The parties had agreed for the supply of automotive parts by the defendant to the claimant under a sole supply arrangement. None were in fact ordered for the first few years. The manufacturer then changed its design and made a new arrangement with a third party. The claimant sought compensation and higher prices for its investment, threatening to withdraw supplies entirely. The defendant agreed under protest, but now claimed duress.
David Donaldson QC
[2007] EWHC 3205 (QB), [2008] Bus LR D55
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – DSND Subsea Ltd v Petroleum Geo Services Asa TCC 28-Jul-2000
Dyson J set out the principles applicable in establishing a pleading of commercial duress:
(i) Economic pressure can amount to duress, provided it may be characterised as illegitimate and has constituted a ‘but for’ cause inducing the claimant . .
Cited – Williams v Roffey Brothers and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd CA 23-Nov-1989
The defendant subcontracted some of its work under a building contract to the plaintiff at a price which left him in financial difficulty and there was a risk that the work would not be completed by the plaintiff. The defendant agreed to make . .
Cited – Dimskal Shipping Co SA v International Transport Workers Federation (‘The Evia Luck’) HL 1991
The Plaintiff shipowners had been induced by industrial action against a vessel in Sweden, which actions would be lawful under Swedish law, to undertake to enter into written agreements with the ITF under which, inter alia, more generous agreements . .
Mentioned – Carillion Construction Ltd v Felix (UK) Ltd 2001
. .
Cited by:
Cited – Progress Bulk Carriers Ltd v Tube City IMS Llc ComC 17-Feb-2012
The claimant sought to set aside an arbitration saying that the arbitrator had misapplied the test for economic duress. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 26 January 2022; Ref: scu.266629
