The Commission noted that there was no indication that the difference there in question was based on any ground such as ‘association with a national minority’. All that was being said was that differences between the laws in different jurisdictions were not in themselves discriminatory.
Citations:
14631/89
Jurisdiction:
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – A and B, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Health SC 14-Jun-2017
The court was asked: ‘Was it unlawful for the Secretary of State for Health, the respondent, who had power to make provisions for the functioning of the National Health Service in England, to have failed to make a provision which would have enabled . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights
Updated: 16 August 2022; Ref: scu.642147
