EAT Practice and Procedure
Employment Tribunal Chairman, after a Case Management and Directions Hearing to delineate issues and set timetable for May hearing, delayed for three months before delivering Decision, and then imposed timetable retrospective to the Case Management Hearing: and then refused joint application by the parties for adjournment of the trial date of case remitted by the Employment Appeal Tribunal inter alia because of failure of earlier case management. Appeal allowed and May date adjourned to September/October date convenient to the parties.
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Burton
Citations:
UKEAT/0168/05, [2005] UKEAT 0168 – 05 – 1204
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Sinclair Roche and Temperley and others v Heard and Another EAT 22-Jul-2004
EAT Sex discrimination claim by former partners against the partnership and individual partners: direct discrimination (in both cases) and indirect discrimination (in one) found by ET.
(i) ET must, if . .
Cited by:
Cited – A C Redfearn v Serco Ltd T/A West Yorkshire Transport Service EAT 27-Jul-2005
The claimant said that he had been indirectly discriminated against on racial grounds. He was dismissed after being elected as a local councillor for the BNP. The employer considered that for Health and Safety reasons, his dismissal was necessary . .
See Also – Sinclair Roche and Temperley (A Firm ) v Heard, Fellows EAT 21-Nov-2005
EAT Practice and Procedure: Disclosure, Costs and Disposal of Appeal
Appeal against interlocutory orders by ET Chairman debarring reliance on some disclosed documents and ordering costs against the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 27 August 2022; Ref: scu.225216
