Gloster LJ declined to decide the point but ‘incline[d] to the view’ that clauses not permitting variation of a contract without the variation being in writing were ineffective.
Gloster LJ
[2013] EWHC 2118 (Comm)
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd SC 16-May-2018
The parties disputed whether a contract (licence to occupy an office) had been varied by an oral agreement, where the terms prohibited such.
Held: The ‘no oral variation’ clause applied. Such clauses were in common commercial use and served a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 July 2021; Ref: scu.513726
