The claimant sought payment of invoices for work carried out in recovering data from computers. The contract required payment for investigation ‘per database’ The defendant argued that the term database should be taken to refer to what was intended at the time of the contract, and that the claimant was making an opportunistic attempt to overcharge.
Judges:
His Honour Judge Richard Seymour Q.C.
Citations:
[2003] EWHC 1739 (TCC)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Vogon International Ltd v Serious Fraud Office CA 4-Feb-2004
The defendant appealed a finding in which the judge had inferred against it serious imputations where neither party had made such an allegation, and the defendant had not been given forewarning of such a finding.
Held: The judge had correctly . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 07 June 2022; Ref: scu.184656
