EAT Disability Discrimination: Disability
The Chairman erred in rejecting the evidence of a clinical diagnosis of severe dyslexia for reasons which were not sustainable. Once this diagnosis is accepted, pursuant to Guidance C12 it is ‘obvious’ that the effect is substantial on day-to-day activities. The parties agreed that since the Chairman otherwise directed herself correctly, she reached the correct result.
Citations:
[2006] UKEAT 0131 – 06 – 0304, UKEAT/0131/06
Links:
Cited by:
See Also – Bayley v Whitbread Hotel Co Ltd (T/A Marriott Worsley Park Hotel) and Another EAT 16-Aug-2007
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Striking-out
The Employment Tribunal struck out a claim for disability discrimination because the Claimant’s father (acting as his representative) had withheld potentially . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 06 July 2022; Ref: scu.241493
