British Broadcasting Corporation v Harpercollins Publishers Ltd and Another: ChD 4 Oct 2010

The claimant sought an injunction and damages to prevent the defendant publishing a book identifying himself as ‘the Stig’ saying that this broke his undertaking of confidentialty as to his identity, a necessary part of the character in the TV programme Top Gear.
Held: The claimant was refused an injunction. The driver had worked for the BBC through a service company. The signatures had been given by him in his capacity as the service company, and he was not personally bound to confidentiality by the contract. Nevertheless he was bound, as was accepted, but also beyond the term of any series in which he appeared was first broadcast.
At the same time there had come to be substantial press and internet speculation as to his identity to the point where no continued confidence could exist, and also the service companies published accounts which sufficiently identified him as the Stig. The material went beyond speculation to statements as to his identity, and the identification had been made. Any confidence was now lost.

Morgan J
[2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch), HC10C02684, [2011] EMLR 6
Bailii
Human Rights Act 1998 12
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedTerrapin v Builders Supply Co (Hayes) ChD 1967
The defendants made up prefabricated portable buildings to the plaintiffs’ design, provided to them only for this purpose. When the contract ended, the defendants then offered their own prefabricated buildings using much of the material, including . .
CitedVestergaard Frandsen A/S and Others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and Others ChD 26-Jun-2009
Arnold J reviewed the authorities and expressed his conclusion that an injunction will not be granted to prevent a future publication of information that has ceased to be confidential. He qualified this statement in relation to information that . .
CitedAmerican Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd HL 5-Feb-1975
Interim Injunctions in Patents Cases
The plaintiffs brought proceedings for infringement of their patent. The proceedings were defended. The plaintiffs obtained an interim injunction to prevent the defendants infringing their patent, but they now appealed its discharge by the Court of . .
CitedSchering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd CA 1982
The Defendants’ professional skills were engaged to present the plaintiff company in a good light, and an injunction was granted to restrain them from doing the opposite. Sach LJ said: ‘even in the commercial field, ethics and good faith are not to . .
CitedCream Holdings Limited and others v Banerjee and others HL 14-Oct-2004
On her dismissal from the claimant company, Ms Banerjee took confidential papers revealing misconduct to the local newspaper, which published some. The claimant sought an injunction to prevent any further publication. The defendants argued that the . .
CitedSchering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd CA 1982
The Defendants’ professional skills were engaged to present the plaintiff company in a good light, and an injunction was granted to restrain them from doing the opposite. Sach LJ said: ‘even in the commercial field, ethics and good faith are not to . .
CitedAttorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (‘Spycatcher’) HL 13-Oct-1988
Loss of Confidentiality Protection – public domain
A retired secret service employee sought to publish his memoirs from Australia. The British government sought to restrain publication there, and the defendants sought to report those proceedings, which would involve publication of the allegations . .
CitedRoger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis CA 1987
The plaintiffs sought various remedies against an ex-employee who had set up a company in competition with the plaintiffs. One was for breach of confidence in respect of a card index of customer contacts, a copy of which the first defendant had . .
CitedUniversal Thermosensors Ltd v Hibben and Others ChD 8-Jul-1992
After complex litigation, the remaining issues were a claim for damages by the claimant in respect of the defendant’s misuse of confidential information and a counterclaim by the defendants for loss falling within the claimant’s cross-undertaking in . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract, Media, Employment, Intellectual Property

Updated: 11 November 2021; Ref: scu.424853