Click the case name for better results:

BTI 2014 Llc v Sequana Sa and Others: ChD 11 Jul 2016

Allegation that the payment of dividends was in breach of Part 23 of the 2006 Act. The direcors had signed the necessary certificate as to solvency before resolving to reduce the company capital and paying a dividend. Held: When making such a statement, the directors were not being asked what would be the position if … Continue reading BTI 2014 Llc v Sequana Sa and Others: ChD 11 Jul 2016

HM Revenue and Customs v Begum and Others: ChD 15 Jul 2010

The Commissioners claim was founded in an alleged conspiracy from a ‘missing trader intra-community fraud’ amounting to andpound;96 million. Held: Section 423 had extra territorial effect. Judges: David Richards J Citations: [2010] EWHC 1799 (Ch), [2011] BPIR 59 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 423 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Regalway Care Ltd … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Begum and Others: ChD 15 Jul 2010

Allen v Hurst and Others: ChD 26 Aug 2022

Applicant’s application for an order under s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 to set aside the Declaration of Trust in respect of the Property which he maintains was entered into for the purpose of putting assets beyond the reach of creditors. Judges: ICC Judge Barber Citations: [2022] EWHC 2204 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act … Continue reading Allen v Hurst and Others: ChD 26 Aug 2022

AA v JJ: KBD 29 Jul 2022

Application for a Norwich Pharmacal order against a financial institution or a financial services provider known, for the purpose of these proceedings as ‘MM’, relating to a claim that the applicant, known as ‘AA’, has against her former husband, known as ‘XY’. Judges: Mr Justice Sweeting Citations: [2022] EWHC 2627 (KB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency … Continue reading AA v JJ: KBD 29 Jul 2022

4Eng Ltd v Harper and Others: ChD 26 Oct 2009

The claimant sought to set aside transactions entered into by the defendants which, it said were intended fraudulently to defeat claims by their creditors. Held: When considering the extent of recovery available under the sections of the 1986 Act, the court should consider general principles applicable in all areas of law. The Act did not … Continue reading 4Eng Ltd v Harper and Others: ChD 26 Oct 2009

Ram v Ram and others: CA 16 Nov 2004

Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 1684, [2005] 2 FLR 63 Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 423 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Akhter and Another CA 14-Feb-2020 Islamic Nikah Ceremony did not create a marriage The parties had undertaken, in 1998, an Islamic marriage ceremony, a Nikah. They … Continue reading Ram v Ram and others: CA 16 Nov 2004

BTI 2014 Llc v Sequana SA and Others: CA 6 Feb 2019

The Court considered a Director’s duty to act in the interests of his company’s creditors. The Directors were said to have paid out an excessive dividend to put assets beyond the reach of its creditors. Judges: Longmore, David Richards, Henderson LJJ Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 112, [2019] 2 All ER (Comm) 13, [2019] BCC 631, … Continue reading BTI 2014 Llc v Sequana SA and Others: CA 6 Feb 2019

Feakins and Another v Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Civ 1513): CA 9 Dec 2005

The department complained that the defendants had entered into a transaction with their farm at an undervalue so as to defeat its claim for recovery of sums due. The transaction used the grant of a tenancy by the first chargee. Held: The farmers’ appeal as to the farm transaction failed: ‘beyond argument that DEFRA was … Continue reading Feakins and Another v Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Civ 1513): CA 9 Dec 2005

In Re Banco Nacional De Cuba: ChD 7 Jun 2001

Where it was alleged that shares in a UK company had been sold at an undervalue, so as to allow a challenge in insolvency proceedings, the leave of the court was still required if the pleadings were to be served abroad. When the court considered such an application, it had to look not just at … Continue reading In Re Banco Nacional De Cuba: ChD 7 Jun 2001

Aiglon Limited and another v Gau Shan Co Limited: ChD 1993

The defendants had obtained world-wide Mareva injunctions in support of substantive proceedings by way of their counterclaim to enforce an arbitration award against the plaintiffs under section 26 against two companies, Aiglon Limited and L’Aiglon SA (a Swiss company). Held: There was no basis under section 26 for enforcement of the arbitration award against SA, … Continue reading Aiglon Limited and another v Gau Shan Co Limited: ChD 1993

Beckenham Mc Ltd v Centralex Ltd and others: ChD 10 Jun 2004

Judges: Hart J Citations: [2004] EWHC 1287 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 423 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Halsall v Brizell ChD 1957 Land in Liverpool was sold in building plots. The vendors retained the roads and sewers and a promenade and sea wall. A separate deed of covenant of 1851 … Continue reading Beckenham Mc Ltd v Centralex Ltd and others: ChD 10 Jun 2004

Inland Revenue Commissioners v Hashmi and Another: ChD 4 Oct 2001

In 1989, the taxpayer transferred property by means of a trust deed in favour of his son in consideration of his ‘natural love and affection’ for him. Four years later the commissioners investigated his tax affairs, and concluded that there were substantial undisclosed business profits. He died in 1997 owing substantial sums, and the commissioners … Continue reading Inland Revenue Commissioners v Hashmi and Another: ChD 4 Oct 2001

Hill (As Trustee In Bankruptcy of Nurkowski) v Spread Trustee Company Ltd and Another: ChD 2005

Citations: [2005] BPIR 842 Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 423 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Hill (As Trustee In Bankruptcy of Nurkowski) v Spread Trustee Company Ltd and Another CA 12-May-2006 The defendants sought relief for transactions entered into at an undervalue. The bankrupt had entered into charges and an assignment of … Continue reading Hill (As Trustee In Bankruptcy of Nurkowski) v Spread Trustee Company Ltd and Another: ChD 2005

National Westminster Bank plc v Jones and Others: CA 24 Oct 2001

The respondent farmers charged the farm by way of an agricultural floating charge to the claimants. On coming into difficulties, they set up a limited company and granted a tenancy in its favour and transferred assets to it. The bank obtained declarations that the charges remained valid and that the new tenancies and assignments should … Continue reading National Westminster Bank plc v Jones and Others: CA 24 Oct 2001

National Westminster Bank Plc v Jones and Others: ChD 7 Jul 2000

A transaction could be deemed to be at an undervalue and caught by the section even though it made no difference to the overall assets and even though only one rather than the generality of creditors was prejudiced by the transaction. Here, by creating a tenancy in favour of a limited company whose shares they … Continue reading National Westminster Bank Plc v Jones and Others: ChD 7 Jul 2000

Hill (As Trustee In Bankruptcy of Nurkowski) v Spread Trustee Company Ltd and Another: CA 12 May 2006

The defendants sought relief for transactions entered into at an undervalue. The bankrupt had entered into charges and an assignment of a loan account in their favour before his bankruptcy, and the trustee had obtained an order for them to be set aside as a fraud on his creditors. Held: To have such orders set … Continue reading Hill (As Trustee In Bankruptcy of Nurkowski) v Spread Trustee Company Ltd and Another: CA 12 May 2006

Dora v Simper and Others: ChD 26 May 1999

A creditor’s claim to set aside an insolvent debtor’s transaction as being at an undervalue could not be pursued to benefit that creditor alone, and a plaintiff was not entitled to his full judgment and costs. A conspiracy claim was hard to establish. Citations: Times 26-May-1999 Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 423 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Dora v Simper and Others: ChD 26 May 1999

Alsop Wilkinson v Neary and Others: ChD 4 Nov 1994

The second defendant, a solicitor, had fraudulently taken money from trusts, and paid money into trusts for his own family. It was claimed that the payments were intended to defeat the recovery of the funds. The trustees sought protection on costs through a Beddoe application. Held: Trustees who sought directions from the court on whether … Continue reading Alsop Wilkinson v Neary and Others: ChD 4 Nov 1994

Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Plc v Woodward and Another: CA 30 May 1994

A tenancy granted by an insolvent farmer to his wife was set aside because of additional benefits which were granted. The tenancy was held to have been granted at an undervalue, even though the court was unable precisely to measure the value of the benefits granted. ‘In applying section 423(1)(c) to the facts of the … Continue reading Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Plc v Woodward and Another: CA 30 May 1994

Formosa Plastics Corporation USA v Chauhan and others: CA 6 Apr 1998

The defendant sought a second adjournment of his application for leave to appeal against summary judgment for $21m with interest in respect of a judgment obtained in Texas. The defendant was said to have given his personal guarantee for the purchase price of goods sold and delivered. Held: The request was rejected. Counsel for the … Continue reading Formosa Plastics Corporation USA v Chauhan and others: CA 6 Apr 1998

The Solicitor for the Affairs of HM Treasury v Doveton and Another: ChD 13 Nov 2008

The claimant requested the revocation of a grant of probate to the defendant. They had suspicions about the will propounded and lodged a caveat which was warned off and the grant completed. In breach of court orders, the defendant had transferred substantial estate assets abroad. The defendant said that the burden of proving that the … Continue reading The Solicitor for the Affairs of HM Treasury v Doveton and Another: ChD 13 Nov 2008

Arbuthnot Leasing International Ltd v Havelet Leasing Ltd (No 2): ChD 1990

Complaint was made that before the insolvency, the director of the compay had put its assets beyond the creditors. He replied that had acted so on legal advice: ‘Mr Maughan stressed . . that what he did he did on legal advice from solicitors and counsel and without any dishonest intent. . . however, seem … Continue reading Arbuthnot Leasing International Ltd v Havelet Leasing Ltd (No 2): ChD 1990

Chohan v Saggar: ChD 1992

Section 423(3) of the 1986 Act requires a plaintiff to show a dominant purpose to remove assets from the reach of actual or potential claimants or creditors, but not excluding the possibility that there might be other purposes behind the relevant . .

Giles v Rhind: CA 17 Oct 2002

An action by a company under a shareholder’s agreement was compromised. The other shareholder now sought to commence an action against the party in breach for his personal losses. The defendant argued that the company’s compromise was binding also against the other shareholder. Held: The company had become obliged to compromise the claim by the … Continue reading Giles v Rhind: CA 17 Oct 2002

Ramlort Ltd v Michael James Meston Reid: CA 8 Jul 2004

The company sought to claim under a life policy. The deceased had died in Scotland insolvent. The trustee of the policy had declared that he held it on trust for the claimant, but the defendant, the judicial factor of the estate, said the declaration of trust was ineffective as a transaction at an undervalue. The … Continue reading Ramlort Ltd v Michael James Meston Reid: CA 8 Jul 2004

Chohan v Saggar and Another: CA 27 Dec 1993

The word ‘and’ in sections 423(2)(a) and 423(2)(b) is to be read conjunctively not disjunctively. Section 238(3) is to be interpreted as requiring restoration of the former position ‘as far as possible’ or ‘as far as practicable’, and that accordingly subsequent events were not an absolute bar against setting aside the sale. Nourse LJ: ‘The … Continue reading Chohan v Saggar and Another: CA 27 Dec 1993

Gita Ram v Baskinder Ram,Solinder Ram, Monder Ram and Maurice William Russell: CA 5 Nov 2004

A bankrupt had, before his bankruptcy disposed of his share in a house at an undervalue. His wife appealed an order that the share disposed of should vest entirely in the trustee in bankruptcy. Matrimonial proceedings had also been commenced. Held: The wife was seeking effectively not re-instatement, but the creation of a position which … Continue reading Gita Ram v Baskinder Ram,Solinder Ram, Monder Ram and Maurice William Russell: CA 5 Nov 2004

Baxendale-Walker v Irwin Mitchell Llp and Others 3572: ChD 20 Dec 2018

Judges: Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Agnello QC Citations: [2018] EWHC 3572 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 303 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Baxendale-Walker v Irwin Mitchell Llp and Others 3423 ChD 20-Dec-2018 Judgment in application by fifth defendant for a limited civil restraint order. . . Lists … Continue reading Baxendale-Walker v Irwin Mitchell Llp and Others 3572: ChD 20 Dec 2018

Barons Bridging Finance 1 Ltd and Others v Barons Finance Ltd: CA 14 Jun 2016

Appeal against finding that an assignment of book debts was void, as it had been made after the commencement of the Company’s winding up or, even if that were not the case, should be set aside (a) under section 238 of the Act as a transaction at an undervalue and (b) under section 423 of … Continue reading Barons Bridging Finance 1 Ltd and Others v Barons Finance Ltd: CA 14 Jun 2016

Bilta (UK) Ltd and Others v Nazir and Others: ChD 30 Jul 2012

The company was said to have engaged in a fraud based on false European Trading Scheme Allowances, and had been wound up by the Revenue. The liquidators, in the company name, now sought recovery from former directors and associates. Held: The court dismissed the application: ‘First, the fact that there is, in accordance with my … Continue reading Bilta (UK) Ltd and Others v Nazir and Others: ChD 30 Jul 2012

Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd (In Provisional Liquidation) v Maxwell and Another: CA 13 May 1992

A company liquidator applied for an order under sections 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 that a director should disclose information to that liquidator. The Director objected that to do so would infringe his privilege against self-incrimination. In separate proceedings, heard for these purposes together, two other companies sought remedies of an account … Continue reading Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd (In Provisional Liquidation) v Maxwell and Another: CA 13 May 1992

Brook v Reed: CA 25 Mar 2011

The court was asked ‘What relation should the costs and remuneration bear to the circumstances, and in particular the size, of the bankruptcy?’ The bankrupt had considered that the costs first awarded to the trustee in bankruptcy and the trustee’s solicitors were disproportionate. On appeal they had been reduced, but he appealed again seeking a … Continue reading Brook v Reed: CA 25 Mar 2011

Warwick (Formerly Yarwood) v Trustee In Bankruptcy of Clive Graham Yarwood: ChD 13 Sep 2010

The trustee sought to have set aside as an unlawful preference, the payment of 75% of the proceeds of sale of the former matrimonial home to the bankrupt’s wife, saying that the payment had been made after the presentation of the petition. The parties had previously compromised a claim for ancillary relief in the divorce … Continue reading Warwick (Formerly Yarwood) v Trustee In Bankruptcy of Clive Graham Yarwood: ChD 13 Sep 2010