Search Results for: Arbitration Act 1996 6

Click the case name for better results:

Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International Ag and Another: ComC 27 Jul 2001

When asking whether the time for appeal against an arbitrator’s award should be extended, the court should look at several circumstances, including the length of the delay; whether the party was acting reasonably in all the circumstances in delaying; whether the other party had contributed to the delay; whether other party would suffer irremediable prejudice … Continue reading Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International Ag and Another: ComC 27 Jul 2001

Pace Shipping Co Ltd of Malta v Churchgate Nigeria Ltd Of Nigeria: ComC 31 Jul 2009

Judges: Teare J Citations: [2009] EWHC 1975 (Comm), [2010] 1 Lloyds Rep 183, [2009] 2 CLC 446 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 69 70 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Pace Shipping Co Ltd of Malta v Churchgate Nigeria Ltd of Nigeria ComC 7-Oct-2010 The courts do not approach arbitration … Continue reading Pace Shipping Co Ltd of Malta v Churchgate Nigeria Ltd Of Nigeria: ComC 31 Jul 2009

Cameroon Airlines v Transnet Ltd: ComC 29 Jul 2004

Where it is claimed that the arbitral tribunal adopted improper procedures to determine an issue, the court should decline to try the issue in order to establish whether substantial injustice has in fact been caused. Judges: Langley J Citations: [2004] EWHC 1829 (Comm) Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 69 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Cameroon Airlines v Transnet Ltd: ComC 29 Jul 2004

Elektrim SA v Vivendi Universal SA and others: ComC 19 Jan 2007

Judges: Mr Justice Aikens Citations: [2007] EWHC 11 (Comm), [2007] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 693, [2007] BusLR D69, [2007] ArbLR 19 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68(2)(g) 80(5), Civil Procedure Rules 62.9(1)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Arbitration Updated: 22 November 2022; Ref: scu.248268

NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) Nv v Cargill International Sa: ComC 1 Feb 2013

The ship (Global Santosh), having been found with illicit drugs, was arrested in error, leading to considerable delays in unloading the cement cargo. The charterparty period off-hire clause (NYPE form) was applied and hire withheld by the head charterers. Construction of the meaning and effect of an off-hire clause contained in a time charter. Held: … Continue reading NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) Nv v Cargill International Sa: ComC 1 Feb 2013

Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves and Company Ltd and others: ComC 7 Nov 2003

One party sought a declaration that arbitrators should have no jurisdiction to determine claims for commission said to be due to the Respondent chartering brokers. Held: Because he has in effect become a statutory assignee of the promisee’s right of action against the promisor and because, by reason of the underlying policy of section 1(4), … Continue reading Nisshin Shipping Co Ltd v Cleaves and Company Ltd and others: ComC 7 Nov 2003

Nanjing Tianshun Shipbuilding Co Ltd v Orchard Tankers Pte Ltd: ComC 11 Feb 2011

The parties had agreed for a ship to be built. The sellers now challenged an arbitral award, saying that the arbitrators did not have jurisdiction. Judges: David Steel J Citations: [2011] EWHC 164 (Comm), [2011] ArbLR 4, [2011] 2 All ER 789, [2011] 2 All ER (Comm) 789 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 67 … Continue reading Nanjing Tianshun Shipbuilding Co Ltd v Orchard Tankers Pte Ltd: ComC 11 Feb 2011

Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd Harrison: QBD 14 Jul 2005

The court set out the principles applicable in an application under section 68: ‘a) Perhaps the best summary of the applicable principles relating to section 68 generally, which lies at the heart of these applications is by His Honour Judge Humphrey Lloyd QC in Weldon Plant Ltd. v. The Commission for the New Towns [2000] … Continue reading Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd Harrison: QBD 14 Jul 2005

West Tankers Inc v Allianz Spa and Another: CA 24 Jan 2012

The Court was asked whether there was power under section 66 of the 1996 Act to order judgment to be entered in the terms of an arbitral award in a case where the award is declaratory in form and more particularly where it takes the form of a negative declaration, i.e. a declaration that the … Continue reading West Tankers Inc v Allianz Spa and Another: CA 24 Jan 2012

Mobile Telesystems Finance Sa v Nomihold Securities Inc: CA 1 Sep 2011

The court heard an appeal as to a point of principle and practice in relation to the granting of freezing orders in aid of the process of execution of an arbitration award. Judges: Ward, Tomlinson LJJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 1040, [2011] ArbLR 29, [2012] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 6, [2012] 1 All ER (Comm) 223, … Continue reading Mobile Telesystems Finance Sa v Nomihold Securities Inc: CA 1 Sep 2011

Westland Helicopters Ltd v Sheikh Al-Hejailan: QBD 13 Jul 2004

Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Colman Citations: [2004] EWHC 1625 (Comm) Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 67 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Wiltshire v Powell and others CA 7-May-2004 The claimant sought a declaration as to the ownership of an aircraft. Saying he had bought it in good faith from E … Continue reading Westland Helicopters Ltd v Sheikh Al-Hejailan: QBD 13 Jul 2004

Tame Shipping Ltd v Easy Navigation Ltd: QBD 28 Jul 2004

The parties had agreed to an arbitration subject to the condition that the reasons given were not to form any basis for appeal. The reasons were published separately from the award. Held: The appeal was based upon an assertion which could only be supported by reference to the reasons. The parties were bound by their … Continue reading Tame Shipping Ltd v Easy Navigation Ltd: QBD 28 Jul 2004

O’Donoghue v Enterprise Inns Plc: ChD 29 Sep 2008

The tenant sought to appeal against an arbitration award as to his rent. He said that the arbitrator should have allowed him an oral hearing. Held: The claim failed: ‘the fact that the Arbitrator might have come to a different conclusion if there had been an oral hearing does not begin to establish that the … Continue reading O’Donoghue v Enterprise Inns Plc: ChD 29 Sep 2008

Peterson Farms Inc v C and M Farming Ltd: ComC 4 Feb 2004

The claimant sought a declaration that an award made in an ICC arbitration was made without jurisdiction and void. Judges: Langley J Citations: [2004] EWHC 121 (Comm), [2004] 1 LLR 603, [2004] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 603, [2004] NPC 13 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 67 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Peterson … Continue reading Peterson Farms Inc v C and M Farming Ltd: ComC 4 Feb 2004

ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: ComC 19 Oct 2005

The court upheld an objection to one member of the arbitration panel for apparent bias, but refused to set aside a preliminary decision of the panel. Judges: Morison J Citations: [2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm), [2006] 2 All ER (Comm) 122 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also … Continue reading ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: ComC 19 Oct 2005

Bandwidth Shipping Corporation v Intaari (‘Magdalena Oldendorrf’): CA 17 Oct 2007

An arbitrator hearing a case, and who appreciated that counsel had failed to take a point, should draw counsel’s attention to the point. No duty could arise if the arbitrator did not himself see the point. An applicant under section 68 faces a high hurdle in establishing serious irregularity, reflecting the reluctance of the courts … Continue reading Bandwidth Shipping Corporation v Intaari (‘Magdalena Oldendorrf’): CA 17 Oct 2007

London Underground Ltd v Citylink Telecommunications Ltd: TCC 20 Jul 2007

Each party challenged elements of an arbitration award. Judges: Ramsey J Citations: [2007] EWHC 1749 (TCC), [2007] 2 All ER (Comm) 694, [2006] 2 Lloyds 1, [2006] 1 All ER (Comm) 529, [2007] ArbLR 39, [2007] BLR 391, (2007) 114 Con LR 1 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 69 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading London Underground Ltd v Citylink Telecommunications Ltd: TCC 20 Jul 2007

CGU International Insurance Plc and others v Astrazeneca Insurance Company Ltd: ComC 1 Dec 2005

Judges: Cresswell J Citations: [2005] EWHC 2755 (Comm) Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 69(8) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – CGU International Insurance Plc and others v Astrazeneca Insurance Co Ltd. CA 16-Oct-2006 Whilst the court of appeal did have a residual discretion to review a refusal by a judge of … Continue reading CGU International Insurance Plc and others v Astrazeneca Insurance Company Ltd: ComC 1 Dec 2005

Vee Networks Limited v Econet Wireless International Limited: QBD 14 Dec 2004

The court considered a complaint that the arbitration award was faulty or lack of jurisdiction under the agreement founding it. Judges: Mr Justice Colman Citations: [2004] EWHC 2909 (Comm), [2005] 1 Lloyd’s Law Reports 192 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 67 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Econet Wireless Ltd v … Continue reading Vee Networks Limited v Econet Wireless International Limited: QBD 14 Dec 2004

L G Caltex Gas Co Ltd v National Petroleum Corporation and Another: CA 15 May 2001

Section 67(1)(a) applies both when a tribunal finds that it has jurisdiction and also when it declines jurisdiction. The respondent said that an informal agreement with the claimant to allow jurisdiction was limited to certain issues only. While an arbitral tribunal is entitled to determine whether it has jurisdiction, its decision on that issue is … Continue reading L G Caltex Gas Co Ltd v National Petroleum Corporation and Another: CA 15 May 2001

Hussmann (Europe) Limited v Ahmed Pharaon (Formerly Trading As Al Ameen Development and Trade Establishment): CA 4 Mar 2003

The appellant sought to set aside a declaration as to the validity of an arbitration award. A first award had been declared of no effect, and the case remitted to the arbitrator, and the second award was now challenged on the basis that the reference to the arbitrator was exhausted by the first award. Held: … Continue reading Hussmann (Europe) Limited v Ahmed Pharaon (Formerly Trading As Al Ameen Development and Trade Establishment): CA 4 Mar 2003

Mousaka Inc v Golden Seagull Maritime Inc: QBD 30 Jul 2001

There has been no change to the rule that a judge refusing leave to appeal from an arbitration award, need not give his reasons. The rationale is that the question is a threshold one, of whether a particular standard had been reached. It was not a situation where a detailed examination was to be undertaken, … Continue reading Mousaka Inc v Golden Seagull Maritime Inc: QBD 30 Jul 2001

Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International AG and Another: QBD 27 Jul 2001

When asking whether the time for appeal against an arbitrator’s award should be extended, the court should look at several circumstances, including the length of the delay; whether the party was acting reasonably in all the circumstances in delaying; whether the other party had contributed to the delay; whether other party would suffer irremediable prejudice … Continue reading Aoot Kalmneft v Glencore International AG and Another: QBD 27 Jul 2001

Profilati Italia S R L v Painewebber Incorporated, Painewebber International Futures Limited: ComC 12 Sep 2001

CS Arbitration – Award – Application to set aside award on the grounds of serious irregularity – Arbitration Act 1996 s. 68(2)(g) – whether inadvertent failure to disclose relevant documents resulted in award being procured in a way contrary to public policy – whether respondents suffered substantial injustice. Arbitration – Disclosure – Arbitration under Rules … Continue reading Profilati Italia S R L v Painewebber Incorporated, Painewebber International Futures Limited: ComC 12 Sep 2001

Dubai Islamic Bank Pjsc v Paymentech Merchant Services Inc: QBD 24 Nov 2000

The place of arbitration, the juridical seat, was necessarily and inherently established at the time when an arbitration began, and could not subsequently be moved, save with the consent of the parties. Until the point where the arbitration commenced, the juridical seat could be established as required under the Act by looking at all the … Continue reading Dubai Islamic Bank Pjsc v Paymentech Merchant Services Inc: QBD 24 Nov 2000

Moscow City Council v Bankers Trust Company and Another: QBD 5 Jun 2003

Proceedings before an arbitrator were governed by rule 62.10, which provided its own entire code, and imposed a presumption in favour of privacy. The principles of Scott v Scott need not apply. Scott would now be decided under analogous reasonings under the Human Rights Act. Judges: Cooke J Citations: Times 01-Sep-2003 Statutes: Civil Procedure Rules … Continue reading Moscow City Council v Bankers Trust Company and Another: QBD 5 Jun 2003

Republic of Uganda v Rift Valley Railways (Uganda) Ld and Others: ComC 11 Dec 2020

Application by RVR Investments (Pty) Limited and KU Railways Holdings Limited (the ‘Shareholders’) to be joined as parties to the proceedings under CPR rule 19.4 – or more correctly CPR rule 19.2. The underlying proceedings are a challenge under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 brought by the Claimant, the Republic of Uganda (‘Uganda’) … Continue reading Republic of Uganda v Rift Valley Railways (Uganda) Ld and Others: ComC 11 Dec 2020

India Steamship Co Ltd v Arab Potash Co Ltd: ComC 12 Dec 1997

Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69(3)(d): when is it just and proper in all the circumstances for the court to determine a question raised on an application for leave to appeal; issue of construction in a one-off charterparty clause where pre-existing judicial authority as to proper construction of similar wording Judges: Colman J Citations: Unreported, 12 … Continue reading India Steamship Co Ltd v Arab Potash Co Ltd: ComC 12 Dec 1997

Kye Gbangbola and Lisa Lewis v Smith Sherriff Limited: TCC 20 Mar 1998

‘A tribunal does not act fairly and impartially if it does not give a party an opportunity of dealing with arguments which have not been advanced by either party’. Judges: His Honour Judge Humphrey Lloyd Qc Citations: [1998] 3 All ER 730 Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 68 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – … Continue reading Kye Gbangbola and Lisa Lewis v Smith Sherriff Limited: TCC 20 Mar 1998

A v B: ComC 9 Jul 2015

Challenge to arbitration award – made without jurisdiction. Held: Rejected. Mr. A signed the 2008 Agreement. Article 2.10 of that agreement contained an arbitration clause which bound Mr. A and conferred jurisdiction on the LCIA tribunal. The application under section 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996 must therefore be dismissed. Teare J [2015] EWHC 1944 … Continue reading A v B: ComC 9 Jul 2015

Occidental Exploration and Production Company vRepublic of Ecuador: CA 9 Sep 2005

The parties had arbitrated their dispute in London under a bilateral investment treaty between the US and Ecuador. The republic sought to appeal the arbitration. The applicant now appealed an order that the English High Court had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Held: The appeal was dismissed. The treaty was intended to encourage bilateral trading … Continue reading Occidental Exploration and Production Company vRepublic of Ecuador: CA 9 Sep 2005

Minister of Finance (Incorporated) and Another v International Petroleum Investment Company and Another: ComC 4 Nov 2021

This unusual arbitration claim seeks to challenge under s.67 or s.68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (‘the Act’) a Consent Award dated 9 May 2017 by which an LCIA arbitration between the parties, LCIA Ref. 163357 (‘Arbitration 1’), was concluded. Mr Justice Andrew Baker [2021] EWHC 2949 (Comm) Bailii Arbitration Act 1996 67 68 England … Continue reading Minister of Finance (Incorporated) and Another v International Petroleum Investment Company and Another: ComC 4 Nov 2021

S Ltd v C Ltd: ComC 27 Feb 2009

Defamation allegation not subject to arbitration The parties had an agreement referring disputes between them to arbitration. One party raised an allegation of defamation, but the arbitrator refused jurisdiction. The parties had chosen the London Metal Exchange for its expertise in metals trading, not defamation. Held: The choice of the LME did indicate the intention … Continue reading S Ltd v C Ltd: ComC 27 Feb 2009

National Ability Sa v Tinna Oils and Chemicals Ltd: CA 11 Dec 2009

Implied promise to pay arbitral award The parties disputed how limitation affects the enforcement of an arbitration award. More than six years had passed since the award had been made, and the defendant said it was out of time. Held: A party can enforce an award either by ordinary action as an action founded upon … Continue reading National Ability Sa v Tinna Oils and Chemicals Ltd: CA 11 Dec 2009

Rees v Windsor-Clive and Others: ChD 11 Nov 2020

Alleged Serious Irregularity in Arbitration The claimant as tenant challenged an arbitration award alleging serious irregularities in the arbitration process under section 68 of the 1996 Act. The court considered whether at the time of service of the notice the land must then be required for use. Held: No serious irregularity was shown. Jarman QC … Continue reading Rees v Windsor-Clive and Others: ChD 11 Nov 2020

ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: Admn 20 Apr 2007

Application to remove arbitrators. Judges: Andrew Smith J Citations: [2007] EWHC 927 (Admin) Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 96 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England CA 16-Oct-2006 The court at first instance had dismissed the ship-owner’s application to set aside the arbitration award, and … Continue reading ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England: Admn 20 Apr 2007

International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v President of India and Another: CA 11 Dec 1995

Actions to enforce arbitration awards were brought, each in the name of a ship-owning company. At the time of the arbitrations the assets of each company had vested in a trustee in bankruptcy appointed under New York law, but the trustee had persuaded the arbitrators that the companies were the proper claimants and had commenced … Continue reading International Bulk Shipping and Services Ltd v President of India and Another: CA 11 Dec 1995

Patel v Patel: CA 24 Mar 1999

A party applying to set a default judgment aside with associated leave to defend did not thereby take any substantial step in proceedings which would debar him from insisting that the matter be stayed pending a referral to arbitration. Citations: Times 09-Apr-1999, [1999] EWCA Civ 1080 Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 9 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Patel v Patel: CA 24 Mar 1999

Slot v East Hants District Council: CA 17 Nov 1998

The claimants appealed the district judge’s decision to rescind the reference to arbitration. Held: A point of law had arisen, and the decision made was one the judge could make of his own volition, and therefore no notice had been required. Citations: [1998] EWCA Civ 1778 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Regina v … Continue reading Slot v East Hants District Council: CA 17 Nov 1998

Inco Europe Ltd and Others v First Choice Distribution (A Firm) and Others: CA 10 Sep 1998

The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against a judge’s grant or refusal of an order staying court proceedings where arbitration was sought by one party under an agreement. Judges: Hobhouse LJ Citations: Times 22-Oct-1998, Gazette 28-Oct-1998, [1998] EWCA Civ 1460, [1999] 1 WLR 270, [1999] CLC 165 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration … Continue reading Inco Europe Ltd and Others v First Choice Distribution (A Firm) and Others: CA 10 Sep 1998

Fakes v Taylor Woodrow Construction Limited: 1973

The plaintiff resisted an application for a stay of his action for an arbitration on the basis that his lack of funds would make it impossible to take part in an arbitration. Citations: [1973] QB 436 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Trustee of Property of Andrews v Brock Buildings (Kessingland) Limited CA … Continue reading Fakes v Taylor Woodrow Construction Limited: 1973

EL Nasharty v J Sainsbury Plc: ComC 13 Nov 2007

Judges: The Hon Mr Justice Tomlinson Citations: [2007] EWHC 2618 (Comm), [2007] ArbLR 18, [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 360 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 9 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Nasharty and others v J Sainsbury Plc ComC 30-Sep-2003 Application for stay of proceedings for arbitration. . . Lists of cited … Continue reading EL Nasharty v J Sainsbury Plc: ComC 13 Nov 2007

Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and Another: CA 17 Oct 2014

Admissibility in forthcoming trial of correspondence said to be without prejudice: ‘That relates to the without prejudice negotiations that led to the settlement of the arbitration between Webinvest and the third party. The judge held that Mr Shlosberg had waived any privilege relating to those negotiations. I disagree. All he said in his evidence was … Continue reading Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Webinvest Ltd and Another: CA 17 Oct 2014

L v R: ComC 24 Oct 2012

Application pursuant to section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 to set aside an arbitration award for serious irregularity. Judges: Mr Justice Hamblen Citations: [2012] EWHC 2894 (Comm) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Arbitration Updated: 20 November 2022; Ref: scu.465469

Pacific Maritime (Asia) Ltd v Holystone Overseas Ltd: ComC 11 Oct 2007

Application on the part of the Defendants, Holystone Overseas Ltd to vary an order for a freezing injunction obtained by the claimant Pacific Maritime (Asia) Ltd pursuant to section 44 (3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 Judges: Christopher Clarke J Citations: [2007] EWHC 2319 (Comm), [2007] ArbLR 46 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 44(3) … Continue reading Pacific Maritime (Asia) Ltd v Holystone Overseas Ltd: ComC 11 Oct 2007

Terna Bahrain Holding Company Wll v Al Shamsi and Others: ComC 22 Nov 2012

Three applications before the Court relating to the validity and enforcement of a London arbitration award by which the Arbitrator awarded the Claimant (‘Terna’) AED 84,285,282, together with interest and costs, against the three individual Respondents (‘the Bin Kamils’). By a Claim Form the Bin Kamils seek to challenge the Award for lack of jurisdiction … Continue reading Terna Bahrain Holding Company Wll v Al Shamsi and Others: ComC 22 Nov 2012

Malekout v Medical Sickness Annuity and Life Assurance Society Limited: CA 21 May 1998

The plaintiff sought to appeal against a stay of his action so that it could be referred to arbitration. His claim was under insurance policies containing clauses providing for arbitration of disputes. Held: The judge had failed to take account of the fact that the claimant was receiving income support as an indication of his … Continue reading Malekout v Medical Sickness Annuity and Life Assurance Society Limited: CA 21 May 1998

A and Another v C and Others: ComC 31 Jul 2020

Judges: His Honour Judge Mark Pelling QC Citations: [2020] EWHC 3045 (Comm) Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 33 68(2) 73 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Costs, Arbitration Updated: 18 November 2022; Ref: scu.682743

Good Challenger Navegante S A v Metalexportimport SA: CA 24 Nov 2003

The claimant sought to enforce an arbitration award made in 1983. Time might otherwise have expired, but the claimants relied on a fax which they said was an acknowledgement of the debt, and also upon a finding in a Romanian court which created an issue estoppel. Held: A typed signature on a fax was capable … Continue reading Good Challenger Navegante S A v Metalexportimport SA: CA 24 Nov 2003

Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Salem: HL 3 Mar 1999

The House of Lords has the power to hear a case where the parties have in effect settled and there remains no lis at issue, but the House will not hear such an academic case where no general issue of importance is at stake, or the facts are particular. There must be a good reason … Continue reading Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Salem: HL 3 Mar 1999

Halki Shipping Corporation v Sopex Oils Limited: CA 19 Dec 1997

The court was aked whether there was a dispute sufficient to sustain a stay of court proceedings for arbitration under the Act. Held: There was a dispute once money is claimed unless and until the defendants admit that the sum is due and payable. In arbitration proceedings a party is entitled to stay other proceedings … Continue reading Halki Shipping Corporation v Sopex Oils Limited: CA 19 Dec 1997

Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd: QBD 29 Dec 2004

Choses in action including contractual rights are ‘assets’ within the meaning of section 44(3). Citations: [2004] EWHC 3175 (QB), [2005] 2 Lloyds Rep 494 Links: Bailii Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 44(3) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd CA 24-May-2005 The parties were engaged in arbitration proceedings. … Continue reading Cetelem Sa v Roust Holdings Ltd: QBD 29 Dec 2004

NWA and Another v NUF and Others: ComC 8 Oct 2021

Whether the failure of a party to comply with a term of an arbitration agreement that the parties should first seek to mediate a settlement of their dispute before referring the dispute to arbitration results in the arbitral tribunal not having jurisdiction to hear the dispute at all (so as to be susceptible to challenge … Continue reading NWA and Another v NUF and Others: ComC 8 Oct 2021

Davies Middleton and Davies Ltd v Toyo Engineering Corporation: CA 29 Aug 1997

Parties to a dispute agreed a way of resolving issues before arbitration. One party then sought to say that the agreement was void for uncertainty, being an agreement to agree. Held: The agreement merely set a mechansim for resolving the dispute and was valid. Citations: [1997] EWCA Civ 2318 Statutes: Arbitration Act 1996 9 Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Davies Middleton and Davies Ltd v Toyo Engineering Corporation: CA 29 Aug 1997

Laker Airways Inc v FLS Aerospace Ltd: ComC 20 Apr 1999

The court was asked: ‘whether a barrister who has been appointed an arbitrator by one party to the arbitration should be removed by the court on the ground that another barrister from the same chambers has been instructed in the arbitration by the appointing party’. The arbitrator had offered to recuse himself if both parties … Continue reading Laker Airways Inc v FLS Aerospace Ltd: ComC 20 Apr 1999

Guidance Investments Ltd v Guidance Hotel Investment Company Bsc: ComC 7 Nov 2013

Application by the Claimant for a stay of part of the Defendant’s Counterclaim under section 9 of the 1996 Act and/or pursuant to the court’s inherent jurisdiction on the grounds that it relates to matters covered by an arbitration clause. In addition the Claimant seeks an order that the Defendant be debarred from relying on … Continue reading Guidance Investments Ltd v Guidance Hotel Investment Company Bsc: ComC 7 Nov 2013

JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov and Others: ComC 28 Mar 2011

The Third Defendant sought a stay of the claims against it pursuant to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996, and the Seventh Defendant asked for a stay of the claims against it on case management grounds. Judges: Christopher Clarke J Citations: [2011] EWHC 587 (Comm), [2011] ArbLR 6 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov and Others: ComC 28 Mar 2011

Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-Es Gazkutato Kft: ComC 15 Oct 2010

Application for stay under the 1996 Act or alternatively under the Regulation. Judges: Gloster DBE J Citations: [2010] EWHC 2567 (Comm), [2011] ILPr 13, [2011] 1 Lloyds Rep 252 Links: Bailii Statutes: Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001, namely the Jurisdiction and Judgments Regulation 2, Arbitration Act 1996 9 Jurisdiction: England and Wales European, Arbitration Updated: 12 … Continue reading Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-Es Gazkutato Kft: ComC 15 Oct 2010

The Republic of Korea v Dayyani and Others: ComC 20 Dec 2019

Application by the Claimant, Republic, to set aside an award made by Professor Bernard Hanotiau (President), Mr Philippe Pinsolle and Dr Gavan Griffith QC pursuant to s. 67 Arbitration Act 1996, on the grounds that the Tribunal lacked substantive jurisdiction over the claims made by the Defendants in the arbitration. Judges: Butcher J Citations: [2019] … Continue reading The Republic of Korea v Dayyani and Others: ComC 20 Dec 2019

Du Plessis v Fontgary Leisure Parks Ltd: CA 2 Apr 2012

The claimant, who owned a holiday mobile home on the respondent’s site challenged the raising of site fees, saying that the contract was unfair. Previously all site fees were equal within the site, but the respondent had introduced a scheme which reflected the differing grades of pitches. The judge had rejected her argument that the … Continue reading Du Plessis v Fontgary Leisure Parks Ltd: CA 2 Apr 2012

Parke v The Fenton Gretton Partnership: ChD 2 Aug 2000

The defendant creditor had obtained an adjudicator’s decision against the debtor on its final account claim, but the debtor had little notice of the adjudication. At the application to set aside the statutory demand, Mr Parke had already commenced proceedings in the TCC arguing that the true final account showed a balance payable in his … Continue reading Parke v The Fenton Gretton Partnership: ChD 2 Aug 2000

Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc v Elektrim Finance Bv and others: ChD 1 Jul 2005

A bond contained an arbitration clause subject to a further clause giving the claimant an ‘exclusive right at its option to apply to the courts of England to settle any disputes which may arise out of or in connection with these presents’. The defendants started an arbitration challenging the claimant’s assertion that events of default … Continue reading Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc v Elektrim Finance Bv and others: ChD 1 Jul 2005

Kastner v Jason, Sherman, Sherman and Sherman, Sherman and Kastner: ChD 23 Mar 2004

The parties had a dispute arbitrated by the Beth Din, who ordered the sale of a property. In apparent breach of that order the owner purported to sell the property. The claimant had registered a caution which the defendants now sought to be vacated. Held: Provisional awards by arbitrators were not directly enforceable unless the … Continue reading Kastner v Jason, Sherman, Sherman and Sherman, Sherman and Kastner: ChD 23 Mar 2004

Phoenix Finance Limited v Federation Internationale De L’automobile, Formula One Management Limited, Formula One Administration Limited: ChD 22 May 2002

The claimant had purchased the interests of a failed Formula One car racing team, including, it said, the right to enter a team in Formula One races. It claimed to have been unlawfully excluded from racing. Held: The claimant had failed to comply with the requirements imposed upon participants, and was not entitled to race. … Continue reading Phoenix Finance Limited v Federation Internationale De L’automobile, Formula One Management Limited, Formula One Administration Limited: ChD 22 May 2002

Margerison v Bates and Another: ChD 30 May 2008

The court considered the construction of a restrictive covenant after the disappearance of the covenantee. The covenant required no additional building without the consent of the covenantee, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. The term ‘vendor’ had been defined without including her successors in title. Held: The court considered the construction of the clause … Continue reading Margerison v Bates and Another: ChD 30 May 2008

Bilta (UK) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Nazir and Others: ChD 17 May 2010

The sixth defendant resisted a claim against it saying that matters between them were governed by a framework agreement which provided for matters to be resolved by arbitration. The claimant resisted, denying the arbitration agreement and saying that the defendant was out of time to make such a claim. Held: Two arguments were directed to … Continue reading Bilta (UK) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Nazir and Others: ChD 17 May 2010

Athletic Union of Constantinople v National Basketball Association and Others: CA 28 May 2002

A party had been refused leave to appeal against an arbitration under the Act by the judge, but later obtained leave to appeal. Held: Such leave could only be granted by the trial judge, and the Court of Appeal could set aside the leave granted in excess of jurisdiction. The parties had argued that the … Continue reading Athletic Union of Constantinople v National Basketball Association and Others: CA 28 May 2002