HM Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Re Order To Wind Up UK Bankruptcy Ltd: SCS 31 Mar 2009

Outer House – Court of Session –

Judges:

Lord Hodge

Citations:

[2009] ScotCS CSOH – 50

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986

Citing:

CitedEquity and Law Life Assurance Society v Tritonia Ltd HL 1943
Viscount Simon LC said: ‘When an appeal is argued before the House of Lords, no one has any right of audience except counsel instructed on behalf of a party or (when the litigant is a natural person) the party himself. In the case of a corporation, . .
CitedRe Union Accident Insurance Co Ltd ChD 1972
A provisional liquidator cannot be appointed on a baseless petition. There are two conditions to be met. The first was that the petition must disclose a prima facie case, the second was that there were circumstances that require that a provisional . .

Cited by:

See AlsoHM Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Re An Order To Wind Up UK Bankruptcy Ltd SCS 21-Sep-2010
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Scotland, Insolvency

Updated: 23 July 2022; Ref: scu.328006

Paulin v Paulin: CA 17 Mar 2009

The court considered an application by the wife when, anticipating ancillary relief claims, the husband sought to have himself declared bankrupt, and she intervened to have the bankruptcy set aside. The husband now appealed.
Held: Wilson LJ set out examples of the application to particular facts of the jurisdiction to reverse an error prior to the perfection of a judgment. The jurisdiction does not exist so as to enable a party to re-argue points already argued orally or to advance points which were not argued before judgment was given.
Wilson LJ said: ‘Until 1972 the courts made no attempt to narrow the circumstances in which it would be proper for a judge to exercise his jurisdiction to reverse his decision prior to the sealing of the order’.

Judges:

Wilson, Longmore, Lawrence Collins LJJ

Citations:

[2009] EWCA Civ 221, [2009] 2 FLR 3, [2009] BPIR 572, [2009] 3 All ER 88, [2009] Fam Law 567, [2009] 2 FCR 477

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 306

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedMohamed, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 5) Admn 16-Oct-2009
The claimant sought to assert that he had been tortured whilst held by the US Authorities. He sought publication of an unredacted report supplied by the US security services to the respondent. The respondent argued that the full publication was . .
CitedSheikh and Another v Dogan and Others ChD 17-Nov-2009
The judge had reserved his judgment, but had since received further voluminous representations from a party.
Held: None of the matters raised suggested a proper reason for exercising the jurisdiction given by In re Barrell. The claimant was . .
CitedRe L and B (Children) SC 20-Feb-2013
The court was asked as to the extent to which a court, having once declared its decision, could later change its mind. Though this case arose with in care proceedings, the court asked it as a general question. The judge in a fact finding hearing in . .
CitedTZ v General Medical Council Admn 17-Apr-2015
Appeal against decision of a Fitness to Practise Panel holding that the Appellant’s fitness to practise as a medical practitioner was impaired by reason of his misconduct. It directed that his name be erased from the Medical Register under section . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Family, Insolvency, Litigation Practice

Updated: 23 July 2022; Ref: scu.321828

National Insurance Corp v Winmark Ltd: PC 16 Mar 2009

(Saint Lucia) The Board considered the relative priorities of a fixed and floating charge over company assets and its obligations to pay national insurance contributions.

Judges:

Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Carswell, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Mance

Citations:

[2009] UKPC 8

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Commonwealth

Commonwealth, Insolvency

Updated: 23 July 2022; Ref: scu.320880

Mead General Building Ltd v Dartmoor Properties Ltd: TCC 4 Feb 2009

Citations:

[2009] EWHC 200 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedAlexander and Law Ltd v Coveside (21BPR) Ltd TCC 12-Dec-2013
The claimant sought to enforce an arbitration award. The respondent resisted, saying that the claimant faced unresolved insolvency proceedings, and may be unable to repay any sum later found due. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Arbitration, Insolvency

Updated: 23 July 2022; Ref: scu.291786

Re Taylor’s Industrial Flooring Ltd; Taylor’s Industrial Flooring Ltd v M and H Plant Hire (Manchester) Ltd: CA 1990

Dillon LJ said: ‘if a debt is due and an invoice is sent and the debt is not disputed, then the failure of the debtor company to pay the debt is itself evidence of inability to pay’. The fact of solvency was not itself an answer to a petition based on an undisputed or indisputable debt.
Disputing the debt for a thoroughly bad reason will not prevent an order being granted: ‘the reason for non-payment has to be substantial [it] is not enough if a thoroughly bad reason is put forward honestly’

Judges:

Dillon LJ

Citations:

[1990] BCC 44, [1990] BCLC 216, (1990) 8 ACLC 529

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedMarine Trade Sa v Pioneer Freight Futures Co Ltd Bvi and Another ComC 29-Oct-2009
The parties stood to make substantial losses against each other under contracts for differences after the dramatic fall in the freight market in the financial turmoil of late 2008. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract, Insolvency

Updated: 23 July 2022; Ref: scu.640547

In re Frontsouth (Witham) Ltd and Another: ChD 30 Jun 2011

The court was asked to make a retrospective appointment of a company administrator.
Held: Henderson J (in a reserved judgement) said that he shared Morgan J’s misgivings, but like him regarded the jurisdiction as a useful one and was prepared to follow the practice.

Judges:

Henderson J

Citations:

[2011] EWHC 1668 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986, Insolvency Rules 1986 7.55

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedIn re Blights Builders Ltd ChD 2-Oct-2006
An out of court appointment of joint administrators of the company, a one-man building company, had been made by the principal shareholder’s executors at a time when, unknown to them, a creditor’s petition for the winding up of the company had . .

Cited by:

CitedIn re Care Matters Partnership Ltd ChD 7-Oct-2011
An application was made for the appointment of administrators with retrospective effect.
Held: ‘there are two separate questions. The first question is whether an administration order should be made at all. This requires both the satisfaction . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.441409

Kelly and Another v Inflexion Fund 2 Ltd and Another: ChD 11 Nov 2010

The court was asked whether the debts due to a former holder of a floating charge which, after the commencement of the liquidation of the company, releases its security, are ‘unsecured debts’ within section 176A.

Judges:

Roger Kaye QC J

Citations:

[2010] EWHC 2850 (Ch), [2011] BCC 93

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 176A(2)(A)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.439801

Corbett v Nysir UK Ltd: ChD 31 Oct 2008

The applicant, a substantial creditor of the respondent sought the appointment of his agents as administrators. The respondent denied that it was insolvent, and claimed a set off as reason for non payment of its loan notes.
Held: The claimant was a creditor, and the company was or was likely to become insolvent. However the administrators proposals were vague and imprecise, and there was no reason to expect that they would improve on the handling of negotiations for the company’s rescue by the current directors. Application refused.

Judges:

Behrens J

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 2670 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 3(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedHammonds (A Firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd ChD 17-Aug-2007
The claimant solicitors sought the winding up of its defendant company client for non-payment of fees including fees not yet delivered. The court refused to hold that the practices developed in relation to winding up should be imported into . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.346877

Tarn Insurance Services Ltd v Kirby and others: CA 27 Jan 2009

Claim by company in administration against former directors for excess payments alleged to have been taken by them. There was now alleged a wilful failure to comply wih court orders for disclosure..
Held: Once non-compliance with an unless order was established, what is required in order to grant relief from sanctions is a material change in circumstances: ‘to relieve someone against such a default was sending ‘entirely the wrong message to those who face allegations of fraud’, and ‘In a case of deliberate and persistent non-compliance with orders to provide information and deliver documents made in order to safeguard proprietary claims, a proper administration of justice requires that, save in very exceptional circumstances, sanctions imposed should take effect. There were no exceptional circumstances in the present case.’

Judges:

Waller LJ VP, Thomas LJ, Sir John Chadwick

Citations:

[2009] EWCA Civ 19, [2009] CP Rep 22

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

AppliedThevarajah v Riordan and Others ChD 9-Aug-2013
The court was asked first whether the defendants had complied with an unless order made with respect to the disclosure of information required to be provided in aid and in order to ensure the proper release of a freezing order which had previously . .
CitedThevarajah v Riordan and Others ChD 10-Oct-2013
The court allowed the application of the first, second and fourth respondents for relief from sanction under CPR 3.9. . .
CitedThevarajah v Riordan and Others CA 16-Jan-2014
Defendants appealed against an order allowing the application of the first, second and fourth respondents for relief from sanction under CPR 3.9. The relief sought had previously been refused by Hildyard J, so this was the respondents’ second . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency, Company, Litigation Practice, Torts – Other

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.280416

Rottmann v Brittain: CA 12 Nov 2008

The applicant sought leave to appeal against a refusal to adjourn his examination in bankruptcy fearing that the contents would become public prejudicing his criminal trial abroad. The court had allowed a private examination, but he felt this was insufficient protection.
Held: Leave was refused.

Judges:

Mummery LJ

Citations:

[2008] EWCA Civ 1360

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Rules 1986 (SI 1986 No 1925) 6.175, Insolvency Act 1986 290

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromIn re Rottmann (a Bankrupt) ChD 20-May-2008
The subject of the bankruptcy proceedings asked that the petition be heard in private so as not to prejudice pending criminal proceedings in a foreign jurisdiction.
Held: The bankrupt would be required to answer questions which might be self . .
CitedSaunders v The United Kingdom ECHR 17-Dec-1996
(Grand Chamber) The subsequent use against a defendant in a prosecution, of evidence which had been obtained under compulsion in company insolvency procedures was a convention breach of Art 6. Although not specifically mentioned in Article 6 of the . .

Cited by:

LeaveIn re Rottmann (a Bankrupt) CA 18-Mar-2009
The bankrupt renewed his request for permission to appeal against a refusal to adjourn his public examination in bankruptcy. The court had allowed a private examination so as not to prejudice pending criminal proceedings in Germany.
Held: The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.279987

Inglis v Roberston and Baxter: HL 11 Jul 1998

HL In a competition between Robertson and Baxter and Inglis, who maintained that under the law of England, by the indorsement and delivery of the warrant, he had acquired a right to the whisky which was preferable to that of any creditor of Goldsmith doing diligence subsequently, held (aff. judgment of the Court of Session-Whole Court) (1) that the competition fell to be determined by the law of Scotland; and (2) that as the assignation had not been intimated to the warehouse-keepers, the real right remained in Goldsmith, subject to the diligence of his creditors.

Citations:

[1898] UKHL 2, (1898) 25 R (HL) 70

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Scotland

Insolvency

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.279657

Hammonds (A Firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd: ChD 17 Aug 2007

The claimant solicitors sought the winding up of its defendant company client for non-payment of fees including fees not yet delivered. The court refused to hold that the practices developed in relation to winding up should be imported into administration. The court considered what was meant by ‘creditor’. Warren J said: ‘a person is a ‘creditor’ within paragraph 12(1)(c) Schedule B1 so long as he has a good arguable case that debt of sufficient amount is owing to him (to adopt the words of Lord Denning in Claybridge Shipping). Thus, even in the case of a disputed debt, such a person may make an application for an administration order. It is then a matter for the discretion of the court whether actually to make an administration order. The court has jurisdiction to deal with the application without having to resolve the dispute about the debt.’

Judges:

Warren J

Citations:

[2007] EWHC 1998 (Ch), [2008] 2 BCLC 159

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoHammond (A Firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd ChD 28-Jun-2007
Application for disclosure of documents. . .

Cited by:

CitedCorbett v Nysir UK Ltd ChD 31-Oct-2008
The applicant, a substantial creditor of the respondent sought the appointment of his agents as administrators. The respondent denied that it was insolvent, and claimed a set off as reason for non payment of its loan notes.
Held: The claimant . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Legal Professions, Insolvency

Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.259428

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Allen: ChD 6 Feb 2003

A block order had been made transferring the duties of an insolvency practitioner to another. In the case of an individual practitioner resigning, a creditor would have to be notified so as to be allowed to object. Here, the applicant sought a review of the transfer ordered by the court, having been notified after the event.
Held: The applicant first had to show a locus standi, by showing that it was a creditor. The court would then ask if, if the objections had been made at the time, the order would still have been made. It should be approached as a rehearing rather than as an appeal. The issue might also be affected by whether the creditor complaining was a majority or minority creditor. Here, the objections were real, but the original practitioner could not be re-instated. The new appointments were discharged where the applicant had an interest.

Judges:

Gilliland QC J

Citations:

Times 20-Mar-2003

Statutes:

Insolvency Rules 1986 (1986 No 1925)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency

Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.180390

Mahon and Another v FBN Bank (UK) Ltd: ChD 6 Jun 2011

The claimants appealed against a refusal to set aside a statutory demand.

Judges:

Simon Barker QC HHJ

Citations:

[2011] EWHC 1432 (Ch), [2011] BPIR 1029

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedIn re a Debtor (No 1 of 1987), ex parte the Royal Bank of Scotland CA 1989
A statutory demand as served showed an incorrectly calculated sum owed and was in the wrong form.
Held: The application to set the demand aside was refused. A statutory demand should not be set aside for a mere technicality.
Lord Justice . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.440432

D’Aquila v Lambert (58): 9 Jun 1761

Where a consignee becomes insolvent, consignor has a right to stop the goods at any time before they come to his hands.

Citations:

[1761] EngR 58, (1761) 2 Eden 75, (1761) 28 ER 824

Links:

Commonlii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See AlsoD’Aquila v Lambert (57) 9-Jun-1761
Merchant consigns goods to A. in England. A. becomes insolvent. The consignor may stop the goods at any time before they get into A.’s hands. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency, Contract

Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.375902

Random House UK Ltd v Allason and others: ChD 11 Dec 2008

The now defendants had lost their action for copyright infringement, and the now claimant sought to enforce the costs order made in their favour. The defendant denied ownership of any assets, but the claimant said that various properties were held in trust for him.

Judges:

David Richards J

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 2854 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Costs, Trusts, Insolvency

Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.278968

Roberts Petroleum Ltd v Bernard Kenny Ltd (in liquidation): CA 1982

The plaintiffs had supplied petrol to the defendant who owned two filling stations. The defendant prepared a statement of affairs ready to hold a meeting of creditors. The plaintiffs took their claim to judgement and obtained a charging order nisi to secure it. The defendant sought to prevent the order being made absolute so as to prevent the plaintiff obtaining an unfair advantage in the winding up.
Held: The charging order was re-instated. The impending insolvency of the defendant was not a good or sufficient reason for it not to make the charging order absolute.

Judges:

Lord Brandon of Oakbrook, Cumming-Bruce LJ, Lane D

Citations:

[1982] 1 WLR 301, [1982] 1 All ER 685, [1981] EWCA Civ 10

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

AppliedBurston Finance Ltd v Spierway Ltd ChD 1974
The lender took a charge over a property held by a company which subsequently became void because it was not registered within the required period at Companies House.
Held: A voidable charge is a valid charge unless and until set aside: . .
CitedGlass (Cardiff) v Jardean Properties 1976
. .

Cited by:

Appeal fromRoberts Petroleum Ltd v Bernard Kenny Ltd HL 2-Jan-1983
The plaintiff supplied petrol to the defendant but had not been paid. Anticipating the defendant winding up, the plaintiff got judgment and a charging order nisi. The defendant appealed against that order being made absolute, saying that this gave . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice, Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.278206

Warner v Verfides: ChD 29 Oct 2008

The deceased bankrupt’s Autralian trustees sought disclosure of documents recording his dealings in the UK. Third party Swiss lawyers now sought to intervene to say that such disclosure would breach the confidence of many of their clients. Redactions were agreed, and the court now looked to the costs.
Held: The interveners’ human rights had been engaged by the request. The court considered the technical meaning of correspondence within article 8, saying ‘To construe the term as applying only to letters still in the possession of the writer or in the process of transmission to the intended recipient appears unduly restrictive. In ordinary parlance, the term would be expected to apply to exchanges of letters in whosever hands they happened to be. ‘ and the interveners’ Article 8 rights are engaged by an application for production of documents in the hands of Verfides that were generated in the course of, or otherwise relate to, the interveners’ business activities. After initial doubts, the interveners had conducted their objections properly. Trustees and interveners were to bear their own costs.

Judges:

John Martin, QC

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 2609 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii, Times

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights 8

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Wills and Probate, Insolvency, Costs, Human Rights

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.277551

Power v Petrus Estates Ltd and others: ChD 31 Oct 2008

The chairman of the creditors meeting had marked the proof of Petrus as objected to but had allowed Petrus to resulting in the appointment of the joint liquidators. The claimant now challenged this saying that had Petrus not been allowed tp vote he would have been appointed.
Held: Lewison J set out the scheme: ‘The general scheme underlying the operation of this rule is the same as that underlying rule 5.22 in relation to personal insolvency (formerly rule 5.17) . . If the chairman decides to mark the claim as ‘objected to’, he must allow the alleged creditor to vote, but the vote is subject to being subsequently declared invalid if the objection to the proof is sustained. This is expressly provided for in rule 4. 70 (3) itself. It is not exactly as Harman J suggested; namely that the claim is admitted but marked as objected to. Rather the claim is objected to but the creditor is allowed to vote. This gives rise to a slight mismatch between the chairman’s powers and the right of appeal. What is contemplated is a quick decision by the chairman, with the possibility of a more leisurely examination of the objection to the proof by the court. Yet the only right of appeal is that contained in rule 4.70 (2) which allows an appeal against the chairman’s decision. Even if the objection to the proof is subsequently sustained, with the result that that creditor’s vote is invalidated, the chairman’s decision may have been entirely correct. It is an oddity if an appeal succeeds against an entirely correct decision, but that seems to be inherent in the way that the rule is framed. Mr Thompson, appearing for Petrus, says that rule 4.70 (2) can be read as eliminating any mismatch. The chairman only makes a decision if he decides to admit or reject a proof under rule 4.70 (1). If he acts under rule 4.70 (3) he does not decide anything: he merely records an objection and doubt. That is why rule 4.70 (4) is itself split into two parts: the first part dealing with the reversal or variation of the chairman’s decision (corresponding to a decision under rule 4.70 (1)); and the second dealing with invalidating a creditor’s vote (corresponding with action under rule 4.70 (3)). There is undoubtedly force in this submission, although rule 4.70 (2) only permits an appeal against the chairman’s decision. If his decision does not encompass action under rule 4.70 (3), it is difficult to see how an appeal can be mounted at all. No one argued for that conclusion.
Be that as it may, rule 4.70 (2) is the mechanism by which an objection to a proof may be tested. It is important to emphasise, however, that what is in issue at this stage is the validity of the proof for the purposes of voting; not the validity of the proof for the purposes of participating in a dividend. A subsequent meeting (or the liquidator) may take a different view of the validity of a proof.’

Judges:

Lewison J

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 2607 (Ch), [2009] 1 BCLC 250, [2009] BPIR 141

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 98, Insolvency Rules 1986 4.70

Cited by:

CitedAB Agri Ltd v Curtis and Others Misc 22-Jul-2016
(Leeds County Court) The creditor sought to have a proof admitted for pounds 479k, but the chair admitted it only for pounds 1.00, and the IVA proposal was accepted again the wishes of the creditor. The creditor said that the IP had misunderstood . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.277396

Chicago Holdings Ltd v Cooper and Another: ChD 5 Dec 2005

Application for specific disclosure of documents which would otherwise be privileged, in the hands of the liquidators, who are respondents to an application for their removal on the ground, inter alia, that the company.

Judges:

Lawrence Collins J

Citations:

[2005] EWHC 3466 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency, Litigation Practice

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.263704

Re Allobrogia Steamship Corporation: 1979

The court considered the effect, on the insolvency of the insured, of ‘pay to be paid’ conditions in contracts of insurance. It was asked to order the winding-up of a foreign registered company. The company had to own assets within the jurisdiction of the English court which could be realised in a winding-up for the benefit of creditors; and that, in turn, depended on whether the company had any realistic prospect of success in a claim against its insurers (a PandI Club). The rules of that Club included a ‘pay to be paid’ condition. The petitioners had obtained judgments against the company in respect of loss of cargo. Liability under those judgments was a risk covered by the company’s membership of the Club. on the making of a winding-up order, the company’s rights against the Club in respect of its indebtedness to the petitioners would be transferred to the petitioners under the provisions of section 1(1) of the 1930 Act.
Held: The Club faced a dilemma. Either the insolvency did, ex hypothesi, render impossible compliance with the ‘pay to be paid’ condition; or it did not. If the latter, then it the claim was not valueless; if the former, then the ‘pay to be paid’ condition would have the substantial effect of altering the rights of the parties under the contract upon the insolvency of the company, and so had to be struck down by section 1(3) of the 1930 Act: ‘The use of the phrase ‘directly or indirectly’ in s.1(3) shows that provision in a relevant contract can fall foul of s.1(3), even though it does not expressly and in terms purport to avoid the contract or alter the rights of the parties upon the happening to the insured of any of the relevant events. The effect of the word ‘indirectly’ is in my judgment that any provision in such a contract which has the substantial effect of avoiding a contract or altering the rights of the parties upon the happening to the insured of any such events is invalidated, even though the contract does not in terms so provide.’ and ‘The manifest purpose of s.1(3) is to make certain that, in any of the events specified in s.1(1), the third party shall be able to take the full benefit of the rights against the insurer, unaltered and undiminished by any provision in the contract which is designed directly or indirectly to cancel, prejudice or reduce such rights in the event of one or more of such events taking place.’

Judges:

Slade J

Citations:

[1979] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 190

Statutes:

Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 1(3)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Dicta AdoptedFirma CF-Trade SA v Newcastle Protection and Indemnity Association (the ‘Fanti’) QBD 1987
The court considered the effect of section 1(3) on a ‘pay to be paid’ clause in a re-insurance contract.
Held: If, as a matter of construction of the membership rules, the condition survived the making of a winding-up order – which he thought . .
CitedFreakley and Curzon Insurance Ltd v Centre Reinsurance International Company and Another; similar CA 11-Feb-2005
Claims were made for personal injury caused by asbestos. The re-insurers sought declaratory relief against the head insurers, and the administrators of the insolvent company. The administrators sought declarations in turn. Curzon insured the company . .
ApprovedSocony Mobil Oil Co Inc and others v West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association Ltd (Padri Island) (No 2); Firma CF-Trade SA v Similar (The ‘Fant’) HL 14-Jun-1990
The House was asked as to the effect of section 1(3) of the 1930 Act on policies including ‘pay or be paid’ clauses.
Held: The central question was whether the condition of prior payment was rendered of no effect by section 1(3) of the Act of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insurance, Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.223312

Arif v Zar and Another: CA 18 Jul 2012

H had declared himself bankrupt. W asserted that he had done this by hiding his assets and fabricating debts in order to defeat her financial claims on the divorce. She appealed from a refusal to transfer the annulment proceedings to the family court to allow the investigation to become part of

Judges:

Thorpe, Rimer, Patten LJJ

Citations:

[2012] EWCA Civ 986, [2012] WLR(D) 239

Links:

Bailii, WLRD

Statutes:

Insolvency Rules 1986

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency, Family

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.462947

Sigma Finance Corporation, Re Insolvency Act 1986: ChD 7 Nov 2008

Judges:

Sales J

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 2997 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRe Sigma Finance Corp CA 25-Nov-2008
. .
At First InstanceSigma Finance Corporation, Re; (in administrative receivership) SC 29-Oct-2009
The court considered how the losses of the insolvent company were to be distributed as between secured creditors and preferential creditors, given the terms of the applicable trust deed.
Held: The court considered the interpretations of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.278843

Moriarty and others v Various Customers of BA Peters Plc (In Administration): ChD 29 Apr 2008

The company had acted as boat sales and brokerage. Claims were made on its insolvency as to the status of boats sold and unsold, and of deposits paid and held by the company.

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 2205 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See alsoMoriarty and Another v Various Customers of BA Peters Plc (In Administration) ChD 22-Jul-2008
. .
See alsoMoriarty and Another v Atkinson and Various Customers of BA Peters Plc CA 16-Dec-2008
The company, a boat sales agent, made a promise to its customers to hold the funds received from them in a trust account. In breach of that promise, it used the funds to pay its own debt. The customers now appealed against a refusal to allow them to . .
CitedBrazzill and Others v Willoughby and Others CA 27-May-2010
The regulated bank Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd (KSF) was in financial difficulties. The Bank of England required KSF to credit to a trust account all future deposits. KSF later went into insolvency. Some deposits had been credited to the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.276664

AIB Capital Markets Plc and Another v Atlantic Computer Systems Plc and others; in re Atlantic Computers: CA 25 Jul 1990

The court was asked how the administrators should deal with third parties seeking to exercise existing proprietary rights (including security rights) against the company in administration, and gave guidance. Nicholls LJ noted that in some cases there would be a dispute over the existence, validity or nature of the security which the third party was seeking to enforce. In that context, it was not for the court (on the application for permission to lift the moratorium) to seek to adjudicate upon that issue ‘unless . . the issue raises a short point of law’. Otherwise (i.e. wherever the issue about the validity or nature of the security did not raise a short point of law) the Court would need to be satisfied only that the applicant for permission to enforce the proprietary right had a seriously arguable case.

Judges:

Neill, Staughton, Nicholls LJJ

Citations:

[1990] EWCA Civ 20, [1992] Ch 505, [1990] BCC 859, [1992] 2 WLR 367

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedMcCartney and Unite The Union and Another v Nortel Networks UK Ltd (In Administration) ChD 22-Apr-2010
The administrators gave employees of the company notice of termination of their employment. Then administrators refused consent under para 43(6) to actions against the company in the Northern Ireland Industrial Tribunal for protective awards, unfair . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency, Company

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.276299

In Re Maxwell Fleet and Facilities Management Ltd: ChD 10 Feb 2000

Although regulation 4 went beyond the obligations imposed by the Directive, it was intended to protect employee rights who were employed by companies which were hived down. In this case the sale of the business to a subsidiary and then onto a third party was to be treated as one transaction, and the regulations applied.

Citations:

Gazette 10-Feb-2000, Times 23-Feb-2000

Statutes:

Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (1981 No 1794)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency, Employment, Company

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.82050

In Re Lomax Leisure Ltd: ChD 4 May 1999

A landlord may exercise a right of peaceable re-entry without court action after his tenant company went into administration. It was not the enforcement of a security so as to be restricted by insolvency legislation.

Citations:

Times 04-May-1999, Gazette 26-May-1999

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 10(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Landlord and Tenant, Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.82007

In Re M (A Debtor) (488-Io of 1996): ChD 10 Feb 1999

A wife who had an order for ancillary relief in her favour, but whose husband entered into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement, was obliged to accept the allotted dividend, but her special position under the Act was also to be acknowledged. She had the choice of awaiting discharge from the IVA first.

Citations:

Gazette 03-Mar-1999, Times 10-Feb-1999

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 281(5)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Family, Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.82012

In Re Insolvency Act 1986; Cork v Rawlins: ChD 27 Jun 2000

The proceeds of a permanent disability benefit insurance policy were not calculated according to the pain and suffering of the bankrupt, and were therefore distributable amongst his creditors. There was no part of it held on constructive trust for the bankrupt by the insurance company. The sums were distributable even though a decision as to the claim was made only after the discharge.

Citations:

Gazette 06-Jul-2000, Times 27-Jun-2000

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insurance, Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81946

In Re Burfoot and Another (Bankrupts): ChD 17 Aug 2000

A general followed by a specific assignment of book debts anticipating a bankruptcy was effective against the trustee in bankruptcy. The specific assignments were not for an undervalue, and were intended to give effect to and perfect the general assignment. The transactions would have effective in the reverse order, and should not be avoided. The assignee having failed to say how much was at stake despite repeated requests could not rely upon an assertion that he was under no obligation to disclose the figure to recover his costs despite winning the argument.

Citations:

Times 17-Aug-2000

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency, Costs

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81763

Kahn and Others v Whirlpool (UK) Ltd and Another: ChD 27 Oct 2014

Application made pursuant to section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 by the Joint Liquidators of Comet Group Limited, (Comet), for information and documents which they contend they require to enable them to investigate and decide whether or not to pursue a claim in damages against the Respondents, Whirlpool (UK) Ltd, (Whirlpool UK), and Embraco Europe srl, (Embraco).

Judges:

Mr John Baldwin QC

Citations:

[2014] EWHC 3477 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 236

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.550164

Minmar (929) Ltd and Another v Khalatschi and Another: ChD 8 Apr 2011

Application was made to set aside the appointment of the company’s administrators.

Judges:

Sir Andrew Morritt Ch

Citations:

[2011] EWHC 1159 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedIn re Care Matters Partnership Ltd ChD 7-Oct-2011
An application was made for the appointment of administrators with retrospective effect.
Held: ‘there are two separate questions. The first question is whether an administration order should be made at all. This requires both the satisfaction . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.441406

In Re Latreefers Inc: ChD 18 Jan 1999

In order for a dismissal or adjournment of a winding up petition pending adjudication of a cross claim the company must show a genuine and serious complaint and that there had been some reason for any delay in litigating the claim.

Citations:

Times 18-Jan-1999

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81998

In Re Lee (A Bankrupt): ChD 24 Feb 1998

An order vesting a lease disclaimed by the trustee in bankruptcy, in a mortgagee, may provide that any profit which is made on a re-sale of the lease was to be paid on to the receiver for the benefit of creditors.

Citations:

Times 24-Feb-1998, Gazette 08-Apr-1998

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 320

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appealed toIn Re Lee (A Bankrupt) CA 22-Aug-1999
The court has sufficient discretion to order that the surplus proceeds of sale of a leasehold interest could be paid to the liquidator despite his having himself disclaimed any interest in the lease. Nobody else had claimed an interest, and the . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromIn Re Lee (A Bankrupt) CA 22-Aug-1999
The court has sufficient discretion to order that the surplus proceeds of sale of a leasehold interest could be paid to the liquidator despite his having himself disclaimed any interest in the lease. Nobody else had claimed an interest, and the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant, Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.82001

In Re Grey Martin Ltd: ChD 29 Jun 1999

The remuneration of a provisional liquidator takes precedence over the costs and expenses of a liquidator. Accordingly the expenses of the provisional liquidator for VAT, and PAYE and National Insurance take a similar priority over later costs of a liquidator.

Citations:

Times 29-Jun-1999

Statutes:

Insolvency Rules 1986 4.218(1)(a)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81910

In Re H S Smith and Sons: ChD 6 Jan 1999

A partnership, itself insolvent, could benefit from an administration order, though one of the partners personally had assets which could cover the debts. The test was the present inability of the firm to pay its debts, and the purpose was to save the firm.

Citations:

Times 06-Jan-1999

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81927

In Re International Bulk Commodities Ltd: ChD 26 Aug 1992

Company receivers in insolvency can include unregistered companies.

Citations:

Gazette 26-Aug-1992, [1993] 3 CL 247

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 29(2)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

DistinguishedIn Re Devon and Somerset Farmers Ltd ChD 25-May-1993
An Industrial and Provident Societies Act society is unregistered and is therefore not a company for the purposes of s40. Had that been intended express statutory provision would have been made. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81947

In Re Kentish Homes Ltd: ChD 31 Mar 1993

The question was whether a post-liquidation liability to community charge on empty flats was an expense of the liquidation.
Held: The company was the chargeable person in respect of the flats for the relevant periods, but the liability was nevertheless not a liquidation expense. It would rank as such only if the court, as a matter of discretion, directed the liquidators to discharge the obligation out of the assets in their hands. There was however no ground upon which the court should do so.
Sir Donald Nicholls V-C said: ‘whether debts should count as expenses of the liquidation is a matter for the discretion of the court’

Judges:

Sir Donald Nicholls V-C

Citations:

Gazette 31-Mar-1993, [1993] BCLC 1375

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

AppliedIn re Atlantic Computer Systems Plc CA 1992
The chargor was a company which arranged with the chargee, a funding bank, that it should purchase equipment and let it on hire purchase to the chargor with permission to sub-lease to end users. The chargor charged to the chargee by way of security . .
CitedIn re Lundy Granite Co; Ex parte Heavan CA 1871
The landlord of Lundy Island, which was let to a third party, distrained upon goods of the company which had been left upon the tenant’s property. The distraint was for rent which had fallen due more than a year after the winding up order. The . .

Cited by:

CitedKahn and Another v Commissioners of Inland Revenue; In re Toshoku Finance plc HL 20-Feb-2002
A company went into liquidation, being owed substantial sums by another company in the same group, but itself insolvent. A settlement did not include accrued interest, but was claimed to be taxed as if it had, and on an accruals basis. If so, was . .
CitedIn re Nortel Companies and Others SC 24-Jul-2013
The court was asked as to the interrelationship of the statutory schemes relating to the protection of employees’ pensions and to corporate insolvency.
Held: Liabilities which arose from financial support directions or contribution notices . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency, Rating

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81975

In Re Kudos Glass Ltd (In Liquidation): ChD 30 Nov 2000

The identity of the petitioner was crucial in determining whether a company voluntary arrangement had been determined, and its trusts discharged by a winding up order. The company’s voluntary arrangement would be determined on the winding up order where the petitioning creditor supervised the arrangement or a creditor bound by the arrangement or, if the petition creditor was not a party, where the supervisor was obliged to bring the petition himself but had failed to do so. It all depends upon the circumstances, the terms of the scheme, and the conduct of the bound creditors. Insolvency legislation would decide what was implied as to the state of the trusts.

Citations:

Times 30-Nov-2000, Gazette 18-Jan-2001

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Company, Insolvency

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.81979

Donaldson v O’Sullivan: ChD 29 Feb 2008

The court refused to set aside a block transfer order made on the transfer of the trusteeship of the bankrupt’s estate.

Judges:

Judge Havelock-Allan, QC

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 387 (Ch), [2008] BPIR 288

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromDonaldson v O’Sullivan CA 30-Jul-2008
The trustee in bankruptcy had retired and an order made for the block transfer of the assets to the new trustee. The bankrupt objected and now appealed against the refusal to set the transfer aside.
Held: Section 303(2) allowed the court to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.266094

Robledillo Nunez v Fondo de Garantia Salarial: ECJ 21 Feb 2008

Europa (Fogasa) – Social policy Protection of workers in the event of insolvency of the employer – Directive 80/987/EEC amended by Directive 2002/74/EC First paragraph of Article 3 and Article 10(a) – Compensation for unfair dismissal agreed under an extra’judicial conciliation procedure – Payment guaranteed by the guarantee institution – Payment conditional upon the adoption of a judicial decision – Principles of equality and non’discrimination.

Citations:

C-498/06, [2008] EUECJ C-498/06

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 80/987/EEC

Jurisdiction:

European

Employment, Insolvency

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.265956

In re Earl Leven, Inland Revenue Comrs v Williams Deacon’s Bank Ltd: ChD 1954

Wynn-Parry J said: ‘the word ‘disposition’, taken by itself, and used in its most extended meaning, is no doubt wide enough to include the act of extinguishment’, but he rejected such a wide interpretation of that word in the Finance Act 1940, partly because it produced ‘a quite unexpected result’ and partly because in other sections of that Act ‘it is clear that where the legislature intended that … ‘disposition’ should include ‘extinguishment’, it was at pains to make express provision’. Accordingly, the extinguishment of a liability to pay insurance premiums did not amount to a ‘disposition’ for the purposes of section 44(1) of the 1940 Act.

Judges:

Wynn-Parry J

Citations:

[1954] 1 WLR 1228

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group SC 1-Feb-2017
Saad Investments was a Cayman Islands company in liquidation. The liquidator brought an action here, but the defendant sought a stay saying that another forum was clearly more appropriate. Shares in Saudi banks were said to be held in trust for the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.640395

Re Mal Bower’s Macquarie Electrical Centre Pty Ltd (in liquidation): 1974

The liquidator made a claim against the bank for the amount of the Payments had been made out of the company’s bank account between the date of the petition and the date of the order and the date when the account was subsequently closed.
Held: The claim was dismissed.
Street CJ considered there was ‘great force in the argument that ‘the paying by a bank of a company’s cheque, presented by a stranger, does not involve the bank in a disposition of the property of the company so as to disentitle the bank to debit the amount of the cheque to the company’s account. The word ‘disposition ‘ connotes in my view both a disponor and a disponee. The section operates to render the disposition void so far as it concerns the disponee. It does not operate to affect the agencies interposing between the company, as disponor, and the recipient of the property, as disponee . . The intermediary functions fulfilled by the bank in respect of paying cheques drawn by a company in favour of and presented on behalf of a third party do not implicate the bank in the consequences of the statutory avoidance prescribed by s. 227 . . I consider that the legislative intention . . is such as to require an investigation of what happened to the property, that is to say what was the disposition, and then to enable the liquidator to recover it upon the basis that the disposition was void. It is recovery from the disponee that forms the basic legislative purpose of s. 227’

Judges:

Street CJ

Citations:

[1974] 1 NSWLR 254

Jurisdiction:

Australia

Cited by:

CitedAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group SC 1-Feb-2017
Saad Investments was a Cayman Islands company in liquidation. The liquidator brought an action here, but the defendant sought a stay saying that another forum was clearly more appropriate. Shares in Saudi banks were said to be held in trust for the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Company, Insolvency

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.640394

In re J Leslie Engineers Co Ltd: 1976

The director of a company between presentation of a petition to wind up and the making of the order paid over pounds 1050 to a creditor for work done. Of this sum, pounds 800 was paid by way of a cheque drawn on the personal account of the director and his wife, which was in fact overdrawn at the time. The director caused the Company to pay pounds 800 into the joint account to reimburse them for the sum paid to the creditor.
Held: The payment of pounds 800 from the Company to the joint account was a disposition of the Company’s property and accordingly void, but the payment out of the joint account to the creditor was not a disposition of the Company’s property and therefore was not void. The creditor therefore was not liable in respect of that sum to the Company. The invalidating provisions in section 227 do not spell out the appropriate remedy of the company when the disposition is avoided: ‘Now, it must be remembered that the invalidation of a disposition of the company’s property and the recovery of the property disposed of, are two logically distinct matters. Section 227 says nothing about recovery; it merely avoids dispositions . . What is the appropriate remedy in respect of the invalidated disposition is a matter not regulated by the statute and that has to be determined by the general law.’
Section 227 did not mean that the company had some special remedy which enabled it to proceed with a claim in circumstances where, had the disposition been invalid on some other ground than the section, no such remedy would have lain.

Judges:

Oliver J

Citations:

[1976] 1 WLR 292

Statutes:

Companies Act 1948 227

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group SC 1-Feb-2017
Saad Investments was a Cayman Islands company in liquidation. The liquidator brought an action here, but the defendant sought a stay saying that another forum was clearly more appropriate. Shares in Saudi banks were said to be held in trust for the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Company, Insolvency

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.640393

Akers and Others v Samba Financial Group: SC 1 Feb 2017

Saad Investments was a Cayman Islands company in liquidation. The liquidator brought an action here, but the defendant sought a stay saying that another forum was clearly more appropriate. Shares in Saudi banks were said to be held in trust for the company, but Saudi law would not recognise such trusts. The shares had been transferred to the defendants, and the liquidators now sought to have the transfer set aside as having been in breach of trust.
Held: Samba’s appeal succeeded. The transfer to Samba did not dispose of any rights belonging to SICL within the meaning of s. 127.
In the eyes of English law, a trust may be created, exist and be enforceable in respect of assets located in a jurisdiction, the law of which does not recognise trusts in any form.
At common law, the interest created by a trust depends on the law governing the trust. The lex situs may treat a disposition of shares to a third party as overriding any interest of the beneficiary in the shares. Even so, a common law trust may exist in respect of those shares. A trust can be created, exist and be enforced in respect of assets located in a jurisdiction such as Saudi Arabia, the law of which does not recognise trusts in any form.
The Hague Convention does not change this conclusion, since one of its aims was exactly to provide for the recognition of trusts in jurisdictions which did not themselves know of the institution.

Judges:

Lord Neuberger, President, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson, Lord Collins

Citations:

[2017] 1 BCLC 151, [2017] WTLR 373, [2017] UKSC 6, [2017] WLR(D) 57, [2017] 2 All ER 799, [2017] 2 WLR 713, [2017] 2 All ER (Comm) 97, [2017] BPIR 263, [2017] AC 424, UKSC 2015/0009

Links:

Bailii, WLRD, Bailii Summary, SC, SC Summary, SC Video Summary

Statutes:

Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006, Insolvency Act 1986 127 436

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

At First InstanceAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group ChD 28-Feb-2014
Samba sought a stay of insolvency proceedings. Shares in a Saudi company were held in trust by a company registered in Cayman. Upon that company going into liquidation, the shares were transferred to the defendant, who now argued that since Saudi . .
Appeal fromAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group CA 4-Dec-2014
Shares in a Saudi company were held I trust for a Cayman company which had gone into liquidation. Saudi law did not recognise such trusts, and the parties now disputed which was the forum conveniens.
Held: The liquidators’ appeal succeeded. . .
CitedOrr Ewing v John Orr Ewing and Co and Orr Ewing’s Trustees HL 5-Dec-1882
A contract of copartnery provided that in the event of the death of any of the partners the surviving and solvent partners who should continue the business should pay out to the representatives of the deceased the amount at his credit in the books . .
CitedAttorney General v Jewish Colonization Association 1901
The court was asked whether on the death of the settlor and the termination of his life interest, the foreign shares held on trust were taxable as on a succession. . .
CitedBritish South Africa Co v De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd CA 1910
The equitable rule against clogging the equity of redemption of a mortgage applied to a contract governed by English law and would be enforced against a contracting party as regards land abroad in a state where the equity of redemption may not be . .
CitedIn re Berchtold 1923
. .
CitedArcher Shee v Garland HL 15-Dec-1930
The parties disputed the taxpayer’s liability to income tax on income coming due to her on an American based family trust.
Held: A beneficiary in a fully administered deceased estate has an equitable interest in property which is the subject . .
CitedWestdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council HL 22-May-1996
Simple interest only on rate swap damages
The bank had paid money to the local authority under a contract which turned out to be ultra vires and void. The question was whether, in addition to ordering the repayment of the money to the bank on unjust enrichment principles, the court could . .
CitedDuke of Marlborough v Attorney General 1945
The Court was asked whether foreign shares held on trust were taxable as on a succession on the death of the beneficiary of the trust.
Held: The proper law of a marriage settlement ‘can only be the law by reference to which the settlement as . .
CitedRe Philipson-Stow HL 1961
The section excluded from liability for estate duty property ‘passing on the death which is situate out of Great Britain if it is shown that the proper law regulating the devolution of the property situate, or the disposition under or by reason of . .
CitedMacmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust Plc and Others (No 3) ChD 1-Jul-1993
Bona fide chargees for value of shares situated in New York and held on trust for Macmillan were able, by application of New York law, to take the shares free of Macmillan’s prior equitable interest of which the chargees had had no notice. Where . .
CitedDeschamps v Miller 1908
The parties disputed land in India. A French couple, had married in France in community of property. So according to the French marriage contract the wife was supposed to be entitled to one half of the husband’s after-acquired property. The husband . .
CitedDeschamps v Miller 1908
The parties disputed land in India. A French couple, had married in France in community of property. So according to the French marriage contract the wife was supposed to be entitled to one half of the husband’s after-acquired property. The husband . .
CitedLake v Bayliss 1974
As to the sale of land: ‘ It is by reason of this trusteeship that the vendor who breaks his contract of sale by reselling to someone else has been held to be accountable to the first intended purchaser for the proceeds of sale.’ . .
CitedLightning v Lightning Electrical Contractors Ltd CA 1998
Mr K asserted beneficial ownership under a resulting trust over land in Scotland bought by an English company to which he had advanced the purchase price. Scots law, the lex situs of the land, did not recognise any equitable interest. The company . .
CitedLuxe Holding Ltd v Midland Resources Holding Ltd ChD 23-Jul-2010
Midland agreed to sell to Luxe shares in 20 companies, 17 of which were incorporated in Russia or the Ukraine, with the lex situs of the shares in them being also there. Midland defaulted, sold the shares in the Russian and Ukrainian companies . .
CitedBristol Airport Plc and Another v Powdrill and Others CA 21-Dec-1989
An airline company went into administration. The airport seized two airplanes. The administrators claimed they were property within the administration, could not be seized without a court order, and the court should exercise its discretion not to . .
CitedClark and Whitehouse (Joint Administrators of Rangers Football Club Plc), Re Directions SCS 23-Mar-2012
(Outer House) Contracts were made in 2011 and subject to English law, between Rangers and two English limited liability partnerships (together ‘Ticketus’). Under the contracts, Ticketus had paid Rangers large sums for future tranches of season . .
CitedGlasgow City Council v Springboig St John’s School and Another SCS 27-Mar-2014
The civil law concept of patrimony has been developed to explain the protection of trust property held by a trustee against claims by the trustee’s personal creditors . .
CitedSaunders v Vautier 7-May-1841
A direction in a will stated that the income from certain shares was to be accumulated and invested until the beneficiary attained the age of 25. On attaining his majority at 21 years, the beneficiary sought termination of the trust, and transfer of . .
CitedAyerst (Inspector of Taxes) v C and K (Construction) Ltd HL 1976
A resolution or order for winding up of a company divests it of the beneficial interest in its assets. They become a fund which the company thereafter holds in trust to discharge its liabilities. Where a company is wound up in this country, its . .
CitedIndependent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd and Others CA 28-Feb-2012
Lloyd LJ said: ‘a transferee of the legal title to property under a disposition made in breach of trust, or a successor in title to such a person, does not have the beneficial title to the property, which remains held on the original trusts, unless . .
CitedIndependent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd and Others CA 28-Feb-2012
Lloyd LJ said: ‘a transferee of the legal title to property under a disposition made in breach of trust, or a successor in title to such a person, does not have the beneficial title to the property, which remains held on the original trusts, unless . .
CitedIn re Earl Leven, Inland Revenue Comrs v Williams Deacon’s Bank Ltd ChD 1954
Wynn-Parry J said: ‘the word ‘disposition’, taken by itself, and used in its most extended meaning, is no doubt wide enough to include the act of extinguishment’, but he rejected such a wide interpretation of that word in the Finance Act 1940, . .
CitedInland Revenue Commissioners v Buchanan CA 1958
The surrender of a life interest under a will trust in favour of those people entitled in remainder operated as a ‘disposition’ of that life interest for the purposes of sections 20 and 21 of the Finance Act 1943.
Jenkins LJ specifically . .
CitedRe Mal Bower’s Macquarie Electrical Centre Pty Ltd (in liquidation) 1974
The liquidator made a claim against the bank for the amount of the Payments had been made out of the company’s bank account between the date of the petition and the date of the order and the date when the account was subsequently closed.
Held: . .
CitedIn re J Leslie Engineers Co Ltd 1976
The director of a company between presentation of a petition to wind up and the making of the order paid over pounds 1050 to a creditor for work done. Of this sum, pounds 800 was paid by way of a cheque drawn on the personal account of the director . .
CitedBristol Airport Plc and Another v Powdrill and Others CA 21-Dec-1989
An airline company went into administration. The airport seized two airplanes. The administrators claimed they were property within the administration, could not be seized without a court order, and the court should exercise its discretion not to . .
CitedRe S A and D Wright Ltd, Denney v John Hudson and Co Ltd CA 1992
Fox LJ said: ‘A disposition carried out in good faith in the ordinary course of business at a time when the parties were unaware that a petition had been presented would usually be validated by the court unless there is ground for thinking that the . .
CitedEl Ajou v Dollar Land Holdings Ltd CA 2-Dec-1993
The court was asked whether, for the purposes of establishing a company’s liability under the knowing receipt head of constructive trust, the knowledge of one of its directors can be treated as having been the knowledge of the company.
Held: . .
CitedExpress Electrical Distributors Ltd v Beavis and Others CA 19-Jul-2016
Sales LJ said: validation will ordinarily only be granted ‘if there is some special circumstance which shows that the disposition in question … has been … for the benefit of the general body of unsecured creditors’. . .
CitedAttorney General v Jewish Colonisation Association 1901
. .
CitedCook Industries Inc v Galliher ChD 1979
The plaintiff claimed a declaration that the defendants held a flat in Paris together with its contents in trust for the plaintiff, and made an order compelling the defendants to allow the plaintiff to inspect the flat. The fact that the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Trusts, International

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.573799

Express Electrical Distributors Ltd v Beavis and Others: CA 19 Jul 2016

Sales LJ said: validation will ordinarily only be granted ‘if there is some special circumstance which shows that the disposition in question … has been … for the benefit of the general body of unsecured creditors’.

Judges:

Sir Terence Etherton Ch, Patten, Sales LJJ

Citations:

[2016] EWCA Civ 765

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 127

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group SC 1-Feb-2017
Saad Investments was a Cayman Islands company in liquidation. The liquidator brought an action here, but the defendant sought a stay saying that another forum was clearly more appropriate. Shares in Saudi banks were said to be held in trust for the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.567262

Akers and Others v Samba Financial Group: ChD 28 Feb 2014

Samba sought a stay of insolvency proceedings. Shares in a Saudi company were held in trust by a company registered in Cayman. Upon that company going into liquidation, the shares were transferred to the defendant, who now argued that since Saudi law would not recognise such a trust, and the trust being invalid, the action should be stayed.
Held: The stay was granted,

Judges:

The Chancellor (Sir Terence Etherton)

Citations:

[2014] EWHC 540 (Ch), (2014) 16 ITELR 808, [2014] CN 346

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Insolvency Act 1986 127, Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group CA 4-Dec-2014
Shares in a Saudi company were held I trust for a Cayman company which had gone into liquidation. Saudi law did not recognise such trusts, and the parties now disputed which was the forum conveniens.
Held: The liquidators’ appeal succeeded. . .
At First InstanceAkers and Others v Samba Financial Group SC 1-Feb-2017
Saad Investments was a Cayman Islands company in liquidation. The liquidator brought an action here, but the defendant sought a stay saying that another forum was clearly more appropriate. Shares in Saudi banks were said to be held in trust for the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

International, Insolvency

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.522121