The court upheld an objection to one member of the arbitration panel for apparent bias, but refused to set aside a preliminary decision of the panel.
Judges:
Morison J
Citations:
[2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm), [2006] 2 All ER (Comm) 122
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – TTMI Ltd of England v ASM Shipping Ltd of India ComC 23-Nov-2005
. .
Appeal from – ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England CA 16-Oct-2006
The court at first instance had dismissed the ship-owner’s application to set aside the arbitration award, and then refused leave to appeal. The court of appeal had to consider whether it had jurisdiction itself to hear an application for leave.
See Also – ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England ComC 20-Apr-2007
. .
See Also – ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England Admn 20-Apr-2007
Application to remove arbitrators. . .
See Also – ASM Shipping Ltd v Harris and others ComC 28-Jun-2007
Objection was made the panel selected to undertake an arbitration. It was said that one member of the panel had been found to be subject to proper objectin for an apparent bias, and that the remaining panel members should recuse themselves for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Arbitration
Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.235478
