Regina v London Borough of Newham ex parte Bibi, Regina v London Borough of Newham ex parte Al-Nashed: Admn 18 Jan 1996

[1996] EWHC Admin 4
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal fromRegina v London Borough of Newham and Manik Bibi and Ataya Al-Nashed CA 26-Apr-2001
CS The housing authority had mistakenly thought that it was obliged to re-house the applicants under the Act with secure accommodation, and promised them accordingly.
Held: That promise had created a . .

Cited by:
Appealed toRegina v London Borough of Newham and Manik Bibi and Ataya Al-Nashed CA 26-Apr-2001
CS The housing authority had mistakenly thought that it was obliged to re-house the applicants under the Act with secure accommodation, and promised them accordingly.
Held: That promise had created a . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 01 February 2021; Ref: scu.136552