(High Court of Australia) it was wrong for judgment to be given for the price because ‘[t]he contract did not provide for payment for the goods on a day certain.’
Judges:
Rich, Dixon and McTiernan JJ
Citations:
(1945) 72 CLR 304, [1945] HCA 34
Links:
Jurisdiction:
Australia
Cited by:
Cited – PST Energy 7 Shipping Llc and Another v OW Bunker Malta Ltd and Another SC 11-May-2016
Parties had entered into a bunker supply contract which contained a retention of title clause in favour of the supplier. It purported to allow the buyer to use the goods before title came to be passed.
Held: The owner’s appeal failed. It did . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 18 May 2022; Ref: scu.618132
