A contract provided against it variation save in writing and signed. A claim was made relying upon an oral variation.
Held: It was a sufficient reason for refusing summary judgment that ‘the law on the topic is not settled.’
Sedley LJ
[2002] EWCA Civ 413
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd SC 16-May-2018
The parties disputed whether a contract (licence to occupy an office) had been varied by an oral agreement, where the terms prohibited such.
Held: The ‘no oral variation’ clause applied. Such clauses were in common commercial use and served a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 July 2021; Ref: scu.217003
