Chambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries: CA 21 Feb 2011

The claimant appealed against the strike out of her case for failing to comply with an order requiring her to submit to medical examination and otherwise to pursue her disability discrimination claim.
Held: The claimant’s further application for an adjournment was denied. There had been consistent and repeated failure to co-operate with the tribunals and the court. The employment ceased in 2005. The respondent was entitled eventually to a decision. The appeal would be decided, and it was refused.
Lord Neuberger MR, Hooper, Rimer LJJ
[2011] EWCA Civ 277
Bailii
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2004 18(7)(c)
England and Wales
Citing:
At EATChambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries EAT 18-Nov-2008
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Striking-out/dismissal
The Appellant appealed a strike out order, but the correct authority (Blockbuster) was applied and there was (i) no perversity in the ET’s findings of . .
Leave grantedChambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries CA 26-Nov-2009
The claimant renewed orally her request for leave to appeal against the EAT which had upheld loss of her claim, after the Employment Tribunal had found her conduct of the proceedings unreasonable in failing to co-operate in a medical enquiry into . .
CitedDe Keyser Limited v Wilson EAT 20-Mar-2001
The claimant appealed against an order striking out her claim.
Held: The right to respect for private life is qualified by the right for both parties to have a just trial of the issues between them; and it has to be borne in mind that it was . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 06 March 2021; Ref: scu.430734