Click the case name for better results:

Cooke (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Quick Shoe Repair Service: KBD 31 Jan 1949

Income Tax, Schedule D – Profits of trade – Deduction – Vendor’s debts paid by purchasers of business to maintain goodwill – Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Schedule D, Cases I and II, Rule 3. The agreement by which the Respondent firm purchased a shoe repair business provided that … Continue reading Cooke (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Quick Shoe Repair Service: KBD 31 Jan 1949

Perry (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Astor; Adamson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Duncan’s Executors: HL 15 Mar 1935

Income Tax, Schedule D – Foreign stocks and shires settled by foreign trust – Income payable to settlor – Power of revocation reserved by settlor in favour of himself – Extent of liability to tax – Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 tfe 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Schedule D, Case V – Finance Act, 1922 … Continue reading Perry (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Astor; Adamson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Duncan’s Executors: HL 15 Mar 1935

Simpson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v The Grange Trust, Ltd: HL 15 Mar 1935

Income Tax – Investment trust company not assessable under Case I of Schedule D – Claim for relief in respect of expenses of management – Income Tax Act, 1918 s 8Wright L said: ‘An ordinary trading company assessed on the balance of its profits and gains for the year under Schedule D, Case I, is … Continue reading Simpson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v The Grange Trust, Ltd: HL 15 Mar 1935

Inverclyde’s (Lord) Trustees v Millar (Inspector of Taxes): HL 31 Mar 1924

Income Tax (Schedule D, Case III)-Deduction–Interest on unpaid Estate Duty-Finance Act, 1896 (59 and 60 Viet., c. 28), Section 18 (1)- Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Section 209, Schedule D, Case III, Rule 2, and Rule 19 of the General Rides. Citations: [1924] UKHL TC – 9 – 14, … Continue reading Inverclyde’s (Lord) Trustees v Millar (Inspector of Taxes): HL 31 Mar 1924

Smith (Surveyor of Taxes) v Lion Brewery Co: HL 14 Feb 1911

A brewery company were, as part of their business, and as a necessary incident of the profitable exploitation of such business, the owners of certain licensed premises. These premises, which were let by the company to tenants as tied houses for the retail sale of the company’s beer, ‘had been acquired by the company and … Continue reading Smith (Surveyor of Taxes) v Lion Brewery Co: HL 14 Feb 1911

Foulsham (Inspector of Taxes) v Pickles: HL 19 Feb 1925

Income Tax, Schedule D-Resident in the United Kingdom employed out of the United Kingdom – Foreign possessions – Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Schedule D, Case V. Citations: [1925] UKHL TC – 9 – 261, [1925] AC 458, 9 TC 261 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Income Tax … Continue reading Foulsham (Inspector of Taxes) v Pickles: HL 19 Feb 1925

Martin v Lowry (HM Inspector of Taxes): KBD 15 Jun 1925

The taxpayer had other business, but purchased a substantial quantity of cloth and resold it. He said this was not by way of trade. The Revenue said that he had used all the standard trade practices, and it was taxable as such. Held: The transactions were taxable. Judges: Jowett J Citations: [1926] 1 KB 550 … Continue reading Martin v Lowry (HM Inspector of Taxes): KBD 15 Jun 1925

Brighton College v Marriott (HM Inspector of Taxes): HL 18 Dec 1925

Income Tax – Public school-Profits from school fees – Whether profits, of trade-Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Section 37 (1) (b), and Schedule D-Finance Act, 1921 (11 and 12 Geo. V, c. 32), Section 30 (1) (c). Citations: [1925] UKHL TC – 10 – 213 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England … Continue reading Brighton College v Marriott (HM Inspector of Taxes): HL 18 Dec 1925

Camas Plc v HM Inspector of Taxes: ChD 7 Jul 2003

An investment company sought to set against its liability to corporation tax, the various costs of taking over another company. They argued that as an investment company these were not costs of the purchase and could be set against tax. Held: The phrase ‘expenses of management’ is an ordinary expression not made up of words … Continue reading Camas Plc v HM Inspector of Taxes: ChD 7 Jul 2003

Ostime (H M Inspector of Taxes) v Australian Mutual Provident Society: HL 16 Jul 1959

Income Tax, Schedule D-Double taxation relief – Australian life assurance society with United Kingdom branch – Mutual society – Income of life assurance fund – ‘Industrial or commercial profits’-Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Schedule D, Case III, Rule 3 ; Double Taxation Relief (Taxes on Income) (Australia) Order, 1947 … Continue reading Ostime (H M Inspector of Taxes) v Australian Mutual Provident Society: HL 16 Jul 1959

Thomson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Moyse: HL 22 Nov 1960

Income Tax, Schedule D – Foreign securities and possessions – Remittances – United States trust income paid into account with United States bank – Cheques drawn in dollars on United States bank in favour of United Kingdom banks – Sterling equivalent credited to accounts with United Kingdom banks – Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and … Continue reading Thomson (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Moyse: HL 22 Nov 1960

Madras Electric Supply Corp Ltd v Boarland House of Lords: HL 11 Mar 1955

Income Tax, Schedule D – Balancing charge – Succession by Crown – Whether cessation provisions apply – Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Schedule D, Cases I and II, Rule 11 ; Finance Act, 1926 (16 and 17 Geo. V, c. 22), Section 32. The Respondent Company carried on an … Continue reading Madras Electric Supply Corp Ltd v Boarland House of Lords: HL 11 Mar 1955

Inland Revenue v Corporation of London (As Conservators of Epping Forest): HL 20 Apr 1953

HL Income Tax – Annual payment – Income Tax Act, 1918 (8 and 9 Geo. V, c. 40), Schedule D, Case III, Rule 1 (a), and General Rules, Rule 19. Citations: [1953] UKHL TC – 34 – 293 Links: Bailii Statutes: Income Tax Act 1918 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Income Tax Updated: 28 June 2022; … Continue reading Inland Revenue v Corporation of London (As Conservators of Epping Forest): HL 20 Apr 1953

Inland Revenue v Hood Barrs: HL 6 Jul 1961

Income Tax – Procedure – Repayment claim – Loss in trade – Losses certified by General Commissioners without hearing Inspector – Whether appeal in nature of Certiorari lies to Court of Session – Whether certificates valid – Court of Exchequer (Scotland) Act, 1856 (19 and 20 Viet. c. 56), Section 17; Income Tax Act, 1918 … Continue reading Inland Revenue v Hood Barrs: HL 6 Jul 1961

Sun Life Assurance Society v Davidson: HL 4 Jul 1957

The court considered the question of what was meant by the phrase ‘expenses of management’ Held: The phrase (s75) could be seen ‘as apt to cover the expenses which would normally be deductible in respect of its life assurance business if an assurance company carrying on life assurance business was assessed as a trade.’ Section … Continue reading Sun Life Assurance Society v Davidson: HL 4 Jul 1957

Lord Inverclyde’s Trustees v Inland Revenue: HL 31 Mar 1924

The income of a trust estate for a certain year included a sum of pounds 72,231 untaxed interest on certain Government securities. Held ( aff. the judgment of the Second Division) that in computing their income for the purpose of assessment under Schedule D of the Income Tax Act 1918 the trustees were not entitled … Continue reading Lord Inverclyde’s Trustees v Inland Revenue: HL 31 Mar 1924

Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation Inc v Inland Revenue Commissioners: HL 1956

The company was a foreign corporation constituted according to the laws of the state of New York for objects which were exclusively charitable according to the law of the United Kingdom. Held: The term ‘charity’ does not include an institution established under the laws of another legal system. Lord Morton said: ‘It is at once … Continue reading Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation Inc v Inland Revenue Commissioners: HL 1956

Inland Revenue v Broadway Cottages: CA 26 Jul 1954

Two charitable trusts appealed against decisions disallowing their claim to allowance for relief against income tax of certain incomes. Held: To be valid, a trust must be one which the Court can control and execute. In this case, the discretion given to the trutees was absolute, and nor was the class of beneficiaries ascertainable. Singleton, … Continue reading Inland Revenue v Broadway Cottages: CA 26 Jul 1954

Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council: HL 1989

The House was asked whether the Ministry of Defence was entitled to cone off a section of the A814 road without the permission of the roads authority under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 or the local planning authority under the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1972. Held: Before the Acts of Union, Scots law … Continue reading Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council: HL 1989

Black, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 19 Dec 2017

The Court was asked whether the Crown is bound by the prohibition of smoking in most enclosed public places and workplaces, contained in Chapter 1 of Part 1 of the Health Act 2006. Held: However reluctantly, the claimant’s appeal was dismissed. Parliament must be assumed to have intended that the Crown be not bound by … Continue reading Black, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice: SC 19 Dec 2017

Belhaj and Another v Straw and Others: SC 17 Jan 2017

The claimant alleged complicity by the defendant, (now former) Foreign Secretary, in his mistreatment by the US while held in Libya. He also alleged involvement in his unlawful abduction and removal to Libya, from which had had fled for political persecution. The defendants now appealed from rejection of the defendants’ claim to state immunity and … Continue reading Belhaj and Another v Straw and Others: SC 17 Jan 2017

Sun Life Assurance Society v Davidson: CA 1956

The phrase ‘general management’ extended further than ‘management’ and included what was done at the lower levels of a company’s executive structure. Romer LJ said: ‘The ratio decidendi of Golder’s Case (Capital and National Trust Ltd. v. Golder (H.M. Inspector of Taxes)) (1949) 31 TC 265, as it seems to me, was that the phrase … Continue reading Sun Life Assurance Society v Davidson: CA 1956

Rye and Eyre v Inland Revenue: HL 1 Mar 1935

TC Income Tax, Schedule D – Copyright royalties – Play produced in London – Royalties transmitted by producer’s solicitors to author resident abroad – Whether solicitors persons ‘by or through ‘ whom payment made – Income Tax Act, 1918 General Rule 21; Finance Act, 1927 (17 and 18 Geo. V, c. 10), Sections 25 and … Continue reading Rye and Eyre v Inland Revenue: HL 1 Mar 1935

Peer International Corporation Southern Music Publishing Company Inc Peermusic (UK) Limited v Termidor Music Publishers Limited Termidor Musikverlag Gmbh and Co Kg -And-Editoria Musical De Cuba: CA 30 Jul 2003

Peer sought declarations that they were the owners, or licensees, of the UK copyright in musical works composed by Cuban nationals, relying on assignments in writing by the composers and in some instances by their heirs. The defendants claimed under other titles. In Cuba laws had been passed to to recover copyrights assigned abroad. Held: … Continue reading Peer International Corporation Southern Music Publishing Company Inc Peermusic (UK) Limited v Termidor Music Publishers Limited Termidor Musikverlag Gmbh and Co Kg -And-Editoria Musical De Cuba: CA 30 Jul 2003

Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd and Others: SC 20 Mar 2019

The claimant appellant alleged that properties she owned were transferred to the first defendant under undue influence or other unconscionable conduct by the second and third defendants. The claim was dismissed. Three years later she claimed to set that judgment aside having been obtained by fraud. To support the allegation she brought evidence not available … Continue reading Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd and Others: SC 20 Mar 2019

Derry, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs: SC 10 Apr 2019

D bought 500,000 shares in TY 2009/10 for pounds 500,000 in Media Pro Four Ltd. In tax year 2010/11 he sold them to ‘Island House Private Charitable Trust’ for pounds 85,500, realising a loss of pounds 414,500. His 2009/10 tax return claimed share loss relief for that amount against income for that year under section … Continue reading Derry, Regina (on The Application of) v Revenue and Customs: SC 10 Apr 2019

Latilla v Inland Revenue (No 2) ;, Latilla Campbell v Inland Revenue, Mayo v Inland Revenue: HL 14 Dec 1950

HL Surtax – Undistributed income of company – Appeal against apportionments of income remitted by High Court to Special Commissioners for further consideration-Right of appeal against amended apportionments – Income apportioned to married woman – Whether assessable on husband – Finance Act, 1922 (12 and 13 Geo. V c. 17), Section 21 and First Schedule; … Continue reading Latilla v Inland Revenue (No 2) ;, Latilla Campbell v Inland Revenue, Mayo v Inland Revenue: HL 14 Dec 1950

Saunders v The United Kingdom: ECHR 17 Dec 1996

(Grand Chamber) The subsequent use against a defendant in a prosecution, of evidence which had been obtained under compulsion in company insolvency procedures was a convention breach of Art 6. Although not specifically mentioned in Article 6 of the Convention the right to silence and the right not to incriminate oneself are generally recognised international … Continue reading Saunders v The United Kingdom: ECHR 17 Dec 1996