The court was asked whether the statutory burden of proof in a case of alleged direct race discrimination was properly understood and applied by the Employment Tribunal in accordance with section 54A(2) of the Race Relations Act 1976, as amended.
Held: The appeal was allowed. The ET had erred as to the law.
Judges:
Mummery, Wilson, Patten LJJ
Citations:
[2010] EWCA Civ 921
Links:
Statutes:
Race Relations Act 1976 54A(2)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – St Christopher’s Fellowship v Walters-Ennis EAT 8-Oct-2009
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Case management
UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal
RACE DISCRIMINATION: Burden of proof
An Employment Tribunal did not err in law when it upheld the Claimant’s . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination
Updated: 22 August 2022; Ref: scu.421209
