Click the case name for better results:

Lynch and Others v East Dunbartonshire Council: EAT 9 Mar 2010

EAT Lis Pendens. Equal pay claims. Claimants presented claims which were met with a response that included the contention that they had not complied with the statutory grievance procedures. While determination of that issue pending, claimants presented further claims (after having issued fresh grievance letters) in which, essentially, the same equal pay claims were made. … Continue reading Lynch and Others v East Dunbartonshire Council: EAT 9 Mar 2010

Chambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries: CA 21 Feb 2011

The claimant appealed against the strike out of her case for failing to comply with an order requiring her to submit to medical examination and otherwise to pursue her disability discrimination claim. Held: The claimant’s further application for an adjournment was denied. There had been consistent and repeated failure to co-operate with the tribunals and … Continue reading Chambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries: CA 21 Feb 2011

Ironopolis Film Co Ltd and Others v Fox: EAT 7 May 2009

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Striking-out/dismissal The Employment Judge through the Tribunal Office wrongly informed the second, third and fourth Respondents that they could not take any action in the proceedings other to seek a review. When striking out the responses under the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 Schedule I Rule 18(7) … Continue reading Ironopolis Film Co Ltd and Others v Fox: EAT 7 May 2009

Riley v The Crown Prosecution Service: EAT 13 Jun 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissalThe Employment Judge did not err, whether as a matter of law or as a matter of the exercise of his case management powers, in the circumstances and on the medical evidence, in striking out this claim, pursuant to Rule 18(7)(f) of the ET Rules 2004, on the ground that … Continue reading Riley v The Crown Prosecution Service: EAT 13 Jun 2012

St Albans Girls School and Another v Neary: CA 12 Nov 2009

The claimant’s case had been struck out after non-compliance with an order to file further particulars. His appeal was allowed by the EAT, and the School now itself appealed, saying that the employment judge had wrongly had felt obliged to have regard to the Civil Procedure Rules on striking cases out. Held: The school’s appeal … Continue reading St Albans Girls School and Another v Neary: CA 12 Nov 2009

Abegaze v Shrewsbury College of Arts and Technology: CA 20 Feb 2009

In 2000 the claimant succeeded in his claim for discrimination, but had not pursued his remedy. He now appealed against a refusal to allow him to take it further. He had initially failed to pursue the matter for ill health. He later refused to submit to an examination by the defendant’s medical experts. Held: Whilst … Continue reading Abegaze v Shrewsbury College of Arts and Technology: CA 20 Feb 2009