Click the case name for better results:

Wilson v Lassman: ChD 7 Mar 2017

Claim for revocation of grant of probate on grounds that the will was not validly executed. It had been signed but before the witnesses attended. Held: The will of the deceased was properly executed and attested in compliance with statute and is valid. The court considered the presumption of due execution of a will: ‘where … Continue reading Wilson v Lassman: ChD 7 Mar 2017

In Re Coventry (deceased): CA 3 Jan 1979

The deceased’s adult son sought provision from the intestate estate. The sole beneficiary under the rules was the plaintiff’s mother. The estate was modest; the intestate’s interest in his house (he had been living there with the plaintiff). The widow was found to have a one third interest in it. The judge took the disposable … Continue reading In Re Coventry (deceased): CA 3 Jan 1979

Barron v Woodhead and Another: ChD 25 Jun 2008

The claimant sought provision under the 1975 Act from the estate of his deceased wife. Judges: Behrens J Citations: [2008] WTLR 1675, [2008] Fam Law 844, [2008] EWHC 810 (Ch), [2009] 1 FLR 747, [2009] 2 FCR 631 Links: Bailii Statutes: Inheritance (Provision For Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited … Continue reading Barron v Woodhead and Another: ChD 25 Jun 2008

Re Pearce, Deceased, Pearce v Pearce: CA 25 Jun 1998

The claimant, the adult son of the deceased sought provision from the estate. He said that he had taken a substantial part in the refurbishment of a family property. Later his parents had separated. At first instance Behrens J had held there was a moral obligation on a father arising out of the very substantial … Continue reading Re Pearce, Deceased, Pearce v Pearce: CA 25 Jun 1998

Musa and Others v Holliday and Others: CA 15 Oct 2012

Judges: Sir Nicholas Wall P FD, Lloyd, Sullivan JJ Citations: [2012] EWCA Civ 1268 Links: Bailii Statutes: Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Holliday and Another v Musa and Others CA 30-Mar-2010 The adult children of the deceased appealed against a finding that their father … Continue reading Musa and Others v Holliday and Others: CA 15 Oct 2012

Dellal v Dellal and Others: FD 1 Apr 2015

The families disputed a claim under the 1975 Act. The defendants now sought summary dismissal of the claim. Judges: Mostyn J Citations: [2015] EWHC 907 (Fam) Links: Bailii Statutes: Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Kemmis v Kemmis (Welland and Others Intervening) CA 1988 H had … Continue reading Dellal v Dellal and Others: FD 1 Apr 2015

Moore v Holdsworth and Others: ChD 12 Mar 2010

The claimant sought reasonable provision from the estate of her late husband. She suffered advanced multiple sclerosis, and the estate was relatively small, from which she was to receive pounds 40,000. She sought all of it. Held: It would be wrong to grant the claimant the entire estate. She should be awarded a life interest … Continue reading Moore v Holdsworth and Others: ChD 12 Mar 2010

Hope and Another v Knight: ChD 15 Dec 2010

The separated widow and the deceased’s daughter sought reasonable provision from the estate. Judges: Purle QC HHJ Citations: [2010] EWHC 3443 (Ch), [2011] WTLR 583 Links: Bailii Statutes: Inheritance (Provisions for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Ilott v The Blue Cross and Others SC 15-Mar-2017 What is … Continue reading Hope and Another v Knight: ChD 15 Dec 2010

H v Mitson and Others: FD 1 Dec 2009

Judges: Eleanor King J Citations: [2010] 1 FLR 1613, [2009] EWHC 3114 (Fam) Links: Bailii Statutes: Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – In Re Coventry (deceased) CA 3-Jan-1979 The deceased’s adult son sought provision from the intestate estate. The sole beneficiary under the rules was the … Continue reading H v Mitson and Others: FD 1 Dec 2009

Goodchild v Goodchild: ChD 13 Dec 1995

The husband and wife had made mirror wills. They divorced, and the husband made a new will. After his death, the child and the third wife of the deceased made a claim against the second wife. Held: The wills were in identical terms, but nevertheless, fell short of having full and explicit status as mutual … Continue reading Goodchild v Goodchild: ChD 13 Dec 1995

Fielden, Graham (Executors of Cunliffe deceased) v Cunliffe: CA 6 Dec 2005

The will was executed anticipating the marriage to the respondent, leaving assets on discretionary trusts for the responent and various family members and others. She had come to work for the deceased as his housekeeper, but later they came to marry. The marriage took place about one year before the death. Held: ‘in relation to … Continue reading Fielden, Graham (Executors of Cunliffe deceased) v Cunliffe: CA 6 Dec 2005

Ilott v Mitson and Others: CA 31 Mar 2011

The claimant, the estranged adult daughter of the deceased, had claimed under the 1975 Act. The judge made an order for payment of pounds 50,000 by way of capitalisation of maintenance. The claimant appealed saying she should have received more, and the charities (beneficiaries under the will) said that no payment should have been ordered … Continue reading Ilott v Mitson and Others: CA 31 Mar 2011

Ilott v The Blue Cross and Others: SC 15 Mar 2017

What is reasonable provision for daughter? The deceased had left her estate in her will to several animal charities. The claimant, her daughter, had been estranged from her mother for many years, and sought reasonable provision from her estate under the 1975 Act. The district judge had rejected her claim. Held: The appeal by the … Continue reading Ilott v The Blue Cross and Others: SC 15 Mar 2017

Cattle v Evans and Another: ChD 19 Apr 2011

The claimant the survivor of a long term relationship with the deceased claimed for provision form his estate, and an interest in the house under a constructive trust. The parties had moved several times buying and selling properties. Held: The claim for a constructive trust failed. The parties had latterly kept their properties and financial … Continue reading Cattle v Evans and Another: ChD 19 Apr 2011

Holliday and Another v Musa and Others: CA 30 Mar 2010

The adult children of the deceased appealed against a finding that their father had died domiciled in the UK, and allowing an application under the 1975 Act. He had a domicile of origin in Cyprus but had lived in England since 1958. Judges: Waller VP, Rix Wilson LJJ Citations: [2010] 2 FLR 702, [2010] EWCA … Continue reading Holliday and Another v Musa and Others: CA 30 Mar 2010

Hannigan v Hannigan: CA 18 May 2000

The widow appealed against strike out of her claim under the 1975 Act. It had been filed with several mistakes and only just in time. Held: Her appeal succeeded. Though the defects were real and to be deplored, the paperwork contained all the necessary information: ‘The ‘quirky’ petition was filed at the Stafford County Court … Continue reading Hannigan v Hannigan: CA 18 May 2000

Harlow v National Westminster Bank Plc and Others; in re Jennings Dec: CA 13 Dec 1993

The adult non-dependent son of the deceased claimed provision from his father’s estate. He had been separated from his father since being a young child, and had received almost nothing. He was a married adult son living with his family in comfortable circumstances, on a good income from two businesses. Held: The claim failed. A … Continue reading Harlow v National Westminster Bank Plc and Others; in re Jennings Dec: CA 13 Dec 1993

Rees v Newbery and Institute of Cancer Research: 1998

The applicant held a tenancy of the deceased, but claimed nevertheless under the Act as a dependent. Held: If as in this case there was a close personal friendship, and a proven wish by the deceased to contribute substantially to the applicant’s maintenance, the existence of a tenancy agreement would not be fatal to a … Continue reading Rees v Newbery and Institute of Cancer Research: 1998

Land v Land; In re Land, deceased: ChD 13 Jul 2006

The claimant had cared for his elderly mother who ‘shunned any type of ‘officialdom’ including doctors and home helps.’ However, the claimant so neglected her that she suffered severe bed sores which had become infected in consequence of her lying in her own excrement. The claimant had pleaded guilty to manslaughter. The court was asked … Continue reading Land v Land; In re Land, deceased: ChD 13 Jul 2006

Perrins v Holland and Another: ChD 31 Jul 2009

The son of the deceased challenged the testamentary capacity of the testator and further claimed under the 1975 Act. The deceased was disabled and had substantial difficulty communicating. Held: The will was validly made. Logically it is possible to lose testamentary capacity and yet retain capacity to know and approve the contents of a will. … Continue reading Perrins v Holland and Another: ChD 31 Jul 2009

Wright v Waters and Another: ChD 6 Nov 2014

The claimant sought provision from her late mother’s estate under the 1975 Act, and asserting a proprietary estoppel. The mother had transferred andpound;10,000 to the daughter several years before. The mother had said it was to be invested on her behalf, and he claimant said it had been a gift. On falling out, the claimant … Continue reading Wright v Waters and Another: ChD 6 Nov 2014

Goodchild and Another v Goodchild: CA 2 May 1997

The deceased and his wife made wills in virtually identical form. The husband changed his will after their divorce, but his son and other wife claimed that the couple had intended the wills to be part of a larger arrangement of their affairs, creating a trust from which he should not resile, and an exceptional … Continue reading Goodchild and Another v Goodchild: CA 2 May 1997

Lim (An Infant) v Walia: CA 29 Jul 2014

The parties disputed a claim under the 1975 Act. Immediately before her death, the deceased had, because of her medical condition, a vested right to bring forward an insurance benefit, but that right had ceased upon her death. The court had found that the sum available was part of the estate for the purposes of … Continue reading Lim (An Infant) v Walia: CA 29 Jul 2014

Myers v Myers and Orhers: FD 3 Aug 2004

The court ordered, from a very large estate, provision which included housing, but he did so by way not of an outright capital sum but of a life interest in a trust fund together with power of advancement designed to cater for the possibility of care expenses in advanced old age. If housing is provided … Continue reading Myers v Myers and Orhers: FD 3 Aug 2004

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts