The two defendants appealed against the increase of compensation orders made to reflect assets received properly after their original sentencing.
Stanley Burnton LJ, Treacy, Slade JJ
[2009] EWCA Crim 654
Bailii
Drug Trafficking Act 1994
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – In re Peacock CA 20-Dec-2010
The court was asked, where a defendant fell to be subject to an increased confiscation order under the 1994 Act, where at the time of the original order his assets had been inadequate to meet the sum of benefit found to have been received, but he . .
At first instance – Peacock, Re SC 22-Feb-2012
The defendant had been convicted of drugs offences, and sentenced under the 1994 Act. The gains he had made exceeded his then assets. Later he acquired further property honestly, and the Court now considered whether those assets could be taken to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 03 August 2021; Ref: scu.329552
