Synthon BV v The Licensing Authority of the Department of Health: ECJ 10 Jul 2008

ECJ Proprietary medicinal products – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation – Abridged procedure – Essentially similar medicinal products – Principle of mutual recognition of a marketing authorisation Grounds for refusal Serious breach of Community law.

Citations:

C-452/06, [2008] EUECJ C-452/06 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionSynthon BV v The Licensing Authority of the Department of Health ECJ 16-Oct-2008
ECJ Community code relating to medicinal products for human use Marketing authorisation Essentially similar medicinal products Abridged procedure Procedure for mutual recognition Grounds for refusal Liability of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270886

Etat belge SPF Finances v Les Vergers Du Vieux Tauves: ECJ 3 Jul 2008

ECJ Opinion – Directive 90/435 Parent company Holder of right of usufruct over shares.

Judges:

Sharpston AG

Citations:

C-48/07, [2008] EUECJ C-48/07 – O

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 90/435

Cited by:

OpinionEtat belge SPF Finances v Les Vergers Du Vieux Tauves ECJ 22-Dec-2008
ECJ Corporation taxes – Directive 90/435/EEC – Status of parent company Capital holding Holding of shares in usufruct . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Corporation Tax

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270883

Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd: Admn 16 Jul 2008

The defendant publican appealed against convictions for dishonestly receiving a broadcast programme with intent to avoid payment.

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 1666 (Admin), [2008] FSR 33, [2008] UKCLR 427

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 297(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoThe Football Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure and others ChD 18-Jan-2008
The court considered interlocutory applications in an action for copyright infringement alleging the unauthorised broadcast of football matches. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime, Media, Intellectual Property, European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270848

Barclay and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v The Seigneur of Sark and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2008

The claimants said that the the laws restricting residence and voting rights and oher constitutional arrangements on the Isle of Sark were in breach of European law, and human rights law.
Held: The claims failed. The composition of Chief Pleas under the Reform Law are not inconsistent with the rights conferred by Article 3, nor did the rules restricting aliens from standing for certain senior elected positions. ‘The mere fact that the Seneschal is a member of Chief Pleas . . and also the Judge of Sark does not mean that he lacks the impartiality and/or independence and/or the appearance thereof demanded by Article 6(1). If he did it would mean that the holder of judicial office is, effectively, barred from holding a position within a legislature or executive. ‘

Judges:

Wyn Williams J

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 1354 (Admin), [2008] 3 WLR 867

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

EC Treaty 19, European Convention on Human Rights p1 A3 14

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedMcGonnell v The United Kingdom ECHR 8-Feb-2000
The applicant owned land in the parish of St Martin’s in Guernsey. He made a number of applications for planning permission for residential use, but they were all rejected. In about 1986 he moved into a converted packing shed on his land. In 1988 a . .
CitedMathieu Mohin and Clerfayt v Belgium ECHR 2-Mar-1987
(Plenary Court) The court described and approved the way in which an ‘institutional’ right to vote had developed into ‘subjective rights of participation – the ‘right to vote’ and the ‘right to stand for election’.’ It described the ambit of Article . .
CitedPabla Ky v Finland ECHR 22-Jun-2004
A member of the Finnish Parliament who also sat as an expert member of the Court of Appeal was said to lack independence as a judge.
Held: The complaint was rejected. Also there was no no objective justification for the applicant’s fear as to . .
CitedSecretary of State for Defence v Al-Skeini and others (The Redress Trust Intervening) HL 13-Jun-2007
Complaints were made as to the deaths of six Iraqi civilians which were the result of actions by a member or members of the British armed forces in Basra. One of them, Mr Baha Mousa, had died as a result of severe maltreatment in a prison occupied . .
CitedSecretary of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v Bancoult, Regina (on the Application of) CA 23-May-2007
The claimant was a Chagos Islander removed in 1970 to make way for a US airbase. The court had ordered that the islanders be allowed to return, but the appellant had passed an Order in Council effectively reversing the position, and now appealed a . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromBarclay and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and others CA 2-Dec-2008
The claimant appealed against refusal of his challenge to the new constitutional law for Sark, and sought a declaration of incompatibility under the 1998 Act. He said that by restricting the people who could stand for election, a free democracy had . .
at First InstanceBarclay and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and Others SC 1-Dec-2009
The claimants said that restrictions within the constitution of Sark on who could sit in the Chief Pleas were incompatible with their human rights. The claimants variously owned property on Sark but had restricted rights to vote and stand.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Constitutional, European, Human Rights

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270209

Wightman MSP and Others for Judicial Review v The Secretary of State for Exiting The European Union: SCS 8 Jun 2018

The Petitioners sought a declaration that the Article 50 notice given by the UK government could be withdrawn by the UK without the consent of the EU.
Held: The matter was referred to the CJEU for a preliminary answer to the question: ‘Where, in accordance with Article 50 [TEU], a Member State has notified the European Council of its intention to withdraw from the European Union, does EU law permit that notice to be revoked unilaterally by the notifying Member State; and, if so, subject to what conditions and with what effect relative to the Member State remaining within the European Union?’

Citations:

[2018] ScotCS CSOH – 61

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Scotland

Citing:

At Outer HouseWightman, MSP and Others, Reclaiming Motion By v The Advocate General SCS 20-Mar-2018
Art 50 withdrawal possibility review to proceed
Petition seeking judicial review of the United Kingdom Government’s ‘position’ on the revocability of a notice of intention to withdraw from the European Union in terms of Article 50.2 of the Treaty on European Union. . .

Cited by:

At SCSWightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ECJ 4-Dec-2018
Opinion – Unilateral withdrawal of Art 50 Notice
Opinion – Right of withdrawal from the European Union – Notification of the intention to withdraw – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom (Brexit)
Question referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 50 TEU – Right of withdrawal from . .
At SCSWightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ECJ 10-Dec-2018
Art 50 Notice withrawable unilaterally
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union – Consequences of the notification – Right of unilateral revocation of the notification – Conditions
The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Constitutional, European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.622410

TTL (Freedom To Provide Services – Corporate Taxation – Payments Made By A Company Resident In A Member State To Non-Resident Companies – Judgment): ECJ 25 Jul 2018

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Corporate taxation – Payments made by a company resident in a Member State to non-resident companies for the leasing of rail tankers – Obligation to charge withholding tax on income from a domestic source paid to a non-resident company – Non-compliance – Double taxation conventions – Charging the resident company default interest for non-payment of the withholding tax – Interest payable from the expiry of the statutory time limit for payment until the date on which evidence that the double taxation convention is applicable is furnished – Irrecoverable interest

Citations:

C-553/16, [2018] EUECJ C-553/16

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Taxes – Other

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.621602

Vanhalewyn v EEAS: ECFI 17 Mar 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Appeal – Public service – Officials – Remuneration – Staff EEAS assigned to a third country – Remove the allowance of living conditions for personnel assigned to Mauritius – Failure to adopt Article DGE 10 of Annex X status

Citations:

T-792/14, [2016] EUECJ T-792/14, ECLI:EU:T:2016:156

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.561967

Parliament v Commission C-286/14: ECJ 17 Mar 2016

ECJ (Judgment) Action for annulment – Article 290 TFEU – Concepts of ‘amending’ and ‘supplementing’ – Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 – Article 21(3) – Scope of the power conferred on the European Commission – Need to adopt a separate legislative act – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014

Citations:

[2016] EUECJ C-286/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:183

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

CitedWightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ECJ 10-Dec-2018
Art 50 Notice withrawable unilaterally
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union – Consequences of the notification – Right of unilateral revocation of the notification – Conditions
The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.561961

Sonos Europe v Staatssecretaris van Financien: ECJ 17 Mar 2016

(Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Customs union and Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Headings 8517, 8518, 8519, 8527 and 8543 – Stand-alone device designed to retrieve, receive and stream digital audio files in the form of amplified sound

Citations:

C-84/15, [2016] EUECJ C-84/15

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87

Jurisdiction:

European

European, Customs and Excise

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.561965

Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern: ECJ 2 Mar 2010

ECJ Citizenship of the Union Article 17 EC – Nationality of one Member State acquired by birth – Nationality of another Member State acquired by naturalisation – Loss of original nationality by reason of that naturalisation – Loss with retroactive effect of nationality acquired by naturalisation on account of deception practised in that acquisition – Statelessness leading to loss of the status of citizen of the Union

Judges:

V Skouris P

Citations:

[2010] 3 WLR 1166, [2010] EUECJ C-135/08, [2010] All ER (EC) 635, [2010] 3 CMLR 2, [2011] CEC 35, [2010] QB 761

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Citing:

OpinionRottmann v Freistaat Bayern ECJ 30-Sep-2009
ECJ Opinion – European Citizenship Loss – Loss of the nationality of the Member State of origin at the time of acquisition of citizenship of another Member State – Withdrawal of the new nationality due to . .

Cited by:

CitedMoohan and Another v The Lord Advocate SC 17-Dec-2014
The petitioners, convicted serving prisoners, had sought judicial review of the refusal to allow them to vote in the Scottish Referendum on Independence. The request had been refused in the Outer and Inner Houses.
Held: (Kerr, Wilson JJSC . .
CitedWightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ECJ 10-Dec-2018
Art 50 Notice withrawable unilaterally
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union – Consequences of the notification – Right of unilateral revocation of the notification – Conditions
The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.541524

Generali-Providencia Biztosito Zrt v Kozbeszerzesi Hatosag Kozbeszerzesi Dontobizottsag: ECJ 18 Dec 2014

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Contracts falling below the threshold laid down in Directive 2004/18/EC – Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU – Applicability – Certain cross-border interest – Grounds for exclusion from a tendering procedure – Exclusion of an economic operator having committed an infringement of national competition rules, established by a judgment given not more than five years ago – Lawfulness – Proportionality

Judges:

C. Vajda (Rapporteur), P

Citations:

C-470/13, [2014] EUECJ C-470/13

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 2004/18/EC, TFEU 49 56

Jurisdiction:

European

Local Government

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.540328

Commission v United Kingdom: ECJ 18 Dec 2014

ECJ (Judgment) Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Recovery of taxes unduly paid under EU law – National legislation – Retroactive curtailment of the limitation period for the applicable remedies – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations

Judges:

A. Tizzano (Rapporteur), P

Citations:

C-640/13, [2014] EUECJ C-640/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2457

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.540326

The Test Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 18 Dec 2014

The company claimants had paid large sums in excess tax under a mistake of European law.

Judges:

Henderson J

Citations:

[2014] EWHC 4302 (Ch), [2015] BTC 3, [2015] STI 49, [2015] STC 1471

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Value Added Tax Act 1994 94

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoTest Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v CIR ECJ 12-Dec-2006
ECJ (Opinion of Geelhoed AG) Interpretation of Articles 43 and 56 EC and Articles 4(1) and 6 of Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent . .
See AlsoTest Claimants In the FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs ChD 27-Nov-2008
The claimants were companies with parent companies in the UK and other subsidiaries not so resident, both in the EU and outside. They complained of the differences in treatment under corporation tax of the payment of dividends between the . .
See AlsoTest Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v The Commissioners For Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs ECJ 19-Jul-2012
ECJ Articles 49 TFEU and 63 TFEU – Payment of dividends – Corporation tax – Case C-446/04 – Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation – Interpretation of the judgment – Prevention of economic double taxation – . .
See AlsoTest Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue ECJ 5-Sep-2013
ECJ Opinion – Recovery of national taxes which are contrary to European Union law – Limitation period for instituting proceedings – National legislation curtailing the limitation period with retroactive effect . .
See AlsoTest Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue ECJ 12-Dec-2013
ECJ Judicial protection – Principle of effectiveness – Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – Restitution of sums paid but not due – Remedies – National legislation – . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Corporation Tax, European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.540253

Somalische Vereniging Amsterdam en Omgeving v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie: ECJ 18 Dec 2014

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 4 – General budget of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 – Article 53b(2) – Decision 2004/904/EC – European Refugee Fund for the period 2005-2010 – Article 25(2) – Legal basis of the obligation to recover funds in the event of an irregularity

Judges:

M. Ilesic, P

Citations:

C-599/13, [2014] EUECJ C-599/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2462

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 4, Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 53b(2)

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.540334

Societa Edilizia Turistica Alberghiera Residenziale SpA v Comune di Quartu S. Elena: ECJ 18 Dec 2014

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/98/EC- Article 15 – Waste management – Possibility for the waste producer to carry out the waste treatment independently – National transposition law adopted, but not yet in force – Expiry of the transposition period – Direct effect

Judges:

A Borg Barthet, Acting P

Citations:

C-551/13, [2014] EUECJ C-551/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2467

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 2008/98/EC 15

Jurisdiction:

European

Environment

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.540333

Larcher v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bayern Sud: ECJ 18 Dec 2014

ECJ (Judgment) Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security for migrant workers – Article 45 TFEU – Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 – Old-age benefits – Principle of non-discrimination – Worker who, prior to retirement, has participated, in a Member State, in a part-time work scheme for older employees – Consideration for entitlement to an old-age pension in another Member State

Judges:

A Tizzano, P

Citations:

C-523/13, [2014] EUECJ C-523/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2458

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Benefits

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.540329

Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami v European Commission: ECFI 25 Apr 2013

ECFI Trade in seal products – Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 – Detailed rules for implementation – Regulation (EU) No 737/2010 – Prohibition on placing such products on the market – Exception in favour of Inuit communities – Plea of illegality – Legal basis – Subsidiarity – Proportionality – Misuse of powers

Judges:

A. Dittrich P

Citations:

T-526/10, [2013] EUECJ T-526/10

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009, Regulation (EU) No 737/2010

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

CitedWightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ECJ 10-Dec-2018
Art 50 Notice withrawable unilaterally
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union – Consequences of the notification – Right of unilateral revocation of the notification – Conditions
The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Animals

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.503490

Unibet (London) Ltd, Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitie-kanslern (Freedom To Provide Services): ECJ 13 Mar 2007

(Grand Chamber) Principle of judicial protection National legislation not providing for a self-standing action to challenge the compatibility of a national provision with Community law Procedural autonomy Principles of equivalence and effectiveness Interim protection. ‘it is for the national courts to interpret the procedural rules governing actions brought before them, such as the requirement for there to be a specific legal relationship between the applicant and the State, in such a way as to enable those rules, wherever possible, to be implemented in such a manner as to contribute to the attainment of the objective, referred to at paragraph 37 above, of ensuring effective judicial protection of an individual’s rights under Community law.’

Citations:

[2006] EUECJ C-432/05 – O, [2007] All ER (D) 217, C-432/05, [2007] ECR I-2271, ECLI:EU:C:2007:163

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Citing:

OpinionUnibet (London) Ltd, Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitie-kanslern (Freedom To Provide Services) ECJ 30-Nov-2006
CJEU Effective judicial protection of Community law rights – National rules not providing for self-standing application for annulment of national legislation conflicting with Community law – Right to interim . .

Cited by:

CitedT-Mobile (Uk) Ltd. and Another v Office of Communications CA 12-Dec-2008
The claimant telecoms companies objected to a proposed scheme for future licensing of available spectrum. The scheme anticipated a bias in favour of auctioniung such content. It was not agreed whether any challenge to the decision should be by way . .
CitedHome Office v Tariq SC 13-Jul-2011
(JUSTICE intervening) The claimant pursued Employment Tribunal proceedings against the Immigration Service when his security clearance was withdrawn. The Tribunal allowed the respondent to use a closed material procedure under which it was provided . .
CitedWightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ECJ 10-Dec-2018
Art 50 Notice withrawable unilaterally
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union – Consequences of the notification – Right of unilateral revocation of the notification – Conditions
The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.278676

KA (EEA: Family Permit; Admission) Sudan: IAT 25 Jun 2008

AIT Article 5 of the Citizens Directive (Council Directive 2004/38/EC) does not confer an unqualified right of pre-entry, entry or residence on family members of a Union citizen exercising Treaty rights. Family members are required to have an entry visa in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 or, where appropriate, with national law. As explained in CO (EEA Regulations: family permit) Nigeria [2007] UKAIT 00070, the United Kingdom has chosen to impose a visa requirement in the form of an EEA family permit regime. If a family member arrives at a United Kingdom border without an EEA family permit and seeks admission, he must satisfy the requirements of regulation 11 of the 2006 Regulations. Whether a person is entitled to a right of admission under regulation 11 depends on his being able to produce relevant documentation on that occasion (or within a reasonable period of time thereafter).

Citations:

[2008] UKAIT 00052

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Council Directive 2004/38/EC

Immigration, European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270759

SIC v Commission (State Aid): ECFI 26 Jun 2008

ECJ State aid Measures taken by the Portuguese Republic for the public service broadcaster RTP in order to finance its public service remit Decision declaring that certain measures do not constitute State aid and that the others are compatible with the common market Classification as State aid Compatibility with the common market Obligation to undertake a diligent and impartial investigation.

Citations:

T-442/03, [2008] EUECJ T-442/03

Links:

Bailii

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270546

Wiedemann (Freedom of Establishment): ECJ 26 Jun 2008

Directive 91/439/EEC – Mutual recognition of driving licences – Withdrawal of a licence in one Member State for use of narcotic drugs or alcohol – New licence issued in another Member State – Refusal to recognise right to drive in the first Member State – Residence not in accordance with Directive 91/439/EEC

Citations:

[2008] ECR I-4635, C-329/06, [2008] EUECJ C-329/06, [2008] 3 CMLR 18

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 91/439/EEC

European, Road Traffic

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270547

Marra v De Gregorio C-200/07 (Privileges and Immunities): ECJ 26 Jun 2008

ECJ Opinion – Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy)

Judges:

Maduro AG

Citations:

[2008] EUECJ C-200/07 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionMarra v De Gregorio C-200/07 ECJ 21-Oct-2008
ECJ Reference for a preliminary ruling European- Parliament – Leaflet issued by a Member of the European Parliament containing insulting remarks Claim for non-pecuniary damages Immunity of Members of the European . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Constitutional

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270542

Marra v De Gregorio C-201/07: ECJ 26 Jun 2008

ECJ Opinion – Privileges And Immunities – Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy)

Judges:

Maduro AG

Citations:

[2008] EUECJ C-201/07 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionMarra v De Gregorio C-201/07 (Privileges And Immunities) ECJ 21-Oct-2008
ECJ Grand Chamber – Reference for a preliminary ruling European Parliament Leaflet issued by a Member of the European Parliament containing insulting remarks – Claim for non-pecuniary damages – Immunity of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Constitutional

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270543

Regie Networks (State Aid) French Text: ECJ 26 Jun 2008

ECJ Opinion – Competition State aid Article 92 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 87 EC) and Article 93 of the EC Treaty (now Article 88 EC) Invalidity of a decision of the French Fund Commission support radio broadcasting scheme whose beneficiaries are only undertaken by national funding a special tax on radio and television advertising broadcast within the territory Collection of tax on radio and television advertising broadcast from abroad also provisional Maintenance the effects of an invalid decision

Judges:

Kokott AG

Citations:

C-333/07, [2008] EUECJ C-333/07 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionRegie Networks v Direction de Controle Fiscal Rhone-Alpes Bourgogne ECJ 22-Dec-2008
ECJ State aid Aid scheme to support local radio stations – Financed by a parafiscal charge on advertising companies – Favourable decision by the Commission at the conclusion of the preliminary stage of the review . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270545

Wheeler, Regina (on the Application of) v Office of the Prime Minister and Another: Admn 25 Jun 2008

The claimant sought to challenge the decision by respondent not to offer a referendum before acceding to the Treaty of Lisbon. The claimant’s case was that the Government’s promise to hold a referendum in relation to the European Union Constitutional Treaty gave rise to a legitimate expectation that a referendum would be held in relation to the Lisbon Treaty.
Lord Justice Richards said: ‘We have expressed ourselves cautiously on the materiality of those various differences between the Constitutional Treaty and the Lisbon Treaty. We have done so because there is a further and deeper difficulty facing the claimant in relation to this issue. The court is in a position to determine the extent of factual differences between the two treaties, but how is it to assess the materiality of the differences that it finds? Whether the differences are sufficiently significant to treat the Lisbon Treaty as falling outside the scope of an implied representation to hold a referendum in respect of a treaty ‘with equivalent effect’ must depend primarily, as it seems to us, on a political rather than a legal judgment. There are, as Mr Sumption submitted, no judicial standards by which the court can answer the question. The wide spectrum of opinion, both within and outside the United Kingdom, to which the parties have drawn the court’s attention with regard to the extent of similarity or difference between the two treaties serves to underline the point.’

Judges:

Richards LJ, MacKay LJ

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 1409 (Admin)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoWheeler, Regina (on the Application of) v Office of the Prime Minister and Another Admn 2-May-2008
The applicant sought leave to bring judicial review of the prime minister’s decsion not to hold a referendum on the ratification of the treaty of Lisbon.
Held: The claimant had arguable points under the 2000 Act and otherwise, and permission . .

Cited by:

CitedRegina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another QBD 28-Oct-2009
The claimant a prisoner detained after the expiry of his lfe sentence tariff as dangerous, sought a declaration that the refusal to allow him to register as a voter in prison infringed his human rights.
Held: Such a claim had already succeeded . .
CitedBank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) SC 19-Jun-2013
The bank challenged measures taken by HM Treasury to restrict access to the United Kingdom’s financial markets by a major Iranian commercial bank, Bank Mellat, on the account of its alleged connection with Iran’s nuclear weapons and ballistic . .
CitedHS2 Action Alliance Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The Secretary of State for Transport and Another SC 22-Jan-2014
The government planned to promote a large scale rail development (HS2), announcing this in a command paper. The main issues, in summary, were, first, whether it should have been preceded by strategic environmental assessment, under the relevant . .
CitedMiller, Regina (On the Application Of) v The Prime Minister QBD 11-Sep-2019
Prorogation request was non-justiciable
The claimant sought to challenge the prorogation of Parliament by the Queen at the request of the respondent.
Held: The claim failed: ‘the decision of the Prime Minister to advise Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament is not justiciable . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Constitutional, European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270376

Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies v Commission (State Aid): ECFI 25 Jun 2008

ECJ State Aid for airlines on account of losses caused by the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible, in part, with the common market and ordering recovery of aid paid Article 87(2)(b) EC Communication from the Commission of 10 October 2001 on the repercussions of the terrorist attacks of 11 September – Causal connection between the exceptional occurrence and the damage – Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based.

Citations:

T-268/06, [2008] EUECJ T-268/06

Links:

Bailii

European

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270391

Ott and Others v Commission: ECFI 22 May 2008

ECJ (Staff Regulations) ‘Appeal’ Cross-appeal ‘Admissibility’ Public Service ‘Officials’ Promotion ‘2004 promotion exercise’ Allocation of priority points ‘General implementing provisions of Article 45 of the Statute’ of illegality ‘Substitution patterns’ in Appeal part unfounded and in part founded ‘Litigation to stand trial’ Rejection of the appeal

Citations:

T-250/06, [2008] EUECJ T-250/06

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.268816

Glaxosmithkline, Laboratoires Glaxosmithkline v Jean-Pierre Rouard (Area of Freedom, Security and Justice): ECJ 22 May 2008

ECJ Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 Section 5 of Chapter II Jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment Section 2 of Chapter II Special jurisdiction Article 6, point 1 More than one defendant).

Citations:

C-462/06, [2008] EUECJ C-462/06

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation (EC) No 44/2001

European, Employment

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.268814

Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH: ECJ 22 May 2008

ECJ Non-discrimination – Copyright and Neighbouring Rights – Rights of nationals of non-EU countries Rules of TRIPS

Citations:

C-240/07, [2008] EUECJ C-240/07 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

See AlsoSony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH -c- Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (Intellectual Property) French Text ECJ 20-Jan-2009
Europa Rights related to copyright – Rights of phonogram producers – Reproduction right – Distribution right – Term of protection – Directive 2006/116/EC – Rights of nationals of non-Member States. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Intellectual Property

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.268817

Marks and Spencer Plc v Customs and Excise: CA 14 Dec 1999

The taxpayer discovered that it had over several years made overpayments of VAT on chocolate covered biscuits because of a mistake as to the tax mutual with the defendants.
Held: MandS’s challenge to section 80(4) (as infringing EU law) failed, as regards the teacakes claim, because the Becker conditions were not satisfied (Becker v Finanzamt Munster-Innenstadt (Case 8/81) [1982] ECR 53) and general principles of Community law could not be relied on in the absence of a directly enforceable right;
(2) MandS’s challenge to section 80 (4) failed, as regards the late vouchers claim, for similar reasons, since the Commissioners’ failure to apply the amended statute correctly was not equivalent to incorrect transposition; and
(3) MandS’s challenge to section 80 (4), as regards the early vouchers, should be referred to the Court of Justice. Schiemann LJ (with whom the other members of the Court agreed) stated ([2000] STC 16, 39): ‘Marks and Spencer have an alternative submission which I shall consider in the next part of this judgment to the effect that the retrospective legislation is unlawfully discriminatory. I am not, for reasons which I shall shortly explain, persuaded that Marks and Spencer are entitled to judgment on that basis. It follows that a decision on whether it is compatible with Community law to enforce legislation which removes with retrospective effect a right under national law to reclaim VAT, which right has existed unexercised for more than three years, is in my judgment necessary to enable this Court to give judgment on the early vouchers claim. I would therefore be minded to refer this question to the Court of Justice.’

Citations:

[1999] EWCA Civ 3024, [2000] BTC 5003, [2000] 1 CMLR 256, [2000] Eu LR 293, [2000] STC 16, [2000] STI 22, [2000] BVC 35

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Value Added Taxes Act 1994 80(4)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromMarks and Spencer Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise Admn 21-Dec-1998
The limitation period for the recovery of overpaid VAT was alleged to offend the principle of equivalence.
Held: Moses J said: ‘In my judgment no comparison can be made with other types of tax such as income tax payable in respect of an . .

Cited by:

At CAMarks and Spencer Plc v Customs and Excise HL 4-Feb-2009
The taxpayer requested refund of VAT overpaid on chocolate covered cakes. The CandE resisted saying that the money had been substantially already paid by its customers. The case had been referred twice to the ECJ, who answered that the maintenance . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, VAT

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.268843

Cartesio Oktato es Szolgaltato bt: ECJ 22 May 2008

ECJ Freedom Of Establishment – Opinion – Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Itel -‘tabla (Hungary)

Judges:

Poiares Maduro AG

Citations:

[2008] BCC 745, [2008] ECR I-9641, C-210/06, [2008] EUECJ C-210/06 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionCartesio Oktato es Szolgaltato bt ECJ 16-Dec-2008
ECJ Grand Chamber – Transfer of a company seat to a Member State other than the Member State of incorporation ‘ Application for amendment of the entry regarding the company seat in the commercial register ‘ . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Company

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.268812

Mote v Regina: CACD 21 Dec 2007

The defendant appealed his convictions for offences relating to the claiming of benefits, saying that he was immune from prosecution as a member of the European Parliament, and that the verdicts were inconsistent with acquittals on other charges.
Held: There had been no abuse of process in prosecuting the defendant whilst he was a member of the European Parliament. The prosecution did not attack any of his privileges. The inconsistencies such as they were could be explained by factual differences between the counts and evidence supporting them. On one count, the appeal was allowed.

Judges:

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers CJ, Ouseley J, Blake J

Citations:

[2007] EWCA Crim 3131

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Theft Act 1968 15A 17(1)(a), Social Security Administration Act 1992 111A(1A), 1965 Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities 8 9 10, Indictments Act 1915 5(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedRegina v Horseferry Road Magistrates’ Court, ex Parte Bennett (No 1) HL 24-Jun-1993
The defendant had been brought to the UK in a manner which was in breach of extradition law. He had, in effect, been kidnapped by the authorities.
Held: The High Court may look at how an accused person was brought within the jurisdiction when . .
CitedRegina, ex parte International Air Transport Association, European Low Fares Airline Association v Department for Transport ECJ 10-Jan-2006
ECJ Carriage by air – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Articles 5, 6 and 7 -Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Validity – . .
CitedRegina v Mullen CACD 4-Feb-1999
British authorities, in disregard of available extradition procedures, initiated and procured the unlawful deportation of the appellant from Zimbabwe to England. The appellant was charged and tried for conspiracy to cause explosions likely to . .
See AlsoMote v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and Another CA 14-Dec-2007
The appellant was accused of having received income benefits to which he was not entitled. A prosecution was commenced and at the same time he appealed to the tribunal against the decision that there had been an overpayment. The authorities . .
CitedRegina v Johal and Ram 1972
Ashworth J said: ‘The argument for the appellants appeared to involve the proposition that an indictment, in order to be defective, must be one which in law did not charge any offence at all and therefore is bad on the face of it. We do not take . .
Not approvedCova Products Ltd, Regina v CACD 14-Jan-2005
The court considered the practice on an appeal alleging that the jury had returned inconsistent verdicts.
Held: The court approved a statement from Professor Smith: ‘a better view would be that the conviction is not safe unless the court is . .
Not ApprovedParry v Halton Magistrates’ Court and Another Admn 20-Jun-2005
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime, Benefits, European

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.262970

Sociedad General De Autores Y Editores De Espana (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA: ECJ 7 Dec 2006

ECJ (Law Relating To Undertakings) Copyright and related rights in the nformation society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3 – Concept of communication to the public – Works communicated by means of television sets installed in hotel rooms.
The Court interpreted Article 3(1) of the Information Society Directive in accordance with Article 8 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty. ‘According to settled case-law, in interpreting a provision of Community law it is necessary to consider not only its wording, but also the context in which it occurs and the objectives pursued by the rules of which it is part (see, in particular, Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 50, and Case C-53/05 Commission v Portugal [2006] ECR I-6215, paragraph 20)’ and
‘Moreover, Community legislation must, so far as possible, be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with international law, in particular where its provisions are intended specifically to give effect to an international agreement concluded by the Community (see, in particular, Case C-341/95 Bettati [1998] ECR I-4355, paragraph 20 and the case-law cited).’

Citations:

C-306/05, [2006] EUECJ C-306/05, [2007] Bus LR 521, [2006] ECR I-11519

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 2001/29/EC 3

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

CitedTwentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Another v Newzbin Ltd ChD 29-Mar-2010
The defendant operated a web-site providing a search facility of the Usenet news system which allowed its users to locate copies of films online for downloading. The claimant said this was an infringement of its copyrights.
Held: The defendant . .
CitedTwentieth Century Fox Film Corp and Others v British Telecommunications Plc ChD 28-Jul-2011
The claimant rights holders sought an order to require the defendant broadband internet provider to deny access to its users to websites which were said to facilitate the distribution of infringing copies of their films. An earlier judgment had . .
CitedForensic Telecommunications Services Ltd v West Yorkshire Police and Another ChD 9-Nov-2011
The claimant alleged infringement by the defendant of assorted intellectual property rights in its database. It provided systems for recovering materials deleted from Nokia mobile phones.
Held: ‘the present case is concerned with a collection . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Media, Intellectual Property

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.246860

Goulbourn v OHMI: ECFI 12 Mar 2003

Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community word mark Silk Cocoon – Earlier word mark COCOON – Proof of genuine use of earlier mark – Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Right to be heard.

Judges:

RM Moura Ramos, P

Citations:

T-174/01, [2003] EUECJ T-174/01

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Intellectual Property

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.180018

Van der Linden: ECJ 14 Mar 1996

ECJ (Judgment) Article 47(1) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, as amended by the Convention of 9 October 1978 on the Accession of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, is to be interpreted as meaning that, where the domestic procedural rules of the State in which application is made so permit, proof of service of the judgment delivered in the State of origin may be produced after the application has been made, in particular during the course of appeal proceedings subsequently brought by the party against whom enforcement is sought, provided that that party is given a reasonable period of time in which to satisfy the judgment voluntarily and that the party seeking enforcement bears all costs unnecessarily incurred.

Citations:

C-275/94, [1996] EUECJ C-275/94

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.161441

Regina v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte British Council of Turkish Cypriot Associations and Another: Admn 19 Mar 1998

The applicants sought judicial review of the respondent’s decision to support the application for admission to the Eurorpean Community of Cyprus.
Held: Leave was refused: ‘the independence of Cyprus since 17th August 1960 forecloses any power in the United Kingdom courts to entertain issues which do not merely touch upon but are inseparable from the constitutionality of events in Cyprus. That the facts amounting to the asserted want of constitutionality are not themselves contentious cannot be an answer because it is not the evidence but the adjudication which in such a situation violates comity.’

Judges:

Sedley J

Citations:

[1998] EWHC Admin 341, 112 ILR 735

Statutes:

Cyprus Act 1960 1

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedBuck v Attorney General CA 2-Jan-1965
By an action for declaratory relief, a challenge was offered to the validity of the Order in Council giving effect to the 1961 Act.
Held: The appeal failed. As a matter of international comity an English court should not grant declarations . .
CitedDuke of Brunswick v The King of Hanover HL 31-Jul-1948
The Duke claimed that the King of Hanover had been involved in the removal of the Duke from his position as reigning Duke and in the maladministration of his estates.
Held: ‘A foreign Sovereign, coming into this country cannot be made . .
CitedUnderhill v Hernandez 29-Nov-1897
(US Supreme Court) Underhill, a US citizen, had constructed a waterworks in Bolivar for the government which was eventually overthrown by revolutionary forces, one of whose generals was Hernandez. After Hernandez had captured Bolivar, Underhill . .
CitedButtes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) HL 1981
In a defamation action, issues arose as to two conflicting oil concessions which neighbouring states in the Arabian Gulf had granted over their territorial and offshore waters. The foreign relations of the United Kingdom and Iran were also involved . .
CitedDubai Bank Ltd v Galadari and Others (No 5) 25-Jun-1990
A British court can legitimately decide whether a foreign plaintiff company was lawfully incorporated. . .

Cited by:

CitedRegina (on the application of Abassi and Another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another CA 6-Nov-2002
A British national had been captured in Afghanistan, and was being held without remedy by US forces. His family sought an order requiring the respondent to take greater steps to secure his release or provide other assistance.
Held: Such an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Administrative

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.138462

Byrne (A Minor) v The Motor Insurers Bureau and Another: CA 22 May 2008

The claimant said that the rejection of his claim against the MIB was out ouf time under the MIB scheme, where, had the claim been against the driver, the claim would have succeeded.
Held: The Bureau’s appeal failed. European law imposed a duty to ensure that the scheme for compensating victims of uninsured drivers was no less generous than the scheme which applied as between insured drivers. The British scheme provided for a shorter limitation period for such claimas and accordingly was in breach of European law.

Judges:

Lord Justice Waller, Lord Justice Keene and Lord Justice Carnwath

Citations:

[2008] EWCA Civ 574, Times 02-Jul-2008

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983, Untraced Drivers Agreement 1972

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromByrne (A Minor) v The Motor Insurers Bureau, Secretary of State for Transport QBD 5-Jun-2007
The court was asked whether the UK provisions for the Motor Insurers bureau met the requirements of the European Directive.
Held: The UK had failed to implement the directive properly by imposing a three year limit on claims when no such . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Personal Injury, Road Traffic, European, Limitation

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.267968

Petersen v Arbeitsmarktservice Niederosterreich: ECJ 15 May 2008

ECJ (Opinion) Unemployment benefits and disability Union citizenship Scope of Articles 17 EC, 18 EC and 39 EC Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 Conditions for granting of an advance on the disability benefit an unemployed resident in another Member State

Judges:

Mr. Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer AG

Citations:

C-228/07, [2008] EUECJ C-228/07 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionPetersen v Arbeitsmarktservice Niederosterreich ECJ 11-Sep-2008
ECJ Social security Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 Article 4(1)(b) and (g), Article 10(1) and Article 69 Freedom of movement for persons Articles 39 EC and 42 EC Statutory pension and accident insurance scheme . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.267962

Oyarce v Cheshire County Council: CA 2 May 2008

The court was asked as to whether the provisions for the reversal of the burden of proof in discrimination cases was limited to findings of discrimination or extended also to issues of victimisation, and as to whether section 5A had properly incorporated the European Directive.
Held: The test in section 54A and in Igen v Wong does not apply to race victimisation claims. The Directive and the 1976 Act do not contain a single concept of discrimination which embraces direct and indirect discrimination on grounds of race or national origins and discrimination by way of victimisation. The legislation relating to race discrimination appears to differ from the legislation relating to sex discrimination and other forms of discrimination.
In victimisation claims based on discrimination, the statutory reversal of the burden of proof did not apply.

Judges:

Buxton LJ, Longmore LJ, Richards LJ

Citations:

[2008] EWCA Civ 434, [2008] ICR 1179, [2008] IRLR 653

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Race Relations Act 1976 54A, Directive 2000/43/EC on equal treatment of persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromOyarce v Cheshire County Council EAT 13-Jun-2007
EAT Victimisation
Burden of proof
Appeal – Perversity challenge on finding important for remedy.
Cross-Appeal – Did ET misdirect itself on burden of proof on victimisation claim.
As a . .
CitedCoote v Granada Hospitality Ltd ECJ 22-Sep-1998
coote_granadaECJ1998
The employer had refused to provide a reference after the claimant had left the company after making a sex discrimination claim. She said this was victimisation.
Held: The state has a duty to protect workers against retaliation after . .
CitedMunu v Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust and others EAT 5-Nov-2007
EAT Sex Discrimination – Victimisation / Inferring discrimination
Practice and Procedure
Application of s54A of the Race Relations Act 1976 to victimisation claims: Oyarce v Cheshire County Council . .
CitedNadine Paquay v Societe d’architectes Hoet + Minne SPRL (Social Policy) ECJ 11-Oct-2007
Europa Social policy ‘Protection of pregnant women’ Directive 92/85/EEC ‘Article 10’ Prohibition on dismissal from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave ‘Period of protection Decision to . .
CitedSt Helens Borough Council v Derbyshire and others HL 25-Apr-2007
The claimants were pursuing an action for equal pay. Several others settled their own actions, and the respondents then wrote direct to the claimants expressing their concern that the action ws being continued and its possible effects. The claimants . .
CitedGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust v Patel EAT 22-Jun-2007
EAT Unfair dismissal – Reinstatement/re-engagement
Practice and Procedure – Adequacy of Reasons
Claimant was a radiographer who became unable to do clinical work as a result of illness and was made . .
CitedAnyanwu and Another v South Bank Student Union and Another HL 24-May-2001
The university had imposed a new constitution on its students union, which resulted in the dismissal of the claimant. He sought to assert racial discrimination.
Held: The concept of ‘aiding’ somebody in committing discriminatory behaviour . .

Cited by:

CitedPothecary Witham Weld (A Firm) and Another v Bullimore and Another EAT 29-Mar-2010
EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION
SEX DISCRIMINATION – Burden of Proof
Ex-employee given unfavourable reference – Claim that terms of reference were partly on account of her having previously brought . .
CitedPricewaterhouse Coopers Llp v Popa EAT 12-Oct-2010
pwc_popaEAT10
EAT RACE DISCRIMINATION
Post employment
Burden of Proof
In determining a claim of post termination victimisation under the Race Relations Act 1976 the Employment Tribunal did not fail to consider . .
CitedFecitt and Others v NHS Manchester EAT 23-Nov-2010
EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosure
S.47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 provides that ‘A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Discrimination, European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.267403

Reynolds v Parliament: ECJ 8 Dec 2005

ECJ Officials – Secondment in-interest of the service – Article 38 of the Statute – Political group – Early termination of secondment – Rights of the defense – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Duty of care – Misuse of powers – Action for annulment – Action for damages – Partial annulment of-a judgment of the Court – res judicata

Citations:

[2005] EUECJ T-237/00

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.267161

Commission v Salzgitter (Ecsc): ECJ 22 Apr 2008

ECJ Appeal State aid Approval by the Commission on the basis of the EC Treaty Steel undertaking Articles 4(c) CS, 67 CS and 95 CS ECSC Treaty EC Treaty Steel Aid Codes Concomitant application Incompatibility of the aid Compulsory notification of aid granted Failure to notify the Commission Prolonged lack of reaction on the part of the Commission Recovery decision Principle of legal certainty Protection of legitimate expectations Rights of the defence Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based.

Citations:

C-408/04, [2008] EUECJ C-408/04

Links:

Bailii

European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.267102

Grunkin and Paul v Grunkin-Paul and Standesamt Stadt Niebull: ECJ 24 Apr 2008

ECJ (European Citizenship) Opinion Citizenship of the Union – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality Freedom of movement and residence – Personal names – Conflict of laws – Surname determined and subsequently changed in accordance with the law of the Member State of birth and habitual residence – Non-recognition by the Member State of nationality.

Judges:

Sharpston AG

Citations:

C-353/06, [2008] EUECJ C-353/06 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionGrunkin and Paul v Grunkin-Paul and Standesamt Stadt Niebull ECJ 14-Oct-2008
ECJ Judgment – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Private international law relating to surnames Applicable law determined by nationality alone – Minor child born and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Children

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.267103

Coop De France Betail and Viande v Commission: ECJ 17 Apr 2008

ECJ Appeal Competition Article 81(1) EC Cartel Beef and veal Suspension of imports Fixing of a union price scale Fines Determination of legal maximum of fine Article 15(2) of Regulation No 17 Taking into account of turnover of members of an association of undertakings.

Citations:

C-101/07, [2008] EUECJ C-101/07

Links:

Bailii

European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266974

Peek and Cloppenburg (Free Movement Of Goods): ECJ 17 Apr 2008

ECJ Copyright Directive 2001/29/EC Article 4(1) Distribution to the public by sale or otherwise of the original of a work or a copy thereof Use of reproductions of copyright-protected furniture as items of furniture exhibited in a sales area and in display windows No transfer of ownership or possession.

Citations:

C-456/06, [2008] EUECJ C-456/06

Links:

Bailii

European, Intellectual Property

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266976

Coop De France Betail and Viande v Commission C-110/07: ECJ 17 Apr 2008

ECJ Appeal Competition Article 81(1) EC Cartel Beef and veal Suspension of imports Fixing of a union price scale Fines Determination of legal maximum of fine Article 15(2) of Regulation No 17 Taking into account of turnover of members of an association of undertakings.

Citations:

C-110/07, [2008] EUECJ C-110/07 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionCoop De France Betail and Viande v Commission C-110/07 ECJ 18-Dec-2008
ECJ Appeals – Competition – Market in beef and veal – Agreement between national federations of farmers and slaughterers with the object of suspending imports of beef and veal and fixing a minimum purchase price . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266975

Heinrich (Law Governing The Institutions): ECJ 10 Apr 2008

ECJ Annex to a regulation not published in the Official Journal – Access to documents – Articles 2(3) and 3(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Article 254 EC.

Citations:

C-345/06, [2008] EUECJ C-345/06

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

See AlsoGottfried Heinrich ECJ 10-Mar-2009
(Grand Chamber) The claimant had been refused entry onto an airplane on the basis that he had in his cabin baggage a prohibited article, namely a tennis racquet. He said that the regulation was not binding because the annex on which the racquet was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266943

Adidas Ag (Approximation of Laws): ECJ 10 Apr 2008

ECJ Trade marks Articles 5(1)(b), 5(2) and 6(1)(b) of Directive 89/104/EEC Requirement of availability Three-stripe figurative marks Two-stripe motifs used by competitors as decoration Complaint alleging infringement and dilution of the mark.

Citations:

C-102/07, [2008] EUECJ C-102/07

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 89/104/EEC 5(1)(b) 5(2) 6(1)(b)

European, Intellectual Property

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266937

Citigroup and Citibank v OHMI- Citi (Citi): ECFI 16 Apr 2008

ECJ Community trade mark Opposition proceedings Application for the Community figurative trade mark CITI Earlier Community word mark CITIBANK Relative ground for refusal Reputation Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94).

Citations:

T-181/05, [2008] EUECJ T-181/05

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation (EC) No 40/94) 8(5)

European, Intellectual Property

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266939

Evropaki Dynamiki v Commission: ECFI 12 Mar 2008

ECJ Law Relating To Undertakings – Public service contracts – Community tendering procedure Provision of services for the development and provision of services in support of the Community Research and Development Service (CORDIS) – Rejection of a tender – Principles of equal treatment as between tenderers and transparency.

Citations:

T-345/03, [2008] EUECJ T-345/03

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266428

Huber v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (European Citizenship): ECJ 3 Apr 2008

ECJ An Austrian businessman who had moved to Germany complained that storing data relating to him in a central register of foreign nationals discriminated against him as there was no such database for German nationals. Advocate General Poiares Maduro pointed out that: ‘The concept of necessity has a long history in Community law and is well established as part of the proportionality test. It means that the authority adopting a measure which interferes with a right protected by Community law in order to achieve a legitimate aim must demonstrate that the measure is the least restrictive for the achievement of this aim.’ If the processing might be liable to infringe the fundamental right to privacy, article 8 became relevant, and the Court had held in the Austrian Radio case that if a national measure was incompatible with article 8, then it also failed to pass the threshold of article 7(e) of the Directive (para AG27). The European Court of Justice did not refer to this paragraph in its judgment and contented itself with saying that ‘the concept of necessity laid down by article 7(e) of Directive 95/46 . . cannot have a meaning which varies between member states. It therefore follows that what is at issue is a concept which has its own independent meaning in Community law and which must be interpreted in a manner which fully reflects the objective of that directive, as laid down in article 1(1) thereof.’
The central register would only comply with article 7(e) if it contained only the data necessary for the authorities to apply the law relating to rights of residence and its centralised nature enabled that legislation to be more effectively applied.

Judges:

Poiares Maduro AG

Citations:

C-524/06, [2008] EUECJ C-524/06, [2009] 1 CMLR 1360

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights 8

Cited by:

CitedSouth Lanarkshire Council v The Scottish Information Commissioner SC 29-Jul-2013
Commissioner’s Approach not in Breach
In May 2010, a Mr Irvine made requests under the 2002 Act for information from South Lanarkshire Council. He wanted to know how many of their employees in a particular post were placed at 10 particular points on the Council’s pay scales. His . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Information

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266448

ATI EAC and Others (Law Relating To Undertakings): ECJ 24 Nov 2005

ECJ Public service contracts – Directives 92/50/EEC and 93/38/EEC – Award criteria – The economically most advantageous tender – Observance of award criteria set out in the contract documents or the contract notice – Establishment of subheadings for one of the award criteria in the contract documents or the contract notice – Decision to apply weighting – Principles of equal treatment of tenderers and transparency.

Citations:

C-331/04, [2005] EUECJ C-331/04

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.235301

Cooper and others v Pure Fishing (UK) Ltd: CA 18 Mar 2004

Citations:

[2004] EWCA Civ 375

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents 17

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedMoore v Piretta Pta Ltd QBD 11-May-1998
M had a series of agency contracts selling women’s clothing. The last contract was in 1994, and on termination, M claimed an indemnity under the contract which itself applied the regulations. Reg 17(3) gave an indemnity for new customers, where the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Agency, European

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.195103

Bank Mellat v Council (Appeal – Strengthening of Restrictive Measures v The Islamic Republic of Iran – Opinion): ECJ 30 May 2018

Appeal – Strengthening of restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Sector-specific measures – Admissibility – Commencement of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in the course of proceedings before the General Court of the European Union – Effect on interest in bringing appeal proceedings – Effect on continuation of interest in bringing proceedings before the General Court – No need to adjudicate – Article 275 TFEU – Jurisdiction of the General Court in Common Foreign and Security Policy matters (CFSP) – Concept of ‘restrictive measures against natural or legal persons’ – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Concept of ‘implementing measures’ – Article 215 TFEU – Concept of necessity – Principle of proportionality – General principles of EU law

Citations:

C-430/16, [2018] EUECJ C-430/16P – O, ECLI:EU:C:2018:345

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

OpinionBank Mellat v Council (Appeal – Strengthening of Restrictive Measures v The Islamic Republic of Iran) ECJ 6-Sep-2018
Appeal – Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Combating of nuclear proliferation – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Sector-specific measures – Restrictions on transfers of funds involving Iranian financial . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Banking

Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.616919

Gauweiler And Others v Deutscher Bundestag: ECJ 16 Jun 2015

ECJ Judgment – Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic and monetary policy – Decisions of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) on a number of technical features regarding the Eurosystem’s outright monetary transactions in secondary sovereign bond markets – Articles 119 TFEU and 127 TFEU – Powers conferred on the ECB and the European System of Central Banks – Monetary policy transmission mechanism – Maintenance of price stability – Proportionality – Article 123 TFEU – Prohibition of monetary financing of Member States in the euro area

Citations:

C-62/14, [2015] EUECJ C-62/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:400

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

CitedWightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union ECJ 10-Dec-2018
Art 50 Notice withrawable unilaterally
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Notification by a Member State of its intention to withdraw from the European Union – Consequences of the notification – Right of unilateral revocation of the notification – Conditions
The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Banking

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.549055

Research In Motion UK Ltd v Visto Corporation: CA 6 Mar 2008

Article 28: ‘requires an assessment of the degree of connection, and then a value judgment as to the expediency of hearing the two actions together (assuming they could be so heard) in order to avoid the risk of inconsistent judgments. It does not say that any possibility of inconsistent judgments means that they are inevitably related. It seems to us that the Article leaves it open to a court to acknowledge a connection, or a risk of inconsistent judgments, but to say that the connection is not sufficiently close, or the risk is not sufficiently great, to make the actions related for the purposes of the Article. Mechanics do not, for once, provide a complete answer.’

Judges:

Mummery, Jacob LJJ, Mann J

Citations:

[2008] EWCA Civ 153, [2008] FSR 20, [2008] Bus LR D141

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation 44/2001 28

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedTelevision Autonomica Valenciana, Sa v Imagina Contenidos Audiovisuales, Sl ChD 8-Feb-2013
The defendant sought a stay of these proceedings pending the outcome of related proceedings in Spain. The claimant sought a declaration that a contract was terminated and damages for such breach. The Spanish proceedings were first in time.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Costs, Intellectual Property, European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.266102

Kempter (Area of Freedom, Security and Justice): ECJ 12 Feb 2008

ECJ Export of cattle – Export refunds – Final administrative decision – Interpretation of a judgment of the Court – Effect of a preliminary ruling given by the Court after that decision – Review and withdrawal – Time-limits – Legal certainty – Principle of cooperation – Article 10 EC

Citations:

C-2/06, [2008] EUECJ C-2/06

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Animals

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.264464

BUPA and Others v Commission: ECFI 12 Feb 2008

ECJ State aid – Risk equalisation scheme introduced by Ireland on the private medical insurance market – Aid system Services of general economic interest Article 86(2) EC Commission decision not to raise objections – Action for annulment Admissibility Principles of necessity and proportionality.

Citations:

T-289/03, [2008] EUECJ T-289/03, [2008] ECR II-81, [2009] 2 CMLR 41

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.264463

Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc and Another: CA 31 Jan 2008

The validity of a patent was challenged at the same time in both UK and European courts. Mummery LJ discussed the inherent consequences of a race between the jurisdictions: ‘the possibility of the duplication of proceedings contesting the validity of a patent granted by the EPO is inherent in the system established by the Convention. In practice national courts exercise exclusive jurisdiction on infringement issues and they have concurrent jurisdiction with the EPO on validity issues. As Mr Daniel Alexander appearing for the claimant said, the contracting states and the UK Parliament contemplated that the national patents courts should be able to determine the same issues of patentability as the EPO. The resultant legislation allowed the determination by the national court and the EPO at the same time. Indeed, there is nothing in the Convention or the 1977 Act to prevent the commencement of revocation proceedings in the Patents Court on the very date of the grant of the patent by the EPO.’

Judges:

Ward, Mummery, Jacob LJJ

Citations:

[2008] EWCA Civ 23, [2008] Bus LR 888

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromGlaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc and Another PatC 15-Jun-2007
So far as patents are concerned, there is a rebuttable presumption in favour of staying English proceedings over EPO proceedings. This was an issue which might deserve consideration by the Court of Appeal. . .

Cited by:

CitedVirgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd SC 3-Jul-2013
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd sought to recover damages exceeding 49,000,000 pounds for the infringement of a European Patent which did not exist in the form said to have been infringed. The Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property, European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.264037

Lianakis and Others v Alexandroupolis and Others (Law Relating To Undertakings): ECJ 24 Jan 2008

ECJ Directive 92/50/EEC Public service contracts Carrying out of a project in respect of the cadastre, town plan and implementing measure for a residential area Criteria which may be accepted as ‘criteria for qualitative selection’ or ‘award criteria’ Economically most advantageous tender Compliance with the award criteria set out in the contract documents or contract notice Subsequent determination of weighting factors and sub-criteria in respect of the award criteria referred to in the contract documents or contract notice Principle of equal treatment of economic operators and obligation of transparency.

Citations:

C-532/06, [2008] EUECJ C-532/06

Links:

Bailii

European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.264002

Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission (Free Movement Of Capital): ECJ 23 Jan 2008

Opinion – The appellant in the present proceedings has been designated by the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council as an entity suspected of supporting terrorism, of which the funds and other financial resources are to be frozen. Before the Court of First Instance, the appellant challenged the lawfulness of the regulation by which the Council has implemented the freezing order in the Community.

Judges:

Poiares Maduro AG

Citations:

C-415/05, [2008] EUECJ C-415/05 – O

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

OpinionAl Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission (Free Movement Of Capital) ECJ 3-Sep-2008
ECJ Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) Restrictive measures taken against persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban United Nations Security Council . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.263998

Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (Social Policy): ECJ 24 Jan 2008

ECJ Directive 2003/88/EC working time arrangements Article 7 Right to paid annual leave minimal right of the compensatory leave not taken Fundamental social rights in Community law Loss of entitlement to the expiration of the time prescribed by law

Citations:

C-350/06, [2008] EUECJ C-350/06 – O

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 2003/88/EC

Cited by:

OpinionStringer and Others v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs; Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund ECJ 20-Jan-2009
(Grand Chamber) Several employees claimed that having been absent from work sick, they were entitled to carry forward their unused holiday entitlements, or if a former worker, to pay in lieu under the Working Time directive.
Held: The workers . .
See AlsoStringer and Others v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs; Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund ECJ 20-Jan-2009
(Grand Chamber) Several employees claimed that having been absent from work sick, they were entitled to carry forward their unused holiday entitlements, or if a former worker, to pay in lieu under the Working Time directive.
Held: The workers . .
CitedRevenue and Customs v Stringer, Ainsworth and Others HL 10-Jun-2009
In each case, the employee had retired after long term sickness. The Employment tribunal had upheld their ability to claim arrears of sickness pay arising under the 1998 Regulations, as an unlawful deduction from their wages. They now appealed . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Employment

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.264004

N v Lammers and Van Cleeff (Free Movement of Capital): ECJ 17 Jan 2008

ECJ Freedom of establishment – Free movement of capital Tax legislation – Corporation tax Interest paid by a subsidiary on funds lent by the parent company established in another Member State – Reclassification of the interest as taxable dividends – No such reclassification where interest payments are made to a resident company.

Citations:

C-105/07, [2008] EUECJ C-105/07

Links:

Bailii

European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.263963

Chevassus-Marche v Groupe Danone (Approximation of Laws): ECJ 17 Jan 2008

ECJ Approximation of laws – Directive 86/653/EEC – Self-employed commercial agents – Right of an agent entrusted with a specific geographical area to a commission – Transactions concluded without any action on the part of the principal.

Citations:

C-19/07, [2008] EUECJ C-19/07

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Directive 86/653/EEC

European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.263959

CP-Pharma (Agriculture): ECJ 16 Jan 2008

ECJ Preliminary reference Validity of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1873/2003 Veterinary medicinal products Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 Maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin Progesterone Restriction of the use of progesterone Council Directive 96/22/EC

Citations:

C-448/06, [2008] EUECJ C-448/06

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation (EC) No 1873/2003, Directive 96/22/EC

European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.263961

Velasco Navarro (Social Policy): ECJ 17 Jan 2008

ECJ Social policy Protection of workers in the event of insolvency of their employer Directive 80/987/EEC amended by Directive 2002/74/EC Direct effect Compensation for unfair dismissal agreed under a judicial conciliation settlement Payment guaranteed by the guarantee institution Payment conditional upon the adoption of a judicial decision.

Judges:

K. Lenaerts, P

Citations:

C-246/06, [2008] EUECJ C-246/06

Links:

Bailii

European, Employment, Insolvency

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.263964

Parti Ecologiste “Les Verts” v European Parliament C-296/83: ECJ 26 Sep 1984

(Order) Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Action against acts which are part of the budgetary procedure.

Citations:

C-296/83, [1984] EUECJ C-296/83

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Citing:

See AlsoParti Ecologiste Les Verts v Parliament C-295/83 ECJ 26-Sep-1984
(Order) Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Action against acts which are part of the budgetary procedure. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.133787