Cohen v Teseo Properties Ltd and Another: ChD 18 Jul 2014

The claimant sought a declaration that a contract for the sale of property in London to the First Defendant has terminated, leaving the Claimant free to deal with the property as he chose. Teseo counterclaimed for specific performance of the Contract and the sale of the property to itself. If it failed in its claim for specific performance, Teseo claims to be relieved under section 49(2) of the Law of Property Act 1925 against forfeiture of the deposit it has paid.

Judges:

Sales J

Citations:

[2014] EWHC 2442 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Law of Property Act 1925 49(2)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Land, Contract

Updated: 29 September 2022; Ref: scu.534641