S v S (Divorce: Distribution of assets): FD 10 Nov 2006

The reference in White v White to the need for a judge in ancillary relief applications always to refer back to the yardstick of equal distribution of all the assets did not mean that the judge had to include in such calculations non-matrimonial assets.


Burton J


Times 15-Jan-2007


England and Wales


CitedWhite v White HL 26-Oct-2000
The couple going through the divorce each had substantial farms and wished to continue farming. It had been a long marriage.
Held: Where a division of the assets of a family would satisfy the reasonable needs of either party on an ancillary . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.


Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.247966