The claimant’s husband was a defendant in drug trafficking proceedings. Anticipating a claim against family homes, the claimant sought a declaration that she held a 50% interest in them. Judges: Cranston J Citations: [2011] EWHC 1688 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 Criminal Sentencing, Trusts Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.441415
Renewed application for permission to appeal a decision refusing the applicant’s application for a certificate of inadequacy under section 17 of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994. Citations: [2002] EWCA Civ 1450 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.217629
Citations: [2001] EWCA Civ 47 Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.217937
Citations: [1999] EWHC Admin 466 Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 Criminal Sentencing Updated: 28 May 2022; Ref: scu.139730
An order to restrain funds was available here though foreign proceedings were in rem. Citations: Times 04-May-1994 Statutes: Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 28 April 2022; Ref: scu.81963
The Customs and Excise were to pay the costs of restraint orders incurred by acquitted Defendant. Citations: Times 13-Oct-1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 07 December 2022; Ref: scu.82272
Figures agreed in confiscation proceedings are conclusive at all stages. Citations: Times 03-Jan-1994 Statutes: Drug Trafficking Offenders Act 1986 3 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 26 October 2022; Ref: scu.88209
No guideline for laundering of proceeds of drugs – too wide variation. Citations: Times 05-Apr-1994 Statutes: Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 24(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 26 October 2022; Ref: scu.87381
Richardson, was described as ‘an important member of the team’ with a ‘highly significant role in the whole enterprise’ of importing drugs to a street value of andpound;50 million, that is, 44 kgs of cocaine on one occasion and 144 kgs on another, plus 2 tons of cannabis. Held: Levels of sentencing for most serious … Continue reading Regina v Richardson, Regina v Teixeira etc: CACD 4 Apr 1994
Costs of drugs seized not themselves benefit to be included as trafficking proceed. Citations: Times 21-Oct-1994 Statutes: Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.86044
Judge to give succinct analysis of his findings of benefits from drug trafficking. Citations: Ind Summary 14-Nov-1994 Statutes: Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.86045
Conspiracy to convert or transfer the proceeds of drug trafficking or of criminal conduct – confiscation order available. The statutory distinction existed between the proceeds of drug trafficking and of crime generally had now been removed, but the conduct here pre-dated the new Act. The offence of conspiracy took place at the time of the … Continue reading Attoney-General’s Reference No 4 of 2003 Under S. 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988; Suchedina: CACD 21 Jul 2004
The applicant was arrested and placed under house arrest on charges relating to his association with the Mafia. As an interim measure some of his property was seized. The proceedings ended in his acquittal. He claimed that the seizure of his property was a violation of his rights under A1P1. Held: His complaint was dismissed.The … Continue reading Raimondo v Italy: ECHR 22 Feb 1994
The appellant was charged with conspiracy to traffic in a dangerous drug, contrary to the common law and section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance Cap 134 of Hong Kong. The prosecution said he had had meetings in Thailand with a man named Needham. who unknown to the appellant was an US undercover drug enforcement … Continue reading Yip Chiu Cheung v Regina: PC 16 Jun 1994
The court discussed why marginal notes are not to be used as an aid for stautory interpretation: ‘I am aware of the general rule of law as to marginal notes, at any rate in public general Acts of Parliament; but that rule is founded, as will be seen on reference to the cases, upon the … Continue reading In re Woking Urban District Council (Basingstoke Canal) Act 1911: CA 1914
Application for certificate of inadequacy. Judges: Hickinbottom J Citations: [2010] EWHC 1531 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 17 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 20 December 2022; Ref: scu.417772
The appellant had been sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and a confiscation order pounds 5.4m with six years in default. Small payments were made later by his receivers, but the interest had taken the total sums due over pounds 8m at the time of payments. The Court was asked say whether when calculating the credit … Continue reading Gibson, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 24 Jan 2018
‘The issue in the case is whether the words ‘the said sum . . as was due at the time the period of detention was imposed’ in section 79(2) of the Magistrates’ Court Act (MCA) 1980 should be construed in the case of confiscation orders made under the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (DTA) as meaning … Continue reading Gibson, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: CA 11 Nov 2015
Judges: Gosnell HHJ Citations: [2013] WLR(D) 344, [2014] 1 WLR 2658, [2013] EWHC 2481 (Admin) Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes:
The court held that they were not precluded by an application made under the 1994 Act against assets of the husband from making an order in favour of the wife under the 1973 Act. The court discharged the Receiver appointed under section 29(2) DTA 1994 and dismissed an application by HM Customs and Excise for … Continue reading H M Customs and Excise and Another v MCA and Another: 18 Apr 2002
Citations: [1999] EWHC Admin 613 Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 42(1), Magistrates Courts (Detention and Forfeiture of Drug Trafficking Cash) Rules 1991 (1991 No 1923) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Regina v Luton Justices ex parte Abecasis CA 30-Mar-2000 Although the rules specified that a form should be used … Continue reading Regina v Luton Justices ex parte Abecasis: Admn 29 Jun 1999
Although the rules specified that a form should be used when making application to extend the time for which money could be held pending an application under the Act for its forfeiture, there was no enforceable duty to prove that the form had been used, and its absence was not a fatal flaw in the … Continue reading Regina v Luton Justices ex parte Abecasis: CA 30 Mar 2000
The central issue in these proceedings has been the question of who is the beneficial owner of a property Judges: King J Citations: [2013] EWHC 501 (Admin), [2013] Lloyd’s Rep FC 262 Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.471681
Citations: [2007] EWCA Civ 568 Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal From – Briggs-Price, Regina v HL 29-Apr-2009 The applicant appealed against a confiscation order made on the basis of evidence obtained for and given in a trial that he had profited from the importation of cannabis. … Continue reading Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Briggs-Price and Another: CA 14 Jun 2007
In the absence of evidence from the defendant as to the value of the drugs found, where the quantity was substantial it was right to apply some discount, in this case twenty per cent, on the basis that he would have received some wholesale discount, before making a confiscation order. Citations: Times 20-Oct-1999 Statutes: Drug … Continue reading Regina v Berry: CACD 20 Oct 1999
The conversion of cash from one currency into another can of itself constitute the offence of facilitating the retention or control of the benefits of drug trafficking irrespective of the purpose of the conversion. The words in the statute are not limited. Citations: Gazette 04-Nov-1998, Times 28-Oct-1998, [1998] EWCA Crim 2824 Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act … Continue reading Regina v MacMaster: CACD 28 Oct 1998
When considering a confiscation order which would affect the wife of the accused, and where property is held in joint names, the court should start with the prima facie position as to where the beneficial interests lay and then go on to find whether there are gifts caught by the Act which ought then to … Continue reading Regina v Buckman: CACD 3 Oct 1996
The making of a confiscation order is part of sentencing. Such an order might be delayed provided the determination was made within six months of conviction. If in the circumstances of the case of an adjournment beyond that period was necessary, whether or not the information gathering process had been completed, an extension of time … Continue reading Regina v Shevki and Another: CACD 14 Dec 2000
The defendant having been convicted of drug offences was subject to an application for confiscation of his assets. For various reasons, including the illness of the judge, the decision was not made within the 6 month period. The court held that the postponement having been made in open court by the judge within the period, … Continue reading Regina v Cole: CACD 22 Apr 1998
The defendant had been made the subject of a confiscation order. He appealed, saying that in calculating the assets, he had taken the gross value of his property without allowing for an outstanding mortgage. Held: The mortgage advance was not tainted money. Although the 1994 and 1988 Acts were intended to operate similarly and in … Continue reading Regina v Walls: CACD 30 Oct 2002
ECHR Article 41 Just satisfaction Absence of award in respect of non-pecuniary damage where delays in confiscation proceedings were mainly attributable to applicant Facts – In June 2001 the applicant was found guilty of drug-trafficking offences and sentenced to fourteen years’ imprisonment (he was released in 2006). By virtue of his conviction he became liable … Continue reading Piper v The United Kingdom: ECHR 21 Apr 2015
The court was asked, where a defendant fell to be subject to an increased confiscation order under the 1994 Act, where at the time of the original order his assets had been inadequate to meet the sum of benefit found to have been received, but he had later honestly acquired further assets. Held: The court … Continue reading In re Peacock: CA 20 Dec 2010
The defendant having pleaded guilty to a serious drugs offence now appealed a confiscation order. He claimed that he had been misled that the prosecution would not request an inquiry for this purpose, and during the course of the hearing the prosecution changed its mind, and that the defendant having been sentences the section no … Continue reading Regina v Keith Ross: CACD 13 Mar 2001
The Crown appealed a decision that a conviction under subsection 2 required proof that the money the disposal of which the defendant was accused to have assisted was in fact the proceeds of drug trafficking. Held: Subsections 1 and 2 were clearly differently worded. Under section 1 it was necessary to prove that the goods … Continue reading Regina v Montilla, Newbury etc: CACD 3 Nov 2003
When the customs seized cash under the section on the suspicion that it might be the proceeds of drug trafficking, the time limit imposed by the section for the return of the money if continued retention was not authorised, was strict. They had 48 hours within which to obtain authority. Money was seized at 11:30am … Continue reading Walsh v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 4 Jul 2001
The defendants faced charges under the two Acts. They raised as a preliminary issue whether it is necessary for the Crown to prove that the property being converted was in fact the proceeds, in the case of the 1994 Act, of drug trafficking and, in the case of the 1988 Act, of crime. The Crown … Continue reading Regina v Montila and Others: HL 25 Nov 2004
The defendant applied for a certificate of inadequacy in respect of a confiscation order. Citations: [2008] EWHC 2226 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 Criminal Sentencing Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.276527
The husband had been convicted of trafficking in cannabis, and an order had been made confiscating his assets. His wife had already petitioned for divorce and begun ancillary relief proceedings. She claimed that her interest in the house under section 24 of the Act was protected. The receiver sought sale of the house to recover … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v A; A v A: FD 18 Apr 2002
Valuation of drugs in confiscation order.Applying the 1994 Act, sections 2(3) and 4(1) were directed to gross payments and not net profits. Judges: Lord Bingham of Cornhill LCJ, Sachs, Toulson JJ Citations: [1996] EWCA Crim 1799, [1997] 2 Cr App R (S) 110, [1997] Crim LR 235 Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 5, … Continue reading Regina v Banks: CACD 9 Dec 1996
The defendant appealed against a forfeiture order, saying that it had been made under the 1990 Act which had been repealed. Held: The wrong naming of the section did not invalidate the decision. Judges: Lord Bingham of Cornhill LCJ, Dyson J Citations: [1998] EWHC Admin 332 Statutes: Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990, Drug Trafficking … Continue reading Regina v Dover Magistrates’ Court ex parte Webb: Admn 18 Mar 1998
The defendant appealed his sentence for conspiracy to supply counterfeit drugs. Held: The defendant need only serve the sentence if he failed to pay a penalty which the court had decided he could afford to pay. Appeal dismissed. Judges: Scott Baker LJ, Holland J, Loraine-Smith J Citations: [2006] EWCA Crim 2717 Links: Bailii Statutes: Medicines … Continue reading Valentine v Regina: CACD 10 Nov 2006
The defendant had been made subject to a confiscation order. He now sought a certificate of inadequacy. Held: The appeal failed. The procedure for obtaining a certificate of inadequacy related only to circumstances arising following the confiscation order. The Acts provided a proper avenue of appeal against the order itself, and the use of this … Continue reading Mckinsley v Crown Prosecution Service: CA 25 Jul 2006
Judges: Goldring J Citations: [2005] EWHC 2641 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 43(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.235196
The defendants appealed against their convictions for conspiracy to launder money under section 49(2) of the 1994 Act. The appellants said that the effect of the decision in Montila, alongside sections 1(1) and 1(2) of the 1997 Act, was that a person could not be guilty of a conspiracy to commit an offence against section … Continue reading Ali, Hussain, Khan, Bhatti, Regina v: CACD 7 Jun 2005
The defendants appealed against confiscation orders on the basis that in various ways, the Crown had failed to comply with procedural requirements. Held: The courts must remember the importance of such procedures in the fight against crime, and must not allow procedural or technical failures to defeat that purpose. Courts should rather look to see … Continue reading Sekhon, etc v Regina: CACD 16 Dec 2002
The three defendants were stopped on their way to Malaga. Each carried andpound;7,000 or andpound;6,000. Their explanations were not accepted, and the money was seized under the Act. The magistrates ordered it to be returned, and Customs appealed. Held: It was not proper to aggregate the sums under the Act so as to reach a … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Duffy and Others: QBD 1 Mar 2002
The defendant appealed against a confiscation order made under the drug trafficking legislation. The judge had made a finding that there would be a serious chance of unfairness in the order but had continued nonetheless, by reducing the relative proportion ordered. Held: It could not be the law that if the judge found a serious … Continue reading Regina v Deprince: CACD 9 Mar 2004
The defendant appealed conviction on three counts of conspiracy to launder money. The prosecution said that he and his co-accused engaged in money laundering between June 1999 and March 2000. Each count alleged that he and his co-conspirators engaged in transactions which were prohibited by section 49(2)(b) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 and section … Continue reading Regina v Gulbir Rana Singh: CACD 18 Dec 2003
Application under section 16(2) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (‘the DTA 1994’) for a certificate of increase to certify that the amount that might be realised in the case of the Defendant is greater than the amount taken into account in making the confiscation order, where the amount which the Defendant had been ordered … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v Iqbal: Admn 19 May 2022
Appeal against refusal of restraint order. Held: It is enough that on the documents a good arguable case arises for treating the relevant assets as the realisable property of the defendant. Lord Justice Simon Brown said: ‘All that I think it appropriate on this appeal to add by way of comment on the approach to … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v Compton, Comptons of Brighton Limited, Coyne, Compton: CA 27 Nov 2002
Statutory provisions which reversed the burden of proof in cases involving drug smuggling and other repeat offenders, allowing confiscation orders to be made were not necessarily in contravention of the article 6 right. However the question of whether the statutory provision infringed the right to a fair trial was for each particular case which came … Continue reading Regina v Benjafield, Regina v Leal, Regina v Rezvi, Regina v Milford: HL 24 Jan 2002
Having been convicted of theft, a confiscation order had been made against which the appellant appealed. The Court of Appeal certified a question of whether confiscation provisions under the 1988 Act were in breach of the defendant’s human rights. Are applications for confiscation orders criminal proceedings under the Convention, and if so do the assumptions … Continue reading Regina v Rezvi: HL 24 Jan 2002
The applicants had either been acquitted of drugs trafficking offences, or were third parties. In each case, property had been taken into receivership, and orders had been made for the receivers to take their costs from the assets taken. The proprietors appealed that part of the orders. Held: The receiver is an officer of the … Continue reading Hughes and Others v HM Customs and Excise: Admn 21 Dec 2001
Having been convicted of drug trafficking, an application was made for a confiscation under the 1994 Act. On the civil balance of proof, and applying the assumptions under the Act, an order was made. The applicant claimed that his article 6 rights had been infringed. The respondent government said the application for an order was … Continue reading Phillips v United Kingdom: ECHR 5 Jul 2001
Lord Woolf MR said that where the original proceedings are brought by a public authority, an appeal is part of those proceedings to which section 22(4) applies: ‘In our judgment, where the original proceedings are brought by, or at the instigation of, a public authority, as is the case with a prosecution, an appeal by … Continue reading Regina v Benjafield, Leal, Rezvi and Milford: CACD 21 Dec 2000
The Customs appealed an order allowing a judge in divorce ancillary relief proceedings to make an order transferring the matrimonial home and two life policies in such a way as would defeat their attempt to enforce recovery under the 1994 Act. Held: The customs had not established that the 1994 had any statutory priority. Both … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v A: A v A: CA 22 Jul 2002
The defendant admitted conspiring to supply cannabis on the basis that he had derived no financial benefit from his involvement in the conspiracy, although he had been promised andpound;200 for his role in transporting a sum of money for the purchase of the drugs. He had also driven a van in which the drugs were … Continue reading Regina v Lunnon: CACD 2004
The court had adjourned its proceedings in the absence of the defendant, so as not to fall foul of the requirement that a confiscation inquiry must take place within six months of conviction. The defendant appealed. Held: The court could exercise its common law power to adjourn. The statutory power could only be exercised where … Continue reading Regina v October: CACD 27 Feb 2003
When a court decided that an offender had benefited from Drug trafficking, it had to first to calculate the amount of benefit to be recovered from the defendant. In making that assessment, the court had to look to the assumptions in the section. The court should not use other assumptions unless there was evidence before … Continue reading Regina v Williams (Errol): CACD 11 Jan 2001
Citations: [2004] EWHC 953 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 42 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 07 May 2022; Ref: scu.226869
The defendants appealed confiscation orders for drug trafficking where there had been a finding that of the tablets sold as ecstacy, probably only one tablet in a million was actually a class A controlled drug. Held:The Act required there to be shown that the defendant had ‘received any payment . . . . In connection … Continue reading Regina v Metcalfe and Another: CACD 21 Dec 2004
The defendants had been charged with four conspiracies, each of which was indicted as a conspiracy to commit offences under the 1994 Act on the one hand and under the 1988 Act on the other. The crown accepted that for a conviction for the laundering of the proceeds of drug trafficking, it was necessary to … Continue reading Regina v El-Kurd: CACD 2001
Appeal against refusal of stay of execution of confiscation order under 1994 Act. Citations: [2006] EWHC 2221 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Practice Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.244852
The Court rejected the applicant’s contention that the proceedings involved a ‘criminal charge’ and resulted in the imposition of a penalty or punishment. The forfeiture was preventative and not a penal sanction. Accordingly it was permissible that, pursuant to section 43(3), the standard of proof required to justify forfeiture was that applicable to civil proceedings. … Continue reading Webb v The United Kingdom: ECHR 10 Feb 2004
A confiscation order was to be made. The judge included the purchase price of the drugs forfeited. Held: As the drugs had been forfeited they were no longer the property of the former owner. So he was in no position to realise that property as an asset. Lord Bingham CJ said: ‘But even if the … Continue reading Regina v Dore: CACD 19 Dec 1996
A substantial confiscation order was made with respect to money seized from the applicant on the ground that customs officers believed the money was directly or indirectly the proceeds of drugs trafficking and/or was intended for use in drug trafficking. The applicant contended that a court, when considering whether to make a forfeiture order in … Continue reading Butler v United Kingdom: ECHR 27 Jun 2002
The court’s ability to make an order under the Act required that order to be made before the principle sentence was handed down. Once that had happened it was too late to make an order. Here the prosecution had not at first sought an order, and when it came to do so, the judge had … Continue reading Regina v Moss: CACD 3 Apr 2001
Although a court normally has the power to determine when and how to deal with its own cases, a Crown Court dealing with an application for confiscation of assets under the Act, had to determine the case within the six month time limit unless it was satisfied that the circumstances were exceptional and an adjournment … Continue reading Regina v Lingham: CACD 2 Jun 2000
It was not a breach of a prisoner’s human rights to impose a sentence of imprisonment on a failure to comply with a confiscation order made in a drugs case. The transfer of the burden onto the defendant was not in breach of the equality of arms provisions in the convention, nor of the imposition … Continue reading Regina v Malik: CACD 30 May 2000
A judge has no discretion other than to make an order with regard to the realisation and confiscation of the proceeds of drug trafficking offences. The Act gives the defendant several ways of displacing the assumptions to be made by the judge, but if the defendant failed to displace the assumptions, the court could not … Continue reading Regina v Croft: CACD 6 Jul 2000
An interim receiver under the Act was primarily appointed to preserve the assets of the defendant to prevent dissipation, and not to maximise them so as to realise greater sums for the purposes of any eventual confiscation order. He was answerable first to the court, and the court should not withdraw its control to such … Continue reading In Re P (Restraint Order) (Sale of Assets): CA 2 Aug 1999
Judges: Wilkie J Citations: [2006] EWHC 2751 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Drug Trafficking Act 1994, Criminal Justice Act 1988 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 05 April 2022; Ref: scu.245977
Each applicant had been subject to confiscation in criminal proceedings relating to drugs offences. They complained that the legislation had reversed the burden of proof. Held: ‘it was not incompatible with the notion of a fair hearing in criminal proceedings to place the onus on each applicant to give a credible account of his current … Continue reading Grayson and Barnham v The United Kingdom: ECHR 23 Sep 2008
The appellant had completed that proportion of a total of 22 years’ imprisonment, which he was required to serve for drug trafficking offences. But he remained in prison serving a default term for failure to pay the whole of the sum of pounds 3,458,806, which he was required to pay by virtue of a confiscation … Continue reading Telli v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office: CA 21 Dec 2007
Each defendant appealed against confiscation orders made when the sentence imposed was an absolute or conditional discharge. They said that Clarke made such orders unlawful. Held: The decision in Clarke was a difficult limitation on the court’s discretion: ‘there are cases in which the combination of an order for discharge with a confiscation order represents … Continue reading Regina v Magro: CACD 8 Jul 2010
Judges: Sir John Thomas P, Cox, Kenneth Parker Jj Citations: [2012] EWCA Crim 2437, [2013] 2 All ER 121, [2013] Crim LR 415, [2013] 1 WLR 2014, [2012] WLR(D) 332, [2013] 1 Cr App R 21 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 29, Drug Trafficking Act 1994 15 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading YDG and Another, Regina v: CACD 20 Nov 2012
A previous conviction of the defendant for a drugs related offence was admissible on a civil application for the forfeiture of cash said to represent the proceeds of drug trafficking under the section 43(1). The court observed that the circumstances in which similar fact evidence would be admitted in a criminal trial were closely circumscribed … Continue reading Regina v Isleworth Crown Court ex parte Marland: Admn 28 Oct 1997
It does not necessarily follow from the mere possession of drugs that a person is not a mere minder or custodian Lord Woolf of Barnes LCJ, Rougier, Bell JJ [2000] EWCA Crim 115, [2001] 1 Cr App R (S) 79 Bailii Drug Trafficking Act 1994 2 Cited by: Cited – Mackle, Regina v SC 29-Jan-2014 … Continue reading Regina v J: CACD 4 Jul 2000
The court was considering the terms of a confiscation order. It decided to postpone the decision beyond the six month limit. Questions had arisen about the apparent shift of the burden of proof. Two cases were due to be heard by the Court of Appeal which would affect the issue before the court. Held: The … Continue reading Regina v Jagdev: CACD 31 May 2002
The judge when sentencing the offender set a timetable for the purpose of determinations under the 1994 Act, requiring disclosure of assets and expenditure by the defendant within 28 days and a prosecutor’s statement within 28 days thereafter. Held: Nevertheless, there had been a breach of section 3 because the court had failed to specify … Continue reading Regina v Davies: CACD 22 May 2001
[2005] EWCA Crim 3553 Bailii Drug Trafficking Act 1994 31(4) England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Gibson v Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office CA 12-Jun-2008 The claimant’s husband had been made subject to a criminal confiscation order in the sum of pounds 5.5 million. She now sought to appeal an action against life policies … Continue reading Ginwalla, Regina v: CACD 8 Dec 2005
The claimant’s husband had been made subject to a criminal confiscation order in the sum of pounds 5.5 million. She now sought to appeal an action against life policies in which she claimed a 50% interest. Held: Despite the finding that she had some awareness of her husband’s activities, the claimant was entitled to keep … Continue reading Gibson v Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office: CA 12 Jun 2008
The court considered the ambit of the discretionary grant of a restraint order, where the proceeds of crime had been transferred to a company. Held: Ouseley J said: ‘In my judgment the real question which a judge faced with an application for a restraint or receivership order is whether the order of the extent sought … Continue reading In Re D: Admn 2006
The husband and wife divorced and a property adjustment order applied for. The husband had been convicted and a drugs proceeds order made under the 1994 Act. The order had not been satisfied, and the receiver applied for money from the matrimonial property. Held: The two Acts gave no indication that either was to take … Continue reading H M Customs and Excise and Another v MCA and Another; A v A; Re MCA: CA 22 Jul 2002
The court was asked how to resolve the conflict between a public policy imperative to deprive offenders of the fruits of their crime and the requirement that dependants are provided for after divorce when the only funds available for both are the same? The CPS appealed against an order distributing a capital sum to the … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v Richards and Richards: CA 27 Jun 2006
The defendant had been convicted of drugs offences, and sentenced under the 1994 Act. The gains he had made exceeded his then assets. Later he acquired further property honestly, and the Court now considered whether those assets could be taken to cover the earlier shortfall, by allowing for them when issuing a certificate to increase … Continue reading Peacock, Re: SC 22 Feb 2012
The applicant appealed against a confiscation order made on the basis of evidence obtained for and given in a trial that he had profited from the importation of cannabis. He had not faced trial on an associated charge, but had been convicted of conspiracy on the importation of heroin. Held: The court need not rely … Continue reading Briggs-Price, Regina v: HL 29 Apr 2009
The defendant had been convicted of involvement in a substantial VAT fraud, and made subject to a confiscation order. He was made subject to a confiscation order in respect of the amounts lost to the fraud where he was involved, but argued that the court had made each of 16 defendants liable for the full … Continue reading May, Regina v: HL 14 May 2008
The appellant had been found to have received criminal proceeds along with another. He appealed against an order making him liable for the full amount. Held: The appeal failed. The defendant’s argument did not face the finding that he had been acting jointly with his co-defendants. ‘The committee cannot, however, regard it as disproportionate to … Continue reading Regina v Green: HL 14 May 2008
Conviction of offences of being concerned in the importation of controlled drugs, namely cocaine, ecstasy and amphetamine. McCready was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment. Complaint that no adjournment before confiscation order. . .
The defendants had been arrested as they unloaded four tons of cannabis from a boat.
Held: Their appeal against a confiscation order was allowed despite the acceptance of a statement when the acceptance had been based on a mistake of law or . .
The court was asked to say how it was to be shown that the defendant had profited from drug trafficking.
Held: It was for the prosecution to establish to the civil standard that the defendant had made payments out of the funds alleged to have . .
The two defendants appealed against the increase of compensation orders made to reflect assets received properly after their original sentencing. . .
The defendant was subject to a confiscation order. The judge had postponed the determination of the amount, but without specifying when it would take place.
Held: The requirement in the Act was mandatory. When deciding to postpone an . .
(From High Court of Justiciary (Scotland)) The defendant had been convicted of drug trafficking. He complained that the following confiscation order had infringed his human rights being based an assumption of guilt and which was incompatible with his article 6 rights. The first question was whether he remained a person ‘charged with a criminal offence’. … Continue reading Her Majesty’s Advocate and Another v Mcintosh: PC 5 Feb 2001
The Crown Court was able to increase the amount of a confiscation order after making the original order, where further assets were revealed, but not beyond assessed benefit to him of the crime. Judges: Rose LJ Citations: Gazette 28-May-1998, Times 06-May-1998, [1998] EWCA Crim 1370, [1999] 1 Cr App R(S) 92, [1998] Crim LR 591 … Continue reading Regina v Tivnan: CACD 6 May 1998
In assessment of proceeds of drug trafficking, court not to treat money launderers as a special case despite statutory distinction. Citations: Times 26-Jan-1998 Statutes: Drug Trafficking Offenders Act 1994 4(5) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 11 October 2022; Ref: scu.86652
Evidence from 3rd Party Torture Inadmissible The applicants had been detained following the issue of certificates issued by the respondent that they posed a terrorist threat. They challenged the decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission saying that evidence underlying the decisions had probably been obtained by torture committed by foreign powers, and should not … Continue reading A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2): HL 8 Dec 2005
This is an appeal on preliminary points of European Union and domestic law regarding the circumstances in which damages may be recoverable for failure to comply with the requirements of the Public Procurement Directive (Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18/EC on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and … Continue reading Nuclear Decommissioning Authority v Energysolutions EU Ltd (Now Called ATK Energy EU Ltd): SC 11 Apr 2017
The defendant appealed aganst his conviction for conspiracy to engage in moneylaundering. At trial he pleaded guilty subject to a qualification that he had not known that the money was the proceeds of crime, though he may have suspected that it would be. Held: (Baroness Hale of Richmond dissenting) The appeal succeeded: ‘the Crown’s principal … Continue reading Saik, Regina v: HL 3 May 2006