Regina v Palmer: CACD 10 Apr 2002

At his trial the judge had added another defendant to the indictment, on the basis that the indictment was defective under the Act. The defendant appealed his conviction.
Held: The word ‘defective’ when used within the section included the idea of ‘lack’ or ‘want’, and such an amendment was permissible where no injustice would be created.

Judges:

Lord Justice Rose, Mr Justice McKinnon and Mr Justice Poole

Citations:

Times 18-Apr-2002

Statutes:

Indictments Act 1915 5(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Criminal Practice

Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.169834