Click the case name for better results:

Tough v Revenue and Customs (Practice and Procedure – Strike Out): EAT 14 Feb 2020

The Claimant’s claims of direct disability discrimination and harassment had been struck out after a Preliminary Hearing at which the Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) had determined he was not a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. The Claimant appealed, complaining that the ET had erred: (1) in failing to make findings as … Continue reading Tough v Revenue and Customs (Practice and Procedure – Strike Out): EAT 14 Feb 2020

Equality and Human Rights Commission (Decision Notice): ICO 16 Dec 2010

On 14 May 2010 the complainant requested information regarding any assistance provided by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to protect Orthodox Jews from discrimination, and information relating to cases of religious discrimination in which the EHRC had intervened. The EHRC provided a partial response on 2 July 2010 followed by a full response … Continue reading Equality and Human Rights Commission (Decision Notice): ICO 16 Dec 2010

MBT, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department (Restricted Leave; ILR; Disability Discrimination): UTIAC 13 Dec 2019

(i) A decision of the Secretary of State not to grant indefinite leave to remain to a person subject to the restricted leave policy (‘the RL policy’) does not normally engage Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. However, Article 8 may be engaged by a decision to refuse to grant indefinite leave … Continue reading MBT, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department (Restricted Leave; ILR; Disability Discrimination): UTIAC 13 Dec 2019

Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and Another v Kocur and Another (Agency Workers and Contract of Employment): EAT 11 Dec 2020

This appeal is primarily concerned with the scope of the rights conferred on agency workers by and the Agency Workers’ Regulations 2010 (‘the AWR’), which implements the Agency Workers Directive (‘the Directive’) into domestic law. The EAT found that: (1) The right conferred by regulation 13(1) of the AWR (derived from Article 6.1 of the … Continue reading Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd and Another v Kocur and Another (Agency Workers and Contract of Employment): EAT 11 Dec 2020

Scott v Kenton Schools Academy Trust (Disability Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal): EAT 30 Sep 2019

The Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a teacher. He was dismissed for the given reason of conduct. This concerned, principally, his admitted conduct in carrying out a request, made by a colleague, to give pupils taking an assessment exam, manuscript notes that she had prepared for them to follow. The Tribunal found that … Continue reading Scott v Kenton Schools Academy Trust (Disability Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal): EAT 30 Sep 2019

Re Erskine 1948 Trust: ChD 29 Mar 2012

The trust was created in 1948, and provided gifts over, which had now failed. The court considered the construction of the term ‘stautory next of kin’. The possible beneficiaries claimed through being adopted, arguing that at the date of the last beneficary’s death, all impediments to inheritance by adopted children had been removed by statute. … Continue reading Re Erskine 1948 Trust: ChD 29 Mar 2012

Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Limited v Lord Advocate: HL 21 Apr 1964

The General Officer Commanding during the war of 1939 to 1945 ordered the appellants oil installations near Rangoon to be destroyed. The Japanese were advancing and the Government wished to deny them the resources. It was done on the day before the Japanese occupied Rangoon. The question was, whether compensation was payable for this destruction. … Continue reading Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Limited v Lord Advocate: HL 21 Apr 1964

Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v The United Kingdom: ECHR 2 Mar 2009

The claimant Iraqi nationals complained of their long term detention by British forces in Iraq, and of their transfer to the Iraqi authorities for trial for murder. Held: The transfer was a breach of the applicants’ rights. The Iraqis had re-introduced the death penalty for such crimes which they said amounted to war crimes. The … Continue reading Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v The United Kingdom: ECHR 2 Mar 2009

Ameyaw v Pricewaterhousecoopers Services Ltd: EAT 11 Dec 2019

Practice and Procedure – Case Management The Claimant presented three claims containing multiple complaints under the Equality Act 2010, of alleged treatment by the Respondents during the course of her employment. In the run-up the Full Merits Hearing, she dis-instructed her solicitors and subsequently retained counsel to represent her at that Hearing on a direct … Continue reading Ameyaw v Pricewaterhousecoopers Services Ltd: EAT 11 Dec 2019

The Commissioner of The City of London Police v Geldart: EAT 29 Nov 2019

Maternity Rights and Parental Leave – Sex Discrimination – Jurisdiction The Employment Tribunal was right to conclude that, on their correct construction, the Police Regulations and the determinations made thereunder entitled the Claimant to receive the London Allowance in full throughout her maternity leave. However, the Respondent did not pay the London Allowance (in part … Continue reading The Commissioner of The City of London Police v Geldart: EAT 29 Nov 2019

Watson v Hemingway Design Ltd and Others: EAT 16 Dec 2019

Practice and Procedure – Postponement or Stay – Transfer/Hearing Together An employment judge had erred in law in deciding that he lacked jurisdiction to determine a claim under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 (the 2010 Act) arising between the claimant and the insurer of the insolvent first respondent. The employment tribunal was … Continue reading Watson v Hemingway Design Ltd and Others: EAT 16 Dec 2019

Jakkhu v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: EAT 2 Aug 2019

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Direct disability discrimination DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Section 15 VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION Disability discrimination – direct discrimination (section 13 Equality Act 2010 ) – discrimination because of something arising in consequences of disability (section 15 Equality Act 2010 ) – victimisation (section 27 Equality Act 2010 ) The Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) had rejected the … Continue reading Jakkhu v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd: EAT 2 Aug 2019

South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust v King: EAT 31 Oct 2019

Extension of Time The Claimant lodged a grievance against her managers complaining of, amongst other matters, acts of discrimination. Her grievance was the subject of a report produced by an external consultant. The report dismissed the grievance. The Claimant’s appeal was rejected. Dissatisfied with the grievance outcome and the Trust’s failure to take action against … Continue reading South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust v King: EAT 31 Oct 2019

Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and Others: CA 31 Jan 2019

Judges: Underhill, Peter Jackson LJJ, Lord Sales Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 44, [2019] 2 CMLR 18, [2019] ICR 1118, [2019] 4 All ER 450, [2019] WLR(D) 56, [2019] IRLR 335 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Equality Act 2010 79(4) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and Others SC … Continue reading Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and Others: CA 31 Jan 2019

Bailey and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Brent Council and Others: CA 19 Dec 2011

Appeal against failure of challenge to decision to close public libraries. Judges: Pill, Richards,Davis LJJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 1586 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Approved – Meany and Others, Regina (On the Application of) v Harlow District Council Admn 9-Mar-2009 Challenge to process used for advertising an invitation to tender for its … Continue reading Bailey and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Brent Council and Others: CA 19 Dec 2011

Birmingham City Council v Abdulla and Others: CA 29 Nov 2011

The Council appealed against an order dismissing its application for the claimants’ claims under equal pay legislation to be struck out for want of jurisdiction. The claims had been brought in the High Court rather than te hEmployment Tribunal, thus extending the effective limitation date from 6 months to six years. Held: The Council’s appeal … Continue reading Birmingham City Council v Abdulla and Others: CA 29 Nov 2011

Equality and Human Rights Commission v Prime Minister and Others: Admn 3 Oct 2011

The defendant had published a set of guidelines for intelligence officers called upon to detain and interrogate suspects. The defendant said that the guidelines could only be tested against individual real life cases, and that the court should not answer hypothetical questions. The objection lay to reactions to anticipated torture and mistreatment by third party … Continue reading Equality and Human Rights Commission v Prime Minister and Others: Admn 3 Oct 2011

Freeman v Ultra Green Group Ltd: EAT 9 Aug 2011

EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosureUNFAIR DISMISSAL – Automatically unfair reasonsThe Tribunal erred in law in holding that words spoken at a meeting by the Claimant did not amount to information for the purposes of section 43B of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Cavendish Munro Professional Risks Management v Geduld [2010] ICR 125 applied.The Tribunal … Continue reading Freeman v Ultra Green Group Ltd: EAT 9 Aug 2011

Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 23 Jul 1999

The police had arrested three peaceful but vociferous preachers when some members of a crowd gathered round them threatened hostility. Held: Freedom of speech means nothing unless it includes the freedom to be irritating, contentious, eccentric, heretical, unwelcome and provocative provided it did not tend to provoke violence. There was no reasonable inference available in … Continue reading Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 23 Jul 1999

Alcom Ltd v Republic of Colombia: HL 1984

A bank account used to cover the day-to-day expenses of an Embassy, clearly served sovereign purposes and therefore was immune from enforcement measures. The Act of 1978 must be read against the background of customary international law current in 1978. It is highly unlikely that Parliament intended to require United Kingdom courts to act contrary … Continue reading Alcom Ltd v Republic of Colombia: HL 1984

Department of Work and Pensions v Robinson (Discrimination : Disability): EAT 23 Jul 2019

The employment tribunal had been bound to dismiss the claimant’s claim for discrimination arising from the claimant’s disability. The claimant had a disability which caused her to suffer from migraines caused by computer software, which the respondent unsuccessfully tried to address by use of screen magnification software. The respondent eventually moved the claimant to a … Continue reading Department of Work and Pensions v Robinson (Discrimination : Disability): EAT 23 Jul 2019

Parkin, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Admn 19 Sep 2019

‘The Claimant challenges the effect of regulation 62 of the Universal Credit Regulations (2013 SI No 376) (‘the Regulations’). The Regulations make provision about a welfare benefit, Universal Credit (‘UC’). Regulation 62 provides for a minimum income floor (‘MIF’). I will say more about its effect in due course. The Claimant argues that regulation 62 … Continue reading Parkin, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Admn 19 Sep 2019

Bessong v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (Race Discrimination – Harassment): EAT 18 Oct 2019

RACE DISCRIMINATION – Harassment, Third-Party Harassment The issue in this appeal is whether s . 26 (1) of the Equality Act 2010 (‘the 2010 Act’) should be interpreted so as to impose liability on an employer for third-party harassment against employees. The Claimant worked as a mental health nurse and was assaulted by a patient … Continue reading Bessong v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (Race Discrimination – Harassment): EAT 18 Oct 2019

Harrison v Aryman Ltd (Admissibility of Evidence): EAT 27 Aug 2019

Following her resignation, the Claimant presented a claim form. The Respondent had written her a letter in August 2016 proposing that her employment be terminated on the basis of a settlement agreement. Her case was that this was a reaction to the news that she was pregnant, that there had been a history of various … Continue reading Harrison v Aryman Ltd (Admissibility of Evidence): EAT 27 Aug 2019

Northumberland Tyne and Wear NhHS Foundation Trust v Ward: EAT 18 Oct 2019

Disability Discrimination – Reasonable AdjustmentsThe Claimant suffers from ME/chronic fatigue syndrome (‘CFS’). This makes it more likely that she will have higher absences than other employees. In 2011, the Respondent made an adjustment to its sickness absence management policy (‘SAMP’) whereby the Claimant could have up to 5 absences in a 12-month period before triggering … Continue reading Northumberland Tyne and Wear NhHS Foundation Trust v Ward: EAT 18 Oct 2019

Britliff v Birmingham City Council (Disability Discrimination): EAT 16 Aug 2019

The Claimant is pursuing claims of disability discrimination in the Employment Tribunal, which are defended. It is common ground between the parties that for the purposes of an Equality Act 2010 claim the 2006 United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has indirect effect. At a Preliminary Hearing the Employment Tribunal correctly … Continue reading Britliff v Birmingham City Council (Disability Discrimination): EAT 16 Aug 2019

Parnaby v Leicester City Council (Disability Discrimination): EAT 19 Jul 2019

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – disability – disabled person – section 6 Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010 In finding that the Claimant, who suffered work related stress, was not a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (‘the EqA’), the Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) accepted that he suffered an impairment that had a substantial adverse … Continue reading Parnaby v Leicester City Council (Disability Discrimination): EAT 19 Jul 2019

Town and Country Glasgow Ltd v Munro (Maternity Rights and Parental Leave — Sex Discrimination): EAT 23 Jul 2019

Sex discrimination – pregnancy and discrimination; Contract Workers; Jurisdiction Contract of employment Maternity Rights and Parental leave – sex discrimination In this case the Employment Appeal Tribunal heard an appeal against the Employment Tribunal’s decision under s 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010. The EAT allowed the appeal and concluded on the facts found proved … Continue reading Town and Country Glasgow Ltd v Munro (Maternity Rights and Parental Leave — Sex Discrimination): EAT 23 Jul 2019

Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Doffman and Another: ChD 11 Oct 2010

The defendants applied for directors’ disqualification proceedings for the claim to be struck out or dismissed on the ground that the respondent had breached their rights to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and/or breached his duty to act fairly, in that they had failed to disclose material … Continue reading Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Doffman and Another: ChD 11 Oct 2010

Department of Work and Pensions v Robinson (Disability Discrimination – Section 15 : Jusrisdictional Points – Extension of Time: Just and Equitable): EAT 24 Jul 2019

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Section 15 JUSRISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: just and equitable The employment tribunal had been bound to dismiss the claimant’s claim for discrimination arising from the claimant’s disability. The claimant had a disability which caused her to suffer from migraines caused by computer software, which the respondent unsuccessfully tried to address … Continue reading Department of Work and Pensions v Robinson (Disability Discrimination – Section 15 : Jusrisdictional Points – Extension of Time: Just and Equitable): EAT 24 Jul 2019

Johal v Commission for Equality and Human Rights: EAT 2 Jul 2010

EAT SEX DISCRIMINATION – Pregnancy and discriminationWhether detriment complained of by Claimant was unfavourable treatment on the grounds that she was on maternity leave (Sex Discrimination Act 1975, s3A)? Employment Tribunal found on the facts that it was not. That finding was a permissible one on the facts; there was no error in the ET’s … Continue reading Johal v Commission for Equality and Human Rights: EAT 2 Jul 2010

Uzukauskas v Lithuania: ECHR 6 Jul 2010

ECHR The applicant had a licence for a pistol and rifle. His was refused another licence, and then the existing licence was withdrawn. His name had been included in a police list in an operational records file holding data for law enforcement bodies obtained during operational activities. He began proceedings challenging his listing. The court … Continue reading Uzukauskas v Lithuania: ECHR 6 Jul 2010

Kraft Foods Uk Ltd v Hastie: EAT 6 Jul 2010

EAT AGE DISCRIMINATIONContractual redundancy scheme incorporating a cap preventing employees recovering more than they would have earned if they had remained in employment until retirement age – Cap applied to Claimant, reducing the amount that he would otherwise have received by some andpound;14,000 – Tribunal holds that cap disproportionately applied to those approaching retiring age … Continue reading Kraft Foods Uk Ltd v Hastie: EAT 6 Jul 2010

Neary v Service Children’s Education and Others: EAT 17 Jun 2010

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Exclusions/jurisdictions Was the Claimant ‘ordinarily resident in Great Britain’ for the purposes of section 68(2A)(c) Disability Discrimination Act and regulation 10(2)(c) Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, so as to found jurisdiction to determine his complaints of disability and age discrimination? Employment Tribunal’s decision that he was not was upheld on the … Continue reading Neary v Service Children’s Education and Others: EAT 17 Jun 2010

Scerbaks v Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Ltd: EAT 19 Apr 2010

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS Claim in time and effective date of termination On the Employment Judge’s findings, the claim was presented 3 days out of time, it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to comply and there were no reasons to enlarge time. As the judge had unsatisfactory evidence from both sides, he was entitled to … Continue reading Scerbaks v Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Ltd: EAT 19 Apr 2010

Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: CA 27 Apr 2010

The claimant alleged indirect age discrimination, in not having received a promotion to a post of legal adviser to the defendant. He did not have a law degree and did not want to undertake the study required which would have him acquiring the degree only after retirement. The EAT had allowed the employer’s appeal finding … Continue reading Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police: CA 27 Apr 2010

Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong and Others: EAT 22 Feb 2010

EAT EQUAL PAY – Material factor defence and justification EQUAL PAY – Indirect discrimination Appeal from decision of Employment Tribunal on issues remitted by the Court of Appeal in Armstrong v Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust [2006] IRLR 124. Held: The Tribunal was entitled to find: (a) that the factor relied on by the … Continue reading Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Hospitals Trust v Armstrong and Others: EAT 22 Feb 2010

Brauer v Germany: ECHR 28 Jan 2010

Just satisfaction – friendly settlement Judges: Peer Lorenzen, P Citations: 3545/04, [2010] ECHR 74 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 8 Citing: See Also – Brauer v Germany ECHR 28-May-2009 The applicant was born outside marriage in 1948 in East Germany and claimed a share of the estate of her father, who had … Continue reading Brauer v Germany: ECHR 28 Jan 2010

Jivraj v Hashwani (Rev 2): CA 22 Jun 2010

The court was asked whether parties to an arbitration agreement in a commercial contract can stipulate that the tribunal is to be drawn from members of a particular religious group, in this case the Ismaili community. Held: The defendant’s appeal succeeded. The Directive was concerned with discrimination in several fields many of which were already … Continue reading Jivraj v Hashwani (Rev 2): CA 22 Jun 2010

Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 14 Dec 2009

The claimant, an EU national, came to the UK to join her son. He had worked but became dependent on benefits. She sought payment of the State Pension. Held: A refusal to pay the pension would dissuade workers from moving around within the EU, and was therefore contrary to EU law and the Citizens Directive. … Continue reading Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: CA 14 Dec 2009

McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd: EAT 30 Nov 2009

EAT RELIGION OR BELIEF DISCRIMINATIONUNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reason for dismissalChristian counsellor dismissed by Relate for failing to give an unequivocal commitment to counsel same-sex couples.Held: Tribunal right to dismiss claims of discrimination (direct and indirect) contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 and of unfair dismissal – London Borough of Islington v … Continue reading McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd: EAT 30 Nov 2009

Zagorski and Baze, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and Others: Admn 29 Nov 2010

The claimants, in the US awaiting execution for murders, challenged the permitting by the defendant for export of the chemical Sodium Thipental which would be used for their execution. The respondent said that its use in general anaesthesia practice meant that it was not subject to control. The claimants said that the export was a … Continue reading Zagorski and Baze, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and Others: Admn 29 Nov 2010

Sivanandan v Hackney Action for Racial Equality (Hare): EAT 20 Oct 1999

EAT Procedural Issues – Employment Tribunal Judges: His Honour Judge J Hicks QC Citations: [1999] UKEAT 616 – 99 – 2010, EAT/616/99 Links: Bailii, EAT Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Sivanandan v Hackney Action for Race Equality (Hare) EAT 1-Feb-2001 . .See Also – Sivanandan v Hackney Action for Racial Equality … Continue reading Sivanandan v Hackney Action for Racial Equality (Hare): EAT 20 Oct 1999

Domb and Others, Regina (On the Application of) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and Another: CA 8 Sep 2009

The applicants sought to challenge a decision by the authority to charge for various home care services provided to the disabled applicants. They alleged that the charges were discriminatory. Held: Officials reporting to or advising Ministers/other public authority decision makers, on matters material to the discharge of the duty, must not merely tell the Minister/decision … Continue reading Domb and Others, Regina (On the Application of) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and Another: CA 8 Sep 2009

London Borough of Islington v Ladele: EAT 19 Dec 2008

EAT RELIGION OR BELIEF DISCRIMINATION The claimant was a Registrar who, amongst other things, registered marriages. When the Civil Partnerships Act came into force, she refused to participate in registering such partnerships because to do so was inconsistent with her religious beliefs. The council insisted that she should undertake at least some of these duties, … Continue reading London Borough of Islington v Ladele: EAT 19 Dec 2008

London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Weaver, Regina; Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening: CA 18 Jun 2009

The Trust appealed against a finding that in terminating an assured tenancy transferred to it from a local authority, it had acted as a hybrid public authority and was subject to controls under the 1998 Act. Held: (Rix LJ dissenting). The appeal failed. When dealing with social tenants, the trust exercised a public law function. … Continue reading London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Weaver, Regina; Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening: CA 18 Jun 2009

Naeem v The Secretary of State for Justice: CA 9 Dec 2015

The claimant appealed against rejection of his claim for discrimination when under the 1952 Act, there was a requirement to appoint a member as pastor of the prison a Clergyman of the Church of England, and other chaplains, including himself, an imam, were paid less. Held: The claimant’s appeal failed. It was not enough to … Continue reading Naeem v The Secretary of State for Justice: CA 9 Dec 2015

Meany and Others, Regina (On the Application of) v Harlow District Council: Admn 9 Mar 2009

Challenge to process used for advertising an invitation to tender for its welfare rights and advice services within the district. Held: Davis J said that the: ‘general regard to issues of equality is not the same as having specific regard, by way of conscious approach to the statutory criteria.’ Judges: Davis J Citations: [2009] EWHC … Continue reading Meany and Others, Regina (On the Application of) v Harlow District Council: Admn 9 Mar 2009

Kaur and Another, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Ealing and Another: Admn 29 Jul 2008

The applicants, representatives of the Black Sisters, challenged the implementation of a policy allocating grants. The authority required the services sponsored to provise services irrespective of race. The Black Sisters said this would impact disproportionately on black and ethnic minorities. Held: A Minister must assess the risk and extent of any adverse impact and the … Continue reading Kaur and Another, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Ealing and Another: Admn 29 Jul 2008

A Ltd v Z: EAT 28 Mar 2019

Disability related discrimination – section 15(2) – knowledge; section 15(1)(b) – justification; loss and mitigation; compensation It was accepted that the Claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 – by reason of the fact she suffered from mental and psychiatric impairments, namely stress, depression, low mood and schizophrenia – … Continue reading A Ltd v Z: EAT 28 Mar 2019

Evans v Xactly Corporation Ltd: EAT 15 Aug 2018

Harassment – Disability Related Discrimination VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosure The Employment Tribunal were best placed to make findings of fact about the context and office culture which it did, and which was necessary in order to understand the Claimant’s allegations of harassment and victimisation as well as direct discrimination and section 15 disability discrimination. … Continue reading Evans v Xactly Corporation Ltd: EAT 15 Aug 2018

Birtenshaw v Oldfield: EAT 11 Apr 2019

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Disability related discrimination The Claimant was employed by the Respondent, a provider of services for adults and children with special needs, as a care worker on a temporary basis. She applied for and was granted a permanent position, but subject to medical clearance. Following receipt of a medical report, the Respondent withdrew … Continue reading Birtenshaw v Oldfield: EAT 11 Apr 2019

The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) v Lloyd (Age Discrimination): EAT 15 Mar 2019

The Claimant was a member and branch secretary of the Respondent trade union. At the age of 62, he was nominated to stand for election to the Respondent’s National Executive Committee for the requisite three-year term. His nomination was rejected by the Respondent on the basis of a rule in its Rulebook which did not … Continue reading The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) v Lloyd (Age Discrimination): EAT 15 Mar 2019

Ince Gordon Dadds Llp and Others v J Tunstall and Others: EAT 19 Jun 2019

Practice and Procedure – Stay – Paragraph 43(6) Schedule B1 Insolvency Act 1986 The Claimant had commenced Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) proceedings against eight Respondents. Subsequently, the first two Respondents (one of which had been the Claimant’s employer) went into administration and a stay was imposed on the proceedings under paragraph 43(6) Schedule B1 Insolvency Act … Continue reading Ince Gordon Dadds Llp and Others v J Tunstall and Others: EAT 19 Jun 2019

Dhamija v The Liberal Democrats In England: QBD 24 Apr 2019

The claimant challenged his non-selection by the defendant political party as a candidate for the forthcoming European elections, and in particular their recently adopted protocol for selecting candidates. Judges: Waksman J Citations: [2019] EWHC 1398 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Equality Act 2010 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Discrimination Updated: 08 July 2022; Ref: scu.638201

Simpson v Air Business Ltd: EAT 9 Apr 2019

Victimisation Discrimination – Protected Disclosure – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissal There is an issue between the parties as to the cause of detriments, the subject of the alleged victimisation contrary to the Equality Act 2010. The Claimant alleges that they were because of an admitted protected act, the bringing of a grievance alleging sex … Continue reading Simpson v Air Business Ltd: EAT 9 Apr 2019

Bui van Thanh v United Kingdom: ECHR 12 Mar 1990

The applicant, one of the ‘Vietnamese Boat People’, complained of the acts of government official in Hong Kong. Held: The UK government had not extended the Convention to Hong Kong and the application failed. Citations: 16137/90 Jurisdiction: Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Regina v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte … Continue reading Bui van Thanh v United Kingdom: ECHR 12 Mar 1990

McLeary v One Housing Group Ltd: EAT 6 Feb 2019

JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Claim in time and effective date of termination DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION Following her resignation, the Appellant complained of various types of disability discrimination and of constructive unfair dismissal. At a Preliminary Hearing the Judge determined that all the complaints of discrimination during employment were out of time and that it was not just … Continue reading McLeary v One Housing Group Ltd: EAT 6 Feb 2019

Prasad v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: EAT 23 Jan 2019

HARASSMENT – Conduct SEX DISCRIMINATION – Continuing act JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Extension of time: just and equitable The Claimant’s complaints included one of harassment related to sex, by a colleague having sent an anonymous letter criticising her handling of a patient’s care, to five recipients. The Respondent’s case was that the sender acted solely from … Continue reading Prasad v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: EAT 23 Jan 2019

Iforce Ltd v Wood: EAT 3 Jan 2019

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Disability related discrimination The Claimant was employed by the Respondent to work in its warehouse. She was a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (‘EqA’) by reason of suffering osteoarthritis. It was her perception (supported by her GP) that her symptoms worsened in cold and damp weather. When … Continue reading Iforce Ltd v Wood: EAT 3 Jan 2019

Regina v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State For Health, ex Parte Fedesa and Others: ECJ 13 Nov 1990

ECJ 1. Community law – Principles – Legal certainty – Protection of legitimate expectations – Prohibition of the use in livestock farming of certain substances having a hormonal action in the absence of unanimity as to their harmlessness – Infringement – None (Council Directive 88/146) 2. Community law – Principles – Proportionality – Prohibition of … Continue reading Regina v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State For Health, ex Parte Fedesa and Others: ECJ 13 Nov 1990

Arvunescu v Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd (Practice and Procedure): EAT 23 Sep 2021

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE The claimant, who was formerly employed by the respondent, brought proceedings against them for race discrimination after his employment was terminated. The proceedings were compromised by a ‘COT3’ agreement signed in March 2018. Soon afterwards, in May 2018, the claimant brought a new claim against the respondent. He alleged, among other matters, … Continue reading Arvunescu v Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd (Practice and Procedure): EAT 23 Sep 2021

Sami v Avellan and Others (Practice and Procedure): EAT 17 May 2022

The Claimant brought proceedings against his former employer, the first respondent, for race discrimination and harassment. He also brought claims against the second respondent, a company which owned all the shares in the first respondent, on the basis that it was an agent of first respondent for the purpose of section 109 of the Equality … Continue reading Sami v Avellan and Others (Practice and Procedure): EAT 17 May 2022

Nikolova v Bulgaria: ECHR 25 Mar 1999

(Grand Chamber) The claimant had been detained for long periods after coming under suspicion of theft of large sums. Her detention had initially been ordered by prosecutors. Her initial appeals against her detention were also decided by prosecutors. After three weeks she appealed to a court, which refused her appeal about four weeks later. It … Continue reading Nikolova v Bulgaria: ECHR 25 Mar 1999

Loizidou v Turkey: ECHR 23 Mar 1995

(Preliminary objections) The ECHR considered the situation in northern Cyprus when it was asked as to Turkey’s preliminary objections to admissibility: ‘although Article 1 sets limits on the reach of the Convention, the concept of ‘jurisdiction’ under this provision is not restricted to the national territory of the High Contracting Parties. According to its established … Continue reading Loizidou v Turkey: ECHR 23 Mar 1995

Dombo Beheer BV v The Netherlands: ECHR 27 Oct 1993

‘under the principle of equality of arms, as one of the features of the wider concept of a fair trial, each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a disadvantage vis-a-vis his opponent ‘ and ‘the contracting states have greater latitude when dealing … Continue reading Dombo Beheer BV v The Netherlands: ECHR 27 Oct 1993

De Freitas v The Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing and others: PC 30 Jun 1998

(Antigua and Barbuda) The applicant was employed as a civil servant. He joined a demonstration alleging corruption in a minister. It was alleged he had infringed his duties as a civil servant, and he replied that the constitution allowed him to speak out. Held: The demonstration did contravene the restriction on publishing his views. Analogies … Continue reading De Freitas v The Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing and others: PC 30 Jun 1998

Matadeen and others v M G C Pointu and others (Mauritius): PC 18 Feb 1998

It is a well recognised canon of construction that domestic legislation, including the Constitution, should if possible be construed so as to conform to international instruments to which the state is party. Lord Hoffmann said: ‘of course persons should be uniformly treated unless there is some valid reason to treat them differently . . The … Continue reading Matadeen and others v M G C Pointu and others (Mauritius): PC 18 Feb 1998

X v United Kingdom: ECHR 1979

(Commission) The claimant sought admission of her complaint that being employed by the European Commission and resident in Belgium she had lost her right to vote. She contrasted her position with that of members of the armed forces and members of diplomatic missions who retained their votes though overseas. Held: The complaint was inadmissible. The … Continue reading X v United Kingdom: ECHR 1979

MA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 9 Nov 2016

The appellants claimed housing benefit. They appealed against rejection of their claims that the imposition of limits to the maximum sums payable, ‘the bedroom tax’, was unlawful on equality grounds. The claimants either had disabilities, or lived with dependent family with disabilities, or live in what are known as ‘sanctuary scheme’ homes (accommodation specially adapted … Continue reading MA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 9 Nov 2016

Littrell v Government of the United States of America and Another (No 2): CA 24 Nov 1993

The plaintiff claimed damages for personal injuries arising from medical treatment which he had received at a United States military hospital in the United Kingdom while a serving member of the United States Air Force. Held: Section 16(2) applied and therefore the case fell to be decided at common law. The acts complained of took … Continue reading Littrell v Government of the United States of America and Another (No 2): CA 24 Nov 1993

Loizidou v Turkey (Merits): ECHR 18 Dec 1996

The court was asked whether Turkey was answerable under the Convention for its acts in Northern Cyprus. Held: It was unnecessary to determine whether Turkey actually exercised detailed control over the policies and actions of the authorities of the TRNC. It was obvious from the fact that more than 30,000 Turkish military personnel were engaged … Continue reading Loizidou v Turkey (Merits): ECHR 18 Dec 1996

Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: Admn 1 Mar 2019

The claimants challenged as discriminatory the statutory requirement for landlords to verify the immigration status of potential tenants and land occupiers. Held: The challenge succeeded. Judges: Martin Spencer Citations: [2019] EWHC 452 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Human Rights Act 1998 4, Immigration Act 2014 20-37, European Convention on Human Rights 8 14, Equality Act 2010 … Continue reading Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: Admn 1 Mar 2019

Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen (Sex Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Harassment): EAT 12 Feb 2019

SEX DISCRIMINATION – Direct SEX DISCRIMINATION – Indirect RELIGION OR BELIEF DISCRIMINATION HARASSMENT The Appeal Tribunal dismissed appeals against findings that the Respondent had been subjected to direct sex discrimination and harassment. The Tribunal’s findings of fact were a sufficient basis for its conclusions on each of these claims. The Appeal Tribunal allowed the Appellant’s … Continue reading Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen (Sex Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Harassment): EAT 12 Feb 2019

Nissa v Waverly Education Foundation Ltd and Another: EAT 19 Nov 2018

Disability – definition – ‘substantial’ – ‘long-term’ Until she resigned on 31 August 2016, the Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a Science Teacher. In her subsequent ET claim, she contended she had suffered disability discrimination; it was the Claimant’s case that, since December 2015, she had suffered from a physical impairment, ultimately diagnosed … Continue reading Nissa v Waverly Education Foundation Ltd and Another: EAT 19 Nov 2018

Hoareau and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs: Admn 8 Feb 2019

Challenge to resettlement arrangements for population removed from Chagos Islands. Judges: Singh LJ, Carr J Citations: [2019] EWHC 221 (Admin), [2019] WLR(D) 85 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Equality Act 2010 149 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Human Rights, Constitutional Updated: 27 April 2022; Ref: scu.633412

Ali v Torrosian and Others (T/A Bedford Hill Family Practice): EAT 2 May 2018

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Section 15 Discrimination due to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability – proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim – section 15 Equality Act 2010 The Claimant was a doctor employed by the four partners of a small GP’s practice. Having been signed off work on long-term sickness … Continue reading Ali v Torrosian and Others (T/A Bedford Hill Family Practice): EAT 2 May 2018

Simpson v Secretary of State for Justice: EAT 29 Mar 2018

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Reasonable adjustments UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissal Disability discrimination – reasonable adjustments – sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 Unfair dismissal – constructive dismissal – section 95 Employment Rights Act 1996 The Claimant, who had been employed by the Respondent as a Probation Service Officer (‘PSO’) from April 1999, was a … Continue reading Simpson v Secretary of State for Justice: EAT 29 Mar 2018

Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and Department of Health and Social Security: HL 17 Oct 1985

Lawfulness of Contraceptive advice for Girls The claimant had young daughters. She challenged advice given to doctors by the second respondent allowing them to give contraceptive advice to girls under 16, and the right of the first defendant to act upon that advice. She objected that the advice infringed her rights as a parent, and … Continue reading Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority and Department of Health and Social Security: HL 17 Oct 1985

Carson and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 16 Mar 2010

(Grand Chamber) The court ruled admissible claims against the United Kingdom by 13 persons entitled to British State pensions for violation of article 14 of the Convention in combination with article 1 of the First Protocol. All the claimants had earned pensions by working in Britain, but had emigrated to South Africa, Australia or Canada … Continue reading Carson and Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 16 Mar 2010

Ward and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: CA 16 Apr 2019

Challenge to housing policy as discriminatory against Irish travellers or Kurdish refugees. Judges: Underhill VP, Lewison, King LJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 692, [2019] WLR(D) 244, [2019] PTSR 1738 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Housing Act 1996 166A, Children Act 2004 11(2), Equality Act 2010 19 29 149 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – … Continue reading Ward and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon and Others: CA 16 Apr 2019

Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and Others (Equal Pay Act): EAT 31 Aug 2017

EQUAL PAY ACT – Article 141/European law EQUAL PAY ACT – Equal value EQUAL PAY ACT – Other establishments 1. Although the point is not acte clair, the better view is that article 157 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is directly effective in a claim founded on equal pay for … Continue reading Asda Stores Ltd v Brierley and Others (Equal Pay Act): EAT 31 Aug 2017

NHS Trust Development Authority (NHS TDA) v Saiger and Others (Practice and Procedure): EAT 17 Jul 2017

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity < PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke In the first appeal (UKEAT/0167/15/LA), the Appellant, the NHS Trust Development Authority (‘TDA’), complained that the Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) had reached conclusions which were not supported by the evidence or were arrived at by inferential conclusions, which could not … Continue reading NHS Trust Development Authority (NHS TDA) v Saiger and Others (Practice and Procedure): EAT 17 Jul 2017

North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust v Saiger and Others (Practice and Procedure): EAT 17 Jul 2017

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke In the first appeal (UKEAT/0167/15/LA), the Appellant, the NHS Trust Development Authority (‘TDA’), complained that the Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) had reached conclusions which were not supported by the evidence or were arrived at by inferential conclusions, which could not be … Continue reading North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust v Saiger and Others (Practice and Procedure): EAT 17 Jul 2017

DA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 15 May 2019

Several lone parents challenged the benefits cap, saying that it was discriminatory. Held: (Hale, Kerr LL dissenting) The parents’ appeals failed. The legislation had a clear impact on lone parents and their children. The intention was to encourage claimants back into work. It was said that thus contradicted the other policy of providing no free … Continue reading DA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: SC 15 May 2019

Donald v AVC Media Enterprises Ltd: EAT 9 Nov 2016

EAT Unfair Dismissal : Mitigation of Loss – DISCRIMINATION: JURISDICTIONAL POINTS: Extension of time: just and equitable In a case where the claimant had succeeded in a claim of constructive unfair dismissal, the Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to mitigation of loss. The judgment contained no acknowledgment of where the onus of proof lay. … Continue reading Donald v AVC Media Enterprises Ltd: EAT 9 Nov 2016