Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, Ex Parte Khatib-Shahidi: CA 3 Aug 2000

There is no appeal from the decision of an adjudicator not to recommend that there existed sufficient compassionate grounds for granting exceptional leave to remain in the UK in the absence of any statutory grounds for such a recommendation. A failure to make a recommendation in this situation is not open to judicial review.

Citations:

Times 03-Aug-2000, Gazette 07-Sep-2000

Statutes:

Immigration Appeals (Procedure) Rules 1984 (1984 N0 2041) 6

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal FromRegina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex Parte Anderson, Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex Parte Khatib-Shahidi QBD 22-Mar-2000
There is no appeal to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal against either a decision of an adjudicator to make or one to refuse to make a recommendation to the Secretary of State when he was himself refusing an appeal. Nor is such a decision subject to . .

Cited by:

Appealed toRegina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex Parte Anderson, Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex Parte Khatib-Shahidi QBD 22-Mar-2000
There is no appeal to the Immigration Appeal Tribunal against either a decision of an adjudicator to make or one to refuse to make a recommendation to the Secretary of State when he was himself refusing an appeal. Nor is such a decision subject to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.85312