Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex Parte Anderson, Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex Parte Khatib-Shahidi: QBD 22 Mar 2000

There is no appeal to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal against either a decision of an adjudicator to make or one to refuse to make a recommendation to the Secretary of State when he was himself refusing an appeal. Nor is such a decision subject to judicial review. This practice, unlike that on granting an appeal, was an extra statutory concession, and it could not be a determination of any question in issue under the appeal to the adjudicator.

Citations:

Times 22-Mar-2000

Statutes:

Immigration Act 1971 20

Citing:

Appealed toRegina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, Ex Parte Khatib-Shahidi CA 3-Aug-2000
There is no appeal from the decision of an adjudicator not to recommend that there existed sufficient compassionate grounds for granting exceptional leave to remain in the UK in the absence of any statutory grounds for such a recommendation. A . .

Cited by:

Appeal FromRegina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, Ex Parte Khatib-Shahidi CA 3-Aug-2000
There is no appeal from the decision of an adjudicator not to recommend that there existed sufficient compassionate grounds for granting exceptional leave to remain in the UK in the absence of any statutory grounds for such a recommendation. A . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.85315