LT Section 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 – Jurisdiction – whether covenant negative or positive – Alterations covenant within Section Citations: [2004] EWLands LP – 34 – 2002 Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 84(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 21 August 2022; Ref: scu.225785
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – restriction to two detached bungalows not exceeding one storey in height – application to modify the restriction so as to permit the retention and completion of a partly constructed first floor extension on the sole property occupying the site – whether practical benefits of substantial value or advantage secured by the restriction … Continue reading Coles and Another, Re Law of Property Act 1925: LT 4 Oct 2004
LT RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – restriction requiring construction to conform to building line – application to amend this limitation to permit erection of one house in garden at rear of existing house – whether erection of garages and sheds breaches covenant requiring dwellinghouse use only – whether any such breach amounts to acquiescence in further breaches … Continue reading Camstead Ltd, Re Law of Property Act 1925: LT 18 Oct 2004
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – discharge – house – restriction on use to private dwellinghouse or learned or artistic profession – whether restriction obsolete – Law of Property Act 1925, s84(1)(a). Citations: [2004] EWLands LP – 51 – 2003 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 13 August 2022; Ref: scu.225826
A covenant prevented new building other than for a garage. The owner proposed a three-car garage extension, but with a play-room above, for the applicant’s own use. The relevant property of the objector was not her own house, but consisted of a driveway, and a plot of land on which she hoped to be allowed … Continue reading Skupinski, Re Law of Property Act 1925: LT 30 Nov 2004
LT RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – modification – discharge – restriction limiting development on plot to one dwellinghouse – application to amend to permit dormer bungalow in rear garden – no interference with objectors’ amenities – change in character of estate as some areas developed to greater density – many covenants on estate no longer enforceable – … Continue reading Felton Homes Ltd, Re Law of Property Act 1925: LT 2 Dec 2004
LT RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – restriction to single dwellinghouse and against use causing nuisance, etc to owner of adjoining properties – extent of neighbourhood – whether covenant obsolete – application refused – Law of Property Act 1925, s84(1)(a) Judges: N J Rose FRICS Citations: [2003] EWLands LP – 45 – 2002 Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of … Continue reading Harrold and Another, Re Law of Property Act 1925: LT 27 Oct 2003
LT RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – restriction requiring paddock to remain undeveloped – application to discharge or modify this restriction so as to permit development with five houses – whether use of restriction as a bargaining tool relevant to para (a) – whether practical benefits of substantial value or advantage secured by restriction – application for modification … Continue reading Broomhead and Others, Re Law of Property Act 1925: LT 13 Mar 2003
Vendor and purchaser summons under section 49 of the Law of Property Act 1925 Judges: Morgan J Citations: [2020] EWHC 1711 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 49 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land, Contract Updated: 09 December 2022; Ref: scu.652232
The landlord served a section 146 notice and the tenant served a counternotice under the 1938 Act. The landlord sought leave to forfeit the lease. Held: Leave was given under ground (e) to forfeit the lease of a public house which had closed for business in 1998 and then had been vandalised and finally destroyed … Continue reading Landmaster Properties Limited v Thackeray Property Services Limited: 2003
The land-owners applied for a variation of a restrictive covenant to allow them to put a second house on their plot. They had bought out the right of the original builder, but a neighbour also had the benefit of the covenant. They now appealed the nil compensation awarded. Held: ‘it is perhaps difficult, as a … Continue reading Winter and Another v Traditional and Contemporary Contracts Ltd: CA 7 Nov 2007
Objecting neighbours appealed against a decision allowing a variation of a restrictive covenant to allow the owner to convert a dwellinghouse into two self-contained apartments. Held: The appeal failed. The power in the 1985 Act to vary a covenant must be used judicially, and ‘the statute does not create any presumption in favour of the … Continue reading Lawntown Ltd v Camenzuli and Another: CA 10 Oct 2007
A breach of the covenant either against subletting or against assignment are uniquely not a breach capable of remedy, and the lease was subject to forfeiture. Citations: [1974] QB 575 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 146 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Akici v LR Butlin Ltd CA 2-Nov-2005 The tenant appealed … Continue reading Scala House and District Property Co Ltd v Forbes: CA 1974
Tenants occupied land next to land which was to be developed after compulsory acquisition. The tenants and the landlords asserted a right of light over the land, and sought an injunction to prevent the development. The developer denied that any right of light had been acquired. The sky contour diagrams projected that the reductions in … Continue reading Midtown Ltd v City of London Real Property Company Ltd: ChD 20 Jan 2005
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – modification – covenants restricting development, use and density to three detached private dwellings – modification sought to permit 83-bed care home – application dismissed – grounds (aa) and (c), s.84(1), Law of Property Act 1925 Citations: [2019] UKUT 70 (LC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 14 June 2022; Ref: … Continue reading Signature of St Albans (Property) Guernsey Ltd v Wragg and Others: UTLC 4 Mar 2019
Restrictive Covenant – Modification : Costs – – garden land with planning consent for additional residential dwelling – restriction preventing construction of more than one house per plot – building scheme – whether covenant secures practical benefits of substantial value or advantage – held it did not – exercise of discretion – application under ground … Continue reading Drummond and Another v Bastow and Others Re Cedar Lawn: UTLC 9 Mar 2018
The Court considered the effect of a note or memorandum evidencing the sale of a property where it was described as ‘6,8 and 41, Boundary Street, Shoreditch (freehold).’ It was sought to connect the signature on a purchaser’s deposit cheque with an unsigned memorandum that stated the terms of the contract. Held: Jenkins LJ said: … Continue reading Timmins v Moreland Street Property Co Ltd: CA 1958
The district auditor for Poplar Council had surcharged council members for making payments of a minimum wage of andpound;4 a week to their lowest grade of workers. This was notwithstanding that the cost of living had fallen during the year from 176% to 82% above its pre-First World War level. The council was motivated by … Continue reading Roberts v Hopwood: HL 1925
The court considered a proviso for re-entry that: ‘forfeiture on the bankruptcy of the lessee is considered as a case of breach of condition.’ Held: It was clearly a condition rather than a mere covenant of the original protected tenancy that the tenant should not become a bankrupt and this condition had been broken by … Continue reading Halliard Property Co Ltd v Jack Segal Ltd: 1978
The landlord claimed possession of a dwelling house let on a weekly tenancy, saying the tenant had been convicted of using the premises for an unlawful purpose. The tenant had been convicted of handling stolen goods by receiving them at the premises. He submitted that the section should be interpreted as applying only to convictions … Continue reading Schneiders and Sons Ltd v Abrahams: 1925
Section 136 by its terms preserves the equitable rule that the debtor can rely on any rights of set-off which arose before he had notice of assignment . Citations: [1988] 1WLR 150 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 136 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Edlington Properties Limited v J H Fenner and … Continue reading Pfeiffer GmbH v Arbuthnot Factors Limited: 1988
A ‘subject to contract’ document might be evidence of an antecedent or oral contract and satisfy section 40 of the Law of Property Act 1925 if the stipulation was later waived. A memorandum or note must, if it is to be effective, not only state the terms of the contract but also contain an acknowledgement … Continue reading Law v Jones: 1974
The lease provided for re-entry for breach of covenant. The landlord served a notice requiring repairs and payment of compensation on both the tenant and the mortgagee. The mortgagees served a counter-notice, and the landlord proceeded against the tenant alone. The tenant argued that the counter-notice operated to trigger the requirement for proceedings to begin … Continue reading Church Commissioners for England v Ve-Ri-Best Manfacturing Co Ltd: 1956
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – Discharge – pub on housing estate – restriction on use to hotelier and licensed victualler – objectors seeking to keep pub open – possibility of pub closing – held that the restriction does not secure practical benefits to the objectors – Tribunal’s discretion to modify – application allowed – Law of Property … Continue reading James Hall and Company (Property) Ltd v Maughan and Others, Re The Aclet (Restrictive Covenants): UTLC 8 Jun 2017
UTLC RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – Law of Property Act 1925 section 84 — whether persons appearing entitled to benefit of restrictive covenant so as to be admitted to oppose application to discharge it – section 84(3A) [2016] UKUT 513 (LC) Bailii Law of Property Act 1925 84 England and Wales Land Updated: 26 January 2022; Ref: … Continue reading James Hall and Company (Property) Ltd v Maughan and Others: UTLC 14 Nov 2016
UTTC Rentcharges – leases created pursuant to section 121(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925 – registration – mortgage by demise [2016] UKUT 395 (TCC) Bailii Law of Property Act 1925 121(4) England and Wales Registered Land Updated: 24 January 2022; Ref: scu.570424
To defeat a defence of adverse possession, the plaintiff must succeed in an action which itself had been commenced within the twelve year period. A squatter does not succeed to the title that he has disturbed: by sufficiently long adverse possession he obtains a title of his own, but ‘his possession only defeats the rights … Continue reading St Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Fairweather: HL 16 Apr 1962
The parties disputed whether good title had been shown when an assent under seal had been used where a conveyance ordinarily should have been used. Held: Good title had been shown. Though the law is concerned with substance rather than form, it would not be consistent with the orderly development of the common law if … Continue reading Re Stirrup’s Contract: 1961
The parties entered into a written contract for the sale of land which, in error, provided for completion on a Sunday. The parties varied the date to the Friday but did not execute a new contract which would comply with section 2(1) of the 1989 Act. Time was not initially of the essence of the … Continue reading McCausland and Another v Duncan Lawrie Ltd and Another: CA 18 Jun 1996
A colliery manager asked for police protection for his colliery during a strike. He wanted police officers to be billeted on the premises. The senior police officer for the area was willing to provide protection by a mobile force, but he refused to . .
LRA Easements – right of way by foot alleged over adjoining owners’ land – land previously in common ownership – absence of an express grant in the conveyance – implied grant under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows . .
Regarding service of notices on the Public Trustee under Administration of Estates Act 1925. . .
To defeat a defence of adverse possession, the plaintiff must succeed in an action which itself had been commenced within the twelve year period. A squatter does not succeed to the title that he has disturbed: by sufficiently long adverse possession . .
References: [2016] UKUT 395 (TCC) Links: Bailii Ratio: UTTC Rentcharges – leases created pursuant to section 121(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925 – registration – mortgage by demise Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 121(4) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Last Update: 27-Oct-16 Ref: 570424
1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts
The rent review notice was sent by recorded delivery, and received and signed for at the demised premises. The lease incorporated the statutory presumption as to service in section 196(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925.
Held: The Court . .
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – DISCHARGE – OBSOLETENESS – Law of Property Act 1925, s. 84(1)(a) – Restriction against building or alterations without prior approval of plans and specifications by the vendors’ surveyor – Whether covenant obsolete following . .
application by Pt 8 claim seeking a vesting order under section 181 of the Law of Property Act 1925. Citations: [2021] EWHC 941 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 181 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 20 December 2022; Ref: scu.662210
The knowledge of a solicitor, acting for both the borrower and the lender, of the lay clients intentions as regards the future use of the loan, is not to be imputed to the lender, even though the solicitor acts for both parties, and is the lender’s agent.Morritt LJ discussed section 199: ‘Counsel for the wife … Continue reading Halifax Mortgage Services Ltd (Formerly BNP Mortgages Ltd) v Stepsky and Another: CA 1 Dec 1995
The court discussed the duty of trustees to sell in the absence of unanimity: ‘The trust for sale will prevail, unless all three trustees agree in exercising the power to postpone.’ Judges: Simonds, J Citations: [1943] Ch 302 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 30 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Jones v … Continue reading In re Mayo: ChD 1943
Restrictive Covenants : Modification – house on 1980’s estate – planning permission to demolish garage and build second house on plot – parties agreeing no injury under ground (c) – assessment of sum to reflect diminution in price originally paid because of inclusion of restrictions – sub-para (ii) of Section 84(1) of Law of Property … Continue reading Sheppard v Grant and Others: UTLC 12 Jun 2020
Even an unlawful sub-tenancy can have protection under Part II of the 1954 Act. The court described as fallacious the submission that section 74(1) does not extend to or answer the question whether the document has ever been delivered, saying: ‘The section says that the document is to be deemed to have been duly executed … Continue reading D’Silva v Lister House Development Ltd: 1970
A tenant may apply to the court for relief immediately he receives the landlord’s section 146 notice. Citations: (1977) 3 P and CR 112 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 146 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Landlord and Tenant Updated: 05 December 2022; Ref: scu.245837
Property was offered for sale by tender. The tender documents contained all the detailed terms upon which the contract was to be based. The successful tender was accepted by letter, but by mistake the secretary who typed it typed in the words ‘subject to contract’ at the bottom. The purchaser had refused to complete after … Continue reading Michael Richards Properties Ltd v Corporation of Wardens of St Saviour’s Parish Southwark: 1975
The court was asked as to the nature and effect of tenancies for life granted by fully mutual housing co-operatives and in particular how they can lawfully be brought to an end and a possession order obtained. The tenants sought a declaration of incompatibility in respect of section 80. The Co-operative was fully mutual and … Continue reading Southward Housing Co-Operative Ltd v Walker and Another: ChD 8 Jun 2015
In about 1930 a house, no 16, one of two adjacent houses in common ownership was rebuilt. One wall was built close against the adjacent no. 14. Thirty years later no. 14 was demolished by its later owner, the Defendant, leaving the adjoining wall of no.16, which was rough and unpointed, exposed to the weather. … Continue reading Phipps v Pears and others: CA 10 Mar 1964
The parties, a married couple disputed the shares in which the matrimonial home, formerly held by them as joint tenants would be held after severance o that joint tenancy. Held: The wife was entitled to a half share in the property.Russell LJ considered that the court had no jurisdiction under section 17 of the 1882 … Continue reading Bedson v Bedson: CA 1965
The Borough’s tenant had died. His wife and daughter had lived with him, but the mother not for long enough to succeed to his tenancy. The daughter (aged thirteen) claimed to have done so having lived with him for three years. Held: The 1985 Act did not limit its effects to adults. A minor may … Continue reading Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames v Prince and Another: CA 2 Dec 1998
The consideration for the grant of a lease was not a capital sum, but substantial building works. Application was made for its forfeiture. Held: Dillon LJ assumed that the words ‘if the tenant shall enter into liquidation whether compulsorily or voluntarily’ in a re-entry clause in a lease refer to the making of the winding … Continue reading Official Custodian for Charities v Parway Estates Developments (In Liquidation): CA 1985
‘A deed, whether executed by a corporation or by an individual, does not necessarily bind the grantor as soon as it is sealed. It only becomes binding when it has been ‘delivered’ by the grantor as his deed, i.e., when the grantor has indicated by words or conduct that he intends the deed which he … Continue reading Windsor Refrigerator Co Ltd v Branch Nominees: 1961
The appellant had agreed to take leases on a development of the defendant, hoping to sell the apartments on at a profit. After difficulties, the appellant refused to complete, and the defendant forfeited the deposits. Held: Eyestorm’s appeal was dismissed. It had failed to show the breach of the contract by the defendant. Judges: Tuckey … Continue reading Eyestorm Ltd v Hoptonacre Homes Ltd: CA 19 Dec 2007
The court considered the significance of a reservation that a letter was sent ‘subject to licence’. After considering case law: ‘All three go to show that there is a distinction recognised by the law between the relationships, such as those between landlord and tenant, where there is an existing set of legal obligations between the … Continue reading Venetian Glass Gallery Ltd v Next Properties Ltd.: 1989
A notice of an assignment of a debt need not state the date of the assignment. Citations: [1969] 1 QB 607 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 136 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – W F Harrison and Co v Burke 1956 If a notice of assignment of a debt describes the assignment by … Continue reading Van Lynn Developments Ltd v Pelvis Construction Co Ltd: 1969
The applicants had agreed with the planning authority under section 37 of the 1962 Act that part of their land would be used only as a private open space. They later sought planning consent to build a house. The consent was granted on appeal to the Secretary of State. When the authority still refused to … Continue reading Re Martin and Another’s Application: CA 10 May 1988
The landlord served a section 146 notice for breach of a repairing covenant. The lease had been assigned. Held: The notice should be served on the assignee. Citations: [1958] 1 QB 332 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 146 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Old Grovebury Manor Farm Ltd v W Seymour … Continue reading Kanda v Church Commisioners for England: 1958
Landlord and Tenant – Service Charges – Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, s. 27A – Landlord’s legal costs of proceedings before Upper Tribunal under Law of Property Act 1925, s. 84 – Whether landlord’s contractual entitlement to recover such costs under service charge provisions of chalet leases on holiday park precluded by consent order agreed … Continue reading Shearbarn Holiday Park Ltd v Wornell and Others: UTLC 27 Apr 2021
Appeal, by way of case stated, from a decision of the Lands Tribunal refusing to order the discharge of certain restrictions affecting land of which the appellant, the University of Westminster, is the freehold owner. Judges: Swinton Thomas, Waller, Chadwick LJJ Citations: [1998] 3 All ER 1014, [1998] EWCA Civ 1215 Links: Bailii Statutes: Law … Continue reading In the Matter of University of Westminster: CA 15 Jul 1998
The tenant served by recorded delivery a counter-notice. On the day it was first delivered, nobody was available to sign for it. The landlord claimed it was out of date. Held: The statutory fiction was just that. A letter was deemed to be served on the it would have been served in the normal course … Continue reading WX Investments Ltd v Begg: ChD 13 May 2002
The home owners requested the setting aside of the sale of their house after a re-possession, alleging impropriety, and that it had been sold at an undervalue. The respondent society had a rule that properties taken into possession could not be purchased by its own employees. The property had been purchased in breach of that … Continue reading Deakin, JDeakin v Corbett, Corbett, Halifax Plc: CA 18 Dec 2002
Restrictive Covenants – Modification – Leasehold Office Premises – planning permission for change of use to hotel – hotel use prohibited by lease – whether covenants secure to freeholder practical benefits of substantial value or advantage – application refused – s.84(1), Law of Property Act 1925 Citations: [2020] UKUT 104 (LC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law … Continue reading Edgware Road (2015) Ltd v The Church Commissioners for England: UTLC 3 Apr 2020
A notice was served under section 146, and specified breaches of the covenant to repair and breach of a covenant against sub-letting. In fact there was no covenant against sub-letting in the lease. Held: Having regard to earlier cases, the notice was held to be sufficient for the purposes of Section 146. The breach relied … Continue reading Silvester v Ostrowska: 1959
Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 1764 Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 50 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 19 November 2022; Ref: scu.220661
The claimant sought an order to prevent the respondent erecting a building on Greenham Common. The respondent had argued that the rights of common had been removed by conveyance and the land was not registered as a common. Held: ‘under no conceivable circumstances could Miss Howse establish that the building of the enterprise centre on … Continue reading Howse v Newbury District Council: CA 7 Apr 1998
UTLC RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – modification – building scheme – proposed development of dormer bungalow – whether a precedent for similar development elsewhere on estate – density and layout – whether practical benefits of substantial value or advantage to objectors – application refused – Law of Property Act 1925 s84(1)(aa) Citations: [2013] UKUT 34 (LC) Links: … Continue reading Walsh and Another, Re Bowen Road: UTLC 13 Feb 2013
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – preliminary issue – whether restriction imposed under a disposition made gratuitously – Law of Property Act 1925 s 84(7) – applicant held not entitled to apply under s 84(1) Citations: [2005] EWLands LP – 17 – 2004 Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 84(7) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: … Continue reading In re Robins: LT 16 Feb 2005
The parties disputed whether a contract had been entered into for the sale of land, and whether new evidence could be entered on an appeal against a strike out. The estate agents had signed a contract as agents for the mortgagee in possession, but the mortgagee said that they has acted outside their agency. Eventually … Continue reading Rudra v Abbey National Plc and Stickley and Kent (Risk Management Unit) Limited: CA 26 Feb 1998
The applicant had sought removal of a fence erected near Greenham Common airbase. She sought leave to appeal an order refusing its removal. The land was a common. Held: The fence served a proper purpose, and there were insufficient grounds to expect any success on an appeal. Leave refused. Citations: [1998] EWCA Civ 393 Statutes: … Continue reading Howse and others v Secretary Of State for Defence: CA 4 Mar 1998
Restrictive Covenants – Discharge – Proposed Use of Field As A Farm Strip for Private Aircraft in close proximity to Sandown Airport – planning permission for construction of agricultural barn – whether to be used to hangar applicant’s aircraft – possibility of future unspecified use of application land – relevance of GPDO – Law of … Continue reading Miller v Subhani: UTLC 30 Mar 2020
A common right of grazing which was quantified but not related to the ability of the land to sustain it was capable of existing in gross, and was therefore severable entirely from the land to which it related. The severance was no necessary prejudice to the land. Robert Walker LJ doubted ‘whether it is correct … Continue reading Bettison and Another v Penton and Another: CA 22 Jan 1998
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – MODIFICATION – covenant against alterations to new dwelling without consent of developer – covenantee refusing consent to enlargement of garage and creation of additional accommodation – application by original covenantor to modify or discharge covenant to permit enlargement – covenant imposed only three years before application – risk of breaches of other … Continue reading O’Callaghan and Another v Middleton and Others (Restrictive Covenants – Modification): UTLC 19 Mar 2020
Landlord and Tenant – Service Charges – Administration Charges – Burden of Proof – Scope of Costs Incurred for The Purpose of The preparation and service of a notice under section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925 Judges: Judge Elizabeth Cooke Citations: [2022] UKUT 285 (LC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act … Continue reading Assethold Ltd v Nelio Patricio Teixeira Franco: UTLC 7 Nov 2022
UTLC RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – modification – dwellinghouse – covenant not to alter property without covenantee’s written consent – application to modify so as to permit significant extension and remodelling of existing bungalow – effect upon visual amenity – practical benefits of substantial value or advantage – injury – Law of Property Act 1925 section 84, … Continue reading Wild and Another, Re Golf Links Road: UTLC 5 Nov 2012
The plaintiffs granted a business lease to the defendants for three years. The tenant covenanted not to assign the lease without the written consent of the landlord, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld in the case of a respectable tenant. The tenant assigned the lease without the landlord’s consent. That assignment was effective. The … Continue reading Old Grovebury Manor Farm Ltd v W Seymour Plant Sales and Hire Ltd and Another: CA 21 Jun 1979
LANDLORD AND TENANT – ADMINISTRATION CHARGES – address for service of notice requiring payment of ground rent – tenant’s address known to landlord but not to its successor – whether knowledge of address to be imputed to successor – notice served by post – whether required to be addressed to tenant at subject property – … Continue reading Maureen Ngozi Obi-Ezekpazu v Avon Ground Rents Ltd (Landlord and Tenant – Administration Charges): UTLC 10 May 2022
UTLC RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – modification – covenant restricting development to one dwelling per plot – proposal to erect additional house within grounds of existing property – objectors’ entitlement to benefit – whether Building Scheme – whether proposed use of land reasonable – whether practical benefits of substantial value or advantage secured by the restriction – … Continue reading Perkins and Another, Re 87 Peplins Way: UTLC 25 Oct 2012
A property had been bought in the husband’s name. The wife made financial contributions to repayment of the charge, and thereby acquired an interest in it. The property was later charged by the paper owner to the claimant, who sought possession under that charge. The wife resisted. Held: The discretion of court to order the … Continue reading Bank of Baroda v Dhillon and Dhillon: CA 17 Oct 1997
Citations: [2012] EWHC 2351 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 84(2) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 05 November 2022; Ref: scu.464602
The widow and personal representative of the chargor challenged the enforcement proceedings taken by the bank under a guarantee. The chargor had begun to suffer Alzheimers disease. She now sought leave toappeal saying that to enforce the guarantee, the bank should have applied to appointed receivers under the 1983 Act. Held: Leave to appeal was … Continue reading Calvert v Clydesdale Bank Plc and Others: CA 27 Jun 2012
Beneficial equitable interests in land were overreached by a mortgage despite no the fact that no capital was actually advanced under the charge. Citations: Gazette 13-Nov-1996, Times 07-Nov-1996, [1996] EWCA Civ 835 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 2(1)(ii) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Williams and Glyn’s Bank Ltd v Boland CA 1979 … Continue reading State of India v Sood and Others: CA 30 Oct 1996
The County court may not suspend a possession order pending an application to the High Court for an order for sale. The court considered the protection given by s15(1) of the 1970 Act, and found the protection to be limited, but nevertheless of considerable value to mortgagors who are in default. Citations: Gazette 20-Nov-1996, Times … Continue reading Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Krausz: CA 22 Oct 1996
The tenant had broken a negative covenant against making alterations, namely not to change the exterior sign and not to alter the premises without consent. The landlord sought to forfeit the lease. Held: The breach of the covenant was remediable if the harm caused can be rectified. The breach was a continuing one. Possession was … Continue reading Savva and Another v Houssein: CA 24 Apr 1996
A parole agreement by all the shareholders in a company, to liquidate it, created a constructive trust. That a specifically enforceable agreement to assign an interest in property, created an equitable interest in the assignee, was unquestionably correct. A trust deed governed by s53(2) is not subject to the requirement to be in writing. Judges: … Continue reading Neville and Another v Wilson and Others: CA 4 Apr 1996
The assignment of a debt by a company in liquidation to a significant shareholder, in order to allow him to make an application for legal aid, and to avoid having to give security for costs and to allow the action to proceed was not unlawful, but the Legal Aid Board should be careful in supporting … Continue reading Circuit Systems Ltd (In Liquidation) and Another v Zuken Redac (Uk) Ltd: CA 5 Apr 1996
A claim for an easement based upon section 62 of the 1925 Act failed. There had not been regular use of the path in question with the putative dominant tenement to gain access to it. Roch LJ said: ‘Section 62 of the 1925 Act cannot create new rights where there has been no actual enjoyment … Continue reading Payne v Inwood: CA 1996
A notice to quit given by one of two joint tenants was binding on the other tenant despite there having been no consultation between them. Citations: Times 23-Feb-1995, [1996] 1 QB 13 Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 26-3 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Sims v Dacorum Borough Council CA 24-Jan-2013 Husband … Continue reading Crawley Borough Council v Ure: CA 23 Feb 1995
A break clause was contained in an agreement not in the lease but in a side letter which made the benefit of the break clause personal to the original lessee but said nothing express as to whether the burden of the break clause passed to an assignee of the reversion. Held: The burden of a … Continue reading System Floors Ltd v Ruralpride Ltd and Another: CA 31 Oct 1994
The owner of a common appealed a finding that the neighbouring land owner had acquired by prescription a right of way across the common to use a track for commercial vehicles (buses) to get to the property (the bus depot). Held: An easement cannot become a right where the use of the route is illegal … Continue reading Hanning and Others v Top Deck Travel Group Ltd: CA 9 Jun 1993
Citations: [2007] EWHC 387 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 84(2) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 24 October 2022; Ref: scu.526404
LT RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – modification – dwellinghouse – restrictions preventing erection of more than one dwellinghouse or bungalow – application to modify to permit two or three dwellinghouses – whether restrictions obsolete – whether proposed user reasonable – whether restrictions secured practical benefits of substantial value or advantage – whether discharge would cause injury – … Continue reading Fisher, Re Dayspring: LT 30 Jun 2008
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – MODIFICATION – restriction to one dwellinghouse per plot on small estate – modification sought to permit one additional house on largest plot – whether restriction secured practical benefit of substantial value or advantage – whether modification would set a damaging precedent – whether compensation payable for short term disruption caused by building … Continue reading Martin v Lipton and Others (Restrictive Covenants – Modification): UTLC 14 Jan 2020
Judges: Master Kaye Citations: [2022] EWHC 2375 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Law of Property Act 1925 181 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: 14 October 2022; Ref: scu.681338
Leeds County Court – Claim that a proposed bulding of additional premises within a property boundary would amount to an infringement of a restrictive covenant against causing a nuisance or annoyance to a neighbour. Held: The building would be in breach of the covenant against causing annoyance. Judges: Behrens HHJ Citations: [2015] EW Misc B28 … Continue reading Tupholme and Others v Firth: Misc 17 Sep 2015
Restrictive Covenants – Discharge – 1.83 ha with outline planning permission for residential development – 1984 planning agreement under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 preventing erection of buildings – Tribunal’s jurisdiction to discharge or modify – modification ordered limited to planning permission – section 84(1)(aa) Law of Property Act 1925 Citations: [2019] UKUT 335 … Continue reading Payne v Maldon District Council: UTLC 5 Nov 2019
Restrictive Covenants – Modification – Leasehold Grade I Listed building in Berkeley Square – user clause restricted to offices – application to modify to allow use as a private members’ club – whether restriction obsolete – whether practical benefit of substantial value or advantage secured – whether injury would be caused by modification – section … Continue reading Berkeley Square Investments Ltd v Berkeley Square Holdings Ltd: UTLC 9 Dec 2019
The parties had litigated the sale of land free of restrictive covenants. Held: The rule that a party was entilted to its costs of defending an action under the Act for the discharge of a covenant at least as far as was necessary for it to have been able to establish whether it was proper … Continue reading University of East London Higher Education Corporation v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham and others: ChD 14 Dec 2004
Mrs Moss inherited the former matrimonial home. Her daughter (L) suggested that she transfer it into their joint names to ease its transfer on her mother’s death. It was agreed the house would never be sold during Mrs Moss’s lifetime. L borrowed andpound;30,000 using the house as security and forged her mother’s signature on the … Continue reading Abbey National plc v Moss and Others: CA 1994
The claimant sought a declaration that a contract for the sale of property in London to the First Defendant has terminated, leaving the Claimant free to deal with the property as he chose. Teseo counterclaimed for specific performance of the Contract and the sale of the property to itself. If it failed in its claim … Continue reading Cohen v Teseo Properties Ltd and Another: ChD 18 Jul 2014
UTLC RESTRICTIVE COVENANT – modification – covenant in 1870 Deed Poll restricting estate development to two dwellings per plot – proposal to erect additional house on part of two of the original plots – whether proposed use of land reasonable – whether practical benefits of substantial value or advantage secured by the restriction – whether … Continue reading Hoyle and Another, Re Land At Woodlands: UTLC 21 Nov 2011
The tenant appealed against an order granting possession. The tenancy, being held of a mutual housing co-operative did not have security but was in a form restricting the landlord’s right to recover possession, and the tenant resisted saying that it was worded to create a lease for life (applying the LRB case). Held: The tenant’s … Continue reading Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-Operative Ltd: SC 9 Nov 2011
The parties disputed the liability on lessees to contribute to a service charge for maintenance of common parts of the building. The six tenants covenanted to pay a proper proportion of the landlord’s costs of meeting his repair obligations. The landlord executed repair after a water leak. Two tenants argued that the cost was too … Continue reading 69 Marina, St Leonards-On-Sea, Freeholders of v Oram and Another: CA 8 Nov 2011
