Claims Advisory Group Limited v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 16 Aug 2021

VAT – Exemption under Article 135(1)(a) of the Principal VAT Directive (PVD) – for insurance and reinsurance transactions, including related services performed by insurance brokers and insurance agents – economic purpose and commercial reality of Appellant’s services were not that of insurance transactions but making claims for compensation in respect of mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI) – not acting as an insurance agent nor performing services related to insurance transactions – appeal dismissed

[2021] UKUT 199 (TCC), [2021] STI 2037, [2021] STC 1726, [2021] BVC 512
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 20 January 2022; Ref: scu.671197

Vehicle Control Services Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 16 Feb 2011

VAT- parking enforcement on private land- does management company with a licence have sufficient interest in land to take proceedings for trespass as principal- no- parking charges are in consideration of supply of services under contract with motorist – therefore subject to VAT at standard rate – charges which are notified are not punitive fines akin to damages in lieu of trespass outside scope of VAT .

[2011] UKFTT 125 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 20 January 2022; Ref: scu.442900

ELS Group Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 5 Jul 2016

Appeal from a decision of the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) refusing the appellant permission to apply for judicial review of the decision of HMRC not to allow an ELS Group company (Education Lecturing Services) to take advantage of an extra-statutory concession relating to VAT on supplies of services by employment bureaux.

Patten, Floyd LJJ, Baker J
[2016] EWCA Civ 663
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 19 January 2022; Ref: scu.566667

HC Motors Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 21 Feb 2011

Value Added Tax – Three-Year Cap – Section 80(4) VATA 1994 – Repayment requested more than three years after the end of the period in which the last assessment was made – Whether capped – Yes – Appeal dismissed

[2011] UKFTT 129 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 19 January 2022; Ref: scu.442870

Lewis (T/A Russell Francis Interiors) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Feb 2011

VAT – PENALTY FOR A CARELESS ERROR – Appellant misunderstood the tax point for a land transaction – Premature claim for input tax – Appellant received maximum discount for prompted disclosure – one-off technical error – no real likelihood of tax loss – unusually large value of the transaction aggravated the monetary penalty – were there special circumstances – yes – penalty reduced to 7.5 per cent of the monetary value – Appeal allowed in part

[2011] UKFTT 107 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 19 January 2022; Ref: scu.442879

Moto Self Drive (UK) Llp v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 31 Mar 2010

VDT Input Tax – VAT – Section 24 VATA 92 – Whether assets owned by Limited Liability Partnership to enable claim for input tax – Evidence of ownership or transfer of ownership – VAT (Input Tax) Order 1992, Article 7 – Personal use – Value of rental not commercially at arms length.

[2010] UKFTT 142 (TC)
Bailii
VAT (Input Tax) Order 1992
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 18 January 2022; Ref: scu.408968

Odvolaci financni reditelstvi v Cesky Rozhlas: ECJ 22 Jun 2016

(Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Sixth Directive 77/388/EC – Value added tax – Article 2(1) – Supply of services effected for consideration – Definition – Public broadcasting – Financing from a compulsory statutory fee

R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), P
ECLI:EU:C:2016:470, [2016] EUECJ C-11/15
Bailii
Sixth Directive 77/388/EC

European, VAT

Updated: 18 January 2022; Ref: scu.565855

Lajver Melioracios Nonprofit Kft v NAV: ECJ 2 Jun 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 9(1) – Definition of ‘taxable person for the purposes of value added tax’ and ‘economic activity’ – Article 24(1) – Definition of ‘supply of services’ – Agricultural engineering works – Construction and operation of a water disposal system by a non-profit company – Effect of the works being funded by means of State and EU aid

C-263/15, [2016] EUECJ C-263/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:392
Bailii
Directive 2006/112/EC5 9(1) 24(1)

European, VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565144

Sport Academies Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Jun 2016

FTTTx (Vat – Exempt Supplies : Health and Welfare) VALUE ADDED TAX – exemption for supplies of welfare services – item 9, Group 7, Sch. 9, VATA – whether the services supplied by the operator of school holiday camps for 3 to 17 year olds were services directly connected with the care or protection of children or young persons, or closely linked to such protection (PVD art. 132(1)(h)) – held they were not, and that the appellant provides a single service constituted by what is enjoyed or received by attendance at its camps and that the essential nature of that service is the provision of the activities made available, rather than the care or protection of children or young people – appeal dismissed

[2016] UKFTT 417 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565788

Sherdons Golf Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 9 Jun 2016

FTTTx (Vat – Penalties : Default Surcharge) VALUE ADDED TAX – default surcharges imposed under Section 59 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether Time to Pay arrangement covered liabilities arising in the future – no – whether the Appellant had a reasonable excuse for late payment of VAT – no – surcharges confirmed

[2016] UKFTT 405 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565786

Changtel Soloutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Penalties : Misdeclaration): FTTTx 7 Jun 2016

FTTTx VAT – Inaccuracy Penalties – Schedule 24 Finance Act 2007 – Whether inaccuracies? – Yes – Whether deliberate and concealed? – No – inaccuracies in returns 03/12 and 04/12 careless – inaccuracies in returns 05/12 and 06/12 deliberate but not concealed – Whether First Appellant’s conduct attributable to Second Appellant? – Yes, but only in relation to 05/12 and 06/12 – Appeals allowed in part

[2016] UKFTT 399 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565762

Directeur General Des Finances Publiques v Mapfre Asistencia Compania Internacional De Seguros Y Reaseguros Sa (Fifth Chamber): ECJ 16 Jul 2015

ECJ Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Turnover tax – Scope – Exemption – Notion of ‘insurance transactions’ – Notion of ‘supply of services’ – Lump sum for a warranty covering breakdowns of a second-hand vehicle

[2015] EUECJ C-584/13, [2015] RTR 32, [2015] STC 2293, ECLI:EU:C:2015:488, [2015] BVC 42
Bailii
Citing:
OpinionDirecteur General Des Finances Publiques v Mapfre Asistencia Compania Internacional De Seguros Y Reaseguros Sa (Fifth Chamber) ECJ 4-Feb-2015
Opinion – Taxation – VAT – Scope – Exemptions – Concept of ‘insurance transactions’ – Concept of ‘supply of services’ – Lump sum paid for a warranty covering breakdowns of a second-hand motor vehicle . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, VAT, Road Traffic

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565752

Directeur General Des Finances Publiques v Mapfre Asistencia Compania Internacional De Seguros Y Reaseguros Sa (Fifth Chamber): ECJ 4 Feb 2015

Opinion – Taxation – VAT – Scope – Exemptions – Concept of ‘insurance transactions’ – Concept of ‘supply of services’ – Lump sum paid for a warranty covering breakdowns of a second-hand motor vehicle

Szpunar AG
ECLI:EU:C:2015:55, [2015] EUECJ C-584/13 – O
Bailii
Cited by:
OpinionDirecteur General Des Finances Publiques v Mapfre Asistencia Compania Internacional De Seguros Y Reaseguros Sa (Fifth Chamber) ECJ 16-Jul-2015
ECJ Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Turnover tax – Scope – Exemption – Notion of ‘insurance transactions’ – Notion of ‘supply of services’ – Lump sum for a warranty covering breakdowns of a . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, VAT, Road Traffic

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565735

Kreissparkasse Wiedenbruck v Finanzamt Wiedenbruck: ECJ 16 Jun 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deduction of input tax – Article 173(1) – Goods or services used to carry out both taxable transactions and exempt transactions (‘mixed use goods and services’) – Determining the amount of the value added tax deduction – Deductible proportion – Article 174 – Deductible proportion calculated by applying an allocation key according to turnover – Article 173(2) – Derogation – Article 175 – Rounding-up rule for the deductible proportion – Articles 184 and 185 – Adjustment of deductions

ECLI:EU:C:2016:452, [2016] EUECJ C-186/15
Bailii
European

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565615

Minister Finansow v Mateusiak: ECJ 16 Jun 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 18(c), 184 and 187 – Taxable transactions – Cessation of the taxable economic activity – Retention of goods on which VAT became deductible – Adjustment of deductions – Adjustment period – Taxation pursuant to Article 18(c) of Directive 2006/112 on expiry of the adjustment period

ECLI:EU:C:2016:454, [2016] EUECJ C-229/15
Bailii
European

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.565621

Bliss Trading Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 15 Nov 2011

Value Added Tax – MTIC appeal involving three purchases leading to two sales of speed-camera detectors known as Indic8tors by the Appellant in July 2006 – whether the supplies had been traced to fraudulent VAT losses – whether the Appellant knew or ought to have known of the connection – whether the evidence of the Appellant’s director was trustworthy – Appeal dismissed

[2011] UKFTT 740 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.449642

Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v National Exhibition Centre Ltd: ECJ 26 May 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Exemption – Article 13B(d)(3) – Transactions in respect of payments and transfers – Concept – Purchase of tickets for shows or other events – Payment by debit or credit card – ‘Card processing’ services’

C-130/15, [2016] EUECJ C-130/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:357
Bailii

European, VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.564891

Envirotec Denmark ApS v Skatteministeren: ECJ 26 May 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Reverse charge mechanism – Article 198(2) – Gold material or semi-manufactured products – Meaning – Article 199(1)(d) and Annex VI – Used materials, waste and scrap – Ingots resulting from the melting down of various objects and scrap used to enable the extraction of gold and with a purity in gold of 325 thousandths or greater

C-550/14, [2016] EUECJ C-550/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:354
Bailii
Directive 2006/112/EC

European, VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.564874

Bookit Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs: ECJ 26 May 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemption – Article 135(1)(d) – Transactions concerning payments and transfers – Meaning – Purchase of cinema tickets by telephone or via the Internet – Payment by debit card or credit card- ‘Card handling’ services

C-607/14, [2016] EUECJ C-607/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:355
Bailii

European, VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.564869

Enfield Tandoori Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Assessments : Best Judgment): FTTTx 16 May 2016

FTTTx VAT – s 73 VATA – whether restaurant takings under-declared – assessment of takings by HMRC following observations and examination of records – whether HMRC correct to assess to best judgment – yes – whether quantum correct – no – assessment reduced and appeal allowed in part

[2016] UKFTT 336 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.564826

DTL Supplies Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Anti-Avoidance): FTTTx 12 May 2016

FTTTx Corporation tax – VAT – payment of advertising costs – full amount not paid – tax avoidance scheme -held – payment not for business purposes – not creditable input tax – not wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business – appeals dismissed.

[2016] UKFTT 351 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

Corporation Tax, VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.564825

Geotrading Europe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (VAT – Registration : Compulsory): FTTTx 10 May 2016

FTTTx VAT – HMRC’s refusal to register appellant for VAT – Definition of ‘taxable person’ – Finance Act 1972 and VAT Act 1994 – Compulsory Registration Threshold – Principal VAT Directive Article 286 – Whether United Kingdom enjoys a valid exemption or derogation in relation to the definition of taxable person? – Yes – Whether HMRC was entitled to refuse to register appellant? – Yes – Appeal dismissed

[2016] UKFTT 312 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.564830

Idealmed III – Servicos de Saude SA v Autoridade Tributaria e Aduaneira: ECJ 5 Mar 2020

(Value Added Tax (VAT) – Hospital and Medical Care – Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(b) – Exemptions – Hospital and medical care – Hospital establishments – Services provided under social conditions comparable to those applicable to bodies governed by public law – Articles 377 and 391 – Derogations – Right to opt for a taxation regime – Maintenance of the taxation – Variation in the conditions for the exercise of the activity

C-211/18, [2020] EUECJ C-211/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:168, [2019] EUECJ C-211/18_O
Bailii, Bailii
European

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.654895

Staatssecretaris Van Financien (Taux Reduit De Tva Pour Aphrodisiaques): ECJ 27 Feb 2020

Opinion – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax – Directive 2006/112 / EC – Article 98 – Reduced rates – Annex III, point 1 – Foodstuffs intended for human consumption and products normally used to supplement or replace foodstuffs – Libido-stimulating products

C-331/19, [2020] EUECJ C-331/19_O, ECLI: EU: C: 2020: 122, [2020] EUECJ C-331/19
Bailii, Bailii
European

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.654826

Roden and Roden v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Sep 2012

VAT – let of hotel accommodation by undisclosed agent – deemed supply by and to agent under s47(3) VATA – whether deemed supply to agent necessarily has same VAT status as deemed supply by agent – no – whether Item 1(d) of Group 1 to Schedule 9 VATA only exempts supplies to physical user of accommodation – no – appeal allowed in principle

[2012] UKFTT 586 (TC), [2012] STI 2938, [2013] SFTD 44
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 17 January 2022; Ref: scu.466178

Shophold (Mauritius) Ltd v The Assessment Review Committee and Another: PC 16 May 2016

(Mauritius) The Board waas asked whether a taxable person, who has a contractual right to be paid for the services which it has provided, is obliged to pay Value Added Tax (‘VAT’) even where it has waived the enforcement of its contractual right and has neither issued an invoice nor received payment for those services.

[2016] UKPC 12
Bailii
Commonwealth

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564475

Max Investments Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Registration : Other): FTTTx 27 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – Request to change effective date of registration for VAT – Whether refusal reasonable – No – Whether there was a genuine error/misunderstanding – Yes – Whether decision would have inevitably have been the same had it been taken into account – Yes – John Dee Ltd v Customs and Excise Commissioners applied – Appeal dismissed

[2016] UKFTT 290 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564355

Blue Chips Hotels Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Supply : Single or Multiple): FTTTx 6 May 2016

VAT VAT – supply of premises for civil wedding ceremony as part of ‘wedding package’ by hotel – single exempt supply of land or standard rated composite supply of wedding package – held — hire of licensed premises separate supply – not exempt supply of land – appeal dismissed.

[2016] UKFTT 309 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564362

Walls (T/A Charlies Accessories Ltd) v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Repayments : Vat – Repayments): FTTTx 21 Apr 2016

FTTTx Value Added Tax – application for strike-out – whether excess VAT paid on estimated assessments is recoverable – time-bar – Section 80(4), VATA 1994 – Rule 8(3)(c) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 – Appeal struck-out

[2016] UKFTT 274 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564360

Mucho Mas Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 6 May 2016

FTTTx VAT – food zero rating – whether supplies pre October 2012 heated for the purposes of enabling food to be consumed at a temperature above the ambient air temperature – whether supplies after September 2012 kept hot after being heated – preliminary issue decided in favour of HMRC

[2016] UKFTT 302 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564370

GH Preston Partnership v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Penalties : Reasonable Excuse): FTTTx 29 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – Default Surcharge – Value Added Tax Act 1994, sections 59 and 71 – The cause of insufficiency of funds – Whether or not a reasonable excuse for late payment – yes for part of the non-payments for two periods – no for the remaining eight periods – allocation of payments – proportionality

[2016] UKFTT 296 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564348

The Grand Folkestone Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Assessments : Other): FTTTx 27 Apr 2016

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – assessment – whether reason to assess trader – yes – whether any evidence to justify amendment of assessment – no – misdeclaration penalty: whether affected by other penalty assessment under Sch 24 FA 2007 – no – held, misdeclaration penalty properly imposed and no reason to adjust – Sch 24 penalty: held, invalid as expressed to cover period before legislation took effect – Direction under para 2 Sch 1 VATA 1994 that businesses to be treated as carrying on single business for VAT purposes: whether HMRC decision unreasonable – no – appeals dismissed but appeal against Sch 24 penalty allowed

[2016] UKFTT 291 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564349

Dyer v Revenue and Customs (Excise Duty Civil Penalty (See Also Excise Hydrocarbon Oil [Duty]) : Evasion): FTTTx 22 Apr 2016

FTTTx EXCISE DUTY, CUSTOMS DUTY, VAT – civil evasion penalties – whether appellant dishonest – whether Tribunal should exercise discretion to reduce the penalties – appeal dismissed

[2016] UKFTT 278 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT, Customs and Excise

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564343

Agilisys Contact Services Ltd and and Another v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Supply : Other): FTTTx 26 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – Recharge of payments made to joint employees under a Service Agreement – Whether Service Agreement reflected commercial and economic reality of relationship between the parties – Whether disbursements or consideration for a supply of services – Appeal allowed

[2016] UKFTT 289 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564336

Halle Concerts Society v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Exempt Supplies : Other): FTTTx 27 Apr 2016

FTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – company limited by guarantee – whether supplies to members were outside the scope of VAT – single supply or multiple supplies – nature of supplies – exemption under Article 13A(1)(l) Sixth Directive – supplies made by an organisation of a philanthropic nature – appeal allowed

[2016] UKFTT 294 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564351

Citipost Mail Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Other : Vat – Other): FTTTx 26 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – import VAT – Channel Islands – appellant granted low value bulk import approval – whether conditions of approval met – appellant issued with demand for import VAT as a customs debt – low value consignment relief (‘LVCR’) for customs duty and import VAT – whether packages sent to the same recipient and listed on the same manifest must be added together for the purposes of customs duty LVCR – whether same approach applies to VAT LVCR – if a customs debt, whether appellant is the debtor – whether waiver provisions at Article 220(2)(b) of the Customs Code apply to import VAT – whether separate waiver appeal required – whether Tribunal has jurisdiction on this issue – whether debt should be waived – appeal against assessment allowed – whether penalty charged should be upheld, discharged or varied – penalty reduced

[2016] UKFTT 283 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564342

Eastern Atlantic Helicopters Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Input Tax : Other): FTTTx 22 Apr 2016

FTTTx VAT – Input tax – Sale of helicopter held in name of US entity on trust for civil aviation regulatory purposes to UK appellant – identity of supplier?- whether supply by UK company which provided invoice or by US legal owner trustee – supplier was the UK company which held beneficial interest – appeal allowed – whether invoice invalid in any case because it referred to previous company name – HMRC to consider exercise of discretion in relation to ‘other evidence’ Regulation 29(2) VAT Regulations 1995

[2016] UKFTT 277 TC
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.564344

Marks and Spencer v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ECJ 10 Apr 2008

(Third Chamber of the Court of Justice) Taxation Sixth VAT Directive Exemption with refund of tax paid at the preceding stage Erroneous taxation at the standard rate Right to zero rate Entitlement to refund Direct effect General principles of Community law Unjust enrichment.

A. Rosas, P
[2008] EUECJ C-309/06, [2008] BVC 577, [2008] STI 1194, [2008] BTC 5457, [2008] ECR I-2283, [2008] STC 1408, [2008] 2 CMLR 42
Bailii
European
Citing:
Advocate General’s OpinionMarks and Spencer v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise ECJ 13-Dec-2007
ECJ Value added tax – Derogation under Article 28 of Directive 77/388 – Principle of neutrality Principle of equal treatment Right to obtain a refund of the tax in the event of incorrect interpretation of . .
At CAMarks and Spencer Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 5); Commissioners of Customs and Excise v University of Sussex CA 21-Oct-2003
The company sought to reclaim overpaid VAT.
Held: If the UK government had failed properly to implement the directive, then a person affected had the right to claim the benefit of direct enforceability. However, the directive itself was . .
Decision to referMarks and Spencer Plc v Customs and Excise HL 28-Jul-2005
The claimant had sought repayment of overpaid VAT, and the respondent resisted arguing that this would be an unjust enrichment. A reference to the European Court was sought.
Held: It was not possible to say that the House’s opinion was acte . .
ReferenceMarks and Spencer Plc v Customs and Excise HL 12-Jul-2006
Question referred to ECJ. Five questions were referred. . .

Cited by:
ECJ DecisionMarks and Spencer Plc v Customs and Excise HL 4-Feb-2009
The taxpayer requested refund of VAT overpaid on chocolate covered cakes. The CandE resisted saying that the money had been substantially already paid by its customers. The case had been referred twice to the ECJ, who answered that the maintenance . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT, European

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.280498

Lord (T/A Pml Building Services) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 3 Aug 2012

VAT – assessment of VAT on undeclared business income – whether deposits into bank account evidence of undeclared income – held yes – whether underdeclaration of turnover in some years evidence of underdeclaration of turnover in earlier years – held yes – whether assessments made to best judgment – held yes – whether VAT loss as result of dishonest evasion of VAT by Appellant – held yes – whether assessments made under extended time limits in time – held yes – appeal dismissed

[2012] UKFTT 489 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.466111

Fanfield Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 Jan 2011

FLAT RATE SCHEME – Relevant turnover – Exempt supplies – Bank interest – whether bank interest an exempt supply – In principle: Yes – Whether bank interest constitutes a receipt arising in the course or furtherance of any business carried on by Appellant – No – VAT Act 1994 s.26B – VAT Act 1994 Schedule 9 Group 5 Items 2 and 8

[2011] UKFTT 42 (TC), [2011] SFTD 324, [2011] STI 674
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.442804

Maximum Networks v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 28 Jan 2011

VAT – MTIC FRAUD (CONTRA-TRADING) – HMRC denied input tax claim in the sum of pounds 1,063,650 in respect of two supplies of mobile phones – Appellant conceded that the supplies were connected with fraudulent VAT losses but denied knowledge – Did the Appellant know or should have known that its transactions were connected to fraudulent evasion of VAT – Yes – Appeal dismissed

[2011] UKFTT 93 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.442818

Next Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 16 Feb 2011

VALUE ADDED TAX – sales brochures supplied for no immediate consideration – consideration payable if order placed, but offset by delivery charge credit – whether zero-rated brochure in reality supplied for no consideration – yes – consideration in truth paid for taxable supply of delivered goods – whether arrangements abusive – no – whether some of several assessments designed to recover under-paid output tax in time – no – appeal allowed in part

[2011] UKFTT 122 (TC), [2011] SFTD 511
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 16 January 2022; Ref: scu.442886

Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v Customs and Excise: ChD 15 Nov 2001

Appeal by an industrial and provident society, the Midlands Co-operative Society Limited against a decision dismissing its appeal against the VAT assessment by the Commissioners concerning the VAT position of another industrial and provident society which had transferred its engagements to the Midlands Society. By reason of that transfer of engagements the VAT Tribunal directed that the appeal be brought in the name of the Midlands Society.
Held: The appeal failed.

Lightman J
[2001] EWHC 701 (Ch), [2002] STC 198
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 15 January 2022; Ref: scu.263742

Corporate Synergy International (In Liquidation) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 31 May 2011

VALUE ADDED TAX – Application for permission to appeal out of time – Applicant not aware of the decisions sought to be appealed until over a year after they were made – Applicant going into liquidation – further delay caused by insufficiency of funds to appeal – further delay caused by the Applicant’s director’s reluctance to assist the liquidator in the prosecution of the appeal – HMRC accepting that the Applicant had a prima facie case – whether refusal to extend time would cause the Applicant measurable loss – yes – whether an extension of time to appeal would cause prejudice to HMRC in terms of the public interest in good administration and legal certainty – yes – whether Applicant to blame for the delay – yes, in respect of the last 21 months of the period of delay – balancing exercise undertaken in relation to the Tribunal’s exercise of its power to extend time – In the result time not extended and the Application refused and the Appeal struck out

[2011] UKFTT 352 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 15 January 2022; Ref: scu.443026

Murdoch UK Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 18 Jan 2011

VAT – Flat rate scheme – Retrospective authorisation – Refusal to backdate to periods for which returns already made – held that refusal not unreasonable – VAT Regulations 1995, reg 55B(i) – VATA 1994, s.84(4ZA) – Appeal dismissed

[2011] UKFTT 62 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 15 January 2022; Ref: scu.442822

Ward v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Aug 2012

VAT – exemptions – accommodation- whether the appellants supply of studio flats to the local authority was excluded from the exemptions within Group 1 of Schedule 9 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 because they were operating a hotel or similar establishment – appeal dismissed

[2012] UKFTT 499 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 15 January 2022; Ref: scu.466137

San Domenico Vetraria SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate: ECJ 11 Mar 2020

(Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388 / EEC – Articles 2 and 6 – Scope – Taxable transactions – Provision of services for consideration – Secondment of staff by a company parent to its subsidiary – Reimbursement by the subsidiary limited to the costs incurred

C-94/19, [2020] EUECJ C-94/19, ECLI: EU: C: 2020 : 193
Bailii
European

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.654927

Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs: SC 11 May 2016

The court was asked whether the appellant, Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd (formerly MyTravel Group plc), was entitled to recover, by way of input tax VAT charged by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of services provided by PwC and paid for by Airtours.
Held: The appeal was dismissed (Clarke and Carnwath LL dissenting) For the VAT to be reclaimable as input tax, it must be ‘VAT on the supply to [Airtours] of any goods or services’ . Whether there had been a supply of services by PwC to Airtours gave rise to two principal questions: whether PwC agreed, under the terms of the Contract, to supply services, and in particular to provide the Report. HMRC accepted that, if the answer to that question was yes, the appeal must be allowed. PwC’s commitment to provide the services described in the Contract was a contractual commitment to the ‘Engaging Institutions’, and not to Airtours, for the following reasons: (i) the Letter is addressed ‘To the Engaging Institutions’, and not to Airtours; (ii) paragraph 1 of the Letter provides that the Institutions had retained PwC; there is no suggestion that Airtours had done so; (iii) paragraph 4 of the Letter provides that any reports are ‘for the sole use of [those] institutions’ (iv) paragraph 8 of the Letter states that the Report is to be provided to the Institutions and Airtours is only to be provided with a copy, which can be redacted; (v) paragraphs 9 and 10 of the Letter recognise a duty of care on the part of PwC to the Institutions, but does not acknowledge one to Airtours; further, paragraph 11 excludes any duty of care or liability to ‘any other party’. While Airtours did countersign the Letter, it had to do so in order to be bound by certain provisions, such as those relating to the payment of PwC’s fees. The fact that Airtours, rather than the Institutions, was to pay PwC for the services, can be fairly said to raise a prima facie expectation that PwC would owe a duty to Airtours to provide those services. However, the Institutions wanted the services; there is no indication Airtours would have still paid for those services had that not been the
case. The same can be said of Airtours’ argument that its interest in having a report produced for the Institutions indicates there was a supply of services to it.
Where the person who pays the supplier is not entitled under the contractual document to receive any services from the supplier, then, unless the documentation does not reflect the economic reality, the payer has no right to reclaim by way of input tax the VAT in respect of the payment to the supplier.
Lord Neuberger held: ‘In the end, we are concerned with the interpretation of a document, and it is well established that that is a matter of law, not fact, in the courts of all parts of the United Kingdom. Of course, where there are relevant findings of primary fact (or even, at least in some cases, of secondary fact) relevant to interpretation, a Tribunal’s finding will deserve particular respect, but that does not arise in this case. . . ‘

Lord Neuberger, President, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hodge
[2016] UKSC 21, [2016] 4 WLR 87, [2016] STI 1529, [2016] 4 All ER 1, [2016] BVC 17, [2016] STC 1509, UKSC 2014/0215
Bailii, Bailii Summary, SC, SC Summary
Value Added Tax Act 1994 24 25 26
England and Wales
Citing:
At FTTTxAirtours Holiday Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs FTTTx 2-Oct-2009
VAT – deduction of input tax – did the paying party receive a supply – yes – appeal allowed.
All that was required to establish its case was that it had ‘obtained anything at all that was used for the purpose of his business’ and ‘a supply of a . .
At UTTCHM Revenue and Customs v Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd UTTC 8-Nov-2010
UTTC INPUT TAX – tripartite agreement entered into by the Respondent, a number of financial institutions and PricewaterhouseCoopers whose fee was to be paid for by the Respondent-whether input tax of the . .
AT CAAirtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs CA 24-Jul-2014
The Court was asked whether Airtours was entitled to recover (as input tax) value added tax charged by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in respect of certain services provided by PwC and for which the appellant paid. The issue turned upon whether, for VAT . .
CitedMarks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd and Another SC 2-Dec-2015
The Court considered whether, on exercising a break clause in a lease, the tenant was entitled to recover rent paid in advance.
Held: The appeal failed. The Court of Appeal had imposed what was established law. The test for whether a clause . .
CitedCommissioners of Customs and Excise v Redrow Group Plc HL 11-Feb-1999
Where house builders had paid the estate agents’ fees for exchanged property on sales, the supply had been, at least in part, to the builder, and the builder could accordingly recover the agents’ VAT as input tax. A supplier could be treated as . .
CitedRevenue and Customs v Aimia Coalition Loyalty UK Ltd SC 13-Mar-2013
The company managed a card loyalty scheme for retailers. The Revenue appealed against a decision that the company could reclaim VAT input tax on the goods purchased on the customers redeeming their points. The ECJ had decided that the service . .
CitedWHA Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs SC 1-May-2013
The Court was asked as to the effectiveness of a scheme, known as Project C, designed to minimise the overall liability to VAT of a group of companies involved in motor breakdown insurance.
Held: The court dismissed WHA’s appeal. There had . .
CitedRevenue and Customs v Secret Hotels2 Ltd SC 5-Mar-2014
The Court was asked as to: ‘the liability for Value Added Tax of a company which markets and arranges holiday accommodation through an on-line website. The outcome turns on the appropriate characterisation of the relationship between the company, . .
CitedTolsma v Inspecteur De Omzebelasting Leeuwarden ECJ 29-Mar-1994
An Organ Grinder receiving donations was not Vatable on those receipts. There was no legal relationship with donors.
A supply of services is effected ‘for consideration’ within the meaning of Article 2(1) of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388) . .
CitedPrimback Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ECJ 15-May-2001
A company made arrangements for finance for its customers to purchase products at an apparent zero rate of interest. In fact the finance company deducted an undisclosed commission before forwarding payment to the shop. The shop wanted to pay VAT . .
CitedLoyalty Management UK (Taxation) ECJ 7-Oct-2010
ECJ Sixth VAT Directive – Taxable amount – Sales promotion scheme – Loyalty rewards scheme allowing customers to earn points from traders and to redeem them for loyalty rewards – Payments made by the operator of . .
CitedPrimback Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ECJ 15-May-2001
A company made arrangements for finance for its customers to purchase products at an apparent zero rate of interest. In fact the finance company deducted an undisclosed commission before forwarding payment to the shop. The shop wanted to pay VAT . .
CitedStaatsecretaris Van Financien v Cooperatieve Aardappelenbewaarplaats ECJ 5-Feb-1981
(The Dutch Potato case) A farmers’ cooperative owned a refrigerated potato store. During 1975 and 1976 it came to be unnecessary, because it was planning to sell the store, to levy the usual storage charges on its members. Dutch tax officials . .
CitedStaatssecretaris Van Financien v Hong Kong Trade Development Council. ECJ 1-Apr-1982
Refund of value added tax. . .
CitedApple and Pear Development Council v Commissioners of Customs and Excise ECJ 8-Mar-1988
Consideration means ‘everything received in return for the supply of services or the provision of services’. . .
CitedFinanzamt Frankfurt am Main V-Hochst v Deutsche Bank AG ECJ 19-Jul-2012
Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 56(1)(e) – Article 135(1)(f) and (g) – Exemption for transactions relating to the management of securities-based assets (portfolio management)
Sharpston AG said: ‘ in connection with exemptions, fiscal neutrality . .
CitedRevenue And Customs v Newey ECJ 20-Jun-2013
ECJ Reference for a preliminary ruling – Sixth VAT Directive – Article 2(1) and Article 6(1) – Meaning of ‘supply of services’ – Supply of advertising and loan broking services – Exemptions – Economic and . .
CitedDixons Retail Plc v Commissioners For Her Majesty’s Revenue And Customs ECJ 21-Nov-2013
ECJ Directive 2006/112/EC – Value added tax – Supply of goods – Concept – Fraudulent use of a bank card . .

Cited by:
CitedX v Y Ltd (Practice and Procedure – Disclosure) EAT 9-Aug-2018
Iniquity surpasses legal advice privilege
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Disclosure
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissal
An Employment Judge struck out paragraphs of the Claimant’s claim as they depended on an email in respect of which legal advice privilege was claimed. . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.563291

Staatssecretaris van Financien v Het Oudeland Beheer BV: ECJ 28 Apr 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – VAT – Taxable transactions – Application for the purposes of the business of goods acquired ‘in the course of the business’ – Treatment as supplies effected for consideration – Taxable amount

C-128/14, [2016] EUECJ C-128/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:306
Bailii

European, VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.563094

Maltavini Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Zero-Rating : Food, Etc): FTTTx 20 Apr 2016

REINSTATEMENT APPLICATION – appellant failed to comply with Unless order when legally advised appeal likely to fail due to failure of ‘Sub One’ litigation – automatically struck out – applied for reinstatement when learnt other solicitors taking new ground of appeal – no real prospect of success in new ground – reinstatement refused

[2016] UKFTT 267 (TC)
Bailii
England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.562866