applied to have set aside the consent order made on her ancillary relief application accusing the husband of material non-disclosure. She complained that her application to have the order varied had been refused on the ground that her only remedy was in an appeal. Held: The appeal … Continue reading CS v ACS and Another: FD 16 Apr 2015
Equitable Interpleader Equitable Interpleader – Enforcement – controlled goods – interpleader – equity – common law – Civil Procedure – Rules of Supreme Court – title to goods – third party – Writ – High Court Enforcement Officers Victoria McCloud M [2018] EWHC 219 (QB) Bailii Civil Procedure Rules 85.4 85.5, Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement … Continue reading Celador Radio Ltd v Rancho Steak House Ltd (Equitable Interpleader – Enforcement): QBD 16 Feb 2018
Guidance for Wasted Costs Orders Guidance was given on the circumstances required for the making of wasted costs orders against legal advisers. A judge invited to make an order arising out of an advocate’s conduct of court proceedings must make full allowance for the fact that an advocate has to make decisions quickly and under … Continue reading Ridehalgh v Horsefield; Allen v Unigate Dairies Ltd: CA 26 Jan 1994
ECHR Grand Chamber – Article 5-1 Lawful arrest or detention Internment in Iraq under Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions: no violation Article 1 Jurisdiction of states Responsibility of states Territorial jurisdiction in relation to detention of Iraqi national by coalition of armed forces in Iraq Facts – In March 2003 a coalition of armed forces … Continue reading Hassan v The United Kingdom (LS): ECHR 16 Sep 2014
The applicants had been imprisoned and held without trial, being suspected of international terrorism. No criminal charges were intended to be brought. They were foreigners and free to return home if they wished, but feared for their lives if they did. A British subject, who was suspected in the exact same way, and there were … Continue reading A v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and X v Secretary of State for the Home Department: HL 16 Dec 2004
The court considered the levels of meaning in an article falsely connecting the claimant with terrorist activity: ‘Once it is recognised that the article may be asserting no more than that in one way or another the respondents may unwittingly have assisted terrorists in the past and may by introducing more controls be able to … Continue reading Jameel, Abdul Latif Jameel Company Limited v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl (No 1): CA 26 Nov 2003
The claimant sought disclosure under the 1998 Act by the defendant of records held by them. The respondent said that the information they held did not amount to data under the Act. Held: The information was contained in different formats, on paper, electronically and on CD, but was then brought together in a risk assessment. … Continue reading Johnson v The Medical Defence Union Ltd: ChD 3 Mar 2006
The respondent had issued bonds but in 2001 had declared a moratorium on paying them. The appellant hedge fund later bought the bonds, heavily discounted. Judgment was obtained in New York, which the appellants now sought to enforce against assets in the UK. They argued that the terms of issue waived state immunity. Held: The … Continue reading NML Capital Ltd v Argentina: SC 6 Jul 2011
The claimants had been in coaches being driven to take part in a demonstration at an air base. The defendant police officers stopped the coaches en route, and, without allowing any number of the claimants to get off, returned the coaches to London. The officer acted saying that he feared a breach of the peace … Continue reading Laporte, Regina (on the application of ) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire: HL 13 Dec 2006
The claimant companies conducted forms of medical research to which the respondents objected, and showed their objections by a wide variety of acts and threats which the claimants sought to have stopped. The defendants sought discharge of an interim injunction. Held: The case of Burris was instructive. New powers were available including ASBOs and under … Continue reading Huntingdon Life Sciences Group Plc Huntingdon Life Sciences Limited, Brian Cass (for and on Behalf of the Employees of the First Claimant Pursuant To Cpr Part 19.6) v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty: QBD 28 May 2004
The student, a Muslim wished to wear a full Islamic dress, the jilbab, but this was not consistent with the school’s uniform policy. She complained that this interfered with her right to express her religion. Held: The school’s appeal succeeded. The school had acted responsibly and carefully seeking to balance and respect several interests when … Continue reading Begum (otherwise SB), Regina (on the Application of) v Denbigh High School: HL 22 Mar 2006
After a personal injury claim, the judge had apportioned liability and ordered each side to pay the costs of the other. The case had been allocated to the fast track. Held: The appeal failed. The existence of the Conditional Fee Agreement did not affect the form of order. The award of costs remained the exercise … Continue reading Horth v Thompson: QBD 6 Jul 2010
Following its earlier main judgment in the case, the court made use of the CPR to award costs on an appeal. The overall result had been that the patent was found to be valid but not infringed. There had been huge costs. Smithkline sought costs on an indemnity basis, saying the court had certified the … Continue reading Smithkline Beecham Plc and Another v Apotex Europe Ltd and others: CA 16 Dec 2004
Anonymity Not Necessary under CPR 3.92. Judgment on the Claimant’s application for an order under CPR 39.2(4) that her name be anonymised in these proceedings by the use of a cipher and that restrictions should be imposed on the reporting of her identity. She said that publication of her name would have adverse psychological factors. … Continue reading Imam, Regina (on The Application of) v The London Borough of Croydon (Anonymity request): Admn 26 Mar 2021
The appellant and defendant said that the agreement compromising their action, and embodied within a Tomlin schedule, had been reached by duress and was vitiated. He said that the Recorder had exercised undue influence in advising the need for a settlement by compromise, and had ventured into discussing the terms of what had been without … Continue reading Watson v Sadiq and Another: CA 16 Jul 2013
The claimants sought damages after delays by the bank in processing transfer requests. The bank said that the delays were made pending reports of suspected criminal activity. The bank’s delay had stigmatised the claimant causing further losses. The bank requested that the claims be struck out. The claimants sought permission to amend their claims. Held: … Continue reading Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd: QBD 26 Jan 2009
The claimant applied for judicial review of a decision of a Magistrates Court to convict her of driving with excess alcohol. The grounds were that the district judge acted unlawfully in proceeding with the trial without disclosure by the prosecution of CCTV film of the custody suite. The court had refused permission to proceed with … Continue reading Imbeah, Regina (on The Application of) v Willesden Magistrates’ Court and Another: QBD 14 Jul 2016
The claimant alleged infringement of his registered trade marks ‘Money Saving Expert’ and associated terms. The defendant operated a service trading as ‘Money Claiming Expert’. Both services included advising those who might wish to claim refunds from banks. The claimant sought summary judgment. Held: The defence as filed proposed no real defence,merely putting the claimant … Continue reading Lewis v Client Connection Ltd: ChD 6 Jul 2011
The applicant sought judicial review of the defendant’s refusal to employ him to work at GCHQ, which had a policy not to employ anyone with non-British parents save exceptionally. The claimant said this was racially discriminatory.
Held: The . .
The Court was asked whether there is jurisdiction in a personal injury claim that attracts the application of Part 44 Section II of the Civil Procedure Rules (‘CPR’), which relates to Qualified One-way Costs Shifting (‘QOCS’), to allow the set-off . .
The Civil Procedure Rules (at 23-11) allow a court to set aside a court order even after the order had been perfected. The court should have a very wide discretion to alter orders, particularly those made in the absence of a party. . .
The defendant was said to have acted in contempt but only after the family proceedings were concluded. The court was now asked whether such an application was to be made in the High or the Family Court.
Held: The material date was that on . .
The claimants sought damages alleging fraud in a company share purchase. They said that their lawyer had secretly been working for the sellers. The claim form had been issued, but the claimant had delayed in requesting permission for its service . .
The court discussed the need for those appearing before tribunals to be given sufficient access to all the material placed before the judge. Upjohn LJ said: ‘It seems to be fundamental to any judicial inquiry that a person or other properly . .
The appellant had been severely injured in a road traffic accident. He settled his claim for damages before action, but his solicitors failed to make proper arrangements to allow for his lack of mental capacity. A claim for damages was then brought . .
The defendant was to be charged with offences associated with terrorism. He had sought stay of the trial as an abuse of process saying that he had been tortured by English US and Pakistani authorities. The judge made an order as to what parts of the . .
Lord Denning MR said that the Rules Committee ‘can make rules for regulating and prescribing the procedure and practice of the Court, but cannot alter the rules of evidence.’ Public policy protects against disclosure any documents which relate to . .
Before proceedings, the plaintiff widow accepted the defendants’ offer to settle her and her infant son’s Fatal Accidents Acts claim ‘subject to the approval of the court’. A summons was then issued for the court to approve that settlement. The . .
The claimant, a child, had sought damages. An agreement was made to compromise the claim. Later the child sought to withdraw from it.
Held: No court order had been made to approve the compromise, and therefore no binding arrangement existed. . .
The claimant had been funded for a personal injury claim under legal aid. He appealed against a decision that he was not a ‘patient’ and that he had been fully capable of managing and administering his affairs for many years. He lost. The . .
‘relatively narrow point about the construction of the Civil Procedure Rules (‘the CPR’). It is an appeal from an order of Costs Master Whelan (‘the Master’) dated 8 December 2015. He decided that the costs allowed to the appellant on provision . .
The various applicants sought judicial review of the operation of the Protection of Vulnerable Adults List insofar as they had been placed provisionally on the list, preventing them from finding work. One complaint was that the list had operated . .
ECJ Appeal – Civil service – Contract staff – Reports procedure – Career development report – 2010 appraisal procedure – Dismissal of the action at first instance – Time-limit for submission of the defence – . .
. .
Judges: Mr Justice Aikens Citations: [2007] EWHC 11 (Comm), [2007] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 693, [2007] BusLR D69, [2007] ArbLR 19 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68(2)(g) 80(5), Civil Procedure Rules 62.9(1)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Arbitration Updated: 22 November 2022; Ref: scu.248268
The court allowed the appellant’s application to dispense with service of a claim form under the rule. The High Court became seised of the matter as at 19 January 2005. Further directions were given. Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Smith Citations: [2005] EWHC 1880 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 6.9 Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Phillips, Harland (Suing As Administrators of the Estate of Christo Michailidis) v Symes (A Bankrupt), Nussberger, Galerie Nefer Ag, Geoff Rowley: ChD 19 Aug 2005
Defendants appealed against an order refusing an order to restrain service of the proceedings on certain defendants outwith the jurisdiction. The claimant was seriously injured holidaying at a resort managed by the several defendants in Jamaica in various ways. The defendants argued that the proper forum was Jamaica. Held: The decision as to forum conveniens … Continue reading Owusu v Jackson, Mammee Bay Resorts Limited etc: CA 19 Jun 2002
The defendant appealed against refusal of a declaration that the court had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. He said that he lived in Kenya, and the claimant had failed first to apply for leave to serve out of the jurisdiction. The claimant had served notice of the proceedings at premises owned by the defendant … Continue reading Varsani v Relfo Ltd: CA 27 May 2010
The claimant had served proceedings on a representative without first checking that they had authority to accept service. This was discovered too late, and applied for an extension of time for service. The application was refused. The requirement to ensure that the person served had such authority was now clear, and the claim form must … Continue reading Mark Smith v David Probyn, PGA European Tour Ltd: QBD 25 Feb 2000
Where it was alleged that shares in a UK company had been sold at an undervalue, so as to allow a challenge in insolvency proceedings, the leave of the court was still required if the pleadings were to be served abroad. When the court considered such an application, it had to look not just at … Continue reading In Re Banco Nacional De Cuba: ChD 7 Jun 2001
Application to set aside order, that applicant saying that he had not been given notice of the proceedings. Citations: [2019] EWHC 889 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules 6.9 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Litigation Practice Updated: 10 July 2022; Ref: scu.638200
The claimant sought damages after being severely injured in a road traffic accident in Australia caused by the defendant. The defendant denied that the court had jurisdiction to permit service out of the jurisdiction. The claimant said that the issues were not as to liability but as to quantum. Held: The defendant’s application failed. The … Continue reading Cooley v Ramsey: QBD 1 Feb 2008
Various cargo owners sought damages against the owners of the ship which had suffered an explosion with the loss of the cargo. The defendants asserted limitation. Some claimants had agreed an extension of time. Proceedings were then issued but served only eventually made with letters claimed to be equivocal. The question was what constituted service. … Continue reading Asia Pacific (Hk) Ltd. and others v Hanjin Shipping Co Ltd (Hanjin Pennsylvania): ComC 7 Nov 2005
The defendant sought to set aside a possession order made where he did not know of the proceedings. Held: The judge had a discretion, not a duty, to set aside a possession order made in such circumstances. Human rights law required the court to allow a defendant a right to be heard, but if on … Continue reading Akram v Adam: CA 30 Nov 2004
The defendants had been given extended time to comply with an order for pre-action discovery. Leave to appeal had been granted, with a stay, but there was confusion as to whether expedition was also ordered. The current date had been fixed, but application was now made for that date to be vacated. Held: The court … Continue reading Black and Another v Sumitomo Corporation and others: CA 28 Sep 2001
In the course of a long dispute, the defendant’s solicitors had indicated that they would accept service of proceedings. Just before the limitation period expired, the papers were served directly in the client. The defendants solicitors said that this was invalid service, and that later service out of time could not revive the claim. Held: … Continue reading Firstdale Ltd v Quinton: ComC 5 Aug 2004
In each case claims had been late in being served and extensions in time were sought and refused. Held: The recent authorities were examined. The words ‘has been unable to serve’ in CPR 7.6(3)(a) include all cases where the court has failed to serve, including mere oversight. The court’s discretion might then be exercised according … Continue reading Cranfield and Another v Bridgegrove Ltd; Claussen v Yeates etc: CA 14 May 2003
The claimant sought an account from the defendant share broker for the proceeds of share transactions. The defendant said the matter should be tried in Hong Kong. Held: The claimant must show a good arguable case. Here there was evidence to support the claimant’s assertion of the use of an address in England, and a … Continue reading Staines v Walsh, Howard: ChD 14 Mar 2003
The applicant’s claim had been dismissed for late service. The defendant had in fact received the documents, but the service appeared deemed to be out of time. The subsequent decisions of Anderton and Godwin meant that the judge’s reasoning no longer applied. Held: In such cases the discretion available to the court under the rules … Continue reading Wilkey and Another v British Broadcasting Corporation and Another: CA 22 Oct 2002
The claimant appealed against an order striking out his claim for personal injuries. The claim had been issued in time, but not served. An extension of time was granted, and the notice sent by first class post the day before that period expired. The defendant had claimed that the rules deemed service on the second … Continue reading Godwin v Swindon Borough Council: CA 10 Oct 2001
The claim form had been issued only just before the limitation period expired. Under the rules it would have been deemed to have been served on a Sunday, the day before the expiry of the period, but evidence suggested it was not received until after the expiration of the period. The defendant argued there was … Continue reading Rhiannon Anderton v Clwyd County Council (2): QBD 25 Jul 2001
The requirement is that documents must be served at the address nominated for this purpose by the prospective defendant under the rules. Where a solicitor was so nominated, it was not open to the claimant to serve papers at a different address. In this case, the claimant solicitors having noticed their mistake had not done … Continue reading Nanglegan v Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust: CA 23 Jan 2001
